Authors :
Benjamin Yaw Kokroko; Joseph Kobi; Edmund Kofi Yeboah
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/y989pm8c
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/5979y9r2
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct1432
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
The modern global supply chains are more vulnerable to disruptions than ever due to their complex geographically
distributed designs. This in-depth research evaluates three advanced analytical tools, scenario analysis, Monte Carlo
simulation, and predictive analytics, and their application to the problem of supply chain disruption to prevent its
development into an operational crisis. This study shows how organizations use these methods to quantify the disruption
probabilities, vulnerability exposure and mitigation strategies by using systematic literature review, quantitative modeling,
and empirical case analysis. Monte Carlo simulation can be used to give probabilistic quantification of risks in multi-tier
supply networks and, through this approach, produce probability distributions of possible outcomes in the thousands of
possible outcomes. Scenario analysis allows the strategic assessment of the possible disruption pathways based on systematic
exploration of the possible what-if. Using machine learning algorithms and patterns of historical data, predictive analytics
provides real-time functionality of risk detection. Findings have shown that hybrid methods which incorporate both these
methods can have high predictive accuracy (76-86%), which is better than single-method methods. The analysis of the
applications in the manufacturing, healthcare, and food supply chain shows that there are sector-related profiles of risks
and mitigation needs. Results indicate the sensitivity of the lower-level visibility of suppliers since the disturbance of Tier 3
is transmitted upstream through supply chains with exponential impacts, worsening the average performance of 97.8% at
the origin to 51.1% at the manufacturer stage. The study adds an elaborate framework of unifying these methodologies into
organizational risk management procedures that would give the practitioners realistic guidelines to apply in implementing
data-driven disruption prevention measures. This research study contributes to the theory on supply chain risk management
by showing how quantitative modeling methodologies can convert reactive approaches to crises management to proactive
resilience.
Keywords :
Supply Chain Disruption, Monte Carlo Simulation, Scenario Analysis, Predictive Analytics, Supply Chain Resilience, Vulnerability Assessment, Probabilistic Modeling, Machine Learning Risk Detection, Multi-Tier Supply Networks, Disaster Recovery Planning.
References :
- Wilson, M. C. (2007). The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(4), 295-320. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249921325_A_Monte_Carlo_simulation_model_of_supply_chain_risk_due_to_natural_disasters
- Gładysz, B., Skorupka, D., Kuchta, D., & Duchaczek, A. (2017). Supply chain risk management by Monte Carlo method. Modern Technologies in Industrial Engineering V (ModTech2017), 178, 04006. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321976195_SUPPLY_CHAIN_RISK_MANAGEMENT_BY_MONTE_CARLO_METHOD
- Ramezankhani, M. J., Torabi, S. A., & Vahidi, F. (2018). Supply chain performance measurement and evaluation: A mixed sustainability and resilience approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 126, 531-548. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270242228_Monte_Carlo_Simulation_Based_Approach_to_Manage_Risks_in_Operational_Networks_in_Green_Supply_Chain
- Ramasesh, R. V., Ord, J. K., Hayya, J. C., & Pan, A. (1991). Sole versus dual sourcing in stochastic lead-time (s, Q) inventory models. Management Science, 37(4), 428-443. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237842639_Monte_carlo_simulation_based_performance_analysis_of_supply_chains
- Gharehgozli, A. H., Rabbani, M., Zaerpour, N., & Razmi, J. (2008). A comprehensive decision-making structure for acceptance/rejection of incoming orders in make-to-order environments. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(9-10), 1016-1032. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338169261_A_monte_carlo_simulation_for_reliability_estimation_of_logistics_and_supply_chain_networks
- Schmitt, A. J., & Singh, M. (2012). A quantitative analysis of disruption risk in a multi-echelon supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1), 22-32. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Quantifying-supply-chain-disruption-risk-using-and-Schmitt-Singh/9653f3d31f14eeb83d2d5511d91886b01e8d8eb9
- Qazi, A., Dickson, A., Quigley, J., & Gaudenzi, B. (2018). Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 196, 24-42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359144285_Supply_chain_risk_network_value_at_risk_assessment_using_Bayesian_belief_networks_and_Monte_Carlo_simulation
- Goh, M., Lim, J. Y., & Meng, F. (2007). A stochastic model for risk management in global supply chain networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1), 164-173. https://informs-sim.org/wsc05papers/202.pdf
- Kumar, S., & Singh, R. (2024). The role of predictive analytics in supply chain optimization. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 13(2), 45-67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383148496_The_role_of_predictive_analytics_in_supply_chain_optimization
- Cavalcante, I. M., Frazzon, E. M., Forcellini, F. A., & Ivanov, D. (2019). A supervised machine learning approach to data-driven simulation of resilient supplier selection in digital manufacturing. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 86-97. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337282451_Supply_chain_data_analytics_for_predicting_supplier_disruptions_a_case_study_in_complex_asset_manufacturing
- Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021). Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), 110-128. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374849416_Predictive_Analytics_and_Machine_Learning_for_Real-Time_Supply_Chain_Risk_Mitigation_and_Agility
- Sharma, M., Luthra, S., Joshi, S., & Kumar, A. (2022). Implementing challenges of artificial intelligence: Evidence from public manufacturing sector of an emerging economy. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101624. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383035770_Predictive_analytics_on_artificial_intelligence_in_supply_chain_optimization
- Baryannis, G., Validi, S., Dani, S., & Antoniou, G. (2019). Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: State of the art and future research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2179-2202. https://epublications.marquette.edu/context/mgmt_fac/article/1336/viewcontent/barratt_13574.pdf
- Sodhi, M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2019). Research opportunities in supply chain transparency. Production and Operations Management, 28(12), 2946-2959. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378872101_Reviewing_predictive_analytics_in_supply_chain_management_Applications_and_benefits
- Choi, T. M., Wallace, S. W., & Wang, Y. (2018). Big data analytics in operations management. Production and Operations Management, 27(10), 1868-1883. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387903364_Leveraging_Artificial_Intelligence_for_predictive_supply_chain_management_focus_on_how_AI-driven_tools_are_revolutionizing_demand_forecasting_and_inventory_optimization
- Hofmann, E., & Rutschmann, E. (2018). Big data analytics and demand forecasting in supply chains: A conceptual analysis. International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(2), 739-766. https://intapi.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/picbe-2023-0090
- Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2019). Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125, 285-307. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266732582300095X
- Kamalahmadi, M., & Parast, M. M. (2016). A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. International Journal of Production Economics, 171(Part 1), 116-133. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896316310564
- Li, Y., Chen, K., Collignon, S., & Ivanov, D. (2021). Ripple effect in the supply chain network: Forward and backward disruption propagation, network health and firm vulnerability. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(3), 1117-1131. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363865025_Resilience_Assessment_and_Risk_Prediction_in_Supply_Chain_Management_Based_on_Network_Analysis
- Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2904-2915. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7261049/
- Queiroz, M. M., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2022). Impacts of epidemic outbreaks on supply chains: Mapping a research agenda amid the COVID-19 pandemic through a structured literature review. Annals of Operations Research, 319, 1159-1196. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-024-06126-x
- Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J., & Grawe, S. (2015). Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management, 33-34, 111-122. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/76/1/41
- Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278712727_Supply_Chain_Risk_Management_Resilience_and_Business_Continuity
- Shishodia, A., Sharma, R., Rajesh, R., & Munim, Z. H. (2023). Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future research. International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(4), 879-908. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667325824003108
- Fan, Y., & Stevenson, M. (2018). A review of supply chain risk management: Definition, theory, and research agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(3), 205-230. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7283689/
- Aldrighetti, R., Zennaro, I., Finco, S., & Battini, D. (2024). Healthcare supply chain simulation with disruption considerations: A case study from Northern Italy. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 25(Suppl 1), 1-17. https://arxiv.org/html/2401.10895v2
- Fahimnia, B., Tang, C. S., Davarzani, H., & Sarkis, J. (2015). Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.034
- Giannakis, M., & Louis, M. (2016). A multi-agent based system with big data processing for enhanced supply chain agility. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(5), 706-727. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-06-2015-0050
- Giannoccaro, I., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2002). Inventory management in supply chains: A reinforcement learning approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 78(2), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00156-0
- Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill.
- Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117-2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261
- Tao, F., Qi, Q., Liu, A., & Kusiak, A. (2018). Data-driven smart manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 48(Part C), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.006
- Cachon, G. P., & Netessine, S. (2004). Game theory in supply chain analysis. In D. Simchi-Levi, S. D. Wu, & Z. J. Shen (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis (pp. 13-66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-7953-5_2
- Brintrup, A., Pak, J., Ratiney, D., Pearce, T., Wichmann, P., Woodall, P., & McFarlane, D. (2020). Supply chain data analytics for predicting supplier disruptions: A case study in complex asset manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 58(11), 3330-3341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1685705
- Mulvey, J. M., Vanderbei, R. J., & Zenios, S. A. (1995). Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Operations Research, 43(2), 264-281. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.43.2.264
- Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829-846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086
- Jaberidoost, M., Nikfar, S., Abdollahiasl, A., & Dinarvand, R. (2013). Pharmaceutical supply chain risks: A systematic review. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 21(1), 69. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848876/
- Ahumada, O., & Villalobos, J. R. (2009). Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.014
- Srai, J. S., & Gregory, M. (2008). A supply network configuration perspective on international supply chain development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(5), 386-411. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570810867178
- Hübner, A., Kuhn, H., & Wollenburg, J. (2016). Last mile fulfilment and distribution in omni-channel grocery retailing: A strategic planning framework. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(3), 228-247. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-11-2014-0154
The modern global supply chains are more vulnerable to disruptions than ever due to their complex geographically
distributed designs. This in-depth research evaluates three advanced analytical tools, scenario analysis, Monte Carlo
simulation, and predictive analytics, and their application to the problem of supply chain disruption to prevent its
development into an operational crisis. This study shows how organizations use these methods to quantify the disruption
probabilities, vulnerability exposure and mitigation strategies by using systematic literature review, quantitative modeling,
and empirical case analysis. Monte Carlo simulation can be used to give probabilistic quantification of risks in multi-tier
supply networks and, through this approach, produce probability distributions of possible outcomes in the thousands of
possible outcomes. Scenario analysis allows the strategic assessment of the possible disruption pathways based on systematic
exploration of the possible what-if. Using machine learning algorithms and patterns of historical data, predictive analytics
provides real-time functionality of risk detection. Findings have shown that hybrid methods which incorporate both these
methods can have high predictive accuracy (76-86%), which is better than single-method methods. The analysis of the
applications in the manufacturing, healthcare, and food supply chain shows that there are sector-related profiles of risks
and mitigation needs. Results indicate the sensitivity of the lower-level visibility of suppliers since the disturbance of Tier 3
is transmitted upstream through supply chains with exponential impacts, worsening the average performance of 97.8% at
the origin to 51.1% at the manufacturer stage. The study adds an elaborate framework of unifying these methodologies into
organizational risk management procedures that would give the practitioners realistic guidelines to apply in implementing
data-driven disruption prevention measures. This research study contributes to the theory on supply chain risk management
by showing how quantitative modeling methodologies can convert reactive approaches to crises management to proactive
resilience.
Keywords :
Supply Chain Disruption, Monte Carlo Simulation, Scenario Analysis, Predictive Analytics, Supply Chain Resilience, Vulnerability Assessment, Probabilistic Modeling, Machine Learning Risk Detection, Multi-Tier Supply Networks, Disaster Recovery Planning.