Authors : Esmen M. Cabal; Jay Edquid Eclevia; Manilyn D. Baltazar

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/cr69m4ax

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdz2h2ey

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct1603

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : Instructional supervision aimed towards the engagement of learning. This study focused in assessing teachers’ instructional supervision and professional engagement in relation to students’ academic performance in the Schools Division of Zambales. The study used survey questionnaire as a research tool and developed the JEDE model to further increase students’ academic performance. The findings revealed that the teacher-respondents and school head-respondents reported that instructional supervision is highly utilized in teaching. The teacher-respondents and school head-respondents reported that teachers were highly engaged in their professional engagement. The Grade 10 students were rated very satisfactory in their academic performance. There was significant difference in teachers’ instructional supervision as described by teachers themselves and by their school heads. There was significant difference in teachers’ professional engagement as described by teachers themselves and by their school heads. There was significant relationship between teachers’ instructional supervision and the level of students’ academic performance. There was a significant relationship between teachers’ professional engagement and the level of students’ academic performance. The JEDE instructional supervision model was conceptualized showing the relationship of teachers’ instructional supervision and professional engagement to the level of students’ academic performance. Teachers are encouraged to further develop their instructional supervision through professional engagement to further increase students’ academic performance. Teachers may consider to pay attention on varying professional engagement and partner to other agencies to further develop weak points.

Keywords : Instructional Supervision, Professional Engagement, Academic Performance.

References :

