Prioritisation of Road Pavement Type Selection with Analitycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method on Palu City Road Rehabilitation Work Packages


Authors : Ketut Gendroyono; Arief Setiawan; Tutang Muhtar

Volume/Issue : Volume 8 - 2023, Issue 12 - December

Google Scholar : http://tinyurl.com/4upnms75

Scribd : http://tinyurl.com/yu5d5pr3

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10389910

Abstract : Policy conditions and budget politics greatly affect the determination of sections and pavement types by road organisers, the number of proposed road improvements each year is not proportional to the amount of budget available. This greatly affects the determination of pavement types, where road organisers will choose a more economical pavement type that adapts to the available budget to meet these interests, although technically it will have an impact on not achieving the planned life which results in high maintenance costs. This study specifically tries to apply the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method in the interest of formulating and making decisions in prioritising the selection of pavement types. It is hoped that through this study it can be proven that the AHP method can help policy makers, especially within the scope of local government, o make decision making more objective.The methods of this study include data collection methods and analysis methods. In this study, a questionnaire was used to collect data, involving respondents who have more than 10 years of experience and are considered experts in the field of roads and bridges. Based on the analysis of the order of the priority weight of the criteria for the priority selection of the type of pavement, namely the technical criteria has the highest weight of 0.344, Furthermore, the policy criteria have the second highest weight value with a weight value of 0.247, in third place is the cost criteria with a weight value of 0.230 and the last is the implementation criteria with a weight value of 0.178. The order of alternative types of pavement for road rehabilitation in the city of Palu is: 1) AC-WC (Asphalt Concret Wearing Course) (19.3%), 2) Macadam Penetration Layer (18.3%), 3) HRS (Hot Roller Sheet) (16.5%), 4) Sand Sheet (16.3%), 5) Composite Pavement (15.4%), 6) Rigid Pavement (14.2%)

Keywords : Road Rehabilitation Budget, Influential Criteria, Alternative Pavement Type Selection.

Policy conditions and budget politics greatly affect the determination of sections and pavement types by road organisers, the number of proposed road improvements each year is not proportional to the amount of budget available. This greatly affects the determination of pavement types, where road organisers will choose a more economical pavement type that adapts to the available budget to meet these interests, although technically it will have an impact on not achieving the planned life which results in high maintenance costs. This study specifically tries to apply the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method in the interest of formulating and making decisions in prioritising the selection of pavement types. It is hoped that through this study it can be proven that the AHP method can help policy makers, especially within the scope of local government, o make decision making more objective.The methods of this study include data collection methods and analysis methods. In this study, a questionnaire was used to collect data, involving respondents who have more than 10 years of experience and are considered experts in the field of roads and bridges. Based on the analysis of the order of the priority weight of the criteria for the priority selection of the type of pavement, namely the technical criteria has the highest weight of 0.344, Furthermore, the policy criteria have the second highest weight value with a weight value of 0.247, in third place is the cost criteria with a weight value of 0.230 and the last is the implementation criteria with a weight value of 0.178. The order of alternative types of pavement for road rehabilitation in the city of Palu is: 1) AC-WC (Asphalt Concret Wearing Course) (19.3%), 2) Macadam Penetration Layer (18.3%), 3) HRS (Hot Roller Sheet) (16.5%), 4) Sand Sheet (16.3%), 5) Composite Pavement (15.4%), 6) Rigid Pavement (14.2%)

Keywords : Road Rehabilitation Budget, Influential Criteria, Alternative Pavement Type Selection.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe