Regulating Compassion: A Policy Analysis of India’s Modern Stray Dog Framework


Authors : Ajita Tiwari; Dr. Reshma Umair

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 12 - December


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2natrvns

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ypdrwece

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25dec539

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : Stray dog management in India has long been a subject of public debate, legal intervention, and ethical concern. Increasing dog-bite incidents, rapid urbanization, and expanding human–animal interfaces have intensified the need for clear and humane regulations. Recent judicial developments have attempted to balance two often conflicting concerns: public safety and animal welfare. This research paper examines India’s evolving policy framework on stray dog management, with a particular focus on feeding rules, sterilization programmes, municipal responsibilities, and citizen obligations. Through a qualitative review of legal documents, public data, and policy reports, the study explores both the positive and negative implications of the new guidelines. The research further analyses the social significance of structured feeding zones, the strengthening of Animal Birth Control (ABC) programs, and the impact on public behaviour and welfare organizations. Challenges related to implementation, public misunderstanding, and administrative limitations are also discussed. Comparative insights from other countries highlight potential improvements for India. Overall, the study concludes that humane coexistence between humans and stray dogs is possible but requires coordinated efforts across civic bodies, communities, and policymakers.

Keywords : Stray Dogs, Public Safety, Animal Welfare, Sterilization Policy, Feeding Regulations, Municipal Governance.

References :

  1. Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, 2001. (2001). Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India.
  2. Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Amendment Rules. (2023). Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India.
  3. Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. (1960). Government of India.
  4. National Centre for Disease Control. (2022). National Rabies Control Programme Annual Report. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. https://ncdc.gov.in
  5. Municipal Solid Waste Management Rules. (2016). Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India.
  6. Animal Welfare Board of India v. A. Nagaraja & Ors., (2014) 7 SCC 547 (Supreme Court of India).
  7. People for Elimination of Stray Troubles v. State of Goa, (2011) (Bombay High Court).
  8. Animal Welfare Board of India v. People for Elimination of Stray Troubles, (2016) (Supreme Court of India).
  9. Shri Mahesh Chand Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2006) (Supreme Court of India).
  10. World Health Organization. (2010). WHO & WSPA Dog Population Management Guidelines. WHO Press.
  11. World Organisation for Animal Health. (2019). Terrestrial Animal Health Code: Chapter 7.7 – Stray Dog Population Control. OIE.
  12. Reece, J. F., & Chawla, S. K. (2006). Control of rabies in Jaipur, India, by the sterilisation and vaccination of neighbourhood dogs. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 53(1), 1–5.
  13. Morters, M. K., et al. (2013). The demography of free-roaming dog populations and implications for rabies control. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 7(11), e2553.
  14. Singh, R., et al. (2017). Status and trends of canine rabies in India. Indian Journal of Public Health, 61(4), 295–302.
  15. Tiwari, H. K., et al. (2018). Prevalence of dog bites in India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 43(2), 104–109.
  16. Totton, S. C., et al. (2010). Stray dog population dynamics in India. BMC Veterinary Research, 6(1), 57.
  17. Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations (FIAPO). (2020). India’s Stray Dog Crisis: Policy Assessment Report.
  18. Humane Society International—India. (2019). Humane Dog Population Management in Urban India.
  19. Blue Cross of India. (2018). ABC Program Implementation Report.
  20. The Hindu. (2023). India records over 1.8 crore dog bites in 2022–23. The Hindu National Desk.
  21. Indian Express. (2023). Rising dog bite cases spark debate over stray dog policies. The Indian Express.
  22. Times of India. (2022). Garbage mismanagement behind dog attacks: Experts. The Times of India.
  23. The News Minute. (2022). Kerala’s stray dog crisis deepens amid weak ABC implementation. The News Minute.
  24. Turkish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. (2018). Turkey’s Sterilise–Vaccinate–Release Stray Dog Policy.
  25. Animal & Veterinary Service Singapore. (2020). AVS Guidelines on Animal Management.

Stray dog management in India has long been a subject of public debate, legal intervention, and ethical concern. Increasing dog-bite incidents, rapid urbanization, and expanding human–animal interfaces have intensified the need for clear and humane regulations. Recent judicial developments have attempted to balance two often conflicting concerns: public safety and animal welfare. This research paper examines India’s evolving policy framework on stray dog management, with a particular focus on feeding rules, sterilization programmes, municipal responsibilities, and citizen obligations. Through a qualitative review of legal documents, public data, and policy reports, the study explores both the positive and negative implications of the new guidelines. The research further analyses the social significance of structured feeding zones, the strengthening of Animal Birth Control (ABC) programs, and the impact on public behaviour and welfare organizations. Challenges related to implementation, public misunderstanding, and administrative limitations are also discussed. Comparative insights from other countries highlight potential improvements for India. Overall, the study concludes that humane coexistence between humans and stray dogs is possible but requires coordinated efforts across civic bodies, communities, and policymakers.

Keywords : Stray Dogs, Public Safety, Animal Welfare, Sterilization Policy, Feeding Regulations, Municipal Governance.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe