Authors :
James Olujoba Adegboye; Wasiu Oladimeji Ismaila; Adeleye Samuel Falohun; Abiodun Adebayo Owolabi; Folasade Muibat Ismaila
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/ytxj9h66
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4hs3c7vv
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug140
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
Digital image processing is a field that employed computer algorithms to analyze digital images. Several images
have been subjected to digital classifications like trauma-related, hypertensive, cancer, plant leaf diseases, breast cancer,
etc. Feature extraction/selection is a pre-processing technique that removes redundant features from images. Several
feature extraction/selection techniques, especially statistical and deep learning methods, have been employed by
researchers but their performances have not dealt with adequately. This work focused on the performance comparison of
three selected feature extraction and selection techniques viz; Local Binary Pattern, Mutual Information and
Convolutional neural network in digital image processing. The datasets of MRI brain tumour images from the Kaggle
website of 394 were pre-processed and also subjected to feature extraction and selection using the selected techniques.
The extracted features were classified by Support Vector Machine and the outcome were evaluated by confusion matrix
parameters.. The results showed the CNN-SVM based Image detection system at threshold of 0.85 produced Recall
84.8%, Specificity 95.9%, False Positive Rate 4.2%, Accuracy 92.9% and Precision 88.1%; the MI-SVM system
produced Recall 70.5%, Specificity 92.0%, False Positive Rate 8.0%, Accuracy 86.3% and Precision 76.3%; while LBP-
SVM system produced Recall 64.8%, Specificity 88.9%, False Positive Rate 11.1%, Accuracy 82.5% and Precision
68.0%.
Keywords :
Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, Local Binary Pattern, Mutual Information, Convolutional Neural Network, Digital Image Processing.
References :
- Abikoye,O. C., Komolafe R. G. and Aro T. O. (2019). Performance Evaluation of Feature Selection Algorithms On Skin Disease Prediction, FUW Trends in Science & Technology Journal, 4(2), 337 – 342
- Ahn .M., Kim H. E., Shin M., and Sim S.-H. (2019). Crack and non crack classification from concrete surface images using machine learning. Structural Health Monitoring, 18(3), 725–738.
- Arunkumar M. and Valarmathy S. (2013). Palmprint and Face Based Multimodal Recognition Using PSO Dependent Feature Level Fusion, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 57(3), 337-346.
- Agboola F. F., Ismaila W. O., Omotosho I. O.; Falohun A.S., Ismaila F. M. (2024). Evaluation of Gabor Filter, GLCM, and DWT Performance in Brain Tumour Classification. Journal of Science Innovation & Technology Research (JSITR). 05 (9), 103-118. Nigeria.
- Ahonen, T., Hadid, A., Pietikainen, M. (2004): Face recognition with local binary patterns. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Prague, Czech, 469–481.
- Alzubaidi, L., Zhang, J., Hamaidi, A.J., Al-Dujaili, A. Duan, Y., Al-shamma, O., SantaMaria, J., Fadhel, M. A., Al-Amidie, M. and Farhan, L. (2021). 'Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures challenges, applications, future directions'. (Springer International Publishing) doi:10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8.
- An, Q., Chen, W., Shao, W.A (2024) Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Pneumonia Detection in X-ray Images with Attention Ensemble. Diagnostics 2024, 14,390.
- Al-ani A. and Deriche, M. (2001). “An optimal feature selection technique using the concept of mutual information,” in Proc. 6th Int. Symp. Signal Processing and Its Applications (ISSPA), Kuala Lumpar, Malaysia, 2001, pp. 477–480.
- Afolabi A. O. and Adagunodo R. (2012). Implementation of an Improved Facial Recognition The algorithm in a Web-based Learning System, International Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 2, No. 11, pp 1885-1892.
- Battiti, R. (1994). “Using mutual information for selecting features in supervised neural net learning,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., vol. 5, no. 4, 537–550, Jul. 1994.
- Bereta, M., Pedrycz, W. and Reformat, M., 2013. Local descriptors and similarity measures for Frontal face recognition: A comparative analysis. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 24(8), 1213-1231
- Bonev B., Escolano F., Cazorla M. (2008). Feature selection, mutual information, and the classification of high dimensional patterns, Pattern Anal Applic., 11,:309–319.
- Bonnlander B. V. and Weigend, A. S. (1994). “Selecting input variables using mutual information and nonparametric density estimation,” in Proc. Int. Symp. Artifificial Neural Network (ISANN), Taiwan, 1994, 42–50.
- Cover T. M. and Thomas, J. A. (1991). Elements of Information Theory. New York: Wiley, 1991.
- Darwish, A., Ezzat, D. and Hassanien, A. E. (2020). An optimized model based on convolutional neural networks and orthogonal learning particle swarm optimization algorithm for plant diseasesdiagnosis. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 52, 100616. doi: htpps;//doi.org/ 10.1016/j.swevo.2019.100616.
- Deepesh R. (2011). A Realtime Face Recognition system using PCA and various Distance Classifiers, Computer vision and processing. 5(3), 15-22.
- Deshpande S., and Apte S. D. (2014). Facial Emotion Recognition using Gabor Features, International Journal of Electronics Communicationand Computer Engineering, Volume 5, Issue July, Technovision-2014, ISSN 2249–071X.
- Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M. and Thrun, S. (2017) “Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks,” Nature, 542 (7639): 115-118.
- Ezzat, D., Hassanien, A.E. and Aboul-Ella, H. (2020). An Optimised deep learning architecture for the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease based on gravitational search optimisation Applied Soft Computing Journal, 98 (2021), 106742.
- Fan, J., Xu, W., Wu, Y., and Gong, Y. (2010). Human tracking using convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural networks, 21(10). 1610-1623.
- Fatemeh, S. F. Mansour S. and Ali F. (2013). Facial Emotion Recognition Using Gravitational Search Algorithm for Colored Images, AISP 2013, CCIS 427, 32–40.
- Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Oerlemans, A., Lao, S., Wu, S. and Lew, M. S. (2016). "Deep Learning for Visual Understanding. A review", Neurocomp., 187, 27-48.
- Hassanipour S., Ghaem H., Arab-Zozani M., Seif, M., Fararouei, M., Abdzadeh, E., Paydar, S.(2019). Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression models for prediction of outcomes in trauma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury, 50(2), 244–250.
- Ismaila W. O., Adetunji A. B., Falohun A. S. and Iwashokun G. B. (2012). A Study of Features Extraction Algorithms for Human FaceRecognition. Transnational Journal of Science and Technology, 2(6), 14-22
- Indraja K., Krishna N. Chaitanya (2018). Blood Vessel Extraction and Retinal Disease Detection Using Local Binary Patterns. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Innovative Research , vol. 10, Issue no. 08, 0981-0986.
- Ismaila Folasade M., Afolabi Adeolu O, Alo Oluwaseun O, Ismaila W. Oladimeji (2024).Performance Evaluation of Selected Feature Extraction Techniques in Digital Face Image Processing. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(1), 2292-2300.
- Ismaila Folasade M., Afolabi Adeolu O, Alo Oluwaseun O, Ismaila W. Oladimeji, Funmilayo A.Ajala (2024). Comparative Analysis of Selected Evolutionary Algorithms as Feature Selectors in Digital Face Image Processing. International Journal of Recent Research in Mathematics, Computer Science and Information Technology, 10(2), 53-62.
- Minace, A., Rivera, P. and Johnson, R. (2019). “Deep learning for biometric recognition,” Applied Computing Research, 56(2) 120-140.
- Minace, S., Boykov, D. and Zhang, Y. (2019). “Deep learning in biometrics,” IEEE Access, 7(4): 102-120.
- Mohamed A. Berbar (2022). Features extraction using encoded local binary pattern for detection and grading diabetic retinopathy. Health Information Science and Systems 10:14.
- Nahiduzzaman, M., Islam, M. R., and Hassan, R. (2023). ChestX-Ray6: Prediction of multiple diseases including COVID-19 from chest X-ray images using Convolutional neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 211, 118576
- Ojala T., Pietikainen M. and Harwood D., (1996). “A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on feature distributions” Pattern Recognition. 29, 1996.
- Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., Maenpaa, M. (2002) Multi-resolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24(7), 971–987.
- Prasetiyowati,M. I., Maulidevi N. U. and Surendro K. (2021). Determining threshold value on information gain feature selection to increase speed and prediction accuracy of random forest, Journal of Big Data (2021) 8:84.
- Ruchi C. (2015). Facial Expression Recognition Using Facial Movement Features, Computer Science & Engineering, India, vol. 4 Issue 4, 2318 – 2324.
- Sarangi, S, Sahidullah, M,; Saha, G. (2020). "Optimization of data-driven filterbank for automatic speaker verification". Digital Signal Processing. 104.
- Subramanian, N., Elharrouss, O., Al-Maadeed, S., & Chowdhury, M. (2022). A review of deep learning-based detection methods for COVID-19. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 105233.
- Sladojevic, S. and others (2016). ”Deep neural networks based recognition of plant diseases by leaf image classification.” Computational intelligence and neuroscience 2016.
- Tommy W. S. Chow, Sand D. Huang (2005). Estimating Optimal Feature Subsets Using Efficient Estimation of High-Dimensional Mutual Information, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 16,
- Vaid, S., Kalantar, R., and Bhandari, M. (2020). Deep learning COVID-19 detection bias: accuracy through artificial intelligence. International Orthopaedics, 44, 1539-1542.
- Wang D, Mo J, Zhou G, Xu L, Liu Y (2020) An efficient mixture of deep and machine learning models for COVID-19 diagnosis in chest X-ray images. PLoS ONE15(11): 1-15.
- Xiao Z., Zheng O. and Yonggiang O. (2018). CSAI ’18 Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 263-267.
- Sristi K., Pallabi D., Sharanya P., Disha D., Bikram K., Arti K., Ausaf M., Moloy D. (2023). LBP Feature Extraction for Early Detection of Diabetic Eye Diseases. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineeringb Technology (IJRASET)
- Vapnik V., and Cortes C.(1995). Support-Vector Machine, Machine Learning, 20, 273-297.
- Yang H. H. and Moody,J. (1999). “Feature selection based on joint mutual information,” in Proc. Int. ICSC Symp. Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis, Rochester, New York, 1999, 342–349.
Digital image processing is a field that employed computer algorithms to analyze digital images. Several images
have been subjected to digital classifications like trauma-related, hypertensive, cancer, plant leaf diseases, breast cancer,
etc. Feature extraction/selection is a pre-processing technique that removes redundant features from images. Several
feature extraction/selection techniques, especially statistical and deep learning methods, have been employed by
researchers but their performances have not dealt with adequately. This work focused on the performance comparison of
three selected feature extraction and selection techniques viz; Local Binary Pattern, Mutual Information and
Convolutional neural network in digital image processing. The datasets of MRI brain tumour images from the Kaggle
website of 394 were pre-processed and also subjected to feature extraction and selection using the selected techniques.
The extracted features were classified by Support Vector Machine and the outcome were evaluated by confusion matrix
parameters.. The results showed the CNN-SVM based Image detection system at threshold of 0.85 produced Recall
84.8%, Specificity 95.9%, False Positive Rate 4.2%, Accuracy 92.9% and Precision 88.1%; the MI-SVM system
produced Recall 70.5%, Specificity 92.0%, False Positive Rate 8.0%, Accuracy 86.3% and Precision 76.3%; while LBP-
SVM system produced Recall 64.8%, Specificity 88.9%, False Positive Rate 11.1%, Accuracy 82.5% and Precision
68.0%.
Keywords :
Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, Local Binary Pattern, Mutual Information, Convolutional Neural Network, Digital Image Processing.