⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



QuantumShield-IoT: A Quantum-Resilient Hybrid Framework for Secure Data Transmission Using Quantum Key Distribution, Lightweight Cryptography and Blockchain Technology


Authors : Yenubarla Winstone Smiles; Dr. S. Sevugarajan

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3c7dcb28

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdfm82hh

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul281

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : With the growing Internet of Things (IoT), many applications like traffic management, smart cities, environment monitoring, industrial automation and healthcare have been revolutionized. As the number of resourcelimited IoT devices grows and connects with each other, security issues have become more intricate and severe, such as unauthorized access, data tampering, replay attacks, and the rise in threat from quantum computing to traditional cryptographic methods. To solve those problems, this paper proposes Quantum Shield-IoT, which is a quantum-resilient hybrid security framework that combines the Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) protocol of BB84 with ASCON lightweight authenticated encryption, blockchain security, and cloud computing to ensure secure end-to-end data transmission in IoT. The BB84 protocol works both to generate quantum secure cryptographic keys, and to identify eavesdropping via Quantum Bit Error Rate (QBER) analysis. The generated keys are used by ASCON-128 to ensure efficient data confidentiality, integrity and authentication with low computation load, which makes it suitable for resourceconstrained IoT devices. Encrypted data are securely stored in the cloud while the data integrity and traceability of the SHA-256 hash values are ensured by being stored on the blockchain, making them irretrievable. Encrypted data are stored securely in the cloud, while the data integrity and traceability of the hash value ensure irretrievable storage through the blockchain. The proposed framework was implemented using IBM Quantum Qiskit, ASCON-128, blockchain platforms and cloud storage. Experimental results show that quantum bit error rate (QBER) varies from 2.1% to 3.5% for typical communication and 24.8% for eavesdropping attempts, proving reliable QKD. ASCON encryption range was between 8.2 ms and 69.5 ms, and blockchain verification was less than 25 ms for 1,000 transactions with more than 99% of the integrity accuracy. Moreover, the framework achieved an attack detection rate higher than 97.9% in several cyberattacks and hence provided a scalable, light-weight and quantum resistant security solution for next generation IoT ecosystems.

Keywords : Internet of Things (IoT), Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), BB84 Protocol, ASCON, Lightweight Cryptography, Blockchain, Cloud Computing, Quantum-Resilient Security, Secure Data Transmission.

References :

  1. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, “Quantum [1] C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, “Quantum Cryptography: Public Key Distribution and Coin Tossing,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India, pp. 175–179, 1984.
  2. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  3. N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, “Quantum Cryptography,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 145–195, 2002.
  4. V. Scarani et al., “The Security of Practical Quantum Key Distribution,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 1301–1350, 2009.
  5. C. Dobraunig, M. Eichlseder, F. Mendel, and M. Schläffer, “Ascon v1.2: Lightweight Authenticated Encryption and Hashing,” Journal of Cryptology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1–42, 2021.
  6. J. Kaur, A. Cintas-Canto, M. M. Kermani, and R. Azarderakhsh, “A Comprehensive Survey on the Implementations, Attacks, and Countermeasures of the Current NIST Lightweight Cryptography Standard,” IEEE Access, 2023.
  7. W. J. Buchanan and L. Maglaras, “Review of the NIST Lightweight Cryptography Finalists,” Future Internet, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1–18, 2023.
  8. A. Cintas-Canto, J. Kaur, M. M. Kermani, and R. Azarderakhsh, “First Implementation of the NIST Lightweight Cryptography Standard ASCON,” IEEE Access, 2023.
  9. S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System,” 2008.
  10. M. Crosby, P. Pattanayak, S. Verma, and V. Kalyanaraman, “Blockchain Technology: Beyond Bitcoin,” Applied Innovation Review, vol. 2, pp. 6–19, 2016.
  11. K. Christidis and M. Devetsikiotis, “Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things,” IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 2292–2303, 2016.
  12. A. Dorri, S. S. Kanhere, and R. Jurdak, “Blockchain in Internet of Things: Challenges and Solutions,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 56–61, 2016.
  13. L. Atzori, A. Iera, and G. Morabito, “The Internet of Things: A Survey,” Computer Networks, vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 2787–2805, 2010.
  14. D. Evans, “The Internet of Things: How the Next Evolution of the Internet is Changing Everything,” Cisco White Paper, 2011.
  15. A. Whitmore, A. Agarwal, and L. Da Xu, “The Internet of Things—A Survey of Topics and Trends,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 261–274, 2015.
  16. M. Conti, A. Dehghantanha, K. Franke, and S. Watson, “Internet of Things Security and Forensics: Challenges and Opportunities,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 78, pp. 544–546, 2018.
  17. D. Boneh and V. Shoup, A Graduate Course in Applied Cryptography. 2020.
  18. B. Schneier, Applied Cryptography, 2nd ed. Wiley, 2015.
  19. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), “Lightweight Cryptography Standardization Process: Selection of ASCON,” 2023.
  20. NIST, “Ascon-Based Lightweight Cryptography Standards for Constrained Devices,” SP 800-232, 2025.
  21. D. Moody et al., “NIST Releases First Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards,” NIST, 2024.
  22. K. Adere, “Systematic Review on Securing IoT Systems with Post-Quantum Cryptography,” Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 2026.
  23. Y. M. Mohialden et al., “Challenges and Advancements in Quantum Cryptography,” Proceedings of ICAIIT, 2025.
  24. A. J. Bhuvaneshwari et al., “Post-Quantum Enhanced ASCON for Secure Vehicular IoT Data Integrity,” Scientific Reports, 2025.
  25. K. Gkouliaras et al., “QKD-Secured Data Acquisition and Control Framework for Critical Infrastructure,” Scientific Reports, 2026.
  26. A. C. H. Chen, “Hybrid Schemes of NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standard Algorithms and Quantum Key Distribution,” 2025.
  27. A. Sandhu, “Securing Financial Transactions in the Quantum Era,” Journal of Information Security, 2026.
  28. A. Dorri, M. Steger, S. S. Kanhere, and R. Jurdak, “Blockchain: A Distributed Solution to Automotive Security and Privacy,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 119–125, 2017.
  29. M. Swan, Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O’Reilly Media, 2015.
  30. X. Xu et al., “A Taxonomy of Blockchain-Based Systems for Architecture Design,” IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture, pp. 243–252, 2017.
  31. P. Mell and T. Grance, “The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing,” NIST Special Publication 800-145, 2011.
  32. R. Buyya, J. Broberg, and A. Goscinski, Cloud Computing: Principles and Paradigms. Wiley, 2011.
  33. M. Armbrust et al., “A View of Cloud Computing,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 50–58, 2010.
  34. S. Pirandola et al., “Advances in Quantum Cryptography,” Advances in Optics and Photonics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1012–1236, 2020.
  35. V. Sachdeva and M. Singh, “Quantum Cryptography for Secure Communication in IoT Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 112345–112360, 2023.
  36. H. Albreiki, M. Habib ur Rehman, K. Salah, and D. Svetinovic, “A Systematic Review of Blockchain for IoT Security,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 110, pp. 101–119, 2020.
  37. M. Ammad-Uddin et al., “Blockchain-Based Framework for Secure Healthcare IoT,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 102–118, 2020.
  38. S. Gupta and R. Kumar, “Lightweight Cryptography for Resource-Constrained IoT Devices,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 210, pp. 103–118, 2024.
  39. M. Kermani, R. Azarderakhsh, and J. Kaur, “ASCON Implementations and Security Evaluation for IoT Platforms,” IEEE Embedded Systems Letters, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2024.
  40. B. Wang, Y. Li, and J. Zhang, “Quantum-Safe IoT Communication Frameworks: Challenges and Future Directions,” Future Internet, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–24, 2025.
  41. A. Ukil, S. Bandyopadhyay, C. Puri, and A. Pal, “IoT Healthcare Analytics: The Importance of Anomaly Detection,” IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems, pp. 1–6, 2016.
  42. N. Koblitz, “Elliptic Curve Cryptosystems,” Mathematics of Computation, vol. 48, no. 177, pp. 203–209, 1987.
  43. M. Conoscenti, A. Vetrò, and J. C. De Martin, “Blockchain for the Internet of Things: A Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, pp. 1–6, 2016.
  44. S. Subashini and V. Kavitha, “A Survey on Security Issues in Service Delivery Models of Cloud Computing,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2011.
  45. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, “Quantum Cryptography: Public Key Distribution and Coin Tossing,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India, pp. 175–179, 1984.
  46. NIST, “Lightweight Cryptography Standardization Process: Final Portfolio,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2023.
  47. S. Goldwasser, S. Micali, and C. Rackoff, “The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof Systems,” SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 186–208, 1989.
  48. R. L. Rivest, A. Shamir, and Y. Tauman, “How to Leak a Secret,” Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2001, pp. 552–565, 2001.
  49. K. Salah, M. H. U. Rehman, N. Nizamuddin, and A. Al-Fuqaha, “Blockchain for AI: Review and Open Research Challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 10127–10149, 2019.
  50. V. Scarani et al., “The Security of Practical Quantum Key Distribution,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 1301–1350, 2009.
  51. A. Alrawais, A. Alhothaily, C. Hu, and X. Cheng, “Fog Computing for the Internet of Things: Security and Privacy Issues,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 34–42, 2017.
  52. S. K. Singh and S. J. Basha, “Quantum Key Distribution Based Secure Cloud Computing Framework,” International Journal of Network Security, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1012–1020, 2019.
  53. J. Daemen, C. Dobraunig, M. Eichlseder, F. Mendel, and M. Schläffer, “Ascon v1.2: Lightweight Authenticated Encryption and Hashing,” Journal of Cryptology, 2021.
  54. A. Bhatia and R. K. Jha, “Quantum Blockchain: A Secure Framework for Future Communication Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 112345–112358, 2022.

With the growing Internet of Things (IoT), many applications like traffic management, smart cities, environment monitoring, industrial automation and healthcare have been revolutionized. As the number of resourcelimited IoT devices grows and connects with each other, security issues have become more intricate and severe, such as unauthorized access, data tampering, replay attacks, and the rise in threat from quantum computing to traditional cryptographic methods. To solve those problems, this paper proposes Quantum Shield-IoT, which is a quantum-resilient hybrid security framework that combines the Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) protocol of BB84 with ASCON lightweight authenticated encryption, blockchain security, and cloud computing to ensure secure end-to-end data transmission in IoT. The BB84 protocol works both to generate quantum secure cryptographic keys, and to identify eavesdropping via Quantum Bit Error Rate (QBER) analysis. The generated keys are used by ASCON-128 to ensure efficient data confidentiality, integrity and authentication with low computation load, which makes it suitable for resourceconstrained IoT devices. Encrypted data are securely stored in the cloud while the data integrity and traceability of the SHA-256 hash values are ensured by being stored on the blockchain, making them irretrievable. Encrypted data are stored securely in the cloud, while the data integrity and traceability of the hash value ensure irretrievable storage through the blockchain. The proposed framework was implemented using IBM Quantum Qiskit, ASCON-128, blockchain platforms and cloud storage. Experimental results show that quantum bit error rate (QBER) varies from 2.1% to 3.5% for typical communication and 24.8% for eavesdropping attempts, proving reliable QKD. ASCON encryption range was between 8.2 ms and 69.5 ms, and blockchain verification was less than 25 ms for 1,000 transactions with more than 99% of the integrity accuracy. Moreover, the framework achieved an attack detection rate higher than 97.9% in several cyberattacks and hence provided a scalable, light-weight and quantum resistant security solution for next generation IoT ecosystems.

Keywords : Internet of Things (IoT), Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), BB84 Protocol, ASCON, Lightweight Cryptography, Blockchain, Cloud Computing, Quantum-Resilient Security, Secure Data Transmission.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - August - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe