Risk Assessment Models Identify Potential Supply Chain Disruptions Through Scenario Analysis Monte Carlo Simulation Predictive Analytics


Authors : Benjamin Yaw Kokroko; Joseph Kobi; Edmund Kofi Yeboah

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/y989pm8c

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/5979y9r2

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct1432

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : The modern global supply chains are more vulnerable to disruptions than ever due to their complex geographically distributed designs. This in-depth research evaluates three advanced analytical tools, scenario analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, and predictive analytics, and their application to the problem of supply chain disruption to prevent its development into an operational crisis. This study shows how organizations use these methods to quantify the disruption probabilities, vulnerability exposure and mitigation strategies by using systematic literature review, quantitative modeling, and empirical case analysis. Monte Carlo simulation can be used to give probabilistic quantification of risks in multi-tier supply networks and, through this approach, produce probability distributions of possible outcomes in the thousands of possible outcomes. Scenario analysis allows the strategic assessment of the possible disruption pathways based on systematic exploration of the possible what-if. Using machine learning algorithms and patterns of historical data, predictive analytics provides real-time functionality of risk detection. Findings have shown that hybrid methods which incorporate both these methods can have high predictive accuracy (76-86%), which is better than single-method methods. The analysis of the applications in the manufacturing, healthcare, and food supply chain shows that there are sector-related profiles of risks and mitigation needs. Results indicate the sensitivity of the lower-level visibility of suppliers since the disturbance of Tier 3 is transmitted upstream through supply chains with exponential impacts, worsening the average performance of 97.8% at the origin to 51.1% at the manufacturer stage. The study adds an elaborate framework of unifying these methodologies into organizational risk management procedures that would give the practitioners realistic guidelines to apply in implementing data-driven disruption prevention measures. This research study contributes to the theory on supply chain risk management by showing how quantitative modeling methodologies can convert reactive approaches to crises management to proactive resilience.

Keywords : Supply Chain Disruption, Monte Carlo Simulation, Scenario Analysis, Predictive Analytics, Supply Chain Resilience, Vulnerability Assessment, Probabilistic Modeling, Machine Learning Risk Detection, Multi-Tier Supply Networks, Disaster Recovery Planning.

References :

  1. Wilson, M. C. (2007). The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(4), 295-320. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249921325_A_Monte_Carlo_simulation_model_of_supply_chain_risk_due_to_natural_disasters
  2. Gładysz, B., Skorupka, D., Kuchta, D., & Duchaczek, A. (2017). Supply chain risk management by Monte Carlo method. Modern Technologies in Industrial Engineering V (ModTech2017), 178, 04006. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321976195_SUPPLY_CHAIN_RISK_MANAGEMENT_BY_MONTE_CARLO_METHOD
  3. Ramezankhani, M. J., Torabi, S. A., & Vahidi, F. (2018). Supply chain performance measurement and evaluation: A mixed sustainability and resilience approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 126, 531-548. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270242228_Monte_Carlo_Simulation_Based_Approach_to_Manage_Risks_in_Operational_Networks_in_Green_Supply_Chain
  4. Ramasesh, R. V., Ord, J. K., Hayya, J. C., & Pan, A. (1991). Sole versus dual sourcing in stochastic lead-time (s, Q) inventory models. Management Science, 37(4), 428-443. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237842639_Monte_carlo_simulation_based_performance_analysis_of_supply_chains
  5. Gharehgozli, A. H., Rabbani, M., Zaerpour, N., & Razmi, J. (2008). A comprehensive decision-making structure for acceptance/rejection of incoming orders in make-to-order environments. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(9-10), 1016-1032. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338169261_A_monte_carlo_simulation_for_reliability_estimation_of_logistics_and_supply_chain_networks
  6. Schmitt, A. J., & Singh, M. (2012). A quantitative analysis of disruption risk in a multi-echelon supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1), 22-32. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Quantifying-supply-chain-disruption-risk-using-and-Schmitt-Singh/9653f3d31f14eeb83d2d5511d91886b01e8d8eb9
  7. Qazi, A., Dickson, A., Quigley, J., & Gaudenzi, B. (2018). Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 196, 24-42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359144285_Supply_chain_risk_network_value_at_risk_assessment_using_Bayesian_belief_networks_and_Monte_Carlo_simulation
  8. Goh, M., Lim, J. Y., & Meng, F. (2007). A stochastic model for risk management in global supply chain networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1), 164-173. https://informs-sim.org/wsc05papers/202.pdf
  9. Kumar, S., & Singh, R. (2024). The role of predictive analytics in supply chain optimization. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 13(2), 45-67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383148496_The_role_of_predictive_analytics_in_supply_chain_optimization
  10. Cavalcante, I. M., Frazzon, E. M., Forcellini, F. A., & Ivanov, D. (2019). A supervised machine learning approach to data-driven simulation of resilient supplier selection in digital manufacturing. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 86-97. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337282451_Supply_chain_data_analytics_for_predicting_supplier_disruptions_a_case_study_in_complex_asset_manufacturing
  11. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021). Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), 110-128. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374849416_Predictive_Analytics_and_Machine_Learning_for_Real-Time_Supply_Chain_Risk_Mitigation_and_Agility
  12. Sharma, M., Luthra, S., Joshi, S., & Kumar, A. (2022). Implementing challenges of artificial intelligence: Evidence from public manufacturing sector of an emerging economy. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101624. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383035770_Predictive_analytics_on_artificial_intelligence_in_supply_chain_optimization
  13. Baryannis, G., Validi, S., Dani, S., & Antoniou, G. (2019). Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: State of the art and future research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2179-2202. https://epublications.marquette.edu/context/mgmt_fac/article/1336/viewcontent/barratt_13574.pdf
  14. Sodhi, M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2019). Research opportunities in supply chain transparency. Production and Operations Management, 28(12), 2946-2959. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378872101_Reviewing_predictive_analytics_in_supply_chain_management_Applications_and_benefits
  15. Choi, T. M., Wallace, S. W., & Wang, Y. (2018). Big data analytics in operations management. Production and Operations Management, 27(10), 1868-1883. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387903364_Leveraging_Artificial_Intelligence_for_predictive_supply_chain_management_focus_on_how_AI-driven_tools_are_revolutionizing_demand_forecasting_and_inventory_optimization
  16. Hofmann, E., & Rutschmann, E. (2018). Big data analytics and demand forecasting in supply chains: A conceptual analysis. International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(2), 739-766. https://intapi.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/picbe-2023-0090
  17. Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2019). Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125, 285-307. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266732582300095X
  18. Kamalahmadi, M., & Parast, M. M. (2016). A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. International Journal of Production Economics, 171(Part 1), 116-133. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896316310564
  19. Li, Y., Chen, K., Collignon, S., & Ivanov, D. (2021). Ripple effect in the supply chain network: Forward and backward disruption propagation, network health and firm vulnerability. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(3), 1117-1131. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363865025_Resilience_Assessment_and_Risk_Prediction_in_Supply_Chain_Management_Based_on_Network_Analysis
  20. Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2904-2915. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7261049/
  21. Queiroz, M. M., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2022). Impacts of epidemic outbreaks on supply chains: Mapping a research agenda amid the COVID-19 pandemic through a structured literature review. Annals of Operations Research, 319, 1159-1196. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-024-06126-x
  22. Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J., & Grawe, S. (2015). Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management, 33-34, 111-122. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/76/1/41
  23. Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278712727_Supply_Chain_Risk_Management_Resilience_and_Business_Continuity
  24. Shishodia, A., Sharma, R., Rajesh, R., & Munim, Z. H. (2023). Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future research. International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(4), 879-908. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667325824003108
  25. Fan, Y., & Stevenson, M. (2018). A review of supply chain risk management: Definition, theory, and research agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(3), 205-230. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7283689/
  26. Aldrighetti, R., Zennaro, I., Finco, S., & Battini, D. (2024). Healthcare supply chain simulation with disruption considerations: A case study from Northern Italy. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 25(Suppl 1), 1-17. https://arxiv.org/html/2401.10895v2
  27. Fahimnia, B., Tang, C. S., Davarzani, H., & Sarkis, J. (2015). Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.034
  28. Giannakis, M., & Louis, M. (2016). A multi-agent based system with big data processing for enhanced supply chain agility. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(5), 706-727. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-06-2015-0050
  29. Giannoccaro, I., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2002). Inventory management in supply chains: A reinforcement learning approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 78(2), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00156-0
  30. Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill.
  31. Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117-2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261
  32. Tao, F., Qi, Q., Liu, A., & Kusiak, A. (2018). Data-driven smart manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 48(Part C), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.006
  33. Cachon, G. P., & Netessine, S. (2004). Game theory in supply chain analysis. In D. Simchi-Levi, S. D. Wu, & Z. J. Shen (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis (pp. 13-66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-7953-5_2
  34. Brintrup, A., Pak, J., Ratiney, D., Pearce, T., Wichmann, P., Woodall, P., & McFarlane, D. (2020). Supply chain data analytics for predicting supplier disruptions: A case study in complex asset manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 58(11), 3330-3341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1685705
  35. Mulvey, J. M., Vanderbei, R. J., & Zenios, S. A. (1995). Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Operations Research, 43(2), 264-281. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.43.2.264
  36. Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829-846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086
  37. Jaberidoost, M., Nikfar, S., Abdollahiasl, A., & Dinarvand, R. (2013). Pharmaceutical supply chain risks: A systematic review. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 21(1), 69. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848876/
  38. Ahumada, O., & Villalobos, J. R. (2009). Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.014
  39. Srai, J. S., & Gregory, M. (2008). A supply network configuration perspective on international supply chain development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(5), 386-411. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570810867178
  40. Hübner, A., Kuhn, H., & Wollenburg, J. (2016). Last mile fulfilment and distribution in omni-channel grocery retailing: A strategic planning framework. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(3), 228-247. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-11-2014-0154

The modern global supply chains are more vulnerable to disruptions than ever due to their complex geographically distributed designs. This in-depth research evaluates three advanced analytical tools, scenario analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, and predictive analytics, and their application to the problem of supply chain disruption to prevent its development into an operational crisis. This study shows how organizations use these methods to quantify the disruption probabilities, vulnerability exposure and mitigation strategies by using systematic literature review, quantitative modeling, and empirical case analysis. Monte Carlo simulation can be used to give probabilistic quantification of risks in multi-tier supply networks and, through this approach, produce probability distributions of possible outcomes in the thousands of possible outcomes. Scenario analysis allows the strategic assessment of the possible disruption pathways based on systematic exploration of the possible what-if. Using machine learning algorithms and patterns of historical data, predictive analytics provides real-time functionality of risk detection. Findings have shown that hybrid methods which incorporate both these methods can have high predictive accuracy (76-86%), which is better than single-method methods. The analysis of the applications in the manufacturing, healthcare, and food supply chain shows that there are sector-related profiles of risks and mitigation needs. Results indicate the sensitivity of the lower-level visibility of suppliers since the disturbance of Tier 3 is transmitted upstream through supply chains with exponential impacts, worsening the average performance of 97.8% at the origin to 51.1% at the manufacturer stage. The study adds an elaborate framework of unifying these methodologies into organizational risk management procedures that would give the practitioners realistic guidelines to apply in implementing data-driven disruption prevention measures. This research study contributes to the theory on supply chain risk management by showing how quantitative modeling methodologies can convert reactive approaches to crises management to proactive resilience.

Keywords : Supply Chain Disruption, Monte Carlo Simulation, Scenario Analysis, Predictive Analytics, Supply Chain Resilience, Vulnerability Assessment, Probabilistic Modeling, Machine Learning Risk Detection, Multi-Tier Supply Networks, Disaster Recovery Planning.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe