Authors : Claridel V. Bijis

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5478vs3v

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2tjrvyjy

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug070

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This qualitative research study examined the reading intervention practices and coping mechanisms of primary grade teachers in addressing the needs of struggling readers in Mati Central District, Division of Mati City. Grounded in a phenomenological approach, the study explored the lived experiences of ten teacher-participants through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. The participants were selected based on their extensive teaching experience and consistent performance in literacy instruction. The analysis revealed three key themes related to reading intervention strategies: recognizing diverse learner needs, utilizing culturally responsive and inclusive practices, and employing multisensory and adaptive instructional techniques. In terms of coping mechanisms for challenges encountered, teachers demonstrated resilience by creating professional collaboration, adapting flexible use of instructional materials and schedules, fostering emotional resilience and reflective practices. Additionally, educational management insights emerged from the study, highlighting the need for data-driven decision-making, flexibility in scheduling and curriculum pacing, and sustainable intervention frameworks. The study offers meaningful implications for improving literacy instruction among struggling readers by providing practical, teacher-informed insights that can inform policy development, teacher training, and school-based reading programs.

Keywords : Reading Intervention; Struggling Readers; Diversity of Learners.

References :

1. Abuya, T., Kitsao-Wekulo, P., & Muhia, N. (2019). Support to Children’s Education in the Urban Slums of Nairobi: Community and Parental Involvement. African Population and Health Research Center. Retrieved from https://aphrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Abuya-Kitsao-Wekulo-Muhia-2018.pdf.
2. Adapon, J., & Mangila, R. (2020). "Navigating Language Barriers in Reading Interventions: The Case of Multilingual Kindergarten Learners in Cebu." Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 50(3), 210-230.
3. Ahmed, S.K.(2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research.Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health. Volume 2, April 2024, 100051
4. Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., & Wagner, R. K. (2020). Individualizing student instruction in reading: Effective strategies for struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.28
5. Allington, R. L. (2021). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs (4th ed.). Pearson.
6. Almendras, A., & Torres, E. (2022). "Impact of Teacher Training on Reading Interventions for Diverse Learners." Philippine Journal of Education Research, 45(3), 90-105.
7. Anderson, C., & Johnson, P. (2021). "Applying Vygotsky’s Theory to Literacy Interventions: The Role of Social Interaction and Scaffolding." Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 193-210.
8. Au, K. H. (2023). Culturally responsive assessment in literacy education. Guilford Press.
9. Barrick, L. (2020). Interviews: In-Depth, Semistructured. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (2nd ed., Vol. 7, pp. 403–404). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10832-7
10. Bean, R. M., & Dole, J. A. (2020). The Reading Specialist: Leadership and Coaching for the Classroom, School, and Community (5th ed.). Guilford Press.
11. Beltman, S., Mansfield, C., & Price, A. (2020). Cultivating teacher resilience: Research and practice for challenging times. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5963-1
12. Bennett, J., Torres, M., & Sullivan, R. (2024). "Technology-Enhanced Reading Interventions: A Review of Evidence-Based Practices for Struggling Readers." Computers & Education, 194, 104569.
13. Besa, C., & Bautista, P. (2019). "Teacher Preparedness in Addressing Diverse Literacy Needs: Insights from Metro Manila Schools." Education Quarterly, 41(1), 75-89.
14. Bhandari, P (2020). What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples.Published on June 19, 2020, by Pritha Bhandari. Revised on September 5, 2024.
15. Birsh, J. R. (Ed.). (2019). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (4th ed.). Brookes Publishing.
16. Birsh, J. R., & Carreker, S. (2020). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (4th ed.). Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
17. Brownell, M. T., Sindelar, P. T., Kiely, M. T., & Danielson, L. C. (2022). Flexible scheduling and resource management in reading interventions. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 35(1), 25–38.
18. CAST. (2019). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from https://udlguidelines.cast.org/
19. Castillo, M., & Mendez, J. (2020). "Targeted Professional Development: Enhancing Teacher Effectiveness in Reading Instruction." Reading Psychology, 41(6), 534-551.
20. Chali, M. T., Eshete, S. K., & Debela, K. L. (2022). Learning How Research Design Methods Work: A Review of Creswell’s Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches.
21. Clark, S. K., & Zygouris-Coe, V. (2020). Supporting emotional well-being through reflective teaching in reading intervention. The Reading Teacher, 74(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1887
22. Coburn, C. E., Hill, H. C., & Spillane, J. P. (2021). Alignment and accountability in policy implementation. Educational Researcher, 50(3), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20983634
23. Collie, R. J., Granziera, H., & Martin, A. J. (2022). Teachers’ well-being and resilience: The roles of school climate and professional support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, 103541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103541
24. Coyne, M. D., Simmons, D. C., Kame’enui, E. J., & Stoolmiller, M. (2022). Improving reading outcomes through response to intervention: A multilevel prevention framework. Exceptional Children, 88(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211025678
25. Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. Sage Publications.
26. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2019). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
27. Cruz, M., Castillo, R., & Reyes, E. (2020). "Comprehensive Literacy Approaches for Struggling Readers: A Review of Effective Practices." Journal of Education and Practice, 11(14), 88-98.
28. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
29. Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2021). Data-driven leadership. Jossey-Bass.
30. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2020). The new lives of teachers. Routledge.
31. De Castro, M., & Miranda, A. (2021). "Challenges in Implementing Culturally Responsive Literacy Programs for Indigenous Learners in Mindanao." Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 32(2), 105-120.
32. De Leon, A., & Santos, M. A. (2021). "Equipping Future Educators: The Impact of Literacy Training in Teacher Preparation Programs." Journal of Education and Practice, 12(3), 45-59.
33. Delve. Ho, L., & Limpaecher, A.(2022). What is Phenomenological Research Design? Essential Guide to Coding Qualitative Data. https://delvetool.com/blog/phenomenology
34. Denton, C. A., Wexler, J., & Vaughn, S. (2020). Individualizing reading intervention with flexible scheduling and materials. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1758492
35. Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2022). Strategic management and instructional coherence: Supporting flexible literacy intervention. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211056972
36. Farrell, T. S. C. (2021). Reflective practice in language teaching: Developments and future directions. Bloomsbury Academic.
37. Ferlazzo, L. (2023). Culturally responsive teaching for struggling readers: Practical strategies. Educational Leadership, 80(6), 42–47.
38. Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2021). Learning Disabilities: From Identification to Intervention (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
39. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2021). Response to intervention and the identification of learning disabilities: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 87(4), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440292110100
40. Fuster-Guillen, D(2019). Qualitative Research: Hermeneutical Phenomenological Method Investigación cualitativa: Método Fenomenológico Hermenéutico.Jan. - Apr. 2019, Vol. 7, N° 1: pp. 201 – 229 ISSN 2307-7999 Monographic: Advances on qualitative research in education e-ISSN 2310-4635 http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n1.267
41. Gay, G. (2020). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. Teachers College Press.
42. Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., & Jayanthi, M. (2020). Meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions for students in the primary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 401–427.
43. Goldenberg, C. (2020). Reading wars, reading science, and English learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, 131–144
44. Gonzales, R., & Reyes, L. (2023). "A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Interventions for Struggling Readers: Implications for Diverse Learners." Reading Psychology, 44(2), 182-207.
45. Goodall, J. (2020). Parental engagement in children's education: A critical overview. Educational Review, 72(3), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1523451
46. Gottardo, A., Chen, X., & Huo, M. R. Y. (2021). Understanding within-and cross-language relations among language, preliteracy skills, and word reading in bilingual learners: Evidence from the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S371–S390.
47. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
48. Gulamhussein, A. (2020). The essential elements of effective intervention programs. Center for Public Education.
49. Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(3), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-06-2019-0107
50. Hindman, A. H., Pendergast, L., & Gooze, R. (2023). Using bifactor models to measure teacher-child interaction quality in early childhood: Evidence from the Caregiver Interaction Scale. Early Childhood Research Quarterly
51. Hinton, L., & Ryan, S. (2020). Interviews. In Qualitative research in health care (pp. 43–55). Wiley Online Books. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119410867.ch4
52. Jennings, P. A., Frank, J. L., Snowberg, K. E., Coccia, M. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2021). Improving classroom learning environments by cultivating awareness and resilience in education (CARE): Results of a randomized controlled trial. School Psychology Quarterly, 36(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000403
53. Jimerson, J. B., Kerr, K. A., & Dembosky, J. W. (2021). Distributed leadership for data use. Routledge.
54. Khalifa, H. and Khalifa H. (2024). Philosophical Assumptions in Communication Qualitative Research: A Scoping Review. Scientific Journal of Radio and Television Research. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsrt.2024.271307.1085. . 2019 Apr 5;8(2):90–97. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
55. Khalifa, H.(2023). Philosophical Assumptions in Communication Qualitative Research:July 2023المجلة العلمية لبحوث الإذاعة والتلفزيون 2023(27):1-26 DOI:10.21608/ejsrt.2023.342674.
56. Kim, Y. S. G., Lee, H., & Zuilkowski, S. S. (2020). Impact of literacy interventions on reading skills in low- and middle-income countries: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 91, 638–660.
57. Kwan, R., De Leon, A., & Reyes, T. (2023). "Response to Intervention: Effectiveness in Supporting Struggling Readers in Elementary Schools." Journal of Learning Disabilities, 56(1), 15-30.
58. Kwon, R., & Santos, M. (2022). "Implementing the Response to Intervention Model for Diverse Learners: Challenges and Opportunities." Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(3), 245-260.
59. Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Asking a different question. Harvard Educational Review, 91(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-91.2.115
60. Lee, J., & Peters, R. (2023). Navigating Challenges in Culturally Responsive Teaching: Insights from Reading Intervention Practices. Reading Psychology, 44(1), 1-18.
61. Lopez, R., & Bautista, C. (2023). "Harnessing Technology: Professional Development for Educators Supporting Struggling Readers." Computers & Education, 201, 104124.
62. Marsh, J. A., Bush-Mecenas, S., & Hough, H. J. (2021). Learning from data use: A research synthesis with implications for practice. Educational Policy, 35(3), 423–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904819888460
63. Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F., & Hamilton, L. S. (2021). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education: Evidence from recent research. RAND Corporation.
64. Martinez, J., Alonzo, R., & Reyes, T. (2022). "The Role of Continuous Professional Development in Enhancing Reading Instruction for Struggling Learners." Teaching and Teacher Education, 111, 103641.
65. McLeskey, J., Barringer, M. D., Billingsley, B., Brownell, M., & Jackson, D. (2021). High-leverage practices in special education: Foundations for effective literacy instruction. Council for Exceptional Children.
66. McNeil W. (2020). The Fate of Phenomenology: Heidegger's Legacy.New Heidegger Research.https://reviews.ophen.org/2021/01/14/william-mcneill-the-fate-of-phenomenology-heideggers-legacy-review/
67. Murphy, S., & Torres, E. (2022). Differentiated Instruction in Culturally Responsive Teaching: Implications for Reading Interventions. Journal of Literacy Research, 54(3), 309-327.
68. Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
69. Nguyen, T., & Lim, J. (2023). "Culturally Responsive Pedagogy: Implications for Teacher Training in Reading Interventions." International Journal of Multicultural Education, 25(1), 44-60.
70. Ortiz, A. A. (2021). Response to intervention (RTI) for English language learners. Corwin.
71. Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2022). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
72. Ramos, J. D., & Del Rosario, N. (2021). "Cultural Disconnect: The Need for Contextualized Reading Materials in Literacy Programs for Indigenous Learners in Davao Oriental." Journal of Philippine Education Studies, 39(2), 145-162.Report, 27(12), 2956-2960. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5901
73. Reutzel, D. R., & Cooter, R. B. (2021). Strategies for reading assessment and instruction: Helping every child succeed (6th ed.). Pearson.
74. Roberts, G. J., Cho, E., Garwood, J. D., Goble, G. H., Robertson, T., & Hodges, A. (2019). Reading interventions for students with reading and behavioral difficulties: A meta-analysis and evaluation of co-occurring difficulties. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 511–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09485-1
75. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2020). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. ASCD.
76. Santiago, L. & Gonzalez, M. (2022). "The Role of Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies in Supporting Struggling Readers." International Journal of Educational Research, 110, 101830.
77. Santiago, L., & Reyes, M. (2024). "Building Capacity Through Collaboration: The Role of Professional Learning Communities in Reading Intervention." Journal of Educational Leadership, 29(2), 119-135.
78. Santos, M. A., & Kim, J. (2021). "Culturally Responsive Teaching: A Key to Improving Reading Outcomes for Diverse Learners." Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 17(1), 25-40.
79. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
80. Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., & Thijs, J. T. (2020). Teacher well-being: The importance of teacher–student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 457–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09485-0
81. Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2019). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.
82. Tomlinson, C. A. (2020). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.
83. Tomlinson, C. A., & Jarvis, J. M. (2022). Differentiation in practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum, instruction, and assessment. ASCD.
84. Wanzek, J., Roberts, G., & Kent, S. C. (2020). Tiered intervention and flexible scheduling: Implementation challenges and outcomes. Reading and Writing, 33(2), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09948-2
85. Williams, A., & Martinez, C. (2024). Bridging Cultures: Integrating Students' Cultural Knowledge in Literacy Instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(2), 234-248.
86. Wood, C., & Fitton, L. (2023). Teacher autonomy and instructional flexibility in reading intervention. The Elementary School Journal, 123(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1086/718225
87. Yin, H., Wang, W., & Lee, J. C. K. (2021). Teacher emotions and professional resilience in the face of student underperformance. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103201