Authors :
Asnar L. Aloro; Eppie N. Katangkatang
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 10 - October
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/yf427hfj
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/53vpa87j
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT1662
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
The study was conducted to analyzed and to
determine the physical properties of soil such as texture,
bulk density, water holding capacity, soil moisture content,
pH, and organic matter content in selected subdivisions in
Tacloban City and Palo, Leyte. Analysis of pH, texture,
water holding capacity, and organic matter was at the Soil
Research Testing and Plant Analysis Laboratory
(SRTPAL) Department of Agronomy and Soil Science
(DASS) VSU Baybay, Leyte. While the bulk density, soil
moisture content was computed using the standard formula.
To analyzed the result Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) using
the SPSS Program to determine whether soils from
subdivisions categorized as waterlogged and mountainous,
developed and developing subdivisions derived from their
filling and parent materials were significant different. The
results showed that soils from various categories from
subdivisions had no significant effect on bulk density, water
holding capacity, & soil moisture content. However, some
properties such as soil pH were significant in the
waterlogged and mountainous area. It is recommended that
a further study be conducted to include all appropriate soil
parameters and procedures such as liming for acid soils,
cause of erosion, flooding, water drainage capacity, depth to
water table and other significant soil quality parameters.
Also recommend for in-depth study by the developers and
engineers to ensure that the soil quality be suitable for
housing and for the safety of the homeowners.
Keywords :
Bulk Density, Water Holding Capacity, Soil PH, Organic Matter, Waterlogged, Mountainous.
References :
[1]. Brady, N.C. & Weil R.R. (1999). The Nature and
Properties of Soils, 12 th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
[2]. Brown, L. R., & Green, T. W. (2021). Soil Physical
Properties and Their Implications for Urban Land Use:
A Case Study. Environmental Management Journal,
38(2), 175-192.
[3]. Curell, Christina, (2011). Boosting Soil Water Holding
Capacity, Michigan State University Extension.
[4]. Jones, A. R., Smith, D. P., & Taylor, J. L. (2019). Local
Soil Characteristics and Their Implications for Urban
Land Use. Journal of Urban Ecology, 5(1), 1-12.
[5]. Karlen, D. L., Gardner, T. D., & Jaynes, D. B. (2009).
Soil Sampling and Analysis for Environmental
Assessment. In Soil Sampling and Analysis for
Environmental Assessment (pp. 24-38). CRC Press.
[6]. Kladivko, Eileen. (2024), Soil Texture as Major
Determiner of Water Holding Capacity. Agronomy
Department, Purdue University.
[7]. Lal, R. (2015). Soil Degradation and Environmental
Sustainability. Soil Science Society of America Journal,
79(6), 1775-1787.
[8]. Mc Lean (1982). Soil pH and Lime Requirements.
Method of Soil Analysis. 2 nd Ed. Agronomy.
[9]. Odesanwo, (2009), American Eurasian Journal of
Agronomy.
[10]. Soil Science Society of America, (2004) S. Sergoe,
Madison, USA.
[11]. Soil Survey Staff, (2003), Keys to Soil Taxonomy. USDA-
Natural Resources Conservation Service.
The study was conducted to analyzed and to
determine the physical properties of soil such as texture,
bulk density, water holding capacity, soil moisture content,
pH, and organic matter content in selected subdivisions in
Tacloban City and Palo, Leyte. Analysis of pH, texture,
water holding capacity, and organic matter was at the Soil
Research Testing and Plant Analysis Laboratory
(SRTPAL) Department of Agronomy and Soil Science
(DASS) VSU Baybay, Leyte. While the bulk density, soil
moisture content was computed using the standard formula.
To analyzed the result Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) using
the SPSS Program to determine whether soils from
subdivisions categorized as waterlogged and mountainous,
developed and developing subdivisions derived from their
filling and parent materials were significant different. The
results showed that soils from various categories from
subdivisions had no significant effect on bulk density, water
holding capacity, & soil moisture content. However, some
properties such as soil pH were significant in the
waterlogged and mountainous area. It is recommended that
a further study be conducted to include all appropriate soil
parameters and procedures such as liming for acid soils,
cause of erosion, flooding, water drainage capacity, depth to
water table and other significant soil quality parameters.
Also recommend for in-depth study by the developers and
engineers to ensure that the soil quality be suitable for
housing and for the safety of the homeowners.
Keywords :
Bulk Density, Water Holding Capacity, Soil PH, Organic Matter, Waterlogged, Mountainous.