Predicting Cancer Outcomes: A Comparative Study of ML Models


Authors : Yuvraj Singh; Swati; Dhirender Pratap Singh; Tanuj; Yash Pratap Singh; Parth Singh

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/48k6nxp4

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/59wz3da8

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr929

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.


Abstract : Prognostic accuracy in cancer is vital for timely diagnosis and effective treatment planning. This study evaluates the performance of three machine learning techniques—Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Decision Tree (DT)—in forecasting cancer progression using clinical and histopathological data. Results demonstrate that SVM surpasses KNN and DT in predictive precision, establishing its robustness in prognostic modeling. The research highlights how machine learning can support clinicians with data-driven decision-making tools to improve patient care. Future directions may involve advanced deep learning models and optimized feature selection to enhance predictive capabilities further.

Keywords : Cancer Survival Prediction, ML Algorithms, SVM Classifier, KNN Algorithm, Decision Tree Model.

References :

  1.  Kourou, A., Exarchos, T. P., Exarchos, K. P., Karamouzis, M. V., & Fotiadis, D. I. (2015). An overview of how machine learning contributes  to  predicting  and  determining  cancer outcomes. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 13, 8–17.J.
  2. Cruz, J. A., & Wishart, D. S. (2007). The role of machine learning in forecasting and analyzing cancer prognosis. Cancer Informatics, 2, 59–77.
  3. Piryani, S. S., & Saxena, S. (2020). Comparative evaluation of machine learning models for breast cancer forecasting. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 11(8), 371–377.
  4. Patel, N. R., Patel, R., & Patel, B. G. (2016). Analysis and comparison of classifiers used for breast cancer prognosis. International Journal of Computer Applications, 145(2), 34–39.
  5. Chaurasia, A., & Pal, S. (2014). A fresh perspective on breast cancer identification through data mining techniques. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 2(1), 2456–2471.
  6. Shinde, G., & Kalbande, D. S. (2019). Classification and detection of lung cancer via machine learning methods. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) , 8(6), 349–354.
  7. Asri, B., Mousannif, H., Al Moatassime, H., & Noel, T. (2016). Implementing machine learning techniques for assessing breast cancer risk and diagnosis. Procedia Computer Science, 83, 1064–1069.
  8. Chien, H. J., Feizi-Derakhshi, M. R., & Chien, D. K. Y. (2021). Review of machine learning-based models for cancer diagnosis. Cancers, 13(6), 1386.
  9. Al-Shaer, A. M., & Al-Khasawneh, R. (2019). A study on machine learning techniques for predicting breast cancer. Applied Computing and Informatics, 15(1), 1–13.
  10. Yu, W., Jiang, S., & Zou, Y. (2020). Evaluating different machine learning approaches for breast cancer outcome prediction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , 39(3), 860–869.
  11. Lee, S. H., Kim, C. S., & Kim, M. (2020). Assessing the effectiveness of machine learning algorithms in breast cancer prediction. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–10.
  12. Krawczyk, B. (2016). Challenges and future trends in learning from
  13. data with class imbalance. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 5(4), 221–232.
  14. Ding, J., Zhang, A., & Yang, W. C. (2018). Application of support vector machines in cancer classification tasks. BMC Bioinformatics, 19(1), 1–15.
  15. Azar, M. V., & El-Sappagh, T. A. (2020). Enhancing cancer prognosis accuracy through a hybrid feature selection technique. Healthcare, 8(3), 246..

Prognostic accuracy in cancer is vital for timely diagnosis and effective treatment planning. This study evaluates the performance of three machine learning techniques—Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Decision Tree (DT)—in forecasting cancer progression using clinical and histopathological data. Results demonstrate that SVM surpasses KNN and DT in predictive precision, establishing its robustness in prognostic modeling. The research highlights how machine learning can support clinicians with data-driven decision-making tools to improve patient care. Future directions may involve advanced deep learning models and optimized feature selection to enhance predictive capabilities further.

Keywords : Cancer Survival Prediction, ML Algorithms, SVM Classifier, KNN Algorithm, Decision Tree Model.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe