Authors :
Novie Grace T. Deña
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/2s3j4479
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4aa6yhd7
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr456
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This study examined the relationship between the implementation of Learning Action Cell (LAC) sessions and the
work performance of public elementary school teachers in hinterland schools. It described the extent of LAC implementation
in terms of regularity, relevance, collaboration, mentoring, and contextual responsiveness; determined the level of teachers’
work performance based on their Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) ratings; and tested the
significant relationship between LAC implementation and teacher performance. A descriptive–correlational design was
employed using a researcher-made survey questionnaire adapted from existing LAC instruments and DepEd Order No. 35,
s. 2016. The instrument consisted of Likert-type items on LAC practices and a self-reported IPCRF rating and was
administered to public elementary teachers assigned in geographically isolated and disadvantaged hinterland schools. Data
were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage) and Pearson product–
moment correlation. Results revealed that LAC sessions were implemented to a high extent, particularly in promoting
collaboration, sharing of best practices, and addressing classroom challenges, although constraints in time, resources, and
follow-through mechanisms were noted. Teachers’ work performance was generally rated Very Satisfactory to Outstanding.
Correlational analysis indicated a positive and significant relationship between the extent of LAC implementation and
teachers’ work performance, suggesting that more frequent, relevant, and well-facilitated LAC sessions are associated with
higher performance levels. The study concludes that strengthening LAC implementation—especially in terms of
contextualized content, sustained mentoring, and systematic monitoring—can support continuous professional development
and enhance teacher performance in hinterland settings.
Keywords :
Learning Action Cell, Professional Growth, Elementary Teachers, Hinterland Areas, Remote Professional Development, Teacher Competencies.
References :
- Calderon, J. F., & Gonzales, E. C. (2012). Methods of research and thesis writing. Mandaluyong City: National Book Store.
- Cruz, L. M., & Aquino, M. L. (2023). Teaching in the margins: Challenges of teachers in geographically isolated and disadvantaged areas. Quezon City: Phoenix Publishing House.
- Delos Reyes, R. J., & Villanueva, A. P. (2022). Professional learning communities in basic education: Practices and issues. Manila: Rex Book Store.
- Hall, A. D., & Fagen, R. E. (1968). Definition of system. In W. Buckley (Ed.), Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist (pp. 81–92). Chicago: Aldine.
- Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (2006). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
- Mateo, A. S., Ramos, J. P., & Dizon, C. E. (2024). Teaching in remote schools: A Philippine perspective. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
- Reyes, F. B., & De Guzman, A. B. (2021). Collaborative professional development for basic education teachers. Manila: C&E Publishing, Inc.
- Santos, M. R., Lopez, J. P., & David, R. C. (2022). Instructional leadership and teacher performance in basic education. Manila: Lorimar Publishing.
- Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development (Educational Practices Series-18). Geneva: UNESCO International Bureau of Education.
- Cruz, L. M., & Aquino, M. L. (2023). Teaching at the periphery: Lived experiences of teachers in geographically isolated Philippine schools. Philippine Journal of Education, 96(2), 45–60.
- Delos Reyes, R. J., & Villanueva, A. P. (2022). Professional learning communities and teacher outcomes in K to 12 basic education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(3), 389–407.
- Llego, M. A. (2020). Factors affecting the performance of public school teachers in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15, 101–115.
- Mendoza, M. A., Santos, J. L., & Villanueva, C. D. (2020). Learning Action Cell as a professional development model: An adaptation of lesson study. World Association of Lesson Studies Journal, 9(1), 55–72.
- Reyes, F. B., & De Guzman, A. B. (2021). School-based collaborative learning and teacher performance: Evidence from Philippine public schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(4), 120–138.
- Santos, M. R., & David, R. C. (2022). Instructional leadership, Learning Action Cells, and teacher effectiveness in public elementary schools. Philippine Social Science Journal, 5(1), 77–89.
- Published Theses/Dissertations
- Ahmed, H. (2011). Building capacity of teachers and trainers in technical and vocational education and training (TVET) in Sudan: Case of Khartoum State (Doctoral dissertation). Dresden: Technische Universität Dresden.
- Catimon, E. (2017). Readiness of public elementary schools in implementing Department of Education (DepEd) Order 35, series of 2016: Basis for policy improvement (Doctoral dissertation). Philippine Normal University, Manila, Philippines.
- Omar, C. (2014). The need for in-service training for teachers and its effectiveness in school (Doctoral dissertation). Sultan Idris Education University, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia.
- Thompson, J. T. (1992). Developing and implementing an in-service training program to change teacher attitude towards mainstream learning disabled students at the secondary level (Doctoral dissertation). Nova University, Florida, USA.
- Uche, U. W. (2011). A study of the perception of teacher educators of in-service training programmes in Lagos State (Master’s thesis). Nigerian Educational Research Council, Lagos, Nigeria.
- Department of Education. (2016). DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016: The Learning Action Cell as a K to 12 basic education program school-based continuing professional development strategy for the improvement of teaching and learning. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph
- Philippine Statistics Authority. (2021). Census of population and housing 2020: Medina, Misamis Oriental statistical tables. Retrieved from https://psa.gov.ph
- TeacherPH. (2020). Understanding the RPMS-PPST and IPCRF for teachers. Retrieved from https://www.teacherph.com
- UNESCO. (2015). Teacher support and professional learning in remote and rural schools. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org
- World Bank. (2019). Teachers in lagging regions: Challenges in delivering quality basic education in rural areas. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org
This study examined the relationship between the implementation of Learning Action Cell (LAC) sessions and the
work performance of public elementary school teachers in hinterland schools. It described the extent of LAC implementation
in terms of regularity, relevance, collaboration, mentoring, and contextual responsiveness; determined the level of teachers’
work performance based on their Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) ratings; and tested the
significant relationship between LAC implementation and teacher performance. A descriptive–correlational design was
employed using a researcher-made survey questionnaire adapted from existing LAC instruments and DepEd Order No. 35,
s. 2016. The instrument consisted of Likert-type items on LAC practices and a self-reported IPCRF rating and was
administered to public elementary teachers assigned in geographically isolated and disadvantaged hinterland schools. Data
were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage) and Pearson product–
moment correlation. Results revealed that LAC sessions were implemented to a high extent, particularly in promoting
collaboration, sharing of best practices, and addressing classroom challenges, although constraints in time, resources, and
follow-through mechanisms were noted. Teachers’ work performance was generally rated Very Satisfactory to Outstanding.
Correlational analysis indicated a positive and significant relationship between the extent of LAC implementation and
teachers’ work performance, suggesting that more frequent, relevant, and well-facilitated LAC sessions are associated with
higher performance levels. The study concludes that strengthening LAC implementation—especially in terms of
contextualized content, sustained mentoring, and systematic monitoring—can support continuous professional development
and enhance teacher performance in hinterland settings.
Keywords :
Learning Action Cell, Professional Growth, Elementary Teachers, Hinterland Areas, Remote Professional Development, Teacher Competencies.