Role of Machine Learning in Policy Making and Evaluation


Authors : Md Kamrul Hasan Chy; Obed Nana Buadi

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/23mp6twn

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ywjhumvm

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT687

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This paper explores how machine learning (ML) can enhance both policy-making and policy evaluation by providing advanced tools for data analysis, predictive modeling, and continuous assessment. ML offers the ability to process vast datasets, uncover patterns, and provide real-time insights, allowing policymakers to make more informed, efficient, and adaptable decisions. By applying ML, governments can predict trends, optimize resource allocation, and tailor interventions to meet the specific needs of various sectors such as healthcare, education, finance, and environmental management. Furthermore, ML supports ongoing policy evaluation by enabling continuous monitoring and adjustment of policies based on up-to-date data. While ML presents transformative potential, challenges related to transparency, bias, and data privacy must be addressed to ensure that its application in policy-making is ethical and fair. This paper highlights the importance of improving ML model explainability and establishing strong legal and regulatory frameworks to maximize its effectiveness in governance.

Keywords : Machine Learning; Policy Making; Policy Evaluation; Security;

References :

  1. E. Potash, R. Ghani, J. Walsh, E. Jorgensen, C. Lohff, N. Prachand and R. Mansour, "Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Childhood Lead Poisoning.," JAMA Network Open, 2020.
  2. R. Caruana, Y. Lou, J. Gehrke, P. Koch, M. Sturm and N. Elhadad, "Intelligible Models for HealthCare.," in In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining., 2015.
  3. Z. C. Lipton, The Mythos of Model Interpretability, 2018.
  4. M. J. Bauman, R. Sullivan, C. Schneweis, R. Ghani, K. S. Boxer, T. Lin, E. Salomon, H. Naveed, L. Haynes, J. Walsh, J. Helsby and S. Yoder, "Reducing Incarceration through Prioritized Interventions.," in Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS) - COMPASS ’18., 2018.
  5. [5] B. Goodman and S. Flaxman, "European Union Regulations on Algorithmic Decision-Making and a “Right to Explanation.”," AI Magazine, 2017.
  6. [6] T. Ye, R. Johnson, S. Fu, J. Copeny, B. Donnelly, A. Freeman, L. Mirian, J. Walsh and R. Ghani, "Using machine learning to help vulnerable tenants in New York city," in COMPASS '19: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies, 2019.
  7. [7] A. Asquer, "The Governance of Big Data: Perspectives and Issues," SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013.
  8. T. H. Davenport, Big data at work: Dispelling the myths, uncovering the opportunities., Boston: Harvard Business, 2014.
  9. A. Peled, Traversing Digital Babel, MIT Press, 2014.
  10. K. R. K. T. L. H. &. G. R. Amarasinghe, "Explainable machine learning for public policy: Use cases, gaps, and research directions.," Data & Policy, 2023.
  11. R. K. Samala, H. Chan, L. M. Hadjiiski and S. Koneru, "Hazards of data leakage in machine learning: a study on classification of breast cancer using deep neural networks," Medical Imaging 2020: Computer-Aided Diagnosis., p. 279–284, 2020.
  12. L.-P. Liu, T. G. Dietterich, N. Li and Z.-H. Zhou, "Transductive Optimization of Top k Precision.," in In Proceedings of the TwentyFifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence., Washington, DC, 2016.
  13. H. Chen, R. H. L. Chiang and V. C. Storey, "Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact.," MIS Quarterly, 2012.
  14. E. Kamateri, E. Panopoulou, E. Tambouris, K. Tarabanis, A. Ojo, D. Lee and D. Price, "A Comparative Analysis of Tools and Technologies for Policy Making.," Policy Practice and Digital Science, 2015.
  15. T. G. Ash, Free speech : ten principles for a connected world., Atlantic Books, 2016.
  16. J. Manyika, M. Chui, B. Brown, J. Bughin, R. Dobbs, C. Roxburgh and A. H. Byers, Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity, 2011.
  17. A. Mackenzie, "The production of prediction: What does machine learning want?," European Journal of Cultural Studies, 2015.
  18. P. S. E. &. A. R. Choudhury, "Machine learning and human capital complementarities: Experimental evidence on bias mitigation.," Strategic Management Journal, 2020.
  19. Z. Lipton, "The Mythos of Model Interpretability.," ArXiv:1606.03490, 2017.
  20. C. D. Mol, L. Reichlin, E. Gautier, D. Giannone, S. Mullainathan, H. v. Dijk and J. Wooldridge, "Big Data in Economics: Evolution or Revolution?," Economics without Borders, 2017.
  21. C. Alfaro, J. Cano-Montero, J. Gómez, J. Moguerza and F. Ortega, "A multi-stage method for content classification and opinion mining on weblog comments.," Annals of Operations Research, 2013.
  22. B. Buchanan and T. & Miller, Machine Learning for Policymakers, 2017.
  23. A. Ingrams, "Amachine learning approach to open public comments for policymaking," Information Polity, 2020.
  24. M. Young, M. Katell and P. M. Krafft, "Municipal surveillance regulation and algorithmic accountability.," Big Data & Society, 2019.
  25. J. Höchtl, P. Parycek and R. Schöllhammer, "Big Data in the Policy cycle: Policy Decision Making in the Digital Era.," Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2016.
  26. T. HENDERSHOTT, C. M. JONES and A. J. MENKVELD, "Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity?," The Journal of Finance, 2011.
  27. B. Albreiki, T. Habuza and N. Zaki, "Framework for automatically suggesting remedial actions to help students at risk based on explainable ML and rule-based models.," International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2022.
  28. K. Ackermann, J. Walsh, A. De Unánue, H. Naveed, A. Rivera, S.-J. Lee, J. Bennett, M. Defoe, C. Cody, L. Haynes and R. Ghani, "Deploying Machine Learning Models for Public Policy: A Framework," in ACM SIGKDD International, NewYork, 2018.
  29. J. Kleinberg, J. Ludwig, S. Mullainathan and Z. Obermeyer, "Prediction Policy Problems," American Economic Review, 2015.
  30. S. Athey, "Beyond prediction: Using big data for policy problems," Science, vol. 355, no. 6324, p. 483–485, 2017.
  31. S. Mullainathan and J. Spiess, "Machine Learning: an Applied Econometric Approach.," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2017.
  32. M. K. H. Chy, "Proactive Fraud Defense: Machine Learning’s Evolving Role in Protecting Against Online Fraud," World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 23, no. 03, pp. 1580-1589, 2024.
  33. M. K. H. C. Chy, "Securing the Web: Machine Learning's Role in Predicting and Preventing Phishing Attacks," International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2024.
  34. W. G. d. Sousa, E. R. P. d. Melo, P. H. D. S. Bermejo, R. A. S. Farias and A. O. Gomes, "How and where is artificial intelligence in the public sector going? A literature review and research agenda.," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4, 2019.
  35. A. Chalfin, O. Danieli, A. Hillis, Z. Jelveh, M. Luca, J. Ludwig and S. Mullainathan, "Productivity and Selection of Human Capital with Machine Learning.," American Economic Review, vol. 106, no. 5, p. 124–127, 2016.
  36. A. Adadi and M. Berrada, "Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)," IEEE Access, 2018.
  37. M. Kuziemski and G. Misuraca, "AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings.," Telecommunications Policy, vol. 44, no. 6, 2020.
  38. T. Q. Sun and R. Medaglia, "Mapping the Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Public sector: Evidence from Public Healthcare.," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 368-383, 2019.
  39. E. Moss, E. Watkins, J. Metcalf and M. C. Elish, "Governing with Algorithmic Impact Assessments: Six Observations.," SSRN Electronic Journal., 2020.
  40. M. Chy and O. Buadi, A Machine Learning-Driven Website Platform and Browser Extension for Real-Time Risk Scoring and Fraud Detection for Website Legitimacy Verification and Consumer Protection, in press, 2024.
  41. M. Veale, M. Van Kleek and R. Binns, "Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making.," in In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, 2018.
  42. M. R. U. Chowdhury, M. Asif, E. Devos and M. K. H. Chy, "Women in C-suite: Does Top Management Team gender diversity matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 96, 2024.
  43. M. Chowdhury, O. Buadi, F. Xie and M. Chy, Do Powerful Cfos Affect Investment Efficiency?, In press, 2024.
  44. D. Gunning, M. Stefik, J. Choi, T. Miller, S. Stumpf and G.-Z. Yang, "XAI—Explainable artificial intelligence," Science Robotics, vol. 4, no. 37, 2019.
  45. M. K. H. Chy and O. N. Buadi, "Role of Data Visualization in Finance," American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 841-856, 2023.

This paper explores how machine learning (ML) can enhance both policy-making and policy evaluation by providing advanced tools for data analysis, predictive modeling, and continuous assessment. ML offers the ability to process vast datasets, uncover patterns, and provide real-time insights, allowing policymakers to make more informed, efficient, and adaptable decisions. By applying ML, governments can predict trends, optimize resource allocation, and tailor interventions to meet the specific needs of various sectors such as healthcare, education, finance, and environmental management. Furthermore, ML supports ongoing policy evaluation by enabling continuous monitoring and adjustment of policies based on up-to-date data. While ML presents transformative potential, challenges related to transparency, bias, and data privacy must be addressed to ensure that its application in policy-making is ethical and fair. This paper highlights the importance of improving ML model explainability and establishing strong legal and regulatory frameworks to maximize its effectiveness in governance.

Keywords : Machine Learning; Policy Making; Policy Evaluation; Security;

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe