Authors : Dr. Kgoshi Kgashane Lucas Pilusa

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2m9rxmsv

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4n2x4ajj

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL830

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Local government in the Republic of South Africa is crucial for providing services and fostering development at the grassroots level. However, the sector is plagued by high levels of corruption, undermining its effectiveness and eroding public trust. This paper examines the challenges of professionalizing local government in South Africa amidst pervasive corruption, exploring the current state of local governance, the impacts of corruption, and strategies for fostering professionalism to enhance service delivery and governance. Efforts to professionalize local government are essential for enhancing administrative efficiency, accountability, and transparency. This study employs a qualitative research design to investigate the barriers to professionalization and the measures that can be taken to overcome these challenges. Through interviews, case studies, and document analysis, the study seeks to provide insights into effective strategies for reducing corruption and improving the performance of local governments in South Africa. The findings suggest that while corruption remains a significant hurdle, targeted interventions such as capacity building, stringent oversight mechanisms, and community engagement can foster a culture of professionalism. The study concludes with recommendations for policymakers, practitioners, and stakeholders to support the professionalization of local government as a means to combat corruption and improve service delivery.

Keywords : Local Government, Corruption, Professionalism, South Africa.

References :

1. Auditor-General of South Africa. (2020). Consolidated General Report on the Local Government Audit Outcomes 2018-19. Pretoria: Auditor-General of South Africa.
2. Bhorat, H., & Kanbur, R. (2006). Local government and poverty reduction in South Africa: Case studies from Cape Town and Johannesburg. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(4), 870-884.
3. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
5. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
7. COGTA (Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs). (2009). State of Local Government in South Africa Report. Pretoria: COGTA.
8. COGTA (Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs). (2016). Integrated Urban Development Framework. Pretoria: COGTA.
9. COGTA (Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs). (2016). Guide for Integrated Development Planning in South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs.
10. Commonwealth Local Government Forum. (2018). The Local Government System in South Africa. London: Commonwealth Local Government Forum.
11. Corruption Watch. (2019). Annual Report 2018. Johannesburg: Corruption Watch.
12. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
13. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
14. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
15. Ethics Institute of South Africa. (2017). Public Sector Ethics Survey. Pretoria: Ethics Institute of South Africa.
16. Fainstein, S. S., & Fainstein, S. S. (2004). The City Builders: Property, Politics, and Planning in London and New York. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
17. Fernández-Maldonado, A. M., & Barreiro-Gen, M. (2019). Understanding the role of local government in global governance: The case of Barcelona. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(7), 907-925. doi:10.1080/07352166.2019.1644667
18. Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (6th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
19. Institute of Local Government Studies. (2018). Professionalization of Local Government: Theory and Practice. Accra: University of Ghana.
20. Khumalo, I. P., & Ngulube, P. (2017). Adoption and use of e-government services by municipalities in South Africa. South African Journal of Information Management, 19(1), a818. doi:10.4102/sajim.v19i1.818
21. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
22. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
23. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24. Municipal Demarcation Board. (2019). Capacity Assessment of Municipalities in South Africa. Pretoria: Municipal Demarcation Board.
25. National Treasury, Republic of South Africa. (2018). Budgeting and Reporting Guidelines for Municipalities. Pretoria: National Treasury, Republic of South Africa.
26. National Treasury. (2020). Budget Review 2020. Pretoria: National Treasury of South Africa.
27. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
28. Public Protector South Africa. (2018). Annual Report 2017-2018. Pretoria: Public Protector South Africa.
29. Public Service Accountability Monitor. (2019). Corruption and Service Delivery in South Africa. Grahamstown: Rhodes University.
30. Republic of South Africa. (1998). White Paper on Local Government. Pretoria: Government of South Africa.
31. Saldana, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
32. SALGA (South African Local Government Association). (2019). Handbook for Municipal Councillors. Pretoria: South African Local Government Association.
33. Shin, H. B., & Lee, Y. (2016). Whose games? The costs of being "Olympic citizens" in the context of Seoul's Neoliberal urban transformation. Urban Studies, 53(3), 524-541.
34. South African Constitution. (1996). The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Pretoria: Government of South Africa.
35. South African Local Government Association. (2019). Handbook for Municipal Councillors. Pretoria: South African Local Government Association.
36. Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2019. Berlin: Transparency International.
37. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2018). E-Government Survey 2018. New York: United Nations.
38. University of Pretoria. (2019). Public Administration Review: Special Issue on Local Governance. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
39. Van der Waldt, G., & Kotzé, J. (2018). Challenges and opportunities in professionalizing local government: The case of South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 53(2), 358-372.3.5
40. World Bank. (2019). Digital Economy for Africa Transformation: Towards a Digital Single Market in Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.
41. World Bank. (2016). Local Government Reforms in the Philippines: A Case Study. Washington, DC: World Bank.