Authors :
Judith J. Regalado
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/vpk93hxj
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/3n6j75s7
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1376
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Inclusive education has increasingly been recognized as a core principle of quality education, yet its success in real
classrooms depends heavily on the daily work of non-special education teachers, who are often the first line of support for diverse
learners. This paper examines how inclusive classroom practices are understood, experienced, and enacted through the lenses
of mainstream or general education teachers. Using a narrative literature review approach, the paper synthesizes major
international policy documents and peer-reviewed studies on teacher attitudes, self-efficacy, collaboration, and classroom
practice in inclusive settings. The review shows that non-special education teachers generally support the philosophy of inclusion,
but their implementation is often conditional, shaped by training, confidence, time, resources, and access to specialist
collaboration. The literature further suggests that inclusive practice becomes more sustainable when schools treat inclusion not
as a specialist add-on, but as a whole-school responsibility supported by professional development, mentoring, Universal Design
for Learning, collaborative planning, and flexible pedagogy. From the perspective of general classroom teachers, inclusion is not
merely about placing students with diverse needs in regular classrooms; it is about redesigning instruction, classroom culture,
and assessment so that all learners can participate meaningfully. The paper concludes that strengthening inclusive education
requires empowering non-special education teachers as capable, reflective, and supported agents of inclusion.
Keywords :
Inclusive Education, Non-Special Education Teachers, Mainstream Teachers, Inclusive Classroom Practices, Teacher SelfEfficacy, Collaboration.
References :
- Al Jaffal, M. (2022). Barriers general education teachers face regarding the inclusion of students with autism. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 873248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873248
- Alabdallat, B., Alkhamra, H., & Alkhamra, R. (2021). Special education and general education teacher perceptions of collaborative teaching responsibilities and attitudes towards an inclusive environment in Jordan. Frontiers in Education, 6, 739384. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.739384
- Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Mohaidat, M. A., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. K. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2218191. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218191
- Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250210129056
- Brussino, O. (2021). Building capacity for inclusive teaching: Policies and practices to prepare all teachers for diversity and inclusion (OECD Education Working Paper No. 256). OECD.
- CAST. (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. CAST.
- Dignath, C., Rimm-Kaufman, S., van Ewijk, R., & Kunter, M. (2022). Teachers’ beliefs about inclusive education and insights on what contributes to those beliefs: A meta-analytical study. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2609–2660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09695-0
- Giorgi, M., Loverre, M., Stefanelli, F., Lucidi, F., Benvenuto, G., & Chirico, A. (2026). Exploring variables related to teachers’ self-efficacy in inclusive education: A network meta-analysis approach. International Journal of Educational Development, 120, 103461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103461
- Kimhi, Y., & Bar Nir, A. (2025). Teacher training in transition to inclusive education. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1510314. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1510314
- Lindner, K.-T., Schwab, S., Emara, M., & Avramidis, E. (2023). Do teachers favor the inclusion of all students? A systematic review of primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 38(6), 766–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2023.2172894
- Savolainen, H., Malinen, O.-P., & Schwab, S. (2020). Teacher efficacy predicts teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion: A longitudinal cross-lagged analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1752826
- Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x
- UNESCO. (2020). Inclusive teaching: Preparing all teachers to teach all students (Policy Paper 43). Global Education Monitoring Report.
- UNICEF. (n.d.). Inclusive education. UNICEF.
- Yada, A., Leskinen, M., Savolainen, H., & Schwab, S. (2022). Meta-analysis of the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103521
Inclusive education has increasingly been recognized as a core principle of quality education, yet its success in real
classrooms depends heavily on the daily work of non-special education teachers, who are often the first line of support for diverse
learners. This paper examines how inclusive classroom practices are understood, experienced, and enacted through the lenses
of mainstream or general education teachers. Using a narrative literature review approach, the paper synthesizes major
international policy documents and peer-reviewed studies on teacher attitudes, self-efficacy, collaboration, and classroom
practice in inclusive settings. The review shows that non-special education teachers generally support the philosophy of inclusion,
but their implementation is often conditional, shaped by training, confidence, time, resources, and access to specialist
collaboration. The literature further suggests that inclusive practice becomes more sustainable when schools treat inclusion not
as a specialist add-on, but as a whole-school responsibility supported by professional development, mentoring, Universal Design
for Learning, collaborative planning, and flexible pedagogy. From the perspective of general classroom teachers, inclusion is not
merely about placing students with diverse needs in regular classrooms; it is about redesigning instruction, classroom culture,
and assessment so that all learners can participate meaningfully. The paper concludes that strengthening inclusive education
requires empowering non-special education teachers as capable, reflective, and supported agents of inclusion.
Keywords :
Inclusive Education, Non-Special Education Teachers, Mainstream Teachers, Inclusive Classroom Practices, Teacher SelfEfficacy, Collaboration.