Authors : Titik Endang Rahayu; Pawito; Y. Slamet

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2s4cezj9

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/e28undcv

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun2068

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Islamic parenting is now widely delivered through digital webinars, but few studies have examined how such material represents ideal communication between parents and adolescents. This study aims to analyze how parents, adolescents, and communication patterns between them are represented in Islamic parenting webinar material titled "Communication Guide for Parents and Adolescents." The study used a qualitative approach using the Qualitative Document Analysis method as formulated by Bowen, with units of analysis consisting of sentences, narratives, communication examples, and parenting principles within the webinar material. Data were analyzed through open coding to form categories and themes, then interpreted using Stuart Hall's representation theory and Berger and Luckmann's theory of the social construction of reality. The analysis revealed four main themes: the representation of ideal parents through empathy, reflection, and relational connection; the representation of adolescents as developing individuals in need of understanding; the representation of ideal communication through emotional validation and two-way dialogue; and the integration of contemporary psychological knowledge with Islamic moral values as the basis for legitimizing recommended communication. This study contributes to expanding the study of family communication and digital religion by demonstrating how religious authority and knowledge Modern psychology blends together to form a discourse on ideal parenting in the digital space.

Keywords : Parent–Teen Communication, Islamic Parenting, Representation, Family Communication, Digital Webinar.

References :

1. E. Fitriana, S. H. Fadillah, and F. A. Abidin, “Parenting Adolescents: Parent-Teen Communication Training,” Abdimas J. Pengabdi. Masy. Univ. Merdeka Malang, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 751–759, 2023, doi: 10.26905/abdimas.v8i4.11148.
2. H. Wei and Z. Su, “The Ways of Communication with Parents and The Parenting Styles During Adolescence,” J. Educ. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 7, pp. 144–147, 2023, doi: 10.54097/ehss.v7i.4076.
3. K. M. Sievwright, C. Moreau, M. Li, A. Ramaiya, J. Gayles, and R. W. Blum, “Adolescent–Parent Relationships and Communication: Consequences for Pregnancy Knowledge and Family Planning Service Awareness,” J. Adolesc. Heal., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. S43–S54, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.09.034.
4. D. O. Braithwaite and L. A. Baxter, Eds., “Engaging Theories in Family Communication: Multiple Perspectives,” 2006, Sage Publications.
5. A. L. Vangelisti, The routledge Handbook of Family Communication. Routledge, 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203848166.
6. S. Livingstone and A. Blum-Ross, Parenting for a Digital Future: How Hopes and Fears About Technology Shape Children’s Lives. Oxford University Press, 2020.
7. P. Siuda, “Mapping Digital Religion: Exploring the Need for New Typologies,” Religions, vol. 12, no. 373, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.3390/rel12060373.
8. A. M. R. Maulana, “Agama Digital (Digital Religion) dan Relevansinya Terhadap Studi Agama Interdisipliner: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur,” At-Tafkir J. Pendidikan, Huk. dan Sos. Keagamaan, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 162–183, 2022, doi: 10.32505/at.v15i2.4821.
9. Q. Gao, O. Woods, L. Kong, and S. Y. Shee, “Lived religion in a Digital Age: Technology , Affect and the Pervasive Space-Times of ‘New’ Religious Praxis,” Soc. Cult. Geogr., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 29–48, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14649365.2022.2121979.
10. S. E. Zaluchu, “Theological Insight of Digital Religion,” Bogosl. Vestn., vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 597–610, 2023, doi: 10.34291/BV2023/03/Zaluchu.
11. C. N. Maghfiroh, S. Komariatin, C. N. Chasanah, M. Sihabuddin, M. M. AS, and M. N. Rohman, “Islamic Parenting dalam Mendidik Anak Di Era Modern Menurut Perspektif Islam,” Prax. J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 111–116, 2023, doi: 10.47776/praxis.v2i2.766.
12. T. Amalia, F. Lasmi, R. Septiani, M. A. Putri, and Y. F. Putri, “Parenting Islami dan Kedudukan Anak dalam Islam,” J. Multidisipliner Bharasumba, vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 156–163, 2022, doi: 10.25157/ag.v6i2.15828.
13. M. S. Machfudh, “Islamic Parenting Style sebagai Solusi Anak Menghadapi Fase Quarter-life Crisis,” J. Psikol. Islam, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 35–42, 2020, doi: 10.47399/jpi.v7i2.95.

14. F. Robiansyah, F. A. Zahra, R. S. Lutfiiah, and S. Zailanty, “Islamic Parenting dalam Mendidik Anak di Era Modern Menurut Perspektif Islam,” J. Wan. dan Kel., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 79–92, 2024, doi: 10.22146/jwk.13672.
15. N. L. Solikhah and M. A. Al-Achsanah, “Digital Religion: Praktik Keagamaan dalam Dunia Digital Kasus Amerika Serika,” Al-Hikmah  J. Stud. Agama-Agama, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 29–44, 2025.
16. S. Hall, J. Evans, and S. Nixon, “Representation (Second Edition),” 2013, Sage.
17. P. L. Berger and T. Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966.
18. G. A. Bowen, “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method,” Qual. Res. J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 27–40, 2009, doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027.