Authors :
Dennis Oshorenoya Kadiri; Bright Osayormwanbo Otabar
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 2 - February
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/2jx7dwhn
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4y3vc5yz
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25feb1402
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
One of the objectives of any university over the years is to ensure that its student perform well academically. To achieve
this objective, the institution needs to have relevant information about its students’ performance on different courses offered
in the institution. These Information could be in terms of how good or bad students perform on the difference courses, the
reasons for poor performance of students as well as whether students’ performance has increased or decreased over the
years amongst others.
It is always advised to observe over three periods before making a decision therefore, this study seeks to describe a
statistical study of students’ performance in quantitative analysis for management decisions during three different periods.
The major objective of this study is to determine if there is a significant Differences in students’ performance during three
different periods. This study was conducted in the department of business administration, faculty of management sciences,
University of Benin, Benin city, Edo state. The most recent secondary data was used for this study based on the academic
performance of students in quantitative analysis for management decision which was sourced from the department of
business administration. ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) was adopted to compare students’ performance in quantitative
analysis for management decisions during the three different periods while frequencies and percentages was also used to
determine the annual performance distribution of students in quantitative analysis for management decisions.
References :
- Abdullah, A. M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Adams, T. (1963). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Agbonifoh, B. A & Yomere, G. O. (1999). Research methodology in the management and social sciences. Benin City: UNIBEN PRESS.
- Alfan, H., & Othman, K. L. (2005). Factors affecting students’ performance in mathematics. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8(8), 4133-4175.
- Amitava, R. (2010). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Anderson, N. & King, N. (1993). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Anna, Y. N. (2008). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning. Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 5(1), 427-447.
- Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Job performance. Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 5(1), 427-447.
- Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Bowen, D. E., & Waldman, D. A., (1999). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Brief, P. U. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Job performance. Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 5(1), 427-447.
- Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, (1999). Retreieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/analysis/s1.html
- Campbell, (1990). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Conway, N. (1999). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Crant, R. L. (1995). Job performance. Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 5(1), 427-447.
- Darling, M. (2005). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Ericsson, S. & Lehmann, B. (1996). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Frese, M & Zapf, H. (1994). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Frese, M. & Sonnentag, S. (2000). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A. & Zempel, J. (1996). Job performance. Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 5(1), 427-447.
- Fried, S. & Ferris, D. I. (1987). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Fried, S. (1991). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Galiher, K. (2006). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Geary, M. J., & Hamson, G. (2000). Factors affecting students’ performance in mathematics. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8(8), 4133-4175.
- Greenberg, C. (1990). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Griffin, N. (1991). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Guzzo, G., Jette, K. & Katzell, J. H. (1985). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Hacker, A. (1973). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Hackman, D. & Oldham, H. (1976). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Hake, M. V. (1998). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Hansen, E. & Joe B. (2000). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Harb, I. & El-Shaarawi, J. (2006). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Hattrup, O. C., O’Connell, L. & Wingate, B. (1998). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Hijaz, K. C. and Naqvi, J. B. (2006). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Hussain, B. (2006). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Ilgen, D. R., & Schneider, J. (1991). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Irfan, M. & Shabana, N. K. (2012). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Kanfer, F. (1990). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Kanfer, R. & Ackerman, P. L., (2005). Job performance. Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 5(1), 427-447.
- Karemera, M. S. (2003). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Kernan, L., Bogart, R. & Wheat, F. (2011). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Kirmani, E. & Siddiquah, P. (2008). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Kluger, N. R. & DeNisi, K. (1996). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P. & LePine, M. A. (2002). Job performance. Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 5(1), 427-447.
- Mitchell, O. (1997). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Morrison, B. & Phelps, S. (1999). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Motowidlo, S. J. & VanScotter, R. (1994). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Motowidlo, S. J., & Schmit, M. J., (1999). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Motowidlo, S. J., Barman, W. C. & Schmit, M. J. (1997). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Neubert, T. (1998). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Noble, C. (2006). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Nordin, A. A. (1992). Factors affecting students’ performance in mathematics. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8(8), 4133-4175.
- Norhidayah, A. (2009). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Organ, B. (1988). Job performance. Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 5(1), 427-447.
- Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, (1996). Retreieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/analysis/s1.html
- Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M. & Turner, N. (2006). Job performance. Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 5(1), 427-447.
- Raychaudhury, A., Debnath, M., Sen, S. & Majumder, B. G., (2010). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Robert, G. & Sampson, D. (2011). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Roe, F. (1999). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Shaibu, I. (2015). The essentials of quantitative analysis for management decisions. Benin City: ACME PUBLISHERS.
- Sonnentag, S. & Frese, M., (2002). Job performance. Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 5(1), 427-447.
- Syed, T. H & Raza, N. (2006). Factors affecting students’ performance. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 3(1), 54-68.
- Trist, T. & Bamforth, E. L. (1951). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Van, D. & LePine, N. (1998). Job performance. Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 5(1), 427-447.
- Vroom, V. (1964). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Waldman, C. (1994). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Wall, S. & Clegg, M. (1981). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Wall, S. & Jackson, M. (1995). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Webster's New World College Dictionary, (2010). Cleveland, Ohio: Wiley Publishing, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.yourdictionary.com/comparison#ec3dyMs4poQHcF19.99
- Williams, K. D. & Anderson, M. U. (1991). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 83(5), 4-26.
- Williams, K. D. & Karau, S. J., (1991). Job performance. Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 5(1), 427-447.
- Young, A. (1999). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
- Zajacova, H., Lynch, M. & Espenshade, G. S. (2005). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.
One of the objectives of any university over the years is to ensure that its student perform well academically. To achieve
this objective, the institution needs to have relevant information about its students’ performance on different courses offered
in the institution. These Information could be in terms of how good or bad students perform on the difference courses, the
reasons for poor performance of students as well as whether students’ performance has increased or decreased over the
years amongst others.
It is always advised to observe over three periods before making a decision therefore, this study seeks to describe a
statistical study of students’ performance in quantitative analysis for management decisions during three different periods.
The major objective of this study is to determine if there is a significant Differences in students’ performance during three
different periods. This study was conducted in the department of business administration, faculty of management sciences,
University of Benin, Benin city, Edo state. The most recent secondary data was used for this study based on the academic
performance of students in quantitative analysis for management decision which was sourced from the department of
business administration. ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) was adopted to compare students’ performance in quantitative
analysis for management decisions during the three different periods while frequencies and percentages was also used to
determine the annual performance distribution of students in quantitative analysis for management decisions.