Risks and Safeguards in Using Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Basis for Ethical Guidelines


Authors : De Marvy B. Agas

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3ks7wpep

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may266

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This descriptive study ‘Risks and Safeguards in Using Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Basis for Ethical Guidelines’ explored the common generative AI tools used, the uses of these tools in language learning, the risks encountered by English language learners, and the safeguards they employed as bases in developing ethical guidelines in the use of generative artificial intelligence. Data were collected through interviews and focus group discussions. Fifteen English language learners from the five purposively selected higher education institutions in Bohol, Philippines participated in the study. Employing reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke), the findings revealed that the GenAI tools used by the learners were ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Cici, Copilot, Gamma AI, and DeepAI. They used these tools for language learning development, academic writing and research, lesson preparation and study, and creative material development. The identified risks of using GenAI included academic integrity threats, ethical issues, detriments to learning skills development, information quality and reliability concerns, and personal and social implications. To address these risks, they strongly suggested the teachers’ use of proactive pedagogy and assessments and that schools provide the necessary institutional and education support for responsible and effective AI use. They also employed critical and responsible use of GenAI, transparency of AI Use and adherence toAI ethicsfor academic integrity careful adherence toAI ethics for academic integrity. They also conducted AI detection test for output verification. Based on the findings, it was concluded that the GenAI promised a transformative potential in redefining the traditional English language education. However, the risks in using AI were alarming as the learners had grown dependent on AI that posed a pressing concern of trading human connection for technological expediency. The researcher recommended that schools must develop and implement comprehensive AI literacy programs and AI utilization framework with ethical guidelines to sustain conscious efforts to leverage AI in English language education without compromising academic integrity and human connection.

Keywords : English Language Learning, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Risks, Safeguards, uses.

References :

  1. Abdullah Sharadgah, T., & Abdulatif Sa’di, R. (2022). A Systematic Review of Research on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in English Language Teaching and Learning (2015-2021): What are the Current Effects? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21, 337–377. https://doi.org/10.28945/4999
  2. Alasgrova, R., et. al (2024). Factors Influencing Teachers’ Use of Artificial Intelligence for Instructional Purposes. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383531129
  3. CEDTyClea. (2023, November 24). CHED urges firms to prepare workers for AI | BusinessWorld Online. https://www.bworldonline.com/labor-and-management/2023/11/24/559432/ched-urges-firms-to-prepare-workers-for-ai/
  4. Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic Literature Review on opportunities, challenges, and Future Research Recommendations of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4(100118), 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
  5. Conley, D. T. (2010). College and career ready: Helping all students succeed beyond high school. Jossey-Bass.
  6. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Psychology Press.
  7. Cornell University. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence | Center for Teaching Innovation. Teaching.cornell.edu. https://teaching.cornell.edu/generative-artificial-intelligence
  8. Crompton, H., & Edmett, A. (n.d.). goes Artificial intelligence and English language teaching: A systematic literature review. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/ai_in_english_language_teaching_systematic_review.pdf
  9. Cuiye, Y. (2016). The construction of english teachers’ classroom teaching ability system based on artificial intelligence. 2016(18), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.17013/risti.18B.94-104
  10. Dewi, H. K., Wardani, T. I., Rahim, N. A., Putri, R. E., & Pandin, M. G. R. (2021). THE USE OF AI (ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE) IN ENGLISH LEARNING AMONG
  11. UNIVERSITY STUDENT: CASE STUDY IN ENGLISH DEPARTMENT, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/sdntr
  12. Digital Promise. (2024, June 18). AI literacy: A framework to understand, evaluate, and use emerging technology. https://digitalpromise.org/2024/06/18/ai-literacy-a-framework-to- understand-evaluate-and-use-emerging-technology/
  13. Druga, S., Vu, S. T., Likhith, E., & Qiu, T. (2019). Inclusive AI literacy for kids around the world. Proceedings of FabLearn 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311890.3311904
  14. Educause Review. (2024, June). A framework for AI literacy. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2024/6/a-framework-for-ai-literacy
  15. Estevez, J., Garate, G., & Grana, M. (2019). Gentle Introduction to Artificial Intelligence for High-School Students Using Scratch. IEEE Access, 7, 179027–179036. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2956136
  16. Fitria, T. N. (2021). THE USE TECHNOLOGY BASED ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ENGLISH TEACHING AND LEARNING). ELT Echo : The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v6i2.9299
  17. García-Peñalvo, F. J., et al. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer.
  18. Gawate, S. (2019). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) BASED INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS IN TEACHING- LEARNING OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE Dr.... ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.33329/ijelr.64.69
  19. Gong, B., Nugent, J. P., Guest, W., Parker, W., Chang, P. J., Khosa, F., & Nicolaou, S. (2019). Influence of artificial intelligence on Canadian medical students’ preference for radiology specialty: A national survey study. Academic Radiology, 26(4), 566-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.007
  20. Huang, X. (2021). Aims for cultivating students’ key competencies based on artificial intelligence education in China. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5127–5147.
  21. Huang, X. Aims for cultivating students’ key competencies based on Artificial Intelligence education in China. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021, 26, 5127–5147. [CrossRef]
  22. Hutson, J., Plate, D., & Berry, K. (2024). Embracing AI in English Composition: Insights and Innovations in Hybrid Pedagogical Practices. Deleted Journal. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewijce42022290
  23. Juri, A. (2024). Use of Artificial Intelligence in education delivery and assessment. : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377625434
  24. Kashive, N., & Georgiadou, K. (n.d.). https://diglib.natlib.lk/bitstream/handle/123456789/57264/Dr%20Keratso%20Georgiadou%20Greece.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  25. Kim, J., Lee, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2022). Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10831-6
  26. Kočková, P., Kristyna Kilianova, Slepankova, M., Schmid, A., & Katerina Kostolanyova. (2024). AI literacy in Teacher Education in the Czech Republic. European Conference on E-Learning, 23(1), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecel.23.1.2753
  27. Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. AAC&U.
  28. Kumar, V., Rajan, B., Venkatesan, R., & Lecinski, J. (2019). Understanding the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Engagement Marketing. California Management Review, 61(4), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619859317‌
  29. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies. McGraw-Hill Education.
  30. LangEdutech Journal. (2024). AI and language education. https://www.langedutech.com/letjournal/index.php/let/article/view/55
  31. Lee, C. J., & Kim, C. (2014). An implementation study of a TPACK-based instructional design model in a technology integration course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(4), 437–460.
  32. Lee, H. S., & Lee, J. (2021). Applying artificial intelligence in physical education and future perspectives. Sustainability, 13(1), 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010351
  33. Lérias, E. 1, Guerra, C. 1, Ferreira, P. 2 1 P. I. of P., protected ] (E.L.), email, email protected ] (C. G.) 2 Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre, 7350-092 P., protected ] (E.L.), email, protected ] (C.G.), email, VALORIZA-Research Center for Endogenous Resource Valorization, 7300-555 P., & Centro de Estudos e Formação Avançada em Gestão e Economia, I. de I. e F. A. (2024). Literacy in Artificial Intelligence as a Challenge for Teaching in Higher Education: A Case Study at Portalegre Polytechnic University. ProQuest, 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15040205
  34. Long, D.; Magerko, B. What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA, 25–30 April 2020; pp. 1–16.
  35. Louise. (2024, June 19). Top 7 AI Tools for Language Teachers and Language Learners - ATC Language Schools. ATC Language Schools. https://atclanguageschools.com/top-7-ai-tools-for-language-teachers-and-language-learners/
  36. Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3), Article 8.
  37. Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 220-235). Sage Publications.
  38. Müller, V. C. (2020, April 30). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-ai/
  39. Mustafa Özdere. (n.d.). The integration of artificial intelligence in English education: Opportunities and challenges. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi.
  40. Ng, D. T., Leung, J. K., Su, J., Ng, R. C., & Chu, S. K. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6
  41. Ng, D. T. K., Luo, W., Chan, H. M. Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022d). Using digital story writing as a pedagogy to develop AI literacy among primary students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100054.
  42. Ng, D. T., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021b). AI literacy: definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 504–509.
  43. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021a). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041.
  44. Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2022). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(28). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
  45. Obari,H. & Lambacher, S. G. (2019). Improving the English skills of native Japanese using artificial intelligence in a blended learning program. Research-Publishing.net, 327–333. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.38.1031
  46. OSF. (2024). Osf.io. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/x3qr6
  47. Özdere, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the Disruption of Higher Education: Strategies for Integrations across Disciplines. https://typeset.io/questions/what-are-the-challenges-and-opportunities-of-using-ai-in-2guw5233yi
  48. Pomeroy, R., Myers, J., & World Economic Forum. (2024, January 14). AI - artificial intelligence - at Davos 2024: Here’s what to know. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/01/artificial-intelligence-ai-innovation-technology-davos-2024/
  49. PowerSchool. (2024). SAMR model: A practical guide for K-12 classroom technology Integrationhttps://www.powerschool.com/blog/samr-model-a-practical-guide-for-k-12-classroom-technology-integration/
  50. Philippine Star. (2024, June 19). Philippines ranks bottom in new PISA test for creative thinking.Philippine Star. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2024/06/19/2364001/philippines-ranks-bottom-new-pisa-test-creative-thinking
  51. Pascual, J. (2023, November 16). PH schools adopting AI; UP among first in Asia: group. ABS-CBN News; ABS-CBN News. https://news.abs-cbn.com/business/11/16/23/ph-schools-adopting-ai-up-among-first-in-asia-group
  52. Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
  53. Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
  54. Rusmiyanto Rusmiyanto, Nining Huriati, Nining Fitriani, & Mike Nurmalia Sari. (2023, May 25). The Role Of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Developing English Language Learner’s Communication Skills. ResearchGate; Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371428477_The_Role_Of_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_In_Developing_English_Language_Learner
  55. Scientific Research Publishing. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=122159
  56. Scientific Research Publishing. (2024). AI literacy framework in education. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3391326
  57. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers?I and the future of education. Wiley.
  58. Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Learner–instructor Interaction in Online Learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–23. http://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9
  59. Shah, C., Anderson, T., Hagen, L., & Zhang, Y. (2021). An iSchool approach to data science: Human-centered, socially responsible, and context-driven. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(7), 793–796. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24434
  60. Sharadgah, T. A., & Sa'di, R. A. (2022). A systematic review of research on the use of artificial intelligence in English language teaching and learning (2015- 2021): What are the current effects? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21, 337–377. https://doi.org/10.28945/4999
  61. StartQuestion. (2024). AI awareness questionnaire. https://www.startquestion.com/survey-ideas/ai-awareness-questionnaire/
  62. The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-93.
  63. UNESCO. (n.d.). Media and information literacy. https://www.unesco.org/en/media-information-literacy
  64. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709
  65. University of San Diego . (2021). 43 Examples of Artificial Intelligence in Education. University of San Diego. https://onlinedegrees.sandiego.edu/artificial-intelligence-education/
  66. View of AI literacy in Teacher Education in the Czech Republic. (2024). Academic-Conferences.org. https://papers.academic-conferences.org/index.php/ecel/article/view/2753/2680
  67. Williams, K., Berman, G., & Michalska, S. (2023). Investigating hybridity in artificial intelligence research. Big Data & Society, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231180577
  68. Wood, E. A., Ange, B. L., & Miller, D. D. (2021). Are We Ready to Integrate Artificial Intelligence Literacy into Medical School Curriculum: Students and Faculty Survey. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 8, 238212052110240. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205211024078
  69. Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025.
  70. Zhang, X., & Chen, L. (2021). College English smart classroom teaching model based on artificial intelligence technology in mobile information systems. Mobile Information Systems, 2021, Article 5644604. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5644604
  71. Zhao, L., Wu, X., & Luo, H. (2022). Developing AI Literacy for Primary and Middle School Teachers in China: Based on a Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Sustainability, 14(21), 14549. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114549

This descriptive study ‘Risks and Safeguards in Using Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Basis for Ethical Guidelines’ explored the common generative AI tools used, the uses of these tools in language learning, the risks encountered by English language learners, and the safeguards they employed as bases in developing ethical guidelines in the use of generative artificial intelligence. Data were collected through interviews and focus group discussions. Fifteen English language learners from the five purposively selected higher education institutions in Bohol, Philippines participated in the study. Employing reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke), the findings revealed that the GenAI tools used by the learners were ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Cici, Copilot, Gamma AI, and DeepAI. They used these tools for language learning development, academic writing and research, lesson preparation and study, and creative material development. The identified risks of using GenAI included academic integrity threats, ethical issues, detriments to learning skills development, information quality and reliability concerns, and personal and social implications. To address these risks, they strongly suggested the teachers’ use of proactive pedagogy and assessments and that schools provide the necessary institutional and education support for responsible and effective AI use. They also employed critical and responsible use of GenAI, transparency of AI Use and adherence toAI ethicsfor academic integrity careful adherence toAI ethics for academic integrity. They also conducted AI detection test for output verification. Based on the findings, it was concluded that the GenAI promised a transformative potential in redefining the traditional English language education. However, the risks in using AI were alarming as the learners had grown dependent on AI that posed a pressing concern of trading human connection for technological expediency. The researcher recommended that schools must develop and implement comprehensive AI literacy programs and AI utilization framework with ethical guidelines to sustain conscious efforts to leverage AI in English language education without compromising academic integrity and human connection.

Keywords : English Language Learning, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Risks, Safeguards, uses.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe