Rational and Experiential Thinking Patterns as Determinants of Resilience Among Indian Civil Service Aspirants


Authors : Agnivesh B; Lavanya S H; Aswathy J S; Sreenandana S; Akhila Krishnan R S

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/355pcs2z

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/u52wwhjc

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep238

PlumX Metrics

Semantic Scholar

ResearchGate

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : Civil Service aspirants face significant academic pressure, psychological stress, and complex decision-making challenges throughout their journey. Their resilience and rational-experiential information processing play a crucial role in enhancing adaptability, perseverance, and overall success, making it essential to understand their interplay for effective stress management and cognitive flexibility. This study examines the relationship between Rational-Experiential Information Processing and Resilience among Civil Service Aspirants in India. It explores how rational and experiential cognitive styles influence resilience, a crucial trait for aspirants facing intense academic and emotional stress. A descriptive study was conducted with 222 Civil Service aspirants (aged 18–32) from North and South India, selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected via a mixed-mode method using Google Forms and direct approaches using validated psychological scales: the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10) and the 40-item Rational- Experiential Inventory (REI-40). Statistical analyses included ANOVA, Karl Pearson’s Correlation, t-tests, and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. The study found that Resilience is strongly correlated with Rational Information Processing, particularly Rational Ability. Rational Engagement and Experiential Ability also contribute, but Experiential Engagement showed no significant correlation. Gender and education level had no significant impact. First-born individuals had higher Rational Engagement, while older participants (28–32 years) had higher resilience. Experiential Processing varied with age, but rational thinking remained stable. North Indian participants engaged more in Rational Thinking, while other cognitive styles remained consistent across regions. Findings highlight the importance of structured cognitive training, which integrates analytical and intuitive processing to optimize aspirant performance. These insights can inform stress management interventions, personalized study techniques, and policy improvements to support mental well-being and academic success among Civil Service aspirants.

Keywords : Rational-Experiential Information Processing, Rational Information Processing, Experiential Information Processing, Rational Ability, Rational Engagement, Experiential Ability, Experiential Engagement, Resilience, Civil Service Aspirants.

References :

  1. Akbari, M. (2015). The relationship between the Big Five personality factor and resilience with addiction potential among students. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 2(3), 53–66. https://shenakht.muk.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=110&sid=1&slc_lang=en
  2. APA Dictionary of Psychology. (n.d.). American Psychological Association. https://dictionary.apa.org/resilience
  3. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, 2, 89–195.             https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3
  4. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359
  5. Bartone, P. T. (2006). Resilience under stress: The importance of social support. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 8(2), 133-138. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327876mp1803s_10
  6. Bhasin, H. (2024, December 19). Information processing – Definition, tools and stages. Marketing91. https://www.marketing91.com/information-processing/
  7. Bonn, M. A. (2005). The role of intuition in decision-making: A comparison of rational and intuitive approaches. Journal of Business Research, 58(9), 1096-1104 https://doi.org/10.31871/WJRR.9.4.7
  8. Cacoyannis, P. A., & Panagiotidis, T. (2016). Resilience in military contexts: Implications for training and support. Journal of Military Psychology, 28(3), 214-225. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279195370_Resilience_Relevance_to_Military_Context
  9. Cerni, T. (2015). Guided reflection model: How executive coaching can assist organizational leaders enhance their creativity, innovation and wisdom. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-4-17
  10. Coşkun, Y. (2018). A comparative study on university students’ rational and experiential thinking styles in terms of faculty, class level and gender variables. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(9), 1863–1868. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060902
  11. Das, A., & Arora, D. (2020). Positive psychology of resilience: How the big five personality factors mediate resilience. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(1), 55-58. https://www.i-scholar.in/index.php/ijpp/article/view/207063
  12. De la Fuente, J., González-Torres, M. C., Artuch-Garde, R., Vera-Martínez, M. M., Martínez-Vicente, J. M., & Peralta-Sánchez, F. J. (2021). Resilience as a buffering variable between the big five components and factors and symptoms of academic stress at university. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, Article 600240. https://doi.org/xx.xxxx/fpsyt.2021.600240
  13. De la Fuente, J., Santos, F. H., Garzón-Umerenkova, A., Fadda, S., Solinas, G., & Pignata, S. (2021). Cross-sectional study of resilience, positivity and coping strategies as predictors of engagement-burnout in undergraduate students: Implications for prevention and treatment in mental well-being. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, Article 596453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.596453
  14. Dillard, A., & Hisler, G. (2014). Enhancing the effects of a narrative message through experiential information processing: An experimental study. Psychology & Health, 30, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.996565
  15. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709
  16. Ercan, H. (2017). The relationship between resilience and the Big Five personality traits in emerging adulthood. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17(70), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.70.5
  17. Fayombo, G. (2010). The relationship between personality traits and psychological resilience among the Caribbean adolescents. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 2(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v2n2p105
  18. Fleming, J., & Ledogar, R. J. (2008). Resilience, an evolving concept: A review of literature relevant to aboriginal research. Pimatisiwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health, 6(2), 7–23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2956753/
  19. Fletcher, D., & Sarkar, M. (2013). Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. European Psychologist, 18(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000124
  20. Fletcher, J. M., Marks, A. D. G., & Hine, D. W. (2011). Working memory capacity and cognitive styles in decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 1136–1141. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-07120-038
  21. Franklin, T. B., Saab, B. J., & Mansuy, I. M. (2012). Neurobiology of resilience: Interface between mind and body. Biological Psychiatry, 71(4), 307–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.10.018
  22. Freeman, D., Evans, N., & Lister, R. (2012). Gut feelings, deliberative thought, and paranoid ideation: A study of experiential and rational reasoning. Psychiatry Research, 197(1-2), 119–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.031
  23. Garmezy, N. (1991). Resilience and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty. American Behavioral Scientist, 34(4), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764291034004003
  24. Garmezy, N., Masten, A. S., & Tellegen, A. (1961). The study of stress and competence in children: A building block for developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 58(1), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130296
  25. Hofgaard, L. S., Nes, R. B., & Røysamb, E. (2021). Introducing two types of psychological resilience with partly unique genetic and environmental sources. Scientific Reports, 11, 8624. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87581-5
  26. Hurley, K. (2024, July 29). Resilience: A guide to facing life’s challenges, adversities, and crises. Everyday Health. https://www.everydayhealth.com/wellness/resilience/
  27. Iimura, S., & Taku, K. (2018). Gender differences in the relationship between resilience and Big Five personality traits in Japanese adolescents. Psychological Reports, 121(5), 920–931. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117741654
  28. Jokić, B., & Purić, D. (2019). Relating rational and experiential thinking styles with trait emotional intelligence in broader personality space. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1692
  29. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-26535-000
  30. Keaton, S. A. (2017). Rational‐Experiential Inventory‐40 (REI‐40). In Debra Worthington & Graham Bodie (Eds.), Sourcebook of Listening Methodology & Measurement (pp. 530–532). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119102991.ch59
  31. Khosbayar, A., Andrade, M. S., & Miller, R. M. (2022). The relationship between psychological resilience and the Big Five personality traits. International Management Review, 18(1), 5-11. http://www.americanscholarspress.us/journals/IMR/pdf/IMR-1-2022/IMRv8n1-art1.pdf
  32. Klaczynski, P. A., Fauth, J. M., & Swanger, A. (1998). Adolescent identity: Rational vs. experiential processing, formal operations, and critical thinking beliefs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021663712950
  33. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215
  34. Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical research: Planning and design (8th ed.). Pearson. https://journals.sfu.ca/jalt/index.php/jalt/article/download/43/41/167
  35. Liu, H., Zhang, C., Ji, Y., & Yang, L. (2018). Biological and psychological perspectives of resilience: Is it possible to improve stress resistance? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, Article 326. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00326
  36. Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organization behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.165
  37. Luthar, S. S., Doernberger, C. H., & Zigler, E. (1993). Resilience is not a unidimensional construct: Insights from a prospective study of inner-city adolescents. Development and psychopathology, 5(4), 703–717. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006246
  38. Luthar, S. S., Sawyer, J. A., & Brown, P. J. (2006). Conceptual issues in studies of resilience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1376.009
  39. Luthar, S. S., & Latendresse, S. J. (2005). Resilience in affluent youth: The role of protective factors. Child Development, 76(5), 1187–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00811.x
  40. Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164
  41. Luthar, S., Merikangas, K., & Cicchetti, D. (2003). Resilience in children of substance-abusing parents: A normative developmental perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 797–823. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1903337/
  42. Luthar, S., Rosenblum, K., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2006). Resilience in the context of adversity: A resilience framework for understanding the protective factors that enable healthy development. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 565–588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy307
  43. Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in children. American Psychologist, 56, 223–239. https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/amp/56/3/227.html?uid=2001-00465-004
  44. Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227
  45. Masten, A. S. (2014). Resilience: A developmental perspective. In S. R. Cohen & G. W. Evans (Eds.), Perspectives on stress and coping (3rd ed., pp. 169–190). Erlbaum.
  46. McLaughlin, J. E., Cox, W. C., Williams, C. R., & Shepherd, G. (2014). Rational and experiential decision-making preferences of third-year student pharmacists. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(6), Article 120. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe786120
  47. Meredith, L. S., Sherbourne, C. D., Gaillot, S. J., Hansell, L., Ritschard, H. V., Parker, A. M., & Wrenn, G. (2011). Promoting psychological resilience in the U.S. military. RAND Health Quarterly, 1(2), Article 2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28083176/
  48. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
  49. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
  50. Moore, C. (2019, December 30). Resilience theory: A summary of the research. PositivePsychology.com. https://positivepsychology.com/resilience-theory/
  51. Moore, C. (2019, December 30). Resilience theory: A summary of the research. PositivePsychology.com. Retrieved February 27, 2025, from https://positivepsychology.com/resilience-theory/#theory
  52. Moriarty, D. (2015). Information processing. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 11–75). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-420244-3.00002-9
  53. Nakaya, M., Oshio, A., & Kaneko, H. (2006). Correlations for the Adolescent Resilience Scale with Big Five personality traits. Psychological Reports, 98(3), 927–930. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.98.3.927-930
  54. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall.
  55. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Davis, C. G. (1999). "Thanks for sharing that": Ruminators and their social support networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.801
  56. Oshio, A., Taku, K., Hirano, M., & Saeed, G. (2018). Resilience and Big Five personality traits: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.048
  57. Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 972–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972
  58. Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 972–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972
  59. Pangeran, P. (2015). Investor's disposition error at emerging market: Evidence for experiential and rational thinking styles. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5p313
  60. Rhino Wellness Center. (2016, July 2). The 3 P's of resilience: How to bounce back! https://rhinowellnesscenter.com/the-3-ps-of-resilience-how-to-bounce-back/
  61. Rutter, M. (1979). Protective factors in children’s responses to stress and disadvantage. In M. W. Kent & J. E. Rolf (Eds.), Primary prevention of psychopathology: Social competence in children (Vol. 3, pp. 49–74). University Press of New England.
  62. Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57(3), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03541.x
  63. Rutter, M. (2006). Implications of resilience concepts for scientific understanding. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1376.002
  64. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1
  65. Scribbr. (n.d.). What is a research design | Types, guide & examples. Scribbr. Retrieved February 27, 2025, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/research-design/
  66. Shean, M. & Victorian Health Promotion Foundation. (2015). Current theories relating to resilience and young people: A literature review. In Victorian Health Promotion Foundation [Literature review]. Victorian Health Promotion Foundation. https://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/Current-theories-relating-to-resilience-and-young-people.pdf
  67. Stark, E., Baldwin, A. S., Hertel, A. W., & Rothman, A. J. (2017). The role of rational and experiential processing in influencing the framing effect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(3), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1198301
  68. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Cognitive psychology. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  69. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem-solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  70. Twinkl. (n.d.). Resiliency. In Twinkl teaching wiki. Retrieved February 27, 2025, from https://www.twinkl.com/teaching-wiki/resiliency
  71. Ungar, M. (2004). Resilience: A developmental perspective. In S. R. Cohen & G. W. Evans (Eds.), Perspectives on stress and coping (3rd ed., pp. 169–190). Erlbaum.
  72. Ungar, M. (2013). Resilience, trauma, context, and culture. Trauma, violence, & abuse, 14(3), 255-266.https://michaelungar.com/files/15contributions/5._Resilience%2C_Trauma%2C_Context%2C_and_Culture.pdf
  73. Ungar, M., Brown, M., Liebenberg, L., Othman, R., Kwong, W. M., Armstrong, M., & Gilgun, J. (2007). Unique pathways to resilience across cultures. Development and Psychopathology, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579407070018
  74. Wagnild, G. M., & Young, H. M. (1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1(2), 165-178. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7850498/
  75. Werner, E. E. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. McGraw-Hill.
  76. Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1985). Kauai's children come of age: Resiliency in action. University of Hawaii Press.
  77. Wong, K. F. E., Kwong, J. Y. Y., & Ng, C. K. (2008). When thinking rationally increases biases: The role of rational thinking style in escalation of commitment. Applied Psychology, 57(2), 246–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00309.x
  78. Wu, Y., Yu, W., Wu, X., et al. (2020). Psychological resilience and positive coping styles among Chinese undergraduate students: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychology, 8, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00444-y
  79. Yildiz Durak, H. (2023). Examining various variables related to authentic learning self-efficacy of university students in educational online social networks: Creative self-efficacy, rational experiential thinking, and cognitive flexibility. Current Psychology, 42(25), 22093-22102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9188916/
  80. Zimmerman, M. A., & Arunkumar, R. (1994). Resiliency research: Implications for schools and policy. Social Policy Report, 8(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.1994.tb00032.x
  81. Zvi, L., & Cohen-Louck, K. (2023). Exposure to continuous political violence: Rational and experiential thinking styles, coping styles, and post-traumatic stress symptoms. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1113608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.111360

Civil Service aspirants face significant academic pressure, psychological stress, and complex decision-making challenges throughout their journey. Their resilience and rational-experiential information processing play a crucial role in enhancing adaptability, perseverance, and overall success, making it essential to understand their interplay for effective stress management and cognitive flexibility. This study examines the relationship between Rational-Experiential Information Processing and Resilience among Civil Service Aspirants in India. It explores how rational and experiential cognitive styles influence resilience, a crucial trait for aspirants facing intense academic and emotional stress. A descriptive study was conducted with 222 Civil Service aspirants (aged 18–32) from North and South India, selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected via a mixed-mode method using Google Forms and direct approaches using validated psychological scales: the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10) and the 40-item Rational- Experiential Inventory (REI-40). Statistical analyses included ANOVA, Karl Pearson’s Correlation, t-tests, and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. The study found that Resilience is strongly correlated with Rational Information Processing, particularly Rational Ability. Rational Engagement and Experiential Ability also contribute, but Experiential Engagement showed no significant correlation. Gender and education level had no significant impact. First-born individuals had higher Rational Engagement, while older participants (28–32 years) had higher resilience. Experiential Processing varied with age, but rational thinking remained stable. North Indian participants engaged more in Rational Thinking, while other cognitive styles remained consistent across regions. Findings highlight the importance of structured cognitive training, which integrates analytical and intuitive processing to optimize aspirant performance. These insights can inform stress management interventions, personalized study techniques, and policy improvements to support mental well-being and academic success among Civil Service aspirants.

Keywords : Rational-Experiential Information Processing, Rational Information Processing, Experiential Information Processing, Rational Ability, Rational Engagement, Experiential Ability, Experiential Engagement, Resilience, Civil Service Aspirants.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe