Authors :
Dr. Nayan P. Joshi; Dr. Khalid M. Agwani; Dr. Ramank Mathur; Dr. Pooja Ghosh; Dr. Kunal Tejnani; Dr. Shrishti Mishra
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/2txycnh5
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/yvcnej8b
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr1088
Google Scholar
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.
Abstract :
In a society that places a high value on aesthetics, the use of implants for the prosthetic rehabilitation of lost teeth
has become increasingly popular among both patients and clinicians. Osseointegration is the biotechnical process behind
implants, which has been studied for years due to advancements in understanding its cellular and molecular mechanisms.
Researchers are now focusing on factors influencing osseointegration, focusing on even the smallest details. The stability of
implants, particularly secondary stability, is influenced by bone formation and integration with surrounding osseous tissues.
Factors affecting osseointegration include implant characteristics, bone quantity and quality, and local and systemic host
conditions. The timing and protocols for functional loading also play a crucial role. Continuous monitoring of
osseointegration status is essential to mitigate challenges and ensure successful implants. This review aims to cover the
mechanisms and influencing factors of osseointegration, along with methods for its assessment, and will conclude with a
discussion on recent advancements and future directions in dental implantology to improve the osseointegration process.
The goal of this review is to inspire further technological developments that enhance osseointegration.
Keywords :
Dental Implant, Osseointegration, Implants, Implant Stability.
References :
- P.-I. Branemark, The Osseointegration Book: From Calvarium to Calcaneus, Quintessence, Berlin, 2005.
- American Academy of Implant Dentistry, “Glossary of implant terms,” The Journal of Oral Implantology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 284–294, 1986.
- J. C. Hickey, “The glossary of prosthodontic terms,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 10–92, 1968.
- Layton DM (Ed.), Morgano SM, Muller F, Kelly JA, Nguyen CT, Scherrer SS, Salinas TJ, Shah KC, Att W, Frelich MA, Ferro KJ. Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms 2023, 10th edition. J Prosthet Dent 2023; 130(4S1): e1-e126.
- G. A. Niznick, “Achieving osseointegration in soft bone: the search for improved results,” Oral Health, vol. 90, pp. 27–32, 2000.
- H. U. Cameron, R. M. Pilliar, and I. MacNab, “The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 301–311, 1973.
- Pandey C, Rokaya D, Bhattarai BP. Contemporary Concepts in Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Review. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jun 14; 2022:6170452.
- Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials. 1999 Dec;20(23-24):2311-21.
- C. H. Damsky and Z. Werb, “Signal transduction by integrin receptors for extracellular matrix: cooperative processing of extracellular information,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 772–781, 1992.
- Trtica M, Gakovic B, Batani D, Desai T, Panjan P, Radak B. Surface modifications of a titanium implant by a picosecond Nd: YAG laser operating at 1064 and 532 nm. Applied surface science. 2006 Dec 30;253(5):2551-6.
- C. Colnot, D. M. Romero, S. Huang et al., “Molecular analysis of healing at a bone-implant interface,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 86, no. 9, pp. 862–867, 2007.
- A. Palmquist, O. M. Omar, M. Esposito, J. Lausmaa, and P. Thomsen, “Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 7, suppl_5, pp. S515–S527, 2010.
- T. Albrektsson, P. I. Brånemark, H. A. Hansson, and J. Lindström, “Osseo integrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 52 no. 2, pp. 155–170, 1981.
- C. E. Misch, Dental Implant Prosthetics, Elsevier Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri, 2015.
- T. Albrektsson and A. Wennerberg, “Oral implant surfaces: part 2–review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces,” The International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 544–564, 2004.
- R. B. Rutherford, T. K. Sampath, D. C. Rueger, and T. D. Taylor, “Use of bovine osteogenic protein to promote rapid osseointegration of endosseous dental implants,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 297–301, 1992.
- J. Chen, M. Cai, J. Yang, T. Aldhohrah, and Y. Wang, “Immediate versus early or conventional loading dental implants with fixed prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 122, no. 6, pp. 516–536, 2019.
- M. Donati, D. Botticelli, V. La Scala, C. Tomasi, and T. Berglundh, “Effect of immediate functional loading on osseointegration of implants used for single tooth replacement. A human histological study,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 738–745, 2013.
- E. Nkenke, M. Hahn, K. Weinzierl, M. Radespiel-Tröger, F. W. Neukam, and K. Engelke, “Implant stability and histomorphometry: a correlation study in human cadavers using stepped cylinder implants,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 601–609, 2003.
- A. Chopra, A. A. Mhapuskar, S. Marathe, S. U. Nisa, S. Thopte, and R. Saddiwal, “Evaluation of osseointegration in implants using digital orthopantomogram and cone beam computed tomography,” The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 953–957, 2016.
- H. Jung, H. J. Kim, S. Hong et al., “Osseointegration assessment of dental implants using a synchrotron radiation imaging technique: a preliminary study,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 121–126, 2003.
- S. Meenakshi, N. Raghunath, S. N. Raju, S. Srividya, and P. N. Indira, “Implant stability a key determinant in implant integration,” Trends in Prosthodontics and Dental Implantology, vol. 4, pp. 28–48, 2013.
- W. E. Roberts, K. E. Simmons, L. P. Garetto, and R. A. De Castro, “Bone physiology and metabolism in dental implantology: risk factors for osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases,” Implant Dentistry, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–24, 1992.
- T. Kaneko, Y. Nagai, M. Ogino, T. Futami, and T. Ichimura, “Acoustoelectric technique for assessing the mechanical state of the dental implant-bone interface,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 169–176, 1986.
- C. Aparicio, N. P. Lang, and B. Rangert, “Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 17, Suppl 2, pp. 2–7, 2006.
- P. G. Coelho, R. Jimbo, N. Tovar, and E. A. Bonfante, “Osseointegration: hierarchical designing encompassing the macrometer, micrometer, and nanometer length scales,” Dental Materials, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 37–52, 2015.
- H. Minamikawa, T. Ikeda, W. Att et al., “Photo functionalization increases the bioactivity and osteoconductivity of the titanium alloy Ti6Al4V,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, vol. 102, no. 10, pp. 3618–3630, 2014.
- R. Smeets, B. Stadlinger, F. Schwarz et al., “Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 6285620, 16 pages, 2016.
- D. Rokaya, S. Bohara, V. Srimaneepong et al., “Metallic biomaterials for medical and dental prosthetic applications,” in Functional Biomaterials: Drug Delivery and Biomedical Applications, S. Jana and S. Jana, Eds., pp. 503–522, Springer, Singapore, 2022.
- R. B. Osman and M. V. Swain, “A critical review of dental implant materials with an emphasis on titanium versus zirconia,” Materials, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 932–958, 2015.
- B. R. Levine, S. Sporer, R. A. Poggie, C. J. Della Valle, and J. J. Jacobs, “Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery,” Biomaterials, vol. 27, no. 27, pp. 4671–4681, 2006.
- S. S. Abhay, D. Ganapathy, D. N. Veeraiyan et al., “Wear resistance, color stability and displacement resistance of milled PEEK crowns compared to zirconia crowns under stimulated chewing and high-performance aging,” Polymers, vol. 13, no. 21, article 3761, 2021.
- S. Mishra and R. Chowdhary, “PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: a systematic review,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 208–222, 2019.
- A. Tabassum, G. J. Meijer, J. G. Wolke, and J. A. Jansen, “Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study,” Clinical Oral Implant Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 213–220, 2010.
- M. Stocchero, M. Toia, D. Cecchinato, J. P. Becktor, P. G Coelho, and R. Jimbo, “Biomechanical, biologic, and clinical outcomes of undersized implant surgical preparation: a systematic review,” International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1247–1263, 2016.
- I. N. Tsolaki, P. P. Tonsekar, B. Najafi, H. J. Drew, A. J. Sullivan, and S. D. Petrov, “Comparison of osteotome and conventional drilling techniques for primary implant stability: an in vitro study,” Journal of Oral Implantology, vol. 42, no. 4 pp. 321–325, 2016.
- A. R. Nóbrega, A. Norton, J. A. Silva, J. P. Silva, F. M. Branco, and E. Anitua, “Osteotome versus conventional drilling technique for implant site preparation: a comparative study in the rabbit,” The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. e109–e115, 2012.
- S. Huwais and E. G. Meyer, “A novel osseous densification approach in implant osteotomy preparation to increase biomechanical primary stability, bone mineral density, and bone-to-implant contact,” International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2017.
- A. D. Inchingolo, A. M. Inchingolo, I. R. Bordea et al., “The effectiveness of osseodensification drilling protocol for implant site osteotomy: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 5, article 1147, 2021.
In a society that places a high value on aesthetics, the use of implants for the prosthetic rehabilitation of lost teeth
has become increasingly popular among both patients and clinicians. Osseointegration is the biotechnical process behind
implants, which has been studied for years due to advancements in understanding its cellular and molecular mechanisms.
Researchers are now focusing on factors influencing osseointegration, focusing on even the smallest details. The stability of
implants, particularly secondary stability, is influenced by bone formation and integration with surrounding osseous tissues.
Factors affecting osseointegration include implant characteristics, bone quantity and quality, and local and systemic host
conditions. The timing and protocols for functional loading also play a crucial role. Continuous monitoring of
osseointegration status is essential to mitigate challenges and ensure successful implants. This review aims to cover the
mechanisms and influencing factors of osseointegration, along with methods for its assessment, and will conclude with a
discussion on recent advancements and future directions in dental implantology to improve the osseointegration process.
The goal of this review is to inspire further technological developments that enhance osseointegration.
Keywords :
Dental Implant, Osseointegration, Implants, Implant Stability.