Authors :
Regina B. Dumdumaya; Cleopas Bette R. Jacutin
Volume/Issue :
Volume 8 - 2023, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://bit.ly/3TmGbDi
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/3LST30E
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7922690
Abstract :
The study was conducted to examine the
performance monitoring evaluation of the programs in
terms of strategic, core and support functions and
identify the challenges encountered in achieving the
functions. The study employed a mixed-methods
research design. The Department Performance
Commitment Review (DPCR) of the academic units from
the academic year 2018-2020 served as the secondary
data to answer the objectives of the study. An interview
was conducted among the participants regarding the
challenges met by the programs in achieving the
different functions. Document analysis was also used to
carefully review and analyze the performance of the
programs, and to assess whether the major final output
targets of the 3 functions were met. Findings revealed
that the quality assurance under strategic functions were
fully achieved against its target while research, extension
and production resulted from partially achieved to not
fully achieved. Most of the core functions were fully
achieved, although 2 of the indicators were partially
achieved. It further shows that the support function on
streamlined process for fast delivery of services was
partially achieved and there was a delay in the
submission of documents and the deliverables were not
done on time as well. This may be explained by the
multitasking of the faculty members in the university.
Moreover, the programs were consistently ranked the
timeframe of document submission as the most
challenging indicator in achieving the department
performance commitment review where they have
difficulty in meeting the deadlines. The programs
resorted to generate more support both from internal
and external stakeholders in order to comply the
expected deliverables.
Keywords :
Core Functions, Department Performance Commitment Review, Performance Monitoring Evaluation, Strategic Functions, Support Functions.
The study was conducted to examine the
performance monitoring evaluation of the programs in
terms of strategic, core and support functions and
identify the challenges encountered in achieving the
functions. The study employed a mixed-methods
research design. The Department Performance
Commitment Review (DPCR) of the academic units from
the academic year 2018-2020 served as the secondary
data to answer the objectives of the study. An interview
was conducted among the participants regarding the
challenges met by the programs in achieving the
different functions. Document analysis was also used to
carefully review and analyze the performance of the
programs, and to assess whether the major final output
targets of the 3 functions were met. Findings revealed
that the quality assurance under strategic functions were
fully achieved against its target while research, extension
and production resulted from partially achieved to not
fully achieved. Most of the core functions were fully
achieved, although 2 of the indicators were partially
achieved. It further shows that the support function on
streamlined process for fast delivery of services was
partially achieved and there was a delay in the
submission of documents and the deliverables were not
done on time as well. This may be explained by the
multitasking of the faculty members in the university.
Moreover, the programs were consistently ranked the
timeframe of document submission as the most
challenging indicator in achieving the department
performance commitment review where they have
difficulty in meeting the deadlines. The programs
resorted to generate more support both from internal
and external stakeholders in order to comply the
expected deliverables.
Keywords :
Core Functions, Department Performance Commitment Review, Performance Monitoring Evaluation, Strategic Functions, Support Functions.