1. Ali, L. (2018). The Design of Curriculum, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education with Constructive Alignment. Journal of Education and e-learning Research, 5(1), 72-78.
2. Al-Khateeb, S. A. (2021). The Effect of Instructional Supervision on the Teaching Effectiveness of Faculty Members in Jordanian Public Universities. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 391-406.
3. Acda, R. F. & Pacaño, R. G. (2019). Effects of the RPMS on teachers' performance and job satisfaction: Evidence from the Philippines. International Journal of Educational engagement, 68, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102126
4. Bailey, G. D., & Merritt, D. E. (2017). The relationship between teacher supervision and professional engagement: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Supervision, 6(2), 10-29.
5. Ball, D. L., & McDiarmid, G. W. (2019). The subject matter preparation of teachers. East Lansing, Michigan: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
6. Becker, H. J., & Riel, M. M. (2020). Teacher Professional Engagement and Constructivist-Compatible Computer Use. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey.
7. Ben Youssef, A., Dahmani, M., & Ragni, L. (2022). ICT use, digital skills and students’ academic performance: Exploring the digital divide. Information, 13(3), 129.
8. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2018). Teacher professional engagement in the Philippines: Trends and challenges. Philippine Journal of Education, 97(1), 1-14.
9. Bond, N. (2019). Effective legislative advocacy: Policy experts’ advice for educators. In The Educational Forum (Vol. 83, No. 1, pp. 75-89). Routledge.
10. Brindley, G. (2018). Outcomes-based assessment and reporting in language learning programmes: A review of the issues. Language testing, 15(1), 45-85.
11. Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
12. Brown, M. G., & LeMay, E. J. (2014). Interpersonal skills in organizations. New York: Routledge.
13. Buckless, F. A., Krawczyk, K., & Showalter, D. S. (2014). Using virtual worlds to simulate real-world audit procedures. Issues in Accounting Education, 29(3), 389-417.
14. Bush, V. (1945). Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.
15. Canter, L., & Canter, M. (2018). Assertive discipline: Positive behavior management for today's classroom. Solution Tree Press.
16. Canter, L., & Canter, M. (2013). Assertive discipline: Positive behavior management for today's classroom. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
17. Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. M. (2013). Framing teacher preparation research: An overview of the field, part I. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 395-407. doi:10.1177/0022487113495013
18. Connor, C. M., Mazzocco, M., Kurz, T., Crowe, E. C., Tighe, E. L., Wood, T. S., & Morrison, F. J. (2018). Using assessment to individualize early mathematics instruction. Journal
19. of School Psychology, 66, 97–113. https://doi.org/1016/j.
20. jsp.2017.04.005
21. Crede, M., & Kuncel, N. R. (2016). Study habits, skills, and attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(6), 733-736.
22. Cruess, R. L., & Cruess, S. R. (2013). Professionalism and professional identity formation. In R. L. Cruess, S. R. Cruess, Y. Steinert, & J. M. Norman (Eds.), Teaching medical professionalism (pp. 9-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Cullen, J., & Greene, M. T. (2017). An investigation of teacher self-efficacy and instructional coaching using a multi-level model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 226-236.
24. Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teaching: Evaluation instrument. Research Edition. Charlotte Danielson.
25. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional engagement. Learning Policy Institute.
26. De Guzman, A. B., & Garing, C. B. (2018). Teacher professional engagement in the Philippines: A review of literature. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), 16-23.
27. Dikerdem, M. A. (2015). Transformative learning in teacher professional engagement: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 15, 1-18.
28. DeSimone, C., Garet, M. S., Birman, B. F., Porter, A. C., & Yoon, K. S. (2015). The impact of online learning on students’ course outcomes: Evidence from a large community and technical college system. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 470-489.
29. Department of Education. (2017). Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/2017/06/01/philippine-professional-standards-for-teachers/
30. Department of Education. (2017). Guidelines on the Implementation of the Comprehensive Supervision and Evaluation of Teachers (CSET). DepEd Memorandum No. 71, s. 2017.
31. Department of Education. (2019). National achievement test. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/k-to-12/assessment-and-evaluation/national-achievement-test/
32. Department of Education. (2019). Guidelines on the Utilization of the Results-based Performance Management System (RPMS) Tools for Teachers and School Heads. DepEd Memorandum No. 137, s. 2019.
33. Doabler, C. T., Baker, S. K., Kosty, D. B., Smolkowski, K., Clarke, B., Miller, S. J., & Fien, H. (2015). Examining the associationbetween explicit mathematics instruction and student mathematics achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 115,
34. 303–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/679969
35. Education Trust. (2018). Schools and inequality: A multifaceted problem requiring a multifaceted solution. Retrieved from https://edtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/School
36. Emmer, E. T., & Sabornie, E. J. (2013). Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. New York: Routledge.
37. Franklin, H., & Harrington, I. (2019). A review into effective classroom management and strategies for student engagement: Teacher and student roles in today’s classrooms. Journal of Education and Training Studies.
38. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
39. Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2013). Principles of instructional design. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
40. Garcia, C. P., & Espiritu, A. L. (2015). Lesson study as a model for teacher professional
41. engagement in the Philippines. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 13-20.
42. Garet, M. S., Wayne, A. J., Stancavage, F., Taylor, J., Eaton, M., Walters, K., ... & Song, M. (2016). Teacher professional engagement evaluation guide. US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
43. Garza, R., & Gurr, D. (2015). Leadership for school success: Lessons from effective principals. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(6), 685-701.
44. Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2018). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
45. Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2014). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach. Pearson.
46. Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2018). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach. Pearson.
47. Gonzales, L. E. (2013). Teacher professional engagement in the Philippines: The journey and the destination. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(3), 07-16.
48. Grant, C. A., & Wong, S. S. (2013). Challenges and strategies for creating an inclusive classroom environment. Journal of International Diversity in Organizations, Communities & Nations, 11(2), 45-56.
49. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2021). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
50. Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Noguera, I. (2018). A model for aligning assessment with competences and learning activities in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 36-46.
51. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
52. Hargreaves, A., Fullan, M., Lieberman, A., & Hopkins, D. (2014). Second international handbook of educational change. Springer.
53. Hazel, A. (2017). Quality teaching and learning in the Philippines: Teachers' perspectives on professional development. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 108-118.
54. Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102.
55. Hsieh, H. F., & Wang, J. J. (2013). Effect of ethical behavior on trust in physician: A structural equation model. Medicine, 92(5), 294-300.
56. Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M., & Espinoza, D. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. Darling-Hammond, L.,
57. Houston, P. D., & Beare, P. L. (2017). Instructional supervision and professional learning: A case study of principals and teachers in a US high school. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 290-310.
58. Jimenez-Silva, M., Guzmán, J., & Alarcón, P. (2014). Professional learning communities and teacher change: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 76-87.
59. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (11th ed.). Pearson.
60. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6), 1-110.
61. Kao, G. (2014). Parental involvement and early literacy: A framework for intervention. Early Child Development and Care, 184(3), 410-428.
62. Keltner, D., & Kogan, A. (2014). The role of empathy in social and emotional competence. In J. D. Mayer, R. F. Roberts, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), Emotional intelligence: An IEB perspective (pp. 71-83). New York: Springer.
63. Kennedy, A. (2016). Understanding continuing professional development: The need for theory to impact on policy and practice. Professional Development in Education, 42(2), 161-176.
64. Kim, K. R., & Seo, E. H. (2018). The relationship between teacher efficacy and students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(4), 529-540.
65. Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Routledge.
66. Kong,  S.  C., &  Song,  Y.  (2013). A  principle-based  design framework  for developing  constructivist  learning  in a seamless learning  environment: A teacher  development model  for learning  and  teaching in  digital classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), E209-E212.
67. Kraft, M. A., & Rogers, T. (2015). The underutilized potential of teacher-to-parent communication: Evidence from a field experiment. Economics of Education Review, 47, 49-63.
68. Lefebvre, D. C. (2013). Social learning theory. In B. M. Velde (Ed.), Encyclopedia of curriculum studies (pp. 807-810). Sage Publications.
69. LePage, P., Darling-Hammond, L., Akar, H., Gutierrez, C., Jenkins-Gunn, E., & Rosebrock, K. (2005). Classroom Management.
70. Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., & Anderson, S. E. (2013). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. Wallace Foundation.
71. Love, M. L., & Ewoldt, K. B. (2021). Implementing asynchronous instructional materials for students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 57(2), 132-137.
72. Mary, L., & Young, A. S. (2017). Engaging with emergent bilinguals and their families in the pre-primary classroom to foster well-being, learning and inclusion. Language and Intercultural Communication, 17(4), 455-473.
73. Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. ASCD.
74. Marzano, R. J. (2013). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
75. McLaren, P., & Kincheloe, J. L. (Eds.). (2013). Critical pedagogy and qualitative research: Moving to the bricolage. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed., pp. 277-303). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
76. Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
77. Nieminen, J. H., Asikainen, H., & Rämö, J. (2021). Promoting deep approach to learning and self-efficacy by changing the purpose of self-assessment: A comparison of summative and formative models. Studies in Higher Education, 46(7), 1296-1311.
78. Ormrod, J. E. (2016). Essentials of educational psychology: Big ideas to guide effective teaching. Pearson.
79. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2013). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Boston: Pearson.
80. Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2013). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 40(6), 751-760.
81. Ng, W. H., Tan, C. L., Wong, K. Y., & Lim, S. W. (2021). The relationship between teacher–student interactions and academic performance among middle school students in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1-15.
82. Pasteur, L. (1989). The Germ Theory and its Applications to Medicine and Surgery. In J. Hericourt (Ed.), Charlas de Pasteur (pp. 55-64). Paris: Flammarion.
83. Rabanal, L. A. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions on the impact of the results-based performance management system on their professional development in the Philippines. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research, 6(1), 1-8.
84. Ramos, J. L. & Lumabi, L. J. (2018). The effects of the CSET on teacher performance and professional development in the Philippines. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 33(1), 1-12.
85. Reddy, Y. M., Rhodes, J. E., & Mulhern, M. (2014). The influence of teacher support on student academic performance in a high-poverty urban school. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 19(2), 66-79.
86. Sallee, M. W., & Flood, J. (2018). Instructional supervision: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Supervision, 7(1), 1-22
87. Sánchez-García, A. B., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2013). E-assessment in massive online courses. The Journal of Distance Education, 27(2), 1-16.
88. Shahzan, S., Gayathri, R., & Priya, V. V. (2018). Effects of classroom management practices in professional education. Drug Invention Today, 10(7).
89. Schuler, M. A. (2018). Bridging the gap between professional development and classroom practice: The role of instructional supervision. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 417-429.
90. Shulman, L. S. (2013). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
91. Simmons, K., Carpenter, L., Crenshaw, S., & Hinton, V. M. (2015). Exploration of Classroom Seating Arrangement and Student Behavior in a Second Grade Classroom. Georgia Educational Researcher, 12(1), 51-68.
92. Stanford, CA: National Staff Development Council. Department of Education. (2013). K to 12 basic education program. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/k-to-12/about/ .
93. Starratt, R. J. (2013). Supervision: A redefinition. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
94. Stiggins, R. J. (2013). Assessment for learning: A comprehensive guide to assessment in the classroom. New York: Pearson
95. Sule, M. A., Ameh, E., & Egbai, M. E (2015). Instructional supervisory practices and teachers’ role effectiveness in public Secondary Schools in Calabar South Local Government Area of Cross Rivers state, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(23), 43-46.
96. Tomlinson, C. A. (2013). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
97. Tuchman, B., Lim, L., Murphy, M., & McBride, C. (2020). A randomized controlled trial of online learning strategies grounded in cognitive load theory. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(2), 371-389.
98. Tudor, I. (2013). Teacher roles in the learner-centred classroom. ELT journal, 47(1), 22-31.
99. Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
100. Usman, Y. D. (2015). The Impact of Instructional Supervision on Academic Performance of Secondary School Students in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(10), 160-167.
101. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2014). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 1-27.
102. Wang, J., Odell, S. J., & Schwille, S. A. (2016). Teacher supervision as professional development: Does it support student achievement?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 114-126.
103. Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad.
104. Williams, L. L., Sheerer, M. C., Royster, M. O., Ward, L. W., & Payton, M. (2021). The Impact of Instructional Supervision and Professional Development on Instructional Practices and Student Achievement in a Rural School District. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 36(1), 1-19.
105. Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2013). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
106. Wong, H. K., & Wong, R. T. (2013). The first days of school: How to be an effective teacher. Mountain View, CA: Harry K. Wong Publications
107. Wong, H. K., & Chen, Y. (2018). Teacher supervision and professional development in China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 208-216.
108. Wong, H. K., & Wong, R. T. (2014). The first days of school: How to be an effective teacher. Harry K. Wong Publications.