Authors : Fahrizal Saputra; Irfan Prasetia; Candra Yuliana

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 3 - March

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4cv8jdc5

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mkr9x4wf

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26mar620

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : High-rise building projects in swampy areas, such as in Banjarmasin City, South Kalimantan, face various technical and non-technical risks that can hinder project implementation, particularly those related to cost and time efficiency. This study aims to identify key risk factors that emerge during the implementation phase and formulate mitigation strategies suited to local project characteristics. This research method uses a quantitative approach with purposive sampling through the distribution of structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders, including contractors, consultants, and PBG officials. Data analysis was conducted using a severity index and a probability-impact matrix to determine risk levels and prioritize their management. The study findings indicate eight significant risk factors, such as material damage or loss, weather delays, and logistical inefficiencies. Recommended mitigation strategies include improving material security, scheduling work according to weather conditions, and more organized material management. This research contributes to construction risk management practices, particularly for high-rise building projects in areas with unstable geographical conditions.

Keywords : Risk Management, High-Rise Buildings, Construction Projects, Severity Index, Swamp Land, Mitigation Strategy

References :

1. Alijoyo, A. (2006). Manajemen Risiko Korporat (Enterprise Risk Management). Bandung: PPM.
2. Djohanputro, B. (2008). Manajemen Risiko Korporat: Panduan Terpadu. Jakarta: PPM.
3. Duffield, C., & Trigunarsyah, B. (2007). Risk Management in Engineering Projects. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
4. Hanafi, M. M. (2016). Manajemen Risiko. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
5. ISO. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization.
6. Joshua, M. R. (2023). Analisis Risiko dalam Pelaksanaan Proyek Konstruksi Gedung. Jurnal Rekayasa dan Manajemen Konstruksi, 11(1), 29–38.
7. Kountur, R. (2006). Metode Penelitian untuk Penulisan Skripsi dan Tesis. Jakarta: PPM.
8. Nopriadie, D. (2016). Manajemen Risiko Proyek Konstruksi Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy AHP. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 10(1), 33–44.
9. PMBOK. (2004). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (3rd ed.). Project Management Institute.
10. Saputri, A. D. (2019). Identifikasi dan Analisa Risiko pada Pembangunan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 6(1), 52–61.
11. Smith, N. J., Merna, T., & Jobling, P. (2006). Managing Risk in Construction Projects (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
12. Suseno, A., Budi, S., & Wijaya, H. (2015). Severity Index dalam Analisis Risiko Proyek. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, 9(1), 45–52.
13. Yuliana, C., & Hidayat, T. (2017). Analisis Risiko pada Proyek Gedung Bertingkat di Perkotaan. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil, 13(2), 87–94.
14. Zulfa, A. (2017). Manajemen Risiko pada Proyek Konstruksi. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 5(2), 112–118.