Authors : Ebuka Emmanuel Ajaegbu; Simon-Jude Mmayie

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/33sak7a3

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mr23e7fy

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct380

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : Agency theory provides a critical framework for analysing the contractual relationship between principals, such as shareholders, and agents, including managers and executives. While agents are entrusted to act in the best interests of principals, conflicts frequently arise due to divergent objectives, information asymmetry, and differing risk appetites. These agency conflicts generate monitoring costs, reduce accountability, and threaten organisational performance. This paper adopts a conceptual research design, drawing on secondary sources including academic literature, regulatory frameworks, professional standards, and case studies from global and Nigerian contexts. Through a thematic analysis, it explores the evolution of agency theory, examines mechanisms traditionally used to mitigate principal–agent conflicts, and emphasises the unique role of internal audit as a governance safeguard. The findings highlight that internal audit reduces information asymmetry, lowers monitoring costs, and enhances transparency and accountability, thereby aligning managerial actions with shareholder interests. Case illustrations, such as Enron, WorldCom, and Cadbury Nigeria, demonstrate how weak internal audit functions exacerbate agency problems. The paper contributes by integrating internal audit directly into the agency theory framework and concludes with recommendations for strengthening audit independence, embedding risk management practices, and adapting audit functions to emerging governance challenges.

Keywords : Agency Theory, Principal Agent Conflict, Internal Audit, Corporate Governance, Agency Costs, Information Asymmetry, Stakeholder Confidence.

References :

1. Alzeban, A. (2020). The impact of internal audit function effectiveness on financial reporting quality: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(3), 437 454. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR 09 2018 0149
2. Allegrini, M., & Greco, G. (2021). Corporate governance, internal audit, and firm performance: Evidence from European listed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(5), 651 674. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ 08 2020 2793
3. Cadbury Nigeria Plc. (2006). Annual reports and accounts. Lagos: Cadbury Nigeria Plc.
4. Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). (2009). Special examination of banks report. Abuja: Central Bank of Nigeria.
5. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57 74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
6. Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria (FRCN). (2018). Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance. Abuja: FRCN.
7. Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2017). International standards for the professional practice of internal auditing (Standards). Altamonte Springs, FL: IIA.
8. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305 360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304 405X(76)90026 X
9. Kabuye, F., Nkundabanyanga, S., Opiso, J., & Akisimire, R. (2021). Internal audit function, audit committee effectiveness, and accountability in public sector organizations. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 33(2), 123 145. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM 02 2020 0027
10. Lenz, R., & Jeppesen, K. K. (2022). The Future of Internal Auditing: Gardener of Governance. Edpacs, 66(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2022.2036314
11. Organisation for Economic Co operation and Development (OECD). (2015). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264236882 en
12. PwC. (2023). State of the Internal Audit Profession Study: Internal audit in a world of disruption. PwC Global. https://www.pwc.com
13. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107 204, 116 Stat. 745 (2002).
14. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2011). Code of corporate governance for public companies in Nigeria. Abuja: SEC.
15. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737 783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540 6261.1997.tb04820.x
16. Tirole, J. (2006). The theory of corporate finance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. WorldCom, Inc. (2002). Securities and Exchange Commission litigation release no. 17829. Washington, DC: SEC.
18. Enron Corp. (2001). U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission complaint. Washington, DC: SEC.
19. Berle, A. and Means, G. (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Commerce Clearing House, New York.