Authors :
Dr. Mabihi Shuping
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 7 - July
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/36e5eyuk
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/ms76wy45
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1758
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This paper seeks to first delve deeper into the
meaning of a learning organizations. I select some
meanings from literature by dedicated scholars, but focus
more on Peter Senge’s five disciplines which gained
popularity in terms of his viewpoint that although there is
no consensus on the meaning of learning organizations,
there is a converging view that continuous learning and
active involvement of all stakeholders play a pivotal role
in learning organization. From the outset, I acknowledge
that there are many meanings that are contributed by
dedicated scholars on the subject but choose meanings
that I consider to provide a clearer meaning based on the
context. Then I offer an analysis of the school (henceforth
referred to apropos: school X throughout the discussion in
this paper) as a learning organizational context by
identifying language barrier as a gap that hinders the
dissemination of information in that school. I label this as
a gap cautiously because the issues relating to language
barrier and dissemination of information in school X are
not problems as in the sense of them being wrong and
needing to be fixed, but I consider them to be gaps that
require enterprising and innovative ideas by everyone in
school X to close down, hence the expediency of a
redefinition.
Keywords :
Learning, Organizations, Language barrier, Dissemination, Information.
References :
- Argyris, C. (2002). Double-loop learning, teaching and research. Academy of Management Learning and Education. 1(2):206-218.
- Argyris, C., & Schön, D.A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
- Berrell, M., & Wrathall, J. (2001). A model for Chinese management education: Adapting the case study method to transfer management knowledge. In Cross Cultural Management Journal. 1(8):28-44.
- Bratianu, C. (2015). Organizational Knowledge Dynamics: Managing knowledge creation, acquisition, sharing and transformation. Hershey. IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8318-1.ch012.
- Cummings, T., Worley, G. (2006): Organization Development & Change.
- Gallos. Organization Development: A Jossey Bass Reader. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
- Heftberger, S. & Stary, S. (2004). Partizipatives organisationales Lernen, Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitatsverlag.
- Karanikola, Z., Zogopoulos,C. & Panagiotopoulos, G. (2018). The learning organisation according to Senge: Recording and valiadation of the park research tool in primary education schools in the prefecture of Ilia. European Centre of Human Resource Management 5(6):1-19
- Knipp, A. (2014). Learning by knowing, Hamburg: Diplomica GmbH.
- Senge, P.M. (2011). Die funte Disziplin, 11., vollig uberarbeitete and atualisierte Aufl.,Stuttgart:Schaffer-Poeschel Verlag.
- Lacey, M. Y. (1995). Internal consulting: Perspectives on the process of planned change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 8(3), 75-84.
- Mulili, B. M., & Wong, P. (2011). Continuous organizational development (COD). Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(6), 377-384.
- Ogbeiwi, O. (2017). Why written objectives need to be really SMART. British Journal of Healthcare Management. 23(7):321-336.
- Orsae-Larbi, J.A., & Asumeng, M.A. (2015). Organization Development models: A critical review and implications for creating learning organizations. European Journal of Training and Development Studies. 3(2):29-43.
- Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J., and Boydell, T. (1989). 'Towards the learning company'. Management Education and Development, 20(1), 1-8.
- Poell, R. F. (1999). The learning organisation: A critical evaluation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312072289
- Senge, P. (1999). The fifth discipline. The art & practice of the learning organisation. London, UK: Random House.
- Unger, H. (2002). Organisationales Lernen durch Teams, 2., verbesserte Auflage, Mering: Rainer Hampp Verlag.
- Vavrek, R. (2018). Efficiency and inefficiency of public administration. In Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People (Vol. 7, Issue 1).
- Wahren, H. E. (1996). Das lernende Unternehmen. Theorie und Praxis des organisationalen Lernens, Berlin: Verlag Walter de Gruyter.
This paper seeks to first delve deeper into the
meaning of a learning organizations. I select some
meanings from literature by dedicated scholars, but focus
more on Peter Senge’s five disciplines which gained
popularity in terms of his viewpoint that although there is
no consensus on the meaning of learning organizations,
there is a converging view that continuous learning and
active involvement of all stakeholders play a pivotal role
in learning organization. From the outset, I acknowledge
that there are many meanings that are contributed by
dedicated scholars on the subject but choose meanings
that I consider to provide a clearer meaning based on the
context. Then I offer an analysis of the school (henceforth
referred to apropos: school X throughout the discussion in
this paper) as a learning organizational context by
identifying language barrier as a gap that hinders the
dissemination of information in that school. I label this as
a gap cautiously because the issues relating to language
barrier and dissemination of information in school X are
not problems as in the sense of them being wrong and
needing to be fixed, but I consider them to be gaps that
require enterprising and innovative ideas by everyone in
school X to close down, hence the expediency of a
redefinition.
Keywords :
Learning, Organizations, Language barrier, Dissemination, Information.