Performance Evaluation of LBP, Mutual Information and CNN in Digital Diseases Image Detection


Authors : James Olujoba Adegboye; Wasiu Oladimeji Ismaila; Adeleye Samuel Falohun; Abiodun Adebayo Owolabi; Folasade Muibat Ismaila

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/ytxj9h66

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4hs3c7vv

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug140

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : Digital image processing is a field that employed computer algorithms to analyze digital images. Several images have been subjected to digital classifications like trauma-related, hypertensive, cancer, plant leaf diseases, breast cancer, etc. Feature extraction/selection is a pre-processing technique that removes redundant features from images. Several feature extraction/selection techniques, especially statistical and deep learning methods, have been employed by researchers but their performances have not dealt with adequately. This work focused on the performance comparison of three selected feature extraction and selection techniques viz; Local Binary Pattern, Mutual Information and Convolutional neural network in digital image processing. The datasets of MRI brain tumour images from the Kaggle website of 394 were pre-processed and also subjected to feature extraction and selection using the selected techniques. The extracted features were classified by Support Vector Machine and the outcome were evaluated by confusion matrix parameters.. The results showed the CNN-SVM based Image detection system at threshold of 0.85 produced Recall 84.8%, Specificity 95.9%, False Positive Rate 4.2%, Accuracy 92.9% and Precision 88.1%; the MI-SVM system produced Recall 70.5%, Specificity 92.0%, False Positive Rate 8.0%, Accuracy 86.3% and Precision 76.3%; while LBP- SVM system produced Recall 64.8%, Specificity 88.9%, False Positive Rate 11.1%, Accuracy 82.5% and Precision 68.0%.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, Local Binary Pattern, Mutual Information, Convolutional Neural Network, Digital Image Processing.

References :

  1.  Abikoye,O. C.,  Komolafe R. G. and  Aro T. O. (2019). Performance Evaluation of Feature  Selection Algorithms On Skin Disease Prediction, FUW Trends in Science & Technology Journal, 4(2), 337 – 342
  2. Ahn .M., Kim H. E.,  Shin M., and  Sim S.-H. (2019). Crack and non crack classification from concrete surface images using machine learning. Structural Health Monitoring, 18(3), 725–738.
  3. Arunkumar M. and  Valarmathy S. (2013). Palmprint and Face Based Multimodal Recognition Using PSO Dependent Feature Level         Fusion,   Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 57(3), 337-346.
  4. Agboola F. F.,  Ismaila W. O.,  Omotosho I. O.; Falohun A.S., Ismaila F. M. (2024). Evaluation of Gabor Filter, GLCM, and DWT Performance in Brain Tumour Classification. Journal of Science Innovation & Technology Research (JSITR). 05 (9), 103-118. Nigeria.
  5. Ahonen, T., Hadid, A., Pietikainen, M. (2004): Face recognition with local binary patterns. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Prague, Czech, 469–481.
  6. Alzubaidi, L., Zhang, J., Hamaidi, A.J., Al-Dujaili, A. Duan, Y., Al-shamma, O., SantaMaria, J., Fadhel, M. A., Al-Amidie, M. and Farhan, L. (2021). 'Review of deep learning: concepts,    CNN architectures challenges, applications, future directions'. (Springer International     Publishing) doi:10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8.
  7. An, Q., Chen, W., Shao, W.A (2024) Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Pneumonia Detection in X-ray Images with Attention Ensemble. Diagnostics 2024, 14,390.
  8. Al-ani A. and Deriche, M. (2001). “An optimal feature selection technique using the concept of mutual information,” in Proc. 6th Int. Symp. Signal Processing and Its Applications (ISSPA), Kuala Lumpar, Malaysia, 2001, pp. 477–480.
  9. Afolabi A. O. and Adagunodo R. (2012). Implementation of an Improved Facial Recognition The algorithm in a Web-based Learning System, International Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 2, No. 11, pp   1885-1892.
  10. Battiti, R. (1994). “Using mutual information for selecting features in supervised neural net learning,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., vol. 5, no.     4, 537–550, Jul. 1994.
  11. Bereta, M., Pedrycz, W. and Reformat, M., 2013. Local descriptors and similarity measures for Frontal face recognition: A comparative analysis. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 24(8), 1213-1231
  12. Bonev B.,  Escolano F.,  Cazorla M. (2008).     Feature selection, mutual information, and the classification of high dimensional patterns, Pattern Anal Applic., 11,:309–319.
  13. Bonnlander B. V. and  Weigend, A. S. (1994). “Selecting input variables using mutual information and nonparametric density    estimation,” in Proc. Int. Symp. Artifificial    Neural    Network (ISANN), Taiwan, 1994, 42–50.
  14. Cover T. M. and  Thomas, J. A. (1991).  Elements of Information Theory. New York: Wiley, 1991.
  15. Darwish, A., Ezzat, D. and Hassanien, A. E.     (2020). An optimized model based on convolutional neural networks and orthogonal learning particle swarm optimization algorithm for plant diseasesdiagnosis. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 52, 100616. doi: htpps;//doi.org/ 10.1016/j.swevo.2019.100616.
  16. Deepesh R. (2011). A Realtime Face Recognition system using PCA and various Distance Classifiers, Computer vision and processing.               5(3), 15-22.
  17. Deshpande S., and Apte S. D. (2014). Facial Emotion Recognition using Gabor Features, International Journal of Electronics Communicationand Computer Engineering, Volume 5, Issue July, Technovision-2014, ISSN 2249–071X.
  18. Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M. and Thrun, S. (2017) “Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks,” Nature, 542 (7639): 115-118.
  19. Ezzat, D., Hassanien, A.E. and Aboul-Ella, H. (2020). An Optimised deep learning architecture for the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease based on gravitational search optimisation Applied  Soft Computing Journal, 98 (2021), 106742.
  20. Fan, J., Xu, W., Wu, Y., and Gong, Y. (2010). Human tracking using convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural networks, 21(10). 1610-1623.
  21. Fatemeh, S. F. Mansour S. and Ali F. (2013).  Facial Emotion Recognition Using Gravitational Search Algorithm for Colored Images, AISP 2013, CCIS  427, 32–40.
  22. Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Oerlemans, A., Lao, S., Wu, S. and Lew, M. S. (2016). "Deep Learning for Visual Understanding. A review", Neurocomp., 187, 27-48.
  23. Hassanipour S., Ghaem H., Arab-Zozani M., Seif, M., Fararouei, M., Abdzadeh, E., Paydar, S.(2019). Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression models for prediction of outcomes in trauma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury, 50(2), 244–250.
  24. Ismaila W. O., Adetunji A. B., Falohun A. S. and Iwashokun G. B. (2012). A Study of  Features Extraction Algorithms for Human FaceRecognition. Transnational Journal of  Science and Technology, 2(6), 14-22
  25. Indraja K., Krishna N. Chaitanya (2018). Blood Vessel Extraction and Retinal Disease Detection Using Local Binary Patterns. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Innovative Research , vol. 10, Issue no. 08, 0981-0986.
  26. Ismaila Folasade M., Afolabi Adeolu O, Alo Oluwaseun O, Ismaila W. Oladimeji (2024).Performance Evaluation of Selected Feature Extraction Techniques in Digital Face Image Processing. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(1), 2292-2300.
  27. Ismaila Folasade M., Afolabi Adeolu O, Alo Oluwaseun O, Ismaila W. Oladimeji, Funmilayo A.Ajala (2024). Comparative Analysis of Selected Evolutionary Algorithms as Feature Selectors in Digital Face Image Processing. International Journal of Recent Research in Mathematics, Computer Science and Information Technology, 10(2), 53-62.
  28. Minace, A., Rivera, P. and Johnson, R. (2019). “Deep learning for biometric recognition,” Applied Computing Research,  56(2) 120-140.
  29. Minace, S., Boykov, D. and Zhang, Y. (2019). “Deep learning in biometrics,” IEEE Access, 7(4): 102-120.
  30. Mohamed A. Berbar (2022). Features extraction using encoded local binary pattern for detection and grading diabetic retinopathy. Health Information Science and Systems  10:14.
  31. Nahiduzzaman, M., Islam, M. R., and Hassan, R. (2023). ChestX-Ray6: Prediction of multiple diseases including COVID-19 from chest X-ray images using Convolutional neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 211, 118576
  32. Ojala T., Pietikainen M. and Harwood D., (1996). “A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on feature distributions” Pattern Recognition. 29, 1996.
  33. Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., Maenpaa, M. (2002) Multi-resolution gray-scale and rotation       invariant texture classification with local binary     patterns. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24(7), 971–987.
  34. Prasetiyowati,M. I.,  Maulidevi N. U. and  Surendro K. (2021). Determining threshold value on information gain feature selection to increase speed and prediction accuracy of random forest, Journal of  Big Data (2021) 8:84.
  35. Ruchi C. (2015). Facial Expression Recognition Using Facial Movement Features, Computer Science & Engineering, India, vol. 4 Issue 4, 2318 – 2324.
  36. Sarangi, S, Sahidullah, M,; Saha, G. (2020). "Optimization of data-driven filterbank for automatic speaker verification". Digital Signal Processing. 104.
  37. Subramanian, N., Elharrouss, O., Al-Maadeed, S., & Chowdhury,  M. (2022). A review of deep learning-based detection methods for COVID-19. Computers in Biology and Medicine,    105233.
  38. Sladojevic, S. and others (2016). ”Deep neural networks based recognition of plant diseases by leaf image classification.” Computational intelligence and neuroscience 2016.
  39. Tommy W. S. Chow, Sand D. Huang (2005). Estimating Optimal Feature Subsets Using Efficient  Estimation of High-Dimensional Mutual Information, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 16,
  40. Vaid, S., Kalantar, R., and Bhandari, M. (2020). Deep learning COVID-19 detection bias: accuracy through artificial intelligence. International Orthopaedics, 44, 1539-1542.
  41. Wang D, Mo J, Zhou G, Xu L, Liu Y (2020) An efficient mixture of deep and machine learning models for COVID-19 diagnosis in chest X-ray images. PLoS ONE15(11): 1-15.
  42. Xiao Z., Zheng O. and Yonggiang O. (2018). CSAI ’18 Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 263-267.
  43. Sristi K.,  Pallabi D.,  Sharanya P., Disha D., Bikram K., Arti K., Ausaf  M., Moloy D. (2023). LBP Feature Extraction for Early Detection of Diabetic Eye Diseases. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineeringb Technology (IJRASET)
  44. Vapnik V., and Cortes C.(1995). Support-Vector Machine,  Machine Learning, 20, 273-297.
  45. Yang H. H. and  Moody,J. (1999). “Feature      selection based on joint mutual information,” in Proc. Int. ICSC Symp. Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis, Rochester, New York, 1999, 342–349. 

Digital image processing is a field that employed computer algorithms to analyze digital images. Several images have been subjected to digital classifications like trauma-related, hypertensive, cancer, plant leaf diseases, breast cancer, etc. Feature extraction/selection is a pre-processing technique that removes redundant features from images. Several feature extraction/selection techniques, especially statistical and deep learning methods, have been employed by researchers but their performances have not dealt with adequately. This work focused on the performance comparison of three selected feature extraction and selection techniques viz; Local Binary Pattern, Mutual Information and Convolutional neural network in digital image processing. The datasets of MRI brain tumour images from the Kaggle website of 394 were pre-processed and also subjected to feature extraction and selection using the selected techniques. The extracted features were classified by Support Vector Machine and the outcome were evaluated by confusion matrix parameters.. The results showed the CNN-SVM based Image detection system at threshold of 0.85 produced Recall 84.8%, Specificity 95.9%, False Positive Rate 4.2%, Accuracy 92.9% and Precision 88.1%; the MI-SVM system produced Recall 70.5%, Specificity 92.0%, False Positive Rate 8.0%, Accuracy 86.3% and Precision 76.3%; while LBP- SVM system produced Recall 64.8%, Specificity 88.9%, False Positive Rate 11.1%, Accuracy 82.5% and Precision 68.0%.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, Local Binary Pattern, Mutual Information, Convolutional Neural Network, Digital Image Processing.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe