Authors :
Hudhoodha Waheedh
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3b6wrc4n
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul465
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
Entrepreneurship theories have traditionally revolved around innovation, uncertainty, and finding opportunity.
This is no longer the case with the advent of digital platforms and AI. This research embarks on a systematic theoretical
analysis, tracing the evolution of entrepreneurship over four phases: classical, opportunity, digital, and AI-based. Findings
reveal how entrepreneurial process risk-taking, resource mobilization, and value creation are increasingly influenced by
web-based platforms, AI systems, and sustainability requirements. The paper develops an emergent conceptual framework
aligning technology progress and ecologically aware consideration into theoretical harmony and applied synergy regarding
the development of entrepreneurship strategies to the globally integrated, AI-powered, connected economy.
Keywords :
Entrepreneurship Development, Entrepreneurship Definition, Entrepreneurship Evolution, Digital Business.
References :
- Almansour, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence and resource optimization: A study of Fintech start-ups. Resources Policy, 79, 103250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103250
- Aldrich, H. E., & Wiedenmayer, G. (1993). From traits to rates: An ecological perspective on organizational foundings. In J. A. Katz & R. H. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol. 1, pp. 145–195). JAI Press.
- Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4
- Amit, R., Glosten, L., & Muller, E. (1993). Challenges to theory development in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management Studies, 30(5), 815–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00327.x
- Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2021). Towards an entrepreneurial ecosystem typology for regional economic development: The role of creative class and entrepreneurship. Regional Studies, 55(4), 735–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1854711
- Autio, E., & Levie, J. (2017). Management of entrepreneurial ecosystems. In G. Ahmetoglu, T. Chamorro-Premuzic, B. Klinger, & T. Karcisky (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Entrepreneurship (Chapter 19). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118970812.ch19
- Berglund, H. (2005). Toward a theory of entrepreneurial action: Exploring risk, opportunity and self in technology entrepreneurship [Doctoral dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237713477
- Bigliardi, B., Dolci, V., Filippelli, S., Petroni, A., & Pini, B. (2025). The role of digitalization in startups: A keyword-based literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 253, 2665–2673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.01.326
- Csaszar, F. A., Ketkar, H., & Kim, H. (2024). Artificial intelligence and strategic decision-making: Evidence from entrepreneurs and investors. Strategy Science. (Forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2024.XXXX
- Donaldson, C., Peiró Signes, Á., & Villagrasa, J. (2025). Is the road to high growth paved with intrapreneurial intention? The role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and digital skills on entrepreneurship intention types. The International Journal of Management Education, 23, 101174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101174
- Farrell, M., Skorodziyevskiy, V., & Willis, C. H. (2025). Analytic induction: A novel approach in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 23, e00527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00527
- Fossen, F. M., McLemore, T., & Sorgner, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence and entrepreneurship (IZA Discussion Paper No. 17055). Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/17055
- Fraccastoro, S., Vanninen, H., & Gabrielsson, M. (2025). Two decades of research on digitalization, entrepreneurship, and internationalization: What foundations do they provide for research on digital entrepreneurial internationalization? International Business Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102455
- Ganuthula, V. R. R. (2025). The solo revolution: A theory of AI-enabled individual entrepreneurship [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.00009
- Gartner, W. B. (1988). “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 11–32.
- George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2021). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899425
- Giones, F., & Brem, A. (2017). Digital technology entrepreneurship: A definition and research agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(5), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1076
- Guerrero, M., & Siegel, D. S. (2024). Schumpeter meets Teece: Proposed metrics for assessing entrepreneurial innovation and dynamic capabilities in entrepreneurial ecosystems in an emerging economy. Research Policy, 53, 104984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.104984
- Huang, Y., Li, P., Bu, Y., & Zhao, G. (2023). What entrepreneurial ecosystem elements promote sustainable entrepreneurship? Journal of Cleaner Production, 422, 138459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138459
- Jung, Y., & Pawlowski, S. (2015). The meaning of virtual entrepreneurship in social virtual worlds. Telematics and Informatics, 32(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.07.002
- Lindquist, M. J., & Vladasel, T. (2025). Are entrepreneurs more upwardly mobile? Journal of Business Venturing, 40, 106498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106498
- Loucã, F. (2014). The elusive concept of innovation for Schumpeter, Marschak and the early econometricians. Research Policy, 43(8), 1442–1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.002
- Mariani, M. M., Machado, I., & Nambisan, S. (2023). Types of innovation and artificial intelligence: A systematic quantitative literature review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113364
- McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379628
- McMullen, J. S., Fitzsimmons, J. R., Shetty, K., & Ramoglou, S. (2024). A temporal typology of entrepreneurial opportunities: Implications for the optimal timing of entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 39, 106356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106356
- Miah, M. T., Aiupova, N., Erdei-Gally, S., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2025). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystems: Then vs. now—a future perspectives. Digital Business, 5, 100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100110
- Nambisan, S. (2016). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
- Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
- Obschonka, M., Grégoire, D. A., Nikolaev, B., Ooms, F., Lévesque, M., Pollack, J. M., & Behrend, T. S. (2024). Artificial intelligence and entrepreneurship: A call for research to prospect and establish the scholarly AI frontiers. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 49(3), 620–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587241304676
- Relente, A. R. R., & Capistrano, E. P. S. (2025). Innovation self-efficacy, theory of planned behavior, and entrepreneurial intentions: The perspective of young Filipinos. Asia Pacific Management Review, 30, 100350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2024.100350
- Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
- Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682
- Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
- Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(Special Issue: Corporate Entrepreneurship), 17–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486667
- Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
- Tang, X., Du, S., & Deng, W. (2025). Business innovation in digital startups: A case study of an AI startup. International Review of Economics and Finance, 98, 103898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103898
- Tian, S., Sharma, A., Wu, L., & Pawar, K. S. (2024). A systematic literature review on the digital platform and its role in the circular economy: State-of-the-art and future research directions. Journal of Digital Economy, 3, 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2024.12.001
- Tülüce, N. S., & Koç Yurtkur, A. (2015). Term of strategic entrepreneurship and Schumpeter's creative destruction theory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 720–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.146
- Uriarte, S., Baier-Fuentes, H., Espinoza-Benavides, J., & Inzunza-Mendoza, W. (2025). Artificial intelligence technologies and entrepreneurship: A hybrid literature review. Review of Managerial Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00839-4
- Van Praag, M. (1999). Some classic views on entrepreneurship. De Economist, 147(3), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003749128457
- Wang, T., Libaers, D., Yang, X., & Hu, L. (2025). Publishing top entrepreneurship research: A dilemma for entrepreneurship scholars. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 23, e00523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00523
- Wei, C.-P., Fang, E. S.-H., Yang, C.-S., & Liu, P.-J. (2025). To shine or not to shine: Startup success prediction by exploiting technological and venture-capital-related features. Information & Management, 62, 104152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2025.104152
- Zander, U., Lu, L., & Chimenti, G. (2025). The platform economy and futures of market societies: Salient tensions in ecosystem evolution. Journal of Business Research, 189, 115037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115037
Entrepreneurship theories have traditionally revolved around innovation, uncertainty, and finding opportunity.
This is no longer the case with the advent of digital platforms and AI. This research embarks on a systematic theoretical
analysis, tracing the evolution of entrepreneurship over four phases: classical, opportunity, digital, and AI-based. Findings
reveal how entrepreneurial process risk-taking, resource mobilization, and value creation are increasingly influenced by
web-based platforms, AI systems, and sustainability requirements. The paper develops an emergent conceptual framework
aligning technology progress and ecologically aware consideration into theoretical harmony and applied synergy regarding
the development of entrepreneurship strategies to the globally integrated, AI-powered, connected economy.
Keywords :
Entrepreneurship Development, Entrepreneurship Definition, Entrepreneurship Evolution, Digital Business.