⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Predictive Policing Through Integrated Crime Mapping Analysis Using Geographical Information System: A Convergent Mixed Method Study


Authors : Mechelle C. Gempesao; Rowela Cartin-Pecson

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/sce5ekcr

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yu7psskm

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul1571

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study developed a predictive policing model through integrated crime mapping and Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis in Region XI, Philippines. Using a convergent mixed-methods design, the study integrated quantitative crime data from 2013 to 2023 with qualitative insights from law enforcement practitioners, crime analysts, and GIS personnel to examine the temporal and spatial patterns of major index crimes and the factors influencing crime incidence. Quantitative findings revealed a significant decline in murder, rape, physical injury, robbery, and theft over time, while regression and time-series forecasting analyses showed strong temporal patterns suitable for predicting future crime trends from 2024 to 2028. GIS hotspot mapping identified urbanized and densely populated areas as persistent crime hotspots. Qualitative findings revealed that GIS-supported predictive policing enhanced hotspot monitoring, strategic police deployment, crime prevention, and evidence-based decision-making despite challenges related to data quality and technical capability. Data integration showed convergence between statistical forecasting, spatial crime concentration, and practitioner experiences, confirming that recurring crime patterns were concentrated in identified hotspot areas. The study concluded that integrating statistical forecasting, GIS mapping, and practitioner-based insights strengthened proactive and data-driven policing strategies in Region XI.

Keywords : Criminology, Predictive Policing, Crime Mapping, GIS, Convergent Mixed-Methods, Time-Series Forecasting, Philippines.

References :

  1. Adeyemi, A., & Balogun, T. (2023). Spatial analysis of socioeconomic factors influencing urban crime patterns using GIS. Journal of Urban Safety and Security, 15(2), 88–102.
  2. Andresen, M. A., & Malleson, N. (2020). Crime seasonality and its variations across space. Applied Geography, 43, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102336
  3. Arif, S. (2019). Leadership and organizational culture transformation in public institutions. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 589–601.
  4. Barreda, R. (2022). Community participation and crime prevention initiatives in Sorsogon Province. Philippine Journal of Criminology, 10(1), 45–59.
  5. Berg, B. L. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
  6. Braga, A. A., Turchan, B., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2020). Hot spots policing and crime reduction: An update of an ongoing systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16(3), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09372-3
  7. Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1981). Environmental criminology. Sage Publications.
  8. Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1993). Environment, routine, and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In R. V. Clarke & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice (pp. 259–294). Transaction Publishers.
  9. Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1995). Criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3(3), 5–26.
  10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  11. Carbonell, J. (2024). Algorithmic accountability in predictive policing systems. Policing and Society, 34(1), 55–72.
  12. Chand, A., Jayesh, & Bhattacharya, S. (2021). Crime prediction and forecasting using data mining techniques. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(5), 620–627. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120573
  13. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589
  14. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  15. Dakalbab, F., Abu Talib, M., Abu Waraga, O., Bou Nassif, A., Abbas, S., & Nasir, Q. (2022). Artificial intelligence & crime prediction: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100342
  16. Dalton, C. T., Barrett, S., Horvath, M. A. H., & Davies, K. (2022). A systematic literature review of specialist policing of rape and serious sexual offences. International Criminology, 2(4), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43576-022-00062-1
  17. Davies, T., & Bishop, S. R. (2021). Modelling spatial patterns of crime using transport and accessibility measures. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 85, 101561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101561
  18. Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20
  19. Department of the Interior and Local Government. (2023). Local governance and public safety reports. https://dilg.gov.ph
  20. Eck, J. E., Clarke, R. V., & Guerette, R. T. (2005). Risky facilities: Crime concentration in homogeneous sets of establishments and facilities. Crime Prevention Studies, 21, 225–264.
  21. Egbert, S., & Leese, M. (2021). Criminal futures: Predictive policing and everyday police work. Policing and Society, 31(2), 123–139.
  22. Haberman, C. P., & Ratcliffe, J. H. (2020). The role of place in policing: Examining the impact of accessibility on crime patterns. Policing: An International Journal, 43(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-09-2019-0133
  23. Hossain, M., Rahman, A., & Chowdhury, N. (2022). Deep learning-based spatial- temporal analysis for crime prediction using GIS integration. Computational Urban Analytics, 9(3), 112–125.
  24. Hu, Y., Wang, F., Guin, C., & Zhu, H. (2020). Spatial-temporal analysis of crime patterns using GIS and predictive analytics. Applied Geography, 124, 102324.
  25. Kim, H., & Lee, S. (2023). Optimizing police resource allocation through GIS-enabled predictive models. International Journal of Crime and Technology, 11(2), 73–89.
  26. Koper, C. S., Lum, C., & Willis, J. J. (2021). Optimizing the use of technology in policing. Policing: An International Journal, 44(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2020-0094
  27. Kurland, J., Johnson, S. D., & Tilley, N. (2022). Crime mapping and hotspot analysis: A GIS-based approach to crime prevention. Applied Geography, 145, 102768.
  28. Lee, M. (2024). Ethical challenges and data bias in predictive policing systems. Journal of Criminal Justice Technology, 8(1), 33–49.
  29. Lee, M., Bradford, B., & Posch, K. (2024). Predictive policing and operational efficiency: A systematic review. Crime Science, 13(1), 1–18.
  30. Lum, C., Koper, C. S., & Willis, J. J. (2022). Understanding the limits of technology in policing. Criminology & Public Policy, 21(1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12552
  31. Mohler, G., Short, M. B., Brantingham, P. J., Schoenberg, F. P., & Tita, G. (2021). Randomized controlled field trials of predictive policing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 184(3), 1025–1048.
  32. Mohler, G. O., Short, M. B., Malinowski, S., et al. (2020). Randomized controlled trials of predictive policing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115(530), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2019.1687617
  33. Mojica, V. J., Choi, A., Leong, R. N., & Co, F. (2017). Spatial analysis of violent crimes in Metro Manila, Philippines. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2017.1398669
  34. Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  35. Morse, J. M. (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10(1), 3–5.
  36. Mugari, I., & Obioha, E. E. (2021). Predictive policing and crime control in the United States of America and Europe: Trends in a decade of research and the future of predictive policing. Social Sciences, 10(6), 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10060234
  37. Niati, D. R., Siregar, Z. M. E., & Prayoga, Y. (2021). The effect of organizational culture on organizational performance. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(6), 675–682.
  38. Ortega, J. (2025). Police visibility and proactive policing strategies in crime prevention. Philippine Public Safety Journal, 14(1), 22–39.
  39. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  40. Philippine National Police. (2023). Crime statistics and geospatial monitoring reports. Philippine National Police.
  41. Rana, M. (2025). Understanding convergent mixed-method research designs in social science inquiry. International Journal of Research Methodology, 18(1), 44–58.
  42. Ratcliffe, J. H. (2020). Intelligence-led policing (2nd ed.). Routledge. Rengert, G. F., Piquero, A. R., & Jones, P. R. (1999). Distance decay reexamined. Criminology, 37(2), 427–445.
  43. Richardson, R., Schultz, J., & Crawford, K. (2021). Dirty data, bad predictions: How civil rights violations impact police data, predictive policing systems, and justice. New York University Law Review Online, 94, 192–233.
  44. Ristea, A., & Leitner, M. (2020). Integration of spatial and temporal crime analysis for predictive policing. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(11), 640.
  45. Rossmo, D. K. (2000). Geographic profiling. CRC Press.
  46. Shah, S., Ahmad, N., & Khan, M. (2020). Technology and development: Emerging trends in public sector innovation. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 612–620.
  47. Shanmugam, P., & Kumar, R. (2022). GIS-enabled adaptive predictive policing models for urban crime prevention. International Journal of Geoinformatics, 18(2), 41–55.
  48. Solymosi, R., Bowers, K., & Fujiyama, T. (2022). Crime mapping and predictive analytics in policing systems. Crime Science, 11(1), 1–14.
  49. Tayebi, M. A., & Glässer, U. (2016). Social network analysis in predictive policing. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change, 7(4), 1–16.
  50. Ugwudike, P. (2024). Predictive policing, ethics, and algorithmic justice. Policing and Society, 34(2), 145–162.
  51. Veenstra, A. F., & Kotterink, B. (2017). Data-driven policy making for wicked problems. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 647–656.
  52. Walczak, S. (2021). Predicting crime and other uses of neural networks in police decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 587943. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.587943
  53. Wheeler, A. P., & Steenbeek, W. (2021). Mapping the risk terrain for crime using machine learning techniques. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(5), 587–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427821992464
  54. Yadav, S., & Singh, P. (2021). Crime prediction using machine learning and GIS integration. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 18(1), 1–14.
  55. Yu, H., & Chen, J. (2022). Spatio-temporal crime prediction using deep learning and forecasting techniques. Applied Sciences, 12(4), 2145. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12042145
  56. Zhang, Y., & Zhao, L. (2020). Spatial clustering techniques for predictive crime hotspot detection. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34(9), 1778–1799.

This study developed a predictive policing model through integrated crime mapping and Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis in Region XI, Philippines. Using a convergent mixed-methods design, the study integrated quantitative crime data from 2013 to 2023 with qualitative insights from law enforcement practitioners, crime analysts, and GIS personnel to examine the temporal and spatial patterns of major index crimes and the factors influencing crime incidence. Quantitative findings revealed a significant decline in murder, rape, physical injury, robbery, and theft over time, while regression and time-series forecasting analyses showed strong temporal patterns suitable for predicting future crime trends from 2024 to 2028. GIS hotspot mapping identified urbanized and densely populated areas as persistent crime hotspots. Qualitative findings revealed that GIS-supported predictive policing enhanced hotspot monitoring, strategic police deployment, crime prevention, and evidence-based decision-making despite challenges related to data quality and technical capability. Data integration showed convergence between statistical forecasting, spatial crime concentration, and practitioner experiences, confirming that recurring crime patterns were concentrated in identified hotspot areas. The study concluded that integrating statistical forecasting, GIS mapping, and practitioner-based insights strengthened proactive and data-driven policing strategies in Region XI.

Keywords : Criminology, Predictive Policing, Crime Mapping, GIS, Convergent Mixed-Methods, Time-Series Forecasting, Philippines.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - August - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe