Authors : Charles Alusine Bangura; Emmanuel Oladipo; Michael Nicol Samai; Mamoud Miracle Sesay

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5bkbcsmj

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/59mcrbk7

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb1298

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This comprehensive study examines cybersecurity governance challenges in Sierra Leone’s public sector through empirical analysis and formal hypothesis testing. We investigate institutional capacity, policy frameworks, and implementation barriers affecting government information security. Our findings reveal significant governance gaps, estimated annual economic losses of USD 2.3–4.8 million, and critical infrastructure vulnerabilities. Using multiple regression analysis (R² = 0.687, p < 0.001) and chi-square contingency analysis (χ² = 6.728, p = 0.009), we confirm that institutional capacity factors and formal security policies significantly predict governance effectiveness and lower incident rates, respectively. Economic impact modeling projects cumulative losses of USD 2.76 million (status quo) through 2027, which would be reduced to USD 797,000 through comprehensive institutional reform. This research provides evidence-based policy recommendations and a strategic implementation roadmap to strengthen digital resilience in Sub-Saharan African public sectors. The study is particularly relevant for developing nations implementing digital transformation initiatives in resource-constrained environments.

Keywords : Cybersecurity Governance, Institutional Capacity, Public Sector Security, Policy Analysis, Developing Nations, Information Security, Digital Resilience, Sub-Saharan Africa.

References :

1. Shamala, P., Choo, K.-K. R., and Bertino, E., “Reconsidering the role of RBAC administration in least privilege,” Journal of Computer Security, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 21–45, 2017.
2. North, D. C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Harvard University Press, 1990.
3. World Economic Forum, “Global cybersecurity outlook: Executive summary,” WEF Reports, pp. 1–28, 2023.
4. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Cybersecurity Framework Version 2.0. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 2023.
5. Frangopoulos, F., Sarvanis, M., and Karanikos, D., “Governance and institutional mechanisms for information security in public administration,” International Journal of Information Security, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 445–462, 2019.
6. Cavusoglu, H., Mishra, B., and Raghunathan, S., “The effect of internet security breaches on market value of e-commerce firms and strategic value of information technology assets,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 137–159, 2004.
7. Kshetri, N., “Cybercrime and cybersecurity in sub-Saharan Africa,” Journal of Global Information Technology Management, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 209–229, 2017.
8. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management Systems. ISO, Geneva, 2022.
9. African Union, African Union Cybersecurity Framework. AU Commission, Addis Ababa, 2021.
10. Kaplan, A. Z. and Haenlein, M., “Siri, Alexa, and other digital assistants: A study of customer satisfaction with artificial intelligence applications,” Journal of Service Marketing, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 649–663, 2019.