⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



PlantReliability Fusion Algorithm for Predicting Equipment and Structural Support Failures in Combined-Cycle Power Plants Using Operational and Structural Data Compared with Weibull Reliability Analysis


Authors : Ransben Zac Addy

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4zcr7d2e

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep933

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Combined-cycle power plants contain strongly coupled mechanical, thermal, electrical, and structural systems whose degradation mechanisms evolve under variable operating loads, cyclic thermal stresses, vibration, environmental exposure, and equipment ageing. Conventional reliability techniques such as Weibull reliability analysis are effective for estimating population-level failure distributions but have limited capability to incorporate high-frequency operational measurements, structural-condition indicators, nonlinear interactions, and time-varying degradation simultaneously. This study develops a novel PlantReliability Fusion Algorithm (PRFA) for integrated prediction of equipment and structuralsupport failures in combined-cycle power plants using operational and structural data. The proposed framework combines a temporal feature-learning module for processing equipment variables such as compressor discharge pressure, turbine exhaust temperature, vibration, bearing temperature, heat-recovery steam generator pressure, start-stop cycles, operating hours, and load fluctuations with a structural-condition module incorporating foundation settlement, support displacement, strain, vibration response, crack development, anchor-bolt condition, thermal expansion, and structural stress indicators. An attention-based multimodal fusion layer dynamically weights degradation signals from both data domains, while a reliability-learning layer estimates failure probability, hazard evolution, remaining useful life, and component reliability over time. PRFA is benchmarked against two-parameter Weibull reliability analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, Long Short-Term Memory networks, and a conventional artificial neural network. Comparative performance is evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, concordance index, Brier score, remaining-useful-life error, and computational efficiency. Graphical evaluation includes Weibull and predicted reliability curves, hazard-rate trajectories, receiver operating characteristic curves, predicted-versusobserved remaining useful life plots, structural-operational degradation maps, feature-importance plots, and comparative algorithm performance charts. The proposed fusion architecture is designed to provide stronger sensitivity to interacting mechanical and structural degradation mechanisms than conventional failure-time models or single-domain machinelearning approaches. The resulting framework provides a technically integrated basis for predictive maintenance, structural integrity management, inspection prioritization, outage planning, and lifecycle reliability optimization in combined-cycle power plants.

Keywords : PlantReliability Fusion Algorithm; Combined-Cycle Power Plants; Equipment Failure Prediction; Structural Support Failures; Weibull Reliability Analysis.

References :

  1. Addy, R. Z., Atoo, A. A., & Nwafor, E. O. (2022). Physics-informed digital twins for real-time health monitoring performance prediction and remaining useful life assessment of gas turbines foundations and structural support systems. International Journal of Scientific Research in Civil Engineering, 6(6), 284–313. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCE229674
  2. Agyekum, B., Gloria, A., & Seffah-Duodu, D. (2026). Energy efficient edge AI with measured energy saving. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 13(3), 553–579. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET2613374
  3. Aikins, S. A., Avevor, J., & Enyejo, L. A. (2024). Optimizing thermal management in hydrogen fuel cells for smart HVAC systems and sustainable building energy solutions. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 3(9), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v3i9.351
  4. Avendaño-Valencia, L. D., Chatzi, E. N., & Tcherniak, D. (2020). Gaussian process models for mitigation of operational variability in the structural health monitoring of wind turbines. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 142, 106686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106686
  5. Bashiru, O., Ochem, C., Enyejo, L. A., Manuel, H. N. N., & Adeoye, T. O. (2024). The crucial role of renewable energy in achieving the sustainable development goals for cleaner energy. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 19(3), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2024.19.3.0099
  6. Benato, A., Bracco, S., Stoppato, A., & Mirandola, A. (2016). LTE: A procedure to predict power plants dynamic behaviour and components lifetime reduction during transient operation. Applied Energy, 162, 880–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.162
  7. Carazas, F. J. G., Salazar, C. H., & Souza, G. F. M. (2011). Availability analysis of heat recovery steam generators used in thermal power plants. Energy, 36(6), 3855–3870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.003
  8. Carvalho, T. P., Soares, F. A. A. M. N., Vita, R., Francisco, R. P., Basto, J. P. T. V., & Alcalá, S. G. S. (2019). A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, 106024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106024
  9. Finn, J., Wagner, J. R., & Bassily, H. (2010). Monitoring strategies for a combined cycle electric power generator. Applied Energy, 87(8), 2621–2627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.02.017
  10. Frank, U. P. (2026a). Artificial intelligence for infection surveillance: Improving early detection of healthcare-associated infections. USR Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Studies.
  11. Frank, U. P. (2026b). Healthcare quality metrics: From data collection to performance improvement; A narrative review of measurement frameworks and improvement methods in United States health care. UKR Journal of Medicine and Medical Research. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22105362
  12. Frank, U. P. (2026c). Optimizing medical inventory management through predictive analytics: Implications for healthcare quality, cost reduction, and patient safety; A narrative review. UKR Journal of Education and Literature, 2(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22105843
  13. Hassani, S., Dackermann, U., Mousavi, M., & Li, J. (2024). A systematic review of data fusion techniques for optimized structural health monitoring. Information Fusion, 103, 102136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.102136
  14. Idoko, I. P., Ijiga, O. M., Akoh, O., Agbo, D. O., Ugbane, S. I., & Umama, E. E. (2024). Empowering sustainable power generation: The vital role of power electronics in California's renewable energy transformation. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 11(1), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.1.0058
  15. Idoko, I. P., Ijiga, O. M., Harry, K. D., Ezebuka, C. C., Ukatu, I. E., & Peace, A. E. (2024b). Renewable energy policies: A comparative analysis of Nigeria and the USA. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), 888–913. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0071
  16. Ilesanmi, M. O., Anim-Sampong, S. D., & Enyejo, J. O. (2023). Cross-sector asset management: Applying real estate portfolio optimization models to renewable energy infrastructure. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 2(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v2i10.1077
  17. Ilesanmi, M. O., Bamigwojo, O. V., Jinadu, S. O., Oyekan, M., & Ijiga, O. M. (2023b). Mitigating regulatory and market risks in U.S. renewable energy portfolios: A portfolio asset manager’s perspective. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 10(6), 878–906. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST5231103
  18. Ilesanmi, M. O., Okoh, O. F., Balogun, S. A., & Ijiga, O. M. (2024). Data-driven portfolio optimization for utility-scale solar, wind, and battery energy storage systems (BESS): Integrating performance analytics with investor EBITDA targets. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 3(11), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v3i11.943
  19. James, U. U., Idika, C. N., & Enyejo, L. A. (2023). Zero Trust Architecture leveraging AI-driven behavior analytics for industrial control systems in energy distribution networks. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(4), 685–709. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT23564522
  20. James, U. U., Salami, E. O., & Enyejo, L. A. (2025). Real time policy orchestration for cybersecurity risk management in GRC aligned financial technology infrastructures. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug1021
  21. Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(7), 1483–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012
  22. Jinadu, S. O., Akinleye, K. E., & Ijiga, O. M. (2024). Deployment of geological CO₂ sequestration with proprietary injection techniques for oil yield optimization and energy independence. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 11(6), 503–525. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET2512162
  23. Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018). Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 104, 799–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.016
  24. Manuel, H. N. N., Adeoye, T. O., Idoko, I. P., Akpa, F. A., Ijiga, O. M., & Igbede, M. A. (2024). Optimizing passive solar design in Texas green buildings by integrating sustainable architectural features for maximum energy efficiency. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 11(1), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.11.1.0089
  25. Ocharo, D. O. (2024). Integration of photovoltaic-thermal systems with HVAC infrastructure for energy-positive buildings in Pennsylvania. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 3(5), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v3i5.993
  26. Okeke, R. O., Ibokette, A. I., Ijiga, O. M., Enyejo, L. A., Ebiega, G. I., & Olumubo, O. M. (2024). The reliability assessment of power transformers. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(4), 1149–1172. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i4.981
  27. Oladoye, S. O., Bamigwojo, O. V., Ogboji, A. J., & Ijiga, O. M. (2023). Techno-economic evaluation of hybrid solar–diesel microgrids for underserved communities using simulation-based load forecasting. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 4(2), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v4i2.2193
  28. Oyekan, M., Jinadu, S. O., & Enyejo, J. O. (2023). Harnessing data analytics to maximize renewable energy asset performance. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 2(8), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v2i8.850
  29. Sabouhi, H., Abbaspour, A., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M., & Dehghanian, P. (2016). Reliability modeling and availability analysis of combined cycle power plants. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 79, 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.01.007
  30. Si, X.-S., Wang, W., Hu, C.-H., & Zhou, D.-H. (2011). Remaining useful life estimation—A review on the statistical data driven approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.11.018
  31. Sinha, J. K., & Elbhbah, K. (2013). A future possibility of vibration based condition monitoring of rotating machines. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 34(1–2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.07.001
  32. Smith, R. L. (1991). Weibull regression models for reliability data. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 34(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(91)90099-S
  33. Zhang, C. W. (2021). Weibull parameter estimation and reliability analysis with zero-failure data from high-quality products. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 207, 107321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107321
  34. Zhao, R., Yan, R., Chen, Z., Mao, K., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X. (2019). Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 115, 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050
  35. Zio, E. (2022). Prognostics and health management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 218, 108119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108119

Combined-cycle power plants contain strongly coupled mechanical, thermal, electrical, and structural systems whose degradation mechanisms evolve under variable operating loads, cyclic thermal stresses, vibration, environmental exposure, and equipment ageing. Conventional reliability techniques such as Weibull reliability analysis are effective for estimating population-level failure distributions but have limited capability to incorporate high-frequency operational measurements, structural-condition indicators, nonlinear interactions, and time-varying degradation simultaneously. This study develops a novel PlantReliability Fusion Algorithm (PRFA) for integrated prediction of equipment and structuralsupport failures in combined-cycle power plants using operational and structural data. The proposed framework combines a temporal feature-learning module for processing equipment variables such as compressor discharge pressure, turbine exhaust temperature, vibration, bearing temperature, heat-recovery steam generator pressure, start-stop cycles, operating hours, and load fluctuations with a structural-condition module incorporating foundation settlement, support displacement, strain, vibration response, crack development, anchor-bolt condition, thermal expansion, and structural stress indicators. An attention-based multimodal fusion layer dynamically weights degradation signals from both data domains, while a reliability-learning layer estimates failure probability, hazard evolution, remaining useful life, and component reliability over time. PRFA is benchmarked against two-parameter Weibull reliability analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, Long Short-Term Memory networks, and a conventional artificial neural network. Comparative performance is evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, concordance index, Brier score, remaining-useful-life error, and computational efficiency. Graphical evaluation includes Weibull and predicted reliability curves, hazard-rate trajectories, receiver operating characteristic curves, predicted-versusobserved remaining useful life plots, structural-operational degradation maps, feature-importance plots, and comparative algorithm performance charts. The proposed fusion architecture is designed to provide stronger sensitivity to interacting mechanical and structural degradation mechanisms than conventional failure-time models or single-domain machinelearning approaches. The resulting framework provides a technically integrated basis for predictive maintenance, structural integrity management, inspection prioritization, outage planning, and lifecycle reliability optimization in combined-cycle power plants.

Keywords : PlantReliability Fusion Algorithm; Combined-Cycle Power Plants; Equipment Failure Prediction; Structural Support Failures; Weibull Reliability Analysis.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - September - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe