⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



School Heads’ Perspectives on Instructional Resource Sufficiency in Public Schools


Authors : Norilyn Ebio-Divina; Manuel V. Estera

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3x9s3jpx

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ywcajme9

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1149

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study examined the perceived sufficiency of instructional learning resources and how school heads’ perceptions influence decision-making on their allocation, distribution, and utilization. Specifically, it explored print-based materials, digital and multimedia resources, and manipulative learning materials, while identifying challenges in resource management and proposing evidence-based guidance for school heads. Using a descriptive-quantitative design, data were collected from school heads through surveys and structured interviews. Findings revealed varying levels of resource sufficiency. Print-based and digital materials were moderately sufficient, with supplementary reading materials and teaching guides rated highest, while textbooks, teachers’ laptops, and learner access to digital devices showed gaps. Manipulative learning materials were rated critically low, particularly in physical education, art, music, and Technical-Vocational-Livelihood tools. School heads assessed resource sufficiency through intuitive judgment, informal monitoring, teacher and property custodian feedback, and formal evaluation procedures. Their perceptions were found to significantly influence decision-making by guiding gap identification, prioritizing distribution, and informing financial planning for evidence-based allocation. Major challenges included the absence of structured tracking tools, limited provision and allotment of materials, constrained budgets, delayed procurement, substandard quality, and delayed delivery of resources. To address these issues, the study proposed the DARE-LRM Model, a cyclical framework encompassing Diagnose, Analyze, Respond, and Evaluate, designed to support systematic, responsive, and sustainable instructional resource management. The study concludes that targeted acquisition and equitable distribution of manipulative materials, combined with structured monitoring and the adoption of the DARE-LRM Model, can strengthen school-level management of instructional resources, enhance teaching effectiveness, and improve learning outcomes.

Keywords : Instructional Resource Sufficiency, Digital and Multi-Media Resources, Manipulative Learning Materials, DARE – LRM Model, Teaching Effectiveness.

References :

  1. Abellera, J. (2017). The state of science teaching in the Philippines: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Philippine Education, 6(1), 35-48.
  2. Abott, C., Kogan, V., Lavertu, S., & Peskowitz, Z. (2020). School district operational spending and student outcomes: Evidence from tax elections in seven states. Journal of Public Economics, 183, 104142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104142
  3. ABS-CBN News. (2024, September 23). DepEd moves to speed up purchase of textbooks, other learning tools. ABS-CBN News. https://www.abs-cbn.com/news/2024/9/23/deped-moves-to-speed-up-purchase-of-textbooks-other-learning-tools-1045
  4. Aguilos, M. D. (2025). The impact of limited budget on resource and facility allocation in education. DepEd Bataan. https://depedbataan.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/THE-IMPACT-OF-LIMITED-BUDGET-ON-RESOURCE-AND-FACILITY-ALLOCATION-IN-EDUCATION.pdf
  5. Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16
  6. Baars, Siebren & Schellings, Gonny & Joore, Peter & Wesemael, P.J.V.. (2022). Physical learning environments’ supportiveness to innovative pedagogies: students’ and teachers’ experiences. Learning Environments Research. 26. 1-43. 10.1007/s10984-022-09433-x.
  7. Bariu, T. N. (2020). Status of ICT infrastructure used in teaching and learning in secondary schools in Meru County, Kenya. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 1(1), e02002. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/8283
  8. Benner, M., & Partelow, L. (2017). Reimagining the school day: Innovative schedules for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
  9. Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications (Rev. ed.). George Braziller.
  10. Caldwell, Brian & Spinks, Jim. (2013). The Self-Transforming School. 1-221. 10.4324/9780203387986.
  11. Chi, C. (2024, December 16). What we know so far: DepEd's P12 billion 'budget cut'. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2024/12/16/2407813/what-we-know-so-far-depeds-p12-billion-budget-cut
  12. Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines (1987), Article XIV, Section 1.
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  14. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  15. Cristina, S. T., Popescu, D. M., Stoica, E., & Erculescu, L. M. (2018). Managing the Influence of Resources on Educational Performance. International Journal of Sustainable Economies Management, 7(4), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSEM.2018100104
  16. Daniels, H., Tse, H. M. C., Stables, A., & Cox, S. (2019). Design as a social practice: The experience of new build schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1521375
  17. Department of Budget and Management. https://www.dbm.gov.ph/index.php/2022/general-appropriations-act-fy-2022
  18. Department of Education (DepEd). 2016. DepEd Order No. 10 s. 2016 - Policy and Guidelines for the Comprehensive Water, Sanitation and Hygiene in Schools (WINS) Program, 19 February 2016. https://wins.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/DO_s2016_10-1.pdf
  19. Department of Education (DepEd). 2021. National School Building Inventory SY 2018-2019 and SY 2019-2020 (Dataset). Pasig City: DepEd. https://sites.google.com/deped.gov.ph/102859/about-us/school-profile/education-facilities/national-school-building-inventory
  20. Department of Education. (2023). Revised Guidelines on the Implementation of the Department of Education Computerization Program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2023_016.pdf
  21. Department of Education-Office of the Undersecretary for Administration (DepEd-OUA). 2020. Accelerating the Implementation of the School Building Program. Aide Memoire, 20 June 2020 (Document). https://authdocs.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/OUAD00 0620-0007.pdf
  22. Department of Education-Office of the Undersecretary for Administration (DepEd-OUA). 2020b. Completing the First Phase of the Solar and Electrification Program for Schools, Aide Memoire, 02 June 2020 (Document). https://authdocs.deped.gov.ph/wp content/uploads/2021/09/FINAL-11-Solar-and-Electrification-Program-for-Schools 0921120-20210908.pdf
  23. DepEd Tambayan. (2023, March 15). The hidden costs of inadequate resources: Exploring the impact on student learning. https://depedtambayan.net/hidden-costs-inadequate-resources-exploring-impact-student-learning/
  24. DepEd Tambayan. (n.d.). The classroom shortage crisis: Understanding the root causes and finding solutions. https://depedtambayan.net/classroom-shortage-crisis-understanding-root-causes-finding-solutions/
  25. Díaz, L.M.B. and Cano, E.V., 2019. Effects on academic performance in secondary students according to the use of ICT. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (12), pp. 90-108.
  26. Dibessa, S. (2021). The role of Finnish comprehensive school principals in inclusive education (Master’s thesis, University of Jyväskylä). University of Jyväskylä, Faculty of Education and Psychology. https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstreams/1ec22e74-fb00-42de-93b1-6f5e5a841a10/download
  27. Dubois, T. (2025, July 7). Mastering the art of decision making with the DARE model. Leadership Development. Retrieved January 23, 2026, from https://www.leadership-development.net/blog/mastering-the-art-of-decision-making-with-the-dare-model/
  28. Espeño, Sheena & Babiano, Emilia & Bucoy, May & Busime, Eleonor & de Borja, Joanna Marie. (2024). Issues and Challenges of Implementing Special Education (SPED) Curriculum in the Philippines: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan. 2. 195-205. 10.60132/jip.v2i4.390.
  29. Espiritu, R. A. (2020). Financial Management of School Heads in Selected Public Elementary Schools in DepEd Region III, Philippines. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research, 4(11), 66- 72. http://ijeais.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/IJAMR201112.pdf
  30. Executive Order No. 138, s. 2021. Full Devolution of Certain Functions to LGUs. https://lawphil.net/executive/execord/eo2021/eo_138_2021.html
  31. Fachrunnisa, O., Adhiatma, A., Tjahjono, H.K. (2020). Collective Engagement and Spiritual Wellbeing in Knowledge Based Community: A Conceptual Model. In: Barolli, L., Hussain, F., Ikeda, M. (eds) Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems. CISIS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 993. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22354-0_83
  32. Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 149–190). Academic Press.
  33. Figueroa, L. L., Lim, S., & Lee, J. (2016). Investigating the relationship between school facilities and academic achievements through geographically weighted regression. Annals of GIS, 22(4), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2016.1231717
  34. Garcia, F. D., Apostol, R. C., Baluyot, K., Hernandez, D. V., Jr., & Ngales, H. (2024). Schools' utilization of learning resources: Basis for the development of guidelines on the utilization of learning resources. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(9), 42–56. https://www.ijams-bbp.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/9-IJAMS-SEPTEMBER-2024-42-56.pdf
  35. Garcia, Helen & Mirasol, Joy & Bicar, Beverly & Belderol-Necosia, Joanne. (2021). Statutory policy analysis on access to Philippine quality basic education. International Journal of Educational Research Open. 2-2. 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100093.
  36. Gumus, S, Bellibas, MS, Esen, M & Gumus, E 2018, ‘A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014’, Educational Management Administration and Leadership, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 25–48.
  37. Hallinger, P.,  &  Murphy, J.  (1985). Assessing  the instructional management  behaviour  of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-47.
  38. Inequality in the Distribution of Educational Resources. (2022). Edubirdie. https://hub.edubirdie.com/examples/inequality-in-the-distribution-of-educational-resources/
  39. Jacob-Dedumo, L. S., Chua, L. L., Niňal, M. M., & Ederio, N. T. (2024). Financial management and resource allocation practices in the Schools Division of Surigao del Norte, Philippines. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), 6(4), 1–13. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2024/4/25687.pdf
  40. John, R. (2010). The economy and the function of production in education. http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/vf/v13n1/v13n1a06.pdf
  41. Johnson, R.C. & Jackson, C.K. (2019). Reducing inequality through dynamic complementarity: Evidence from Head Start and public-school spending. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 11(4):310-349
  42. Jurevicius, O. (2023, October 24). Resource-based view. Strategic Management Insight. https://strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/resource-based-view/
  43. Kaur, S., Gupta, S., Singh, S. K., & Perano, M. (2019). Organizational ambidexterity through global strategic partnerships: A cognitive computing perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.027
  44. Krausen, K., Caparas, R., & Willis, J. (2018). Education budget strategies for challenging times: How California school districts are addressing the Silent Recession. San Francisco, CA: WestEd
  45. Lafortune, J., Rothstein, J. & Schanzenbach, D.W. (2018). School Finance Reform and the Distribution of Student Achievement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 10(2): 1–26.
  46. Lalu, G. P. (2025, August 18). DepEd used only 11% of 2023 textbook funds – House research arm. Inquirer News. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2097143/deped-used-only-11-of-2023-textbook-funds-house-research-arm
  47. Llego, M. A. (2020, June 2). Accelerating the implementation of the DepEd school building program. TeacherPH. Retrieved August 18, 2025, from https://www.teacherph.com/deped-school-building-program/
  48. Macayana, Liezl & Mangarin, Rey. (2024). Why Schools Lack Laboratory and Equipment in Science? Through the Lense of Research Studies. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. 8. 2845-2840. 10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8100238.
  49. Mailani, D., Hulu, M. Z. T., Simamora, M. R., & Kesuma, S. A. (2024). Resource-based view theory to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage of the firm: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Studies, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijeass.v4i1.2002
  50. Malipot, M. H. (2023, May 3). DepEd seeks help of partners for key reform objectives, priority interventions in education. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2023/5/3/dep-ed-seeks-help-of-partnersfor-key-reform-objectives-priority-interventions-in-education
  51. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2017). Massachusetts playbooks: Equitable access to excellent educators. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. http://www.doe.mass.edu/educators/equitableaccess/playbooks.html
  52. Matilla, K. J. C. (2023). Challenges of teachers and school heads during the new normal. DepEd Bataan. https://www.depedbataan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/CHALLENGES-OF-TEACHERS-AND-SCHOOL-HEADS-DURING-THE-NEW-NORMAL.pdf
  53. Mburu, P. K. (2020, January). Application of system’s theory in education. Open Academic Discourse at South Eastern Kenya University. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22063.07844
  54. McKillip, M., & Luhm, T. (2020). Investing additional resources in schools serving low-income students: Evidence for advocates. Fair School Funding: A Resource Equity Report. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED609061.pdf
  55. Mejdalani, A., Mendes E., Costa, R., Hallack, M., Lopez, D. and Vazquez, M., 2018. A brighter future: the impact of rural school electrification programs on the dropout rate in primary education in Brazil. https://publications.iadb.org/en/brighter-future-impact-rural-school electrification-programs-dropout-rate-primary-education-brazil
  56. Mncube, Dumsani & Ajani, Oluwatoyin & Ngema, Thandi & Mkhasibe, Gugu. (2023). Title: Exploring the Problems of Limited School Resources in Rural Schools and Curriculum Management History: Exploring the Problems of Limited School Resources in Rural Schools and Curriculum Management. UMT Education Review. 6. 2023. 10.32350/UER.62.01.
  57. Molaudzi, A.M. (2020). The Role of Resources in Promoting Teaching and Learning in South Africa. In: Adeyemo, K.S. (eds) The Education Systems of Africa. Global Education Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43042-9_35-1
  58. Muliati, Agustina & Sihotang, Winda & Octaviany, Rini & Darwin,. (2022). Effectiveness of School Resources Management in Improving the Quality of Education. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 1. 901-916. 10.55927/eajmr.v1i6.480.
  59. Munna, A. S. (2021). Instructional Leadership and Role of Module Leaders. International Journal of Educational Reform, 32(1), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879211042321 (Original work published 2023)
  60. Nassou, Yousra & Bennani, Zakaria. (2024). Contingency Theory in Management: Conceptual Phases and Strategic Link with Performance Measurement Systems. European Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. 1. 183-187. 10.59324/ejahss.2024.1(3).16.
  61. National Conference of State Legislatures. (2019). Education legislation bill tracking database. National Conference of State Legislatures. http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/education-bill-trackingdatabase.aspx
  62. National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA). 2017. Philippine Development Plan 2017-2022. Pasig City: NEDA.
  63. National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA). 2021. Enhanced PDP 2017-2022 Results Matrices (December 14, 2021 Update). https://neda.gov.ph/enhanced-pdp-2017-2022-results-matrices/
  64. National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA). 2021a. Updated Philippine Development Plan 2017-2022 (February 2021 Update). Pasig City: NEDA.
  65. Navarro, A. M. (2022, March). School infrastructure in the Philippines: Where are we now and where should we be heading? (Discussion Paper Series No. 2022-10). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps2210.pdf
  66. Navarro, A. M. (2022, March). School infrastructure in the Philippines: Where are we now and where should we be heading? (Discussion Paper Series No. 2022-10). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps2210.pdf
  67. Navarro, A. M. (2024). School infrastructure in the Philippines: Where are we now and where should we be heading? Research Paper Series RPS 2024-06. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/rps2024.06
  68. Ndlovu, N. (2018). School resources and student achievement: A study of primary schools in Zimbabwe. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(7), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2017.3293
  69. Ochada, N. R. C., & Gempes, G. P. (2018). The realities of maintenance and other operating expenses (MOOE) allocation in basic education system: unheard voices of public school teachers. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(4), 315-324. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=khlIl0AAAAJ&citation_for_view=kh-lIl0AAAAJ:IWHjjKOFINEC
  70. OECD. (n.d.). Education equity dashboard. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/dashboards/education-equity.html
  71. Of COVID19. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/34432
  72. Ohio Department of Education. (2019). FY19 local equity planning resources. Ohio Department of Education. http://education.ohio.gov/Topics/Teaching/Educator-Equity/Educator-Equity-in-Ohio/Local-Equity-Plan-1
  73. Ombay, G. (2025, May 26). DepEd: Classroom shortage still at 165,000. GMA Integrated News. Retrieved January 23, 2026, from https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/947396/deped-classroom-shortage-still-at-165-000/story/
  74. Ondong, J. (2024). Utilization of School Resources in Basic Education: A Multiple Case Study. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(10), 1045-1064. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10601769
  75. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
  76. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en.html
  77. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2024). Education at a Glance 2024. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/education-at-a-glance-2024_c00cad36-en.html
  78. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Resourcing
  79. Plata, S. M., San Juan, D. M. M., Alontaga, J. V. Q., & Quesada, A. A. (2024). Tech mediated learning resources for developing foundational reading literacy skills in K to 3: Literature review, infrastructure situation, materials availability review, and policy recommendations for Philippine schools (Research Paper Series No. 005). Second Congressional Commission on Education (EDCOM 2). https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2024/11/5_Plata-et-al_Tech-Mediated-Learning- Strouse, G. A., Opoku, A., Mourlam, D. J., Newland, L. A., Chesnut, S. R., & Williams Jr., J. M. (2024). Educators’ enacted beliefs about the use of print and digital media in early and middle childhood classrooms. Discover Education Research. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44217-024-00329-x
  80. Quality education. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4
  81. Republic of the Philippines. (2021). An Act Extending the Availability of the 2021 Appropriations to December 31, 2022, Amending for the Purpose Section 62 of the General Provisions of Republic Act No. 11518, the General Appropriations Act of Fiscal Year 2021. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2021/ra_11640_2021.html
  82. Republic of the Philippines. (2022). General Appropriations Act (GAA) FY 2022.
  83. Republic of the Philippines. (2023). Approved Budget (2023). Department of Education.
  84. Republic of the Philippines. (2024). Approved Budget (2024). Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/Approved-Budget-2024.pdf
  85. Romulo, R. (2025, February 28). How PHL could revitalize school infrastructure. Daily Tribune. https://tribune.net.ph/2025/02/28/how-phl-could-revitalize-school-infrastructure
  86. School Education. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/about/projects/resourcing-school-education.html
  87. SETDA. (2019). Digital vs print instructional materials guide. https://qualitycontent.setda.org/selection/from-print-to-digital/
  88. Sovacool, B. K., & Ryan, S. E. (2016). The geography of energy and education: Leaders, laggards, and lessons for achieving primary and secondary school electrification. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.219
  89. Suprijo, S., Tjahjono, H. K., Muafi, M., & Prajogo, W. (2019, 10-11 April). Innovation behavior and manager’s performance based on local wisdom: Sustainable construction approach. Paper presented at the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, Granada, Spain.
  90. Teachers Click. (2021, September 18). DepEd ideal class size, teacher to learner ratio (KG, G1–G4, G5–G10, SHS). Teachers Click. https://www.teachersclick.com/2021/09/deped-ideal-class-size-teacher-to.html
  91. Teachers Institute. (2023). The impact of print media on distance education. https://teachers.institute/communication-and-information-technology/impact-print-media-distance-education/
  92. Teves, M. J. T. E. G., Sampang, M. J. S., & Candelario, S. G. L. (2025). From access to impact: Assessing the effectiveness of early childhood learning resource materials in the Philippines. EDCOM 2. https://edcom2.gov.ph/publications/from-access-to-impact-assessing-the-effectiveness-of-early-childhood-learning-resource-materials-in-the-philippines/
  93. Trinidad, J. E. (2020). Material resources, school climate, and achievement variations in the Philippines: Insights from PISA 2018. International Journal of Educational Development, 75, 102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102174
  94. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). Public school expenditures. Retrieved January 31, 2019, from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cmb. asp
  95. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). (2024). World Education Statistics 2024.
  96. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). (2025). Data Browser. Retrieved from
  97. UNESCO. (2024, June 25). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023, Southeast Asia: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/global-education-monitoring-report-2023-southeast-asia-technology-education-tool-whose-terms-summary
  98. UNESCO. (n.d.). Education for sustainable development. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved August 18, 2025, from https://www.unesco.org/en/sustainable-development/education
  99. UNICEF East Asia and Pacific Regional Office. (2024). Teachers’ digital literacy in the East Asia and Pacific region: Spotlight on Cambodia, China, Lao PDR, Solomon Islands, and Vanuatu. https://www.unicef.org/eap/media/16211/file/Final%20Teachers%20Digital%20Literacy%20NEW.pdf.pdf
  100. Unite, B. (2021, June 22). A look back on 'Build, Build, Build's' milestones as it reaches its final year. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2021/6/22/a-look-back-on-build-build-builds-milestones-as-it-reaches-its-final-year
  101. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2022). Global Education Monitoring Report 2022 – South Asia – Non-state actors in education: Who chooses? Who loses? Paris: UNESCO. https://inee.org/sites/default/files/resources/383550eng.pdf
  102. United Nations. (2015). Sustainable Development Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable
  103. Valenzuela, Erma & Buenvinida, Lerma. (2021). Managing School Operations and Resources in the New Normal and Performance of Public Schools in One School Division in the Philippines. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 3. 149-157. 10.54476/iimrj296.
  104. Vidal-Esteve, M. I., & Martín-Gómez, S. (2023). Digitalization of Classrooms: A Comparative Study on Teachers’ Perceptions about the Use of Digital Teaching Materials in Early Childhood and Primary Education. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1156. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111156Resources.pdf
  105. Vinuya, M. Q., & Alquizar, R. M. (2025). Digitized instructional materials and learning outcomes. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 8(05). https://www.ijmra.ijpbms.com/v8i5/82.php
  106. Welland, A., 2017. Education and electrification of rural schools. Technical report 2013. April 2017. Smart Villages 2017. http://e4sv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/TR13-Education and-the-Electrification-of-Rural-Schools_web-1.pdf (accessed on April 14, 2021).
  107. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  108. Willis, J., Krausen, K., Caparas, R., & Taylor, T. (2019). Resource allocation strategies to support the Four Domains for Rapid School Improvement. WestEd.
  109. Willis, J., Krausen, K., Caparas, R., & Taylor, T. (2019). Resource allocation strategies to support the Four Domains for Rapid School Improvement. WestEd. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED602981.pdf
  110. World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. World Bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/28340
  111. World Bank. (n.d.). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/
  112. World Bank. 2020. The Human Capital Index 2020 Update: Human Capital in the Time

This study examined the perceived sufficiency of instructional learning resources and how school heads’ perceptions influence decision-making on their allocation, distribution, and utilization. Specifically, it explored print-based materials, digital and multimedia resources, and manipulative learning materials, while identifying challenges in resource management and proposing evidence-based guidance for school heads. Using a descriptive-quantitative design, data were collected from school heads through surveys and structured interviews. Findings revealed varying levels of resource sufficiency. Print-based and digital materials were moderately sufficient, with supplementary reading materials and teaching guides rated highest, while textbooks, teachers’ laptops, and learner access to digital devices showed gaps. Manipulative learning materials were rated critically low, particularly in physical education, art, music, and Technical-Vocational-Livelihood tools. School heads assessed resource sufficiency through intuitive judgment, informal monitoring, teacher and property custodian feedback, and formal evaluation procedures. Their perceptions were found to significantly influence decision-making by guiding gap identification, prioritizing distribution, and informing financial planning for evidence-based allocation. Major challenges included the absence of structured tracking tools, limited provision and allotment of materials, constrained budgets, delayed procurement, substandard quality, and delayed delivery of resources. To address these issues, the study proposed the DARE-LRM Model, a cyclical framework encompassing Diagnose, Analyze, Respond, and Evaluate, designed to support systematic, responsive, and sustainable instructional resource management. The study concludes that targeted acquisition and equitable distribution of manipulative materials, combined with structured monitoring and the adoption of the DARE-LRM Model, can strengthen school-level management of instructional resources, enhance teaching effectiveness, and improve learning outcomes.

Keywords : Instructional Resource Sufficiency, Digital and Multi-Media Resources, Manipulative Learning Materials, DARE – LRM Model, Teaching Effectiveness.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - May - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe