Authors : Thérèse Kindeke Ngatodi; Daniel Mudinga Mudinga; Archal Ngandote Mutemusa; John Pote Wembonyama

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/kx9md5v2

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3khwnjve

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep1524

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : In the Democratic Republic of Congo, more specifically in the city of Kikwit, access to drinking water is unevenly distributed, hence its selective nature. Thus, the populations of the large and famous Commune of Lukemi rely primarily on unconventional sources of supply to meet their water needs. This massive reliance on inappropriate sources of supply affects the health conditions of this population, hence the aim of this study was to identify the different realities related to access to drinking water in the Commune of Lukemi in the city of Kikwit and to inventory the likely health risks associated with it. Our surveys show that out of the 500 sampled households, with an average number of people per household of 8 and an average length of residence in the Commune of Lukemi of 10 years, the majority of the population of the Commune of Lukemi obtains their water from domestic water sources, i.e. 79% of the overall sample, 11% obtain their water from the Régideso facilities where water flows once or twice every two weeks, and 10% of the population, due to a lack of water from the Régideso and the lack of means to obtain their water from domestic water sources, directly use the water from the Kimani-Mani River. The majority of the population, 60% of whom lack the means, transport their own water without resorting to external help. Thirty percent of households rely on external help for a fee of 500 FCFA per container. However, the remaining 10% of households opt for a monthly subscription of approximately 100,000 FCFA per month for a quantity of approximately 10 25-liter containers per day per cart. Young people under 25 years of age make up the majority of this water supply process, at 40%, followed by those between 25 and 35 (30%) and those between 35 and 45 (20%), compared to those aged 45 and over (10%). Pearson correlations showed that age groups correlate significantly negatively with the quantity of water supplied to households and the number of households served, while the number of households served correlates significantly positively with the quantity of water served. In terms of health, we found that 89% of the population of the Lukemi Commune draws its water directly from domestic water sources and the Kimani-Mani River without prior treatment; this population faces many risks, as confirmed by the local epidemiological results. Thus, a series of recommendations were formulated for the population of Lukemi and the relevant authorities.

Keywords : Access to Drinking Water, Health Risks.

References :

1. Abia ALK, Ubomba-Jaswa E, Momba MNB (2015) Impact of seasonal variation on Escherichia coli concentrations in the riverbed sediments in the Apies River, South Africa. Science of the Total Environment 537:462-469 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.132
2. ACP (2025). Kwilu: Kikwit Economic Development Pole Characterization Study Report, Validation Workshop, Kikwit
3. Ahmed W, Stewart J, Powell D, Gardner T (2008) Evaluation of Bacteroides markers for the detection of human fecal pollution. Letters in Applied Microbiology 46:237-242 doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02287.x
4. Al Salah DMM, Laffite A, Poté J (2019) Occurrence of Bacterial Markers and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Sub-Saharan Rivers Receiving Animal Farm Wastewaters. Sci Rep 9:14847 doi:10.1038/s41598-019-51421-4
5. Al Salah DMM, Ngweme GN, Laffite A, Otamonga JP, Mulaji C, Poté J (2020) Hospital wastewaters: A reservoir and source of clinically relevant bacteria and antibiotic resistant genes dissemination in urban river under tropical conditions. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 200:110767 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110767
6. APHA ((American Public Health Association) 2005) Microbial examination. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Water Environment Federation (WEF): Washington, DC.
7. Assembly UG (2010) The Human Right to Water and Sanitation: Resolution/Adopted by the General Assembly, vol.3.
8. Bae S, Wuertz S (2009) Discrimination of viable and dead fecal Bacteroidales bacteria by quantitative PCR with propidium monoazide. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2940-2944 doi: 10.1128/aem.01333-08
9. Betancourt WQ, Duarte DC, Vásquez RC, Gurian PL (2014) Cryptosporidium and Giardia in tropical recreational marine waters contaminated with domestic sewage: Estimation of bathing-associated disease risks. Marine Pollution Bulletin 85:268-273 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.05.059
10. Bradshaw JK et al. (2016) Characterizing relationships among fecal indicator bacteria, microbial source tracking markers, and associated waterborne pathogen occurrence in stream water and sediments in a mixed land use watershed. Water Research 101:498-509 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.014
11. Cabral JP (2010) Water microbiology. Bacterial pathogens and water. Int J Environ Res Public Health 7:3657-3703 doi: 10.3390/ijerph7103657
12. CENCO (2013). Yearbook of the Catholic Church in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Editions du Secrétariat de la CENCO, Kinshasa-Gombe
13. ECOA (2012) European Union development assistance for drinking water supply and basic sanitation in sub-Saharan countries, European Court of Auditors, rue Alcide De Gasperi, Luxembourg. https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR12_13/SR12_13_EN.
14. Gomez Isaza DF, Cramp RL, Franklin CE (2020) Living in polluted waters: A meta-analysis of the effects of nitrate and interactions with other environmental stressors on freshwater taxa. Environmental Pollution 261:114091 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114091
15. Hall RC, Hall RC, Chapman MJ (2008) The 1995 Kikwit Ebola outbreak: lessons hospitals and physicians can apply to future viral epidemics. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 30:446-452 doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.05.003
16. Haller L, Poté J, Loizeau J-L, Wildi W (2009) Distribution and survival of faecal indicator bacteria in the sediments of the Bay of Vidy, Lake Geneva, Switzerland. Ecological Indicators 9:540-547 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.08.001
17. Holcomb DA, Stewart JR (2020) Microbial Indicators of Fecal Pollution: Recent Progress and Challenges in Assessing Water Quality. Current Environmental Health Reports 7:311-324 doi:10.1007/s40572-020-00278-1
18. Kapembo ML et al. (2019) Prevalence of water-related diseases and groundwater (drinking-water) contamination in the suburban municipality of Mont Ngafula, Kinshasa (Democratic Republic of the Congo). J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 54:840-850 doi: 10.1080/10934529.2019.1596702
19. Kapembo ML et al. (2016) Evaluation of Water Quality from Suburban Shallow Wells Under Tropical Conditions According to the Seasonal Variation, Bumbu, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Exposure and Health 8:487-496 doi:10.1007/s12403-016-0213-y
20. Kayembe JM et al. (2018) Assessment of water quality and time accumulation of heavy metals in the sediments of tropical urban rivers: Case of Bumbu River and Kokolo Canal, Kinshasa City, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Journal of African Earth Sciences 147:536-543 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.07.016
21. Kayembe JM et al. (2018) High levels of faecal contamination in drinking groundwater and recreational water due to poor sanitation, in the sub-rural neighborhoods of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 221:400-408 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.01.003
22. Kilunga PI et al. (2016) The impact of hospital and urban wastewaters on the bacteriological contamination of the water resources