Authors :
Sujay Rao Mandavilli
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/w2mw9xa8
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4phhxkaf
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14637072
Abstract :
We believe that this paper is an important
part and a core constituent of our ongoing globalization
of science movement. Before we move on to the meat and
to the essence of this paper, we commence it by
discussing what evidence is, and also by emphasizing its
importance and value in science. We also discuss
different types of evidence summarily as they are
understood by scientists, researchers and laymen, and
explain what is meant by contradictory evidence as well.
The same exercise is repeated with respect to both data
and paradoxes, and the different types of data and
paradoxes are also scrutinized and analyzed, by drawing
information and inspiration from several of our previous
papers, and also from commonly known and widely
available data and information. The meat and the core
essence of this paper lies in the delineation and the
systematic discussion and exploration of the core
components of this approach, along with the steps
involved, and the raison d’etre for each step. We then
wind up this paper by providing a large number of case
studies and examples, and offering suggestions and
advice on how researcher and scholars must go about
implementing such approaches in the cause and in the
interests of good, high quality and repeatable science.
This will male science must more widely accessible and
palatable to the layperson, and can led to what we have
always called ‘Scientific progress at the speed of light”.
References :
- Operationalizing cross-cultural research design: Practical, cost-effective, and a minimalistic application of cross-cultural research design to minimize cultural bias in research and reconcile diverse viewpoints IJISRT, April 2023, Sujay Rao Mandavilli
- Implementing “Epistemic coherentism” in twentyfirst century science: “Epistemic coherentism” as an essential pre-requisite of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, November 2024
- Popularizing auto-dialectics in scientific endeavour: A potentially productive tool in the interests of better and higher-quality science Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, June 2024
- Bill, Thompson (2007). "2.4 Formal Science and Applied Mathematics". The Nature of Statistical Evidence. Lecture Notes in Statistics. Vol. 189. Springer. p. 15.
- Bunge, Mario (1998). "The Scientific Approach". Philosophy of Science: Volume 1, From Problem to Theory. Vol. 1 (revised ed.). New York: Routledge. pp. 3–50
- Furner, Jonathan (1 June 2003). "Little Book, Big Book: Before and After Little Science, Big Science: A Review Article, Part I". Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 35 (2): 115–125
- Leahey, Thomas Hardy (2018). "The psychology of consciousness". A History of Psychology: From Antiquity to Modernity (8th ed.). New York: Routledge. pp. 219–253
- Unveiling the Sociological Ninety-ten rules for Social Sciences research: Towards better hypothesis formulation in the Social Sciences in the interests of higher quality research and intellectual multi-polarity Sujay Rao Mandavilli Published in IJISRT, February 2023
- Elucidating the Certainty uncertainty principle for the Social Sciences: Guidelines for hypothesis formulation in the Social Sciences for enhanced objectivity and intellectual multi-polarity Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, March 2023
- Paradox identification and paradox resolution in scientific endeavour: Reconciliation of contradictory rule sets in the interests of better theorization and hypothesis-building Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, January 2024
- Altshuller, Genrich (1999). The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation, and technical creativity. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center
- Altshuller, Genrich (1994). And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared. translated by Lev Shulyak. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center
- Emphasizing “integrationism” in twenty-first century science: Another useful tool to generate better scientific paradigms better quality science Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT October 2024
- Building upon “Foundationalism” to achieve the objectives of contemporary science: How this can lead to faster scientific progress and inclusive science Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, October 2024
- Advocating Output Criteria based Scientific and Research Methodologies: why the Reliability of Scientific and Research Methods Must be Measured based on Output Criteria and Attributes, IJISRT, 2023
- Understanding the social and cultural dynamics of science and technology: A social sciences approach for understanding science and technology in relation to society and culture Sujay Rao Mandavilli
- Making the use of Inductive approaches, Nomothetic theorybuilding and the application of Grounded theory widespread in the social sciences: A guide to better research and theorization in the social sciences Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT May 2023
- Forging “Methodological inductivism” in the interests of better science: Encouraging Methodological inductivism as a harbinger of meaningful change in different kinds of scientific endeavour, Sujay Rao Mandavilli, IJISRT, February 2024
- Instituting “Institutional coherentism” as a prerequisite for high-quality science: Another crucial step for winning the battle for consistent high-quality science Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, February 2024
- Orchestrating “Irreducible simplicity” in science and science communication: Positioning “irreducible simplicity” as a vital guiding principle for effective and bona fide science Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, February 2024
- Propounding “Structured innovative thinking techniques for Social Sciences Research”: Why this can be a game changer in social sciences research Sujay Rao Mandavili IJISRT, July 2024
- Widening the scope of social science research to cover global considerations: How “practicalism” can help identify new vistas in social science research Sujay Rao Mandavilli Published in IJISRT, July 2024
- Reducing the ‘latency period’for the acceptance of new scientific ideas: Positioning the ‘latency period’ for the acceptance of scientific ideas as an indicator of scientific maturity , Sujay Rao Mandavilli, IJISRT January 2024
- Abstraction, conceptualization, disambiguation, ideation, innovation, objectivization, quantification, and theorization in the social sciences: New pillars for contemporary social sciences research Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, July 2024
We believe that this paper is an important
part and a core constituent of our ongoing globalization
of science movement. Before we move on to the meat and
to the essence of this paper, we commence it by
discussing what evidence is, and also by emphasizing its
importance and value in science. We also discuss
different types of evidence summarily as they are
understood by scientists, researchers and laymen, and
explain what is meant by contradictory evidence as well.
The same exercise is repeated with respect to both data
and paradoxes, and the different types of data and
paradoxes are also scrutinized and analyzed, by drawing
information and inspiration from several of our previous
papers, and also from commonly known and widely
available data and information. The meat and the core
essence of this paper lies in the delineation and the
systematic discussion and exploration of the core
components of this approach, along with the steps
involved, and the raison d’etre for each step. We then
wind up this paper by providing a large number of case
studies and examples, and offering suggestions and
advice on how researcher and scholars must go about
implementing such approaches in the cause and in the
interests of good, high quality and repeatable science.
This will male science must more widely accessible and
palatable to the layperson, and can led to what we have
always called ‘Scientific progress at the speed of light”.