⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Policy Implementation, Monitoring Mechanisms, and Risk Management Compliance: A Mediation Analysis in Higher Education


Authors : Marjhon F. Castro; Genelyn R. Baluyos

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2nj5w47a

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2s37s23k

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun259

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Effective policy implementation and strong monitoring mechanisms are essential in strengthening risk management compliance in higher education institutions. This study examined the mediating effect of monitoring mechanisms on the relationship between policy implementation and risk management compliance in higher education institutions. The study employed a quantitative research approach using an explanatory correlational design with mediation analysis. It was conducted in a private higher education institution in Northern Mindanao, Philippines, during the academic year 2025–2026. The respondents consisted of 180 personnel, including deans, department heads, program heads, coordinators, secretaries, and non-teaching staff, selected through purposive sampling. Three researcher-developed instruments were used: the Policy Implementation Questionnaire (PIQ), the Monitoring Mechanisms Questionnaire (MMQ), and the Risk Management Compliance Questionnaire (RMCQ). Data were analyzed using means and standard deviations, Spearman’s rho correlation, multiple regression, and mediation analysis. The findings revealed that policy implementation was practiced to a very great extent, while monitoring mechanisms and risk management compliance were rated very high. Policy implementation had significant positive relationships with monitoring mechanisms and risk management compliance. Monitoring mechanisms also had a significant positive relationship with risk management compliance. Multiple regression analysis identified leadership and commitment, documentation and standardization, and reporting and transparency as significant predictors of risk management compliance, with leadership and commitment emerging as the strongest predictor. Mediation analysis revealed that monitoring mechanisms partially mediated the relationship between policy implementation and risk management compliance. Leadership commitment, structured documentation systems, and transparent reporting practices play critical roles in sustaining institutional accountability, resilience, and continuous improvement. Deans, department heads, quality assurance officers, and academic supervisors strengthen policy implementation, enhance monitoring systems, improve documentation practices, and sustain transparent reporting mechanisms to support accreditation readiness, ISO compliance, and long-term institutional effectiveness.

Keywords : Accountability, Higher Education Institutions, Monitoring Mechanisms, Policy Implementation, Risk Management Compliance.

References :

  1. Alenezi, M. (2023). Digital learning and digital institution in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(1), 88. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/1/88
  2. Aithal, A., & Aithal, P. S. (2020). Development and validation of survey questionnaire & experimental data–a systematical review-based statistical approach. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 5(2), 233-251.
  3. Alves, F., Leal Filho, W., Casaleiro, P., Nagy, G. J., Diaz, H., Al-Amin, A. Q., ... & Azeiteiro, U. M. (2020). Climate change policies and agendas: Facing implementation challenges and guiding responses. Environmental Science & Policy, 104, 190-198. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S146290111931322X
  4. Bhandari, S., Lopes, M., & Pires, S. M. (2025). A systematic review of factors influencing green public procurement in higher education institutions. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 720. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01562-6
  5. Bognár, F., & Benedek, P. (2021). A Novel Risk Assessment Methodology—A Case Study of the PRISM Methodology in a Compliance Management Sensitive Sector. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 18(7), 89-108. http://bit.ly/4gYkxkL
  6. Borowiecki, M., & Paunov, C. (2018). How is research policy across the OECD organised?. Paris: doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/235c9806-en
  7. Cembranel, P., Gewehr, L., Leila, D. M., Paulo, G. F., Birch, R. S., & José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade,Andrade Guerra. (2024). The pivotal role of higher education institutions in cultivating a sustainable development goals-centric culture. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 25(7), 1385-1411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2024-0057
  8. Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L. K. (2023, September). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1206936). Frontiers Media SA. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936/full
  9. De Villiers, C., Dimes, R., & Molinari, M. (2025). Determinants, mechanisms and consequences of UN SDGs reporting by universities: conceptual framework and avenues for future research. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 37(2), 329-349. https://surl.lu/apbdmk
  10. De Wit, H., & Altbach, P. G. (2021). Internationalization in higher education: Global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy reviews in higher education, 5(1), 28-46. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23322969.2020.1820898
  11. Dietrich, M. (2025). Head-to-head analysis: MetLife (NYSE:MET) vs. SiriusPoint (NYSE:SPNT). Chatham: Newstex. https://www.proquest.com/blogs-podcasts-websites/head-analysis-metlife-nyse-met-vs-siriuspoint/docview/3257022098/se-2
  12. Do, D. T., Le, C. L., & Giang, T. V. (2020). The correlation between internal quality assurance and the formation of quality culture in Vietnam higher education: A case study in Ho Chi Minh city. European journal of educational research, 9(2), 499-509. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1250455
  13. Eboibi, F. E. (2020). Concerns of cyber criminality in South Africa, Ghana, Ethiopia and Nigeria: rethinking cybercrime policy implementation and institutional accountability. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 46(1), 78-109. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03050718.2020.1748075
  14. Emmons, K. M., & Chambers, D. A. (2021). Policy implementation science–an unexplored strategy to address social determinants of health. Ethnicity & disease, 31(1), 133. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7843047/
  15. Erhardt, C., Kullenberg, H., Grigoriadis, A., Kumar, A., Christidis, N., & Christidis, M. (2025). From policy to practice: The regulation and implementation of generative AI in swedish higher education institutes. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 21(1), 21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-025-00195-6
  16. Eshetu, S. B., Yeshitela, K., & Sieber, S. (2021). Urban green space planning, policy implementation, and challenges: The case of Addis Ababa. Sustainability, 13(20), 11344. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11344
  17. Esteve-Mon, F. M., Postigo‐Fuentes, A. Y., & Castañeda, L. (2023). A strategic approach of the crucial elements for the implementation of digital tools and processes in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(3), 558-573. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/hequ.12411
  18. Feng, R., Kantchev, G., & Said, S. (2025, Oct 04). World news: Saudi output boost is big win for trump --- crude prices have fallen this year as riyadh makes move, but risks abound. Wall Street Journal. https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/world-news-saudi-output-boost-is-big-win-trump/docview/3256961146/se-2
  19. Freeman, B., Leihy, P., Teo, I., & Kim, D. K. (2021). Rapid, centralised decision-making in a higher education emergency. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(4), 393-407. https://www.emerald.com/qae/article-abstract/29/4/393/358709/Rapid-centralised-decision-making-in-a-higher?redirectedFrom=fulltext
  20. Hill, M., & Varone, F. (2021). The public policy process. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781003010203/public-policy-process-michael-hill-fr%C3%A9d%C3%A9ric-varone
  21. Himanen, L., & Puuska, H. M. (2022). Does monitoring performance act as an incentive for improving research performance? National and organizational level analysis of Finnish universities. Research Evaluation, 31(2), 236-248. https://academic.oup.com/rev/article/31/2/236/6525023
  22. Jacob, O. N., & Samuel, A. (2020). Educational policy in Nigerian: Challenges of implementation and ways forward. Middle European Scientific Bulletin, 4, 1-9. http://bit.ly/3IWyRgR
  23. Kayyali, M. (2025). Ethical Considerations in Higher Education: Accountability Navigating Complexities. In Accountability in Higher Education: Navigating Current Issues and Trends (pp. 145-184). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/ethical-considerations-in-higher-education/373651
  24. Kennedy, N. (2025). Peoples bank OH sells 600 shares of bristol myers squibb company $BMY. Chatham: Newstex. https://www.proquest.com/blogs-podcasts-websites/peoples-bank-oh-sells-600-shares-bristol-myers/docview/3257021944/se-2
  25. Khalilov, T. (2025). Strategic Planning-Based Management Practices In Higher Education Institution. Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences, 23(1). https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A3%3A23055875/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A186946542&crl=c&link_origin=scholar.google.com
  26. Kovalenko, M., Rusnak, A., & Lomonosov, D. (2021). Ways of ensuring the compliance of the activities of higher education institutions with modern challenges. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 7(5), 104-113. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ways-of-ensuring-the-compliance-of-the-activities-of-higher-education-institutions-with-modern-challenges
  27. Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A. L., Frankenberger, F., Akib, N. A. M., Sen, S. K., Sivapalan, S., ... & Emblen-Perry, K. (2021). Governance and sustainable development at higher education institutions. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4), 6002-6020. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10668-020-00859-y
  28. Leišytė, L. (2022). Performance management under surveillance capitalism in higher education. In Research handbook on academic careers and managing academics (pp. 218-231). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781839102622/9781839102622.00026.xml
  29. Lingegård, S., Havenvid, M. I., & Eriksson, P. E. (2021). Circular public procurement through integrated contracts in the infrastructure sector. Sustainability, 13(21), 11983.
  30. Maznifah, S. (2025). Building cyber-resilient universities: A tailored maturity model for strengthening cybersecurity in higher education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 16(5) doi:https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2025.0160510
  31. Morgane, B., Byrne, A., Forget, D., Gough, G., Louis-René, R., Roche, S., & Siaussat, D. (2025). National context impacts on SDG mapping needs and approaches in higher education, a tri-national comparison. Sustainability, 17(14), 6506. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146506
  32. Mwelu, N., Davis, P. R., Ke, Y., & Watundu, S. (2020). Compliance mediating role within road construction regulatory framework. Journal of Public Procurement, 20(3), 209-233. http://bit.ly/4pVNdia
  33. Nilsen, P. (2020). Making sense of implementation theories, models, and frameworks. In Implementation Science 3.0 (pp. 53-79). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-03874-8_3
  34. Nkonki-Mandleni, B. (2023). Monitoring and evaluation for university–community impact in driving transformation agenda. South African Journal of Higher Education, 37(1), 151-165. https://journals.co.za/doi/full/10.20853/37-1-5679
  35. Nnadozie, R. C. (2024). Monitoring and evaluation implications of the 2014 regulations for reporting by public higher education institutions in South Africa. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2302580. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2302580
  36. Ogunsola, K. O., Balogun, E. D., & Ogunmokun, A. S. (2021). Enhancing financial integrity through an advanced internal audit risk assessment and governance model. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2(1), 781-790. https://tinyurl.com/5b6x4m6y
  37. Roos, N., Heinicke, X., Guenther, E., & Guenther, T. W. (2020). The role of environmental management performance in higher education institutions. Sustainability, 12(2), 655. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/655
  38. Rusdi, M., Sartika, D., Putra, I., & Sari, N. (2023). Quality governance design good university governance in the education sector: a literature review of concepts performance models and audit practices from a risk management perspective. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 3(3). http://bit.ly/4gYkW6L
  39. Sareen, S., & Mandal, S. (2024). Assessing SDG 4 indicators in online and blended higher education within conflict zones: a case study of Northern India's higher education institutions. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100903. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291124001001
  40. Sattiraju, V., Ligade, V. S., Muragundi, P., Pandey, R., & Janodia, M. D. (2023). National and higher education institutions (HEIs) IP policies: Comparison of indian HEIs’ IP policies from a global perspective. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(2), 1979-2006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00915-0
  41. Schaap, L., Femke, N., Cents-Boonstra Miriam, & Kristin, V. (2025). A framework supporting the innovative capacity of higher education institutions: An integrative literature review. Sustainability, 17(14), 6517. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146517
  42. Schneider, B. E. (2020). Relationship Between Leadership Style and Organizational Change to Predict Employee Engagement in Retail EnvironmentThe Purpose of This Quantitative Non-Experimental Correlational Research Study Was to Determine if a Predictive Relationship Exists Between a Subordinate’s Perceptions of His/Her Leade (Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University). https://www.proquest.com/openview/fb20e7fe478ace5e880f45ff7edd4913/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
  43. Shahawati, B. U., Ahmad, J., Muhammad Anas Bin, M. B., Mohd Ali, K. A., & Wan Mohd Hirwani, W. H. (2025). Transforming higher-education-intitutes: Impact of change management on sustainable performance through transformational leadership and knowledge management. Sustainability, 17(6), 2445. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062445
  44. Silaji, T., Bagiwa, Z. L., & Muhammad, T. (2025). Evaluating the Types of Performance Monitoring Used in Private Chartered Universities in Uganda: A mixed-methods. F1000Research, 14, 675. https://f1000research.com/articles/14-675
  45. Sofyani, H., Haslida, A. H., & Saleh, Z. (2023). Does internal control contribute to quality management in higher education institutions? indonesia's adoption experience of the COSO integrated framework. TQM Journal, 35(8), 2162-2180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2022-0201
  46. Trein, P., Biesbroek, R., Bolognesi, T., Cejudo, G. M., Duffy, R., Hustedt, T., & Meyer, I. (2021). Policy coordination and integration: A research agenda. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 973-977.
  47. Ulven, J. B., & Wangen, G. (2021). A systematic review of cybersecurity risks in higher education. Future Internet, 13(2), 39. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/2/39
  48. Van Greuning, H., & Bratanovic, S. B. (2020). Analyzing banking risk: a framework for assessing corporate governance and risk management. World Bank Publications. https://l1nk.dev/0jafkcd
  49. Winhoffer, L. (2025). NTV asset management LLC has $5.73 million position in honeywell international inc. $HON. Chatham: Newstex. https://www.proquest.com/blogs-podcasts-websites/ntv-asset-management-llc-has-5-73-million/docview/3257023995/se-2
  50. Wolfe, T. (2025). Declining by degrees: Higher education at risk. Macmillan+ ORM. http://bit.ly/4mOc2Kb

Effective policy implementation and strong monitoring mechanisms are essential in strengthening risk management compliance in higher education institutions. This study examined the mediating effect of monitoring mechanisms on the relationship between policy implementation and risk management compliance in higher education institutions. The study employed a quantitative research approach using an explanatory correlational design with mediation analysis. It was conducted in a private higher education institution in Northern Mindanao, Philippines, during the academic year 2025–2026. The respondents consisted of 180 personnel, including deans, department heads, program heads, coordinators, secretaries, and non-teaching staff, selected through purposive sampling. Three researcher-developed instruments were used: the Policy Implementation Questionnaire (PIQ), the Monitoring Mechanisms Questionnaire (MMQ), and the Risk Management Compliance Questionnaire (RMCQ). Data were analyzed using means and standard deviations, Spearman’s rho correlation, multiple regression, and mediation analysis. The findings revealed that policy implementation was practiced to a very great extent, while monitoring mechanisms and risk management compliance were rated very high. Policy implementation had significant positive relationships with monitoring mechanisms and risk management compliance. Monitoring mechanisms also had a significant positive relationship with risk management compliance. Multiple regression analysis identified leadership and commitment, documentation and standardization, and reporting and transparency as significant predictors of risk management compliance, with leadership and commitment emerging as the strongest predictor. Mediation analysis revealed that monitoring mechanisms partially mediated the relationship between policy implementation and risk management compliance. Leadership commitment, structured documentation systems, and transparent reporting practices play critical roles in sustaining institutional accountability, resilience, and continuous improvement. Deans, department heads, quality assurance officers, and academic supervisors strengthen policy implementation, enhance monitoring systems, improve documentation practices, and sustain transparent reporting mechanisms to support accreditation readiness, ISO compliance, and long-term institutional effectiveness.

Keywords : Accountability, Higher Education Institutions, Monitoring Mechanisms, Policy Implementation, Risk Management Compliance.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - June - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe