Authors : Khushbu H. Patel; Ruchi M.Patel; Meghna R. Adhvaryu

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5xb9x5em

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4vdm6a47

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY998

Abstract : Withania somnifera also known as Ashwagandha used as rasayana (tonic) in Ayurvedic system of medicine. It is widely considered as Indian Ginseng and possesses medicinal properties like adaptogenic, antistress, anxiolytic, anti-arthritic, anti-inflammatory etc. There is long history of microbes having stable symbiotic relationship with plants aiding them in growth and survival. This endophytic relationship is also been observed in medicinal plants. This study is an attempt to observe the biodiversity of endophytic fungal community in Withania somnifera and to understand their colonization. The study was aimed to isolate endophytes from different organs of Withania somnifera with seasonal variations. A total of 131 endophytic fungi were isolated from 450 explants from different organs like leaves, stems and roots of W. somnifera. The overall colonization rate of endophytes in winter, summer and monsoon were 42.67%, 7.33% and 37.33% respectively. Among the identified isolates, most abundant and frequently isolated genera were Alternaria, Fusarium and Chaetomium sps. The dominant species isolated in winter were the Fusarium moniliformae and Chaetomium globosum from leaves with 17.24% and 13.79% dominant frequency, respectively. While Alternaria raphani and Chaetomium globosum were most dominant species in summer from leaves with 40% dominant density. In the monsoon, Microsporum ferruginem was the most dominant species isolated from leaves and stem with 61.29% and 42.86%, respectively. The most recurring endophytic species of Ascomycetes group were Alternaria alternata and Chaetomium globosum seen in all seasons.

Keywords : Endophytic fungi, Withania somnifera, Seasonal Diversity, Colonization frequency.

References :

1. Alanazi, H. H., & Elfaki, E. (2023). The immunomodulatory role of withania somnifera ( L .) dunal in in fl ammatory diseases. February: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1084757
2. Azevedo, J. L., Maccheroni, W., Pereira, J. O., & De Araújo, W. L. (2000). Endophytic microorganisms: A review on insect control and recent advances on tropical plants. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 3(1):40–65. https://doi.org/10.2225/vol3-issue1-fulltext-4
3. Cohen, S. D. (2006). Host selectivity and genetic variation of Discula umbrinella isolates from two oak species: analyses of intergenic spacer region sequences of ribosomal DNA. Microbial Ecology, 52(3):463–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9073-5
4. Cordero-Bueso, G., Arroyo, T., Serrano, A., Tello, J., Aporta, I., Vélez, M. D., & Valero, E. (2011). Influence of the farming system and vine variety on yeast communities associated with grape berries. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 145(1):132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.11.040
5. Hill, M. O. (1973). Diversity and Evenness: A Unifying Notation and Its Consequences. Ecology, 54(2): 427–432. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934352
6. Kumar, D. S. S., & Hyde, K. D. (2014). Biodiversity and tissue-recurrence of endophytic fungi in Tripterygium wilfordii Biodiversity and tissue-recurrence of endophytic fungi in Tripterygium wilfordii. May.
7. Lindow, S. E., & Brandl, M. T. (2003). Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(4): 1875–1883. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.4.1875-1883.2003
8. Mir, B. A., Khazir, J., Mir, N. A., Hasan, T.-U., & Koul, S. (2012). Botanical, chemical and pharmacological review of Withania somnifera (Indian ginseng): an ayurvedic medicinal plant. Indian Journal of Drugs and Diseases, 1. www.iseeadyar.org/ijdad.html
9. Moricca, S., & Ragazzi, A. (2008). Fungal endophytes in mediterranean oak forests: A lesson from Discula quercina. Phytopathology, 98(4):380–386. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-98-4-0380
10. Petrini, O., Sieber, T. N., Toti, L., & Viret, O. (1993). Ecology, metabolite production, and substrate utilization in endophytic fungi. Natural Toxins, 1(3): 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/nt.2620010306
11. Promputtha, I., Hyde, K. D., McKenzie, E. H. C., Peberdy, J. F., & Lumyong, S. (2010). Can leaf degrading enzymes provide evidence that endophytic fungi becoming saprobes? Fungal Diversity, 41(March):89–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-010-0024-6
12. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(4): 623–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x
13. Simpson, E. H. (1951). The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 13(2): 238–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00088.x
14. Tejesvi, M. VTejesvi, M. V., Nalini, M. S., Mahesh, B., Prakash, H. S., Kini, K. R., Shetty, H. S., & Subbiah, V. (2007). New hopes from endophytic fungal secondary metabolites. Bol Soc Quím Méx, 1(1): 19–26.
15. Wang, Y., & Guo, L. D. (2007). A comparative study of endophytic fungi in needles, bark, and xylem of Pinus tabulaeformis. Canadian Journal of Botany, 85(10):911–917. https://doi.org/10.1139/B07-084
16. Zhang, H. W., Song, Y. C., & Tan, R. X. (2006). Biology and chemistry of endophytes. Natural Product Reports, 23(5): 753–771. https://doi.org/10.1039/b609472b