⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Science Fiction as a Medium for Social Critique: Gender Dynamics on Selected Sci-Fi Novels Across Generations


Authors : Ahsana Fathima A. S.

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yfyrb765

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4tksabj5

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr2485

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : The openness of the genre Science Fiction enables it to address imaginative and crucial concerns of modern society. Gender inequality, systemic oppression and environmental degradation are critiqued in the selected sci-fi works: Frankenstein, Frankissstein and The Stone Gods respectively. This paper will draw upon science fiction as “the literature of cognitive estrangement” a definition coined by Darko Suvin (1979) in analysing science fiction as a tool of critical theory. Science Fiction therefore is “the literature of cognitive estrangement” (Suvin, 1979) which makes use of “estrangement” or defamiliarization of the world as we know it to create a critical distance between the reader and their sociological context. Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein (1818) critiques gender inequality by allowing a male-character to steal womanhood’s biggest contribution - childbirth. Jeanette Winterson’s Frankissstein (2019) critiques binary gender conventions by centring a transgender character, allowing readers to critique modern gender expectations. The novel also critiques the power relations of creating life and consciousness. Jeanette Winterson’s The Stone Gods (2007) critiques womanhood’s marginalization in corporate-and-colonial power structure induced dystopian world. Frankenstein enables systemic oppression to be critiqued through the reader’s symbiosis with the Creature. Frankissstein critiques systemic subjugation through its representation of artificial intelligence and transhumanism. The Stone Gods critiques systemic subjugation in corporations and colonial government and offers spotlight to the consequences of unchecked power. It also criticizes environmental negligence and interconnectedness to it by the mankind. Through the setup of a dystopian society as a result for humankind’s abuse towards earth, the novel portrays the urgency of ethical consideration in the anthropocentric world.

Keywords : Science Fiction, Gender Inequality, Environmental Degradation, Artificial Intelligence, Transhumanism.

References :

  1. Butler, J. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.Routledge,1990.
  2. Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan, 2nd ed, Vintage Books, 1995.
  3. Haraway, D. A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. Socialist Review,15(2), 65-107.
  4. Le Guin, U. K. The Left Hand of Darkness. Ace Books. 1969.
  5. Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein or, The Modern Prometheus. Harmondsworth. Penguin. 1985. free Ebook at planetebook.com
  6. Suvin, D. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre.Yale University Press.1979.
  7. Winterson, Jeanette. Frankissstein: A Love Story. London: Vintage. 2019.
  8. The Stone Gods. London: Penguin. 2007.

The openness of the genre Science Fiction enables it to address imaginative and crucial concerns of modern society. Gender inequality, systemic oppression and environmental degradation are critiqued in the selected sci-fi works: Frankenstein, Frankissstein and The Stone Gods respectively. This paper will draw upon science fiction as “the literature of cognitive estrangement” a definition coined by Darko Suvin (1979) in analysing science fiction as a tool of critical theory. Science Fiction therefore is “the literature of cognitive estrangement” (Suvin, 1979) which makes use of “estrangement” or defamiliarization of the world as we know it to create a critical distance between the reader and their sociological context. Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein (1818) critiques gender inequality by allowing a male-character to steal womanhood’s biggest contribution - childbirth. Jeanette Winterson’s Frankissstein (2019) critiques binary gender conventions by centring a transgender character, allowing readers to critique modern gender expectations. The novel also critiques the power relations of creating life and consciousness. Jeanette Winterson’s The Stone Gods (2007) critiques womanhood’s marginalization in corporate-and-colonial power structure induced dystopian world. Frankenstein enables systemic oppression to be critiqued through the reader’s symbiosis with the Creature. Frankissstein critiques systemic subjugation through its representation of artificial intelligence and transhumanism. The Stone Gods critiques systemic subjugation in corporations and colonial government and offers spotlight to the consequences of unchecked power. It also criticizes environmental negligence and interconnectedness to it by the mankind. Through the setup of a dystopian society as a result for humankind’s abuse towards earth, the novel portrays the urgency of ethical consideration in the anthropocentric world.

Keywords : Science Fiction, Gender Inequality, Environmental Degradation, Artificial Intelligence, Transhumanism.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - June - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe