Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols in Manets under Higher Density and Realistic Mobility


Authors : Usman Nasir; Surajo Abdullahi; Muhammad Garba

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/ymc2ku7z

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4cfs2p2m

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb1077

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) are self-organizing wireless systems without fixed infrastructure, widely applied in military operations, disaster response, and mobile collaboration. Their dynamic topology, high mobility, and varying node densities make routing highly challenging. This study evaluates the performance of the traditional Ad Hoc On- Demand Distance Vector (AODV) protocol and its machine learning–enhanced variant (ML-AODV) under realistic mobility patterns and high-density conditions. Simulations were conducted in NS-2.35 within a 2000 × 2000 m area using node densities of 100, 500, and 1000, three mobility models (Random Waypoint, Random Walk, and Levy Walk), and varying node speeds. Constant Bit Rate (CBR) traffic with 512-byte packets was used, and performance was assessed through Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), throughput, end-to-end delay, routing overhead, and jitter. Results show that ML-AODV outperforms AODV in Random Waypoint and Random Walk scenarios, achieving up to 23% higher PDR, lower jitter, and more than 50% reduction in routing overhead. However, AODV performs better under the Levy Walk model at medium and high speeds, especially in dense networks, due to its lightweight route discovery mechanism. Overall, ML-AODV is more effective in unpredictable or human-like mobility environments, while AODV remains advantageous in dense and structured conditions.

Keywords : High Density; Mobile Ad-hoc Network; Mobility; Routing; High Speed.

References :

  1. Bukhari, A.; Yadav, R. A Review on Evaluation of Routing Protocols using Wireless Mobile Ad-hoc International Journal of Advanced Scientific Innovation 2021, 2, 1-4.
  2. Sivapriya, D.N.; Mohandas, D.R.; Vaigandla, K.K. A QoS Perception Routing Protocol for MANETs Based on Machine Learning. International Journal of Intelligent Systems And Applications In Engineering 2023, 12, 733-745.
  3. Khudayer, B.H. A Comparative Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 2023, 14, 438-446.
  4. Khasa, Y.; Pooja, P. Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols in MANET  IJCSET 2016, 6, 109-112.
  5. Alabdullah, M.G.K. Analysis and simulation of three MANET routing protocols: A research on AODV, DSR & DSDV characteristics and their performance evaluation. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences 2019, 7, 1228-1238.
  6. Mohamed, I.M.; Khalleefah, M.A. Simulation-based Comparison between Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols. Computer Reviews Journal, 2020, 1-7.
  7. Khanchandani, S.K. A Comparative Analysis Of Proactive Routing Protocols (DSDV, OLSR) & Reactive Routing Protocols (AODV, DSR) In Manet Using Ns-3. . International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management 2024, 8, 1-11.
  8. Elsadig, M.A.; Fadlalla, Y.A. Altigani, Performance Analysis of Popular MANET Protocols. . In Proceedings of the 2017 9th IEEE-GCC Conference and Exhibition 2017; pp. 1-10.
  9. Alkahtani, S.M.; Alturki, F. Performance evaluation of different mobile Ad-hoc network routing protocols in difficult situations. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 2021, 12, 1-9.
  10. Kurniawan, A. Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols AODV, OLSR and DSDV on MANET using NS3. International Electronics Symposium 2020, 199-206.
  11. Walunjkar, G.M.; Anne, K.R. Performance analysis of routing protocols in MANET. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 2020, 17, 1047-1052.
  12. Affandi, F.F.M.; Mahiddin, N.A.; Hashim, A.D.A. MANET performance evaluation for DSDV, DSR and ZRP International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration 2023, 10, 1-9.
  13. Narware, K.; Agrawal, C.; Meena, P. Congestion-Aware Multi-Route Establishment Routing for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANET). IJIRTM 2024, 8, 10-23.
  14. Kumar, C.S.; Rao, N.S.; Reddy, G.R. A study on routing metrics to improve the quality of service in MANET environment. In Proceedings of the MATEC Web of Conferences, 2024; pp. 1-21.
  15. Rhee, I. On the levy-walk nature of human mobility. IEEE/ACM transactions on networking 2011, 19, 630-643.
  16. Wheeb, A.H.; Surs, N.A. Al-Jamali, Performance analysis of OLSR protocol in mobile ad hoc networks. IJIM 2022, 16, 99-107.

Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) are self-organizing wireless systems without fixed infrastructure, widely applied in military operations, disaster response, and mobile collaboration. Their dynamic topology, high mobility, and varying node densities make routing highly challenging. This study evaluates the performance of the traditional Ad Hoc On- Demand Distance Vector (AODV) protocol and its machine learning–enhanced variant (ML-AODV) under realistic mobility patterns and high-density conditions. Simulations were conducted in NS-2.35 within a 2000 × 2000 m area using node densities of 100, 500, and 1000, three mobility models (Random Waypoint, Random Walk, and Levy Walk), and varying node speeds. Constant Bit Rate (CBR) traffic with 512-byte packets was used, and performance was assessed through Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), throughput, end-to-end delay, routing overhead, and jitter. Results show that ML-AODV outperforms AODV in Random Waypoint and Random Walk scenarios, achieving up to 23% higher PDR, lower jitter, and more than 50% reduction in routing overhead. However, AODV performs better under the Levy Walk model at medium and high speeds, especially in dense networks, due to its lightweight route discovery mechanism. Overall, ML-AODV is more effective in unpredictable or human-like mobility environments, while AODV remains advantageous in dense and structured conditions.

Keywords : High Density; Mobile Ad-hoc Network; Mobility; Routing; High Speed.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - March - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe