Authors :
Hajiyeva Aysel Hikmet
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/5eds35pr
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/mvkj53mw
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14759697
Abstract :
In modern world mutual relations between people are based on positive and negative approaches. A positive
attitude of the student to his colleagues, or of colleagues to him, as well as the teacher to students, considers it necessary for
students to treat the teacher and others with respect. Here, it is based on the positive qualities and actions, skills and
abilities of the students, not on the students' relationships with each other or with the teacher, or on the shortcomings,
mistakes, and shortcomings of the students in any field. Establishing relationships in this way strengthens the student's
sense of self-confidence, increases his initiative, self-activity, and independence. A negative attitude towards people,
including students, takes the main place in the negative approach. Relationships are already based on coercion, pressure
and incitement, negative evaluation. As a result, students are not inclined to show initiative, cognitive independence and
creative activity.
A positive approach should be preferred to develop tolerance. First of all, teachers of higher education institutions
should learn positive attitude, and then they should develop this important quality in students. Approaches play an
important role in the education of tolerance.
As a result of UNESCO's efforts, "tolerance" has recently gained the status of an international term. Formation of
tolerant consciousness, tolerant thinking and tolerant thinking, education of tolerance to different religions, other peoples,
nations and peacefulness is a priority task in Azerbaijani education.
In the article, an analysis was made on the factors of tolerance, individualism and collectivism for 2 educational
sectors – Russian and Azerbaijan, and the results were processed in a comparative manner. 250 students were involved in
practical research. SPSS software and 2 main analysis models (descriptive-statistical analysis model and "t-test" analysis
model) were used to analyze the research results. "L.Q POCHEBUT" "Cultural Value Tendencies" test was selected to
analyze the participants’ attitude to the problem.
Keywords :
Cultural Values, Tolerance, Individualism, Russian and Azerbaijani Sections.
References :
- Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The counseling psychologist, 35(2), 236-264.
- Ehm, F., & Walter, C. (2015). UNESCO. In International Democracy Documents (pp. 133-147). Brill Nijhoff.
- Kuzmenko, R. (2020). Tolerance as the Basis of Education. Research Journal of Education, Psychology and Social Sciences, 1(1), 9-12.
- Islamov, A. E., Rassolov, I. M., Petunova, S. A., Albov, A. P., Zaikina, I. V., & Shulga, T. I. (2016). Students’ tolerant behavior formation mechanisms. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(1), 43-50.
- Safina, R. N., & Abdurakhmanov, M. A. (2016). The Formation of Students' Tolerance in a Multi-Ethnic School. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(3).
- Sattorova, M. (2022). DIAGNOSTICS OF SOCIAL TOLERANCE OF STUDENTS. Science and innovation, 1(B5), 526-528.
- Patel, P., Hancock, J., Rogers, M., & Pollard, S. R. (2022). Improving uncertainty tolerance in medical students: A scoping review. Medical Education, 56(12), 1163-1173.
- Parfilova, G. G., & Karimova, L. S. (2016). Teenage students’ tolerance formation. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(4), 513-523.
- Orekhovskaya, N. A., Tyurikov, A. G., Razov, P. V., Kibakin, M. V., & Kiseleva, N. I. (2017). Student Youth Tolerance as a Factor of Socio-Cultural Integration. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12.
- Owen, W., & Sweeney, R. (2002). Ambiguity tolerance, performance, learning, and satisfaction: A research direction. School of Computer and Information Sciences.
- https://multiculturalism.preslib.az/az_a4.html
- https://www.anl.az/down/meqale/zaman/2015/aprel/431224.htm
- https://azerbaijan.az/related-information/87
In modern world mutual relations between people are based on positive and negative approaches. A positive
attitude of the student to his colleagues, or of colleagues to him, as well as the teacher to students, considers it necessary for
students to treat the teacher and others with respect. Here, it is based on the positive qualities and actions, skills and
abilities of the students, not on the students' relationships with each other or with the teacher, or on the shortcomings,
mistakes, and shortcomings of the students in any field. Establishing relationships in this way strengthens the student's
sense of self-confidence, increases his initiative, self-activity, and independence. A negative attitude towards people,
including students, takes the main place in the negative approach. Relationships are already based on coercion, pressure
and incitement, negative evaluation. As a result, students are not inclined to show initiative, cognitive independence and
creative activity.
A positive approach should be preferred to develop tolerance. First of all, teachers of higher education institutions
should learn positive attitude, and then they should develop this important quality in students. Approaches play an
important role in the education of tolerance.
As a result of UNESCO's efforts, "tolerance" has recently gained the status of an international term. Formation of
tolerant consciousness, tolerant thinking and tolerant thinking, education of tolerance to different religions, other peoples,
nations and peacefulness is a priority task in Azerbaijani education.
In the article, an analysis was made on the factors of tolerance, individualism and collectivism for 2 educational
sectors – Russian and Azerbaijan, and the results were processed in a comparative manner. 250 students were involved in
practical research. SPSS software and 2 main analysis models (descriptive-statistical analysis model and "t-test" analysis
model) were used to analyze the research results. "L.Q POCHEBUT" "Cultural Value Tendencies" test was selected to
analyze the participants’ attitude to the problem.
Keywords :
Cultural Values, Tolerance, Individualism, Russian and Azerbaijani Sections.
