Authors : Marina S. Villar; Margarita M. Lanciso

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/bdh2zbh3

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mvp5t648

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1609

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study evaluated the consumer acceptability and sensory attributes of Squash (Cucurbita spp.) Jam and determined whether significant differences exist among different product treatments. A total of 100 consumer-respondents aged 18–60 years, who are regular jam consumers and health-conscious individuals from Lagonoy, Camarines, were selected for sensory evaluation. The product was assessed in terms of appearance, aroma, taste, texture, and overall acceptability using a structured hedonic rating scale. Data were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) at a 5% level of significance to determine significant differences among treatments. Results of the sensory evaluation indicated varying levels of acceptability across the different formulations of squash jam. Statistical analysis using F-test revealed significant differences in at least one of the sensory attributes, suggesting that formulation variations influence consumer perception. Among the evaluated attributes, taste and overall acceptability were identified as the most critical factors affecting preference. The findings suggest that Squash Jam is a promising value-added product with acceptable sensory qualities and potential for commercialization. The study highlights the importance of formulation optimization to improve product quality and consumer acceptability. Further refinement of ingredients and processing conditions is recommended to enhance sensory characteristics and market potential.

Keywords : Sensory, Evaluation, Acceptability, Squash, Jam.

References :

1. Department of Agriculture, Regional Filed Unit no. 10, Agribusiness and Marketing Assistance Division Bureau of Agricultural Statistics (2009) information on “Squash”. September 2011. http://afmis. da.gov.ph/
2. Gałkowska, D., Fortuna, T. and Zagórska, W.P. (2010). Physicochemical quality of selected strawberry jams with fructose. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 4(2), 22-24. https:// doi.org/10.5219/46.
3. Baker, R. A., et al. (2005). Fruit and vegetable products: Processing technology. CRC Press.
4. Nindo, C. I., Tang, J., Powers, J. R., & Takhar, P. S. (2005). Rheological properties of blueberry puree after thermal processing. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 38(7), 711–717
5. Pears, P. (2004). Vegetable crops and their uses. Agricultural Publishing.
6. Sas, A. (1984). Vegetable production in tropical regions. University Press.
7. Dagoon, J. D. (2001). Principles and practices of agronomy. Rex Book Store.
8. Shepherd, A. (2011). Pumpkin and squash: Production and uses. CABI Publishing
9. Kubo, A., et.al., (2010), Dietary Factors and the Risksof Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma and Barret’s Oesophagus Nutrition Research Reviews, USA
10. Rachel, S., & Kabelka, E. (2009). Nutritional composition of pumpkin and squash. Horticultural Science Journal
11. Rachel, A. and Kabelka, E.A. (2009). Correlation between L, a, and b color space values and carotenoids content in pumpkin and squash. American Society for Horticulture Science, 44(3), 633-637. https://doi.org/10.21273/ HORTSCI.44.3.633 Dror, D.K. and Allen, L.H. (2011). Vitamin E deficiency in developing countries. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, the United Nations University, 2, 32. https:// doi.org/10.1177/156482651103200206
12. Yadav, M., Jain, S., Tomar, R., Prasad, S. and Yadav, H. (2010). Medicinal and biological potential of pumpkin in: An updated review. Nutrition Research Reviews, 23, 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S095442241000010
13. Ahmed, H.A, Idriss S.H.E., Elhesain M.H.A., Babiker A.M.O.A, Widatalla M.M. and Abdalla M. (2022). A comparative study of jam processing from pumpkin with sugarcane and pumpkin with date juice. Austin Food Sciences, 7(2), 1-5.
14. Chambial, S., Dwivedi, S., Kant Shukla, K., John P.J. and Sharma, P. (2013). Vitamin C in disease prevention and cure: An overview. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemical, 28(4), 314-328. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s12291-013-0375-3
15. Jones, P.J.H., Shamloo, M., MacKay, D.S., Rideout, T.C., Myrie, S.B., Plat, J., Roullet, J.B., Baer, D.J., Calkins, K.L., Davis, H.R., Barton Duell, P., Ginsberg, H., Gylling, H., Jenkins, D., Lütjohann, D., Moghadasian, M., Moreau, R.A., Mymin, D., Ostlund, R.E. and Ras, R.T. (2018). Progress and perspectives in plant sterol and plant stanol research.
16. Cory, H., Passarelli, S., Szeto, J., Tamez, M. and Mattei, J. (2018). The Role of Polyphenols in Human Health and Food Systems: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Nutrition, 21(5), 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fnut.2018.00087
17. Development Initiatives. Country Nutrition Profiles: Philippines. 2022 Glob Nutr Rep. 2022. https://globalnutritionreport.org/resources/nutrition-profiles/asia/south-eastern-asia/philippines/
18. Angeles-Agdeppa I, Sun Y, Denney L, Tanda K V., Octavio RAD, Carriquiry A, et al. Food sources, energy and nutrient intakes of adults: 2013 Philippines National Nutrition Survey. Nutr J. 2019;18: 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12937-019-0481-z 
19. Popkin BM, Corvalan C, Grummer-Strawn LM. Dynamics of the double burden of malnutrition and the changing nutrition reality. Lancet. 2020;395: 65–74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32497-3 
20. Pradeilles R, Baye K, Holdsworth M. Addressing malnutrition in low- and middle-income countries with double-duty actions. Proc Nutr Soc. 2018;78: 388–397. doi: 10.1017/S0029665118002616
21. Davis J, Oaks B, Engle-Stone R. The Double Burden of Malnutrition: A Systematic Review of Operational Definitions. Curr Dev Nutr. 2020;3: 1–14. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa127 
22. de Juras AR, Hsu WC, Hu SC. The Double Burden of Malnutrition at the Individual Level Among Adults: A Nationwide Survey in the Philippines. Front Nutr. 2021;8: 1–9. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.760437 
23. Peryam, D.R. and Pilgrim, F.J. (1957). Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Journal of Food Science, 11(9), 9-14.
24. Lawless, H. T., & Heymann, H. (2010). Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices (2nd ed.). Springer.
25. Meilgaard, M., Civille, G. V., & Carr, B. T. (2007). Sensory evaluation techniques (4th ed.). CRC Press
26. Desrosier, N. W., & Desrosier, J. N. (1977). The technology of food preservation (4th ed.). AVI Publishing.
27. Stone, H., & Sidel, J. L. (2004). Sensory evaluation practices (3rd ed.). Elsevier Academic Press
28. Ahmed, H.A, Idriss S.H.E., Elhesain M.H.A., Babiker A.M.O.A, Widatalla M.M. and Abdalla M. (2022). A comparative study of jam processing from pumpkin with sugarcane and pumpkin with date juice. Austin Food Sciences, 7(2), 1-5
29. Tuolienuo, Cornelia and Galyuoni, (Benedicta 2022). Proximate Composition and Sensory Evaluation of Jam Produced from Pineapple and Pumpkin Pulp Blend. Nat. Volatiles & Essent. Oils, 2022; 9(2): 735-744
30. Montgomery, D. C. (2022). Design and Analysis of Experiments, 9^th edition. Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 9781119113478 (PBK) ; 9781119299455 (EVALC)
31. Mallillin, W. et.al., (2025). Microbial analysis and Sensory Acceptability of Squash Donuts. Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. Volume 6, No. 2
32. Santiago, J. M., Caymo, N. S., & Cajucom, R. L. (2019). Sensory Acceptability of Squash Yema Spread. International Journal Science and Research. Volume 8 issue 8.
33. Mercada, et.,al.,(2022). Sensory Acceptability of Squash (Cucurbita maxima) Cupcake in The Municipality of Isabel, Leyte. Irish Interdisciplinary Journal of Science & Research (IIJSR), 6(4), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.46759/IIJSR.2022.6408
34. Carduza, S. J. G., & Camari, A. G. (2026). Development and Acceptability of Squash Flower Muffins. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. Volume 6, Issue 1
35. Fellows, P. J. (2009). Food Processing Technology: Principles and Practice. International Widely Indexed Open Access Scholarly Academic Research Journal
36. Lawless, H. and Heymann, H. (2010).  Sensory Evaluation of Food Science Principles and Practices. Chapter 1, 2nd Edition, Ithaca, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6488-58
37. Tagud, J. M. J., Baclayon, M. B., & Agoylo, J. C. Jr. (2024). Evaluation of the Organoleptic Properties of Calabash Fruit (Crescentia Cujete) Jam: A Comprehensive Sensory analysis. (2024).  International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science. 13(8) https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2024.130802
38. Nindo, C. I., et al. (2005). Effect of processing on food quality attributes.
39. Peryam, D. R., & Pilgrim, F. J. (1957). Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technology, 11, 9–14.