Simulation and Performance Analysis of a Synchronous Generator Excitation System: Case of the IEEE ST1A


Authors : Achiza Mushagalusa Josué; Ramazani Mukamba Joseph; Assani Pataule Grâce

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 12 - December


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5n6vtfjz

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdf54nnt

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25dec1400

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This paper presents a simulation-based performance analysis of the IEEE ST1A static excitation system for a synchronous generator. This system plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal generator operation by regulating the output voltage and maintaining network stability under disturbances. The main objective is to evaluate the stability, speed, accuracy, and damping characteristics of the voltage regulator. The methodology is based on MATLAB/SIMULINK simulations, enabling a detailed analysis of the ST1A model's dynamic behavior under various fault conditions, including single-phase, two-phase, and three-phase faults within an IEEE 9-bus network. The results show that the ST1A system provides fast and precise voltage regulation, minimizing oscillations and enhancing overall system robustness. However, its ability to damp low-frequency electromechanical oscillations is limited. The integration of a multi-band Power System Stabilizer (PSS4B) proves essential to significantly improve damping, reduce settling times, and enhance transient stability. The coordinated ST1A–PSS4B configuration thus represents an effective solution for reliable voltage control and stability enhancement.

Keywords : Synchronous Generator, Excitation System, IEEE ST1A Model, Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR), Voltage Stability, Transient Response, MATLAB/SIMULINK Simulation, Reactive Power, Power System Stabilizer (PSS), Dynamic Performance.

References :

  1. M. B. Idris and A. J. Elzubia, ‘The Effect of Excitation System on Synchronous Generator Transient Stability’, IJIREEICE, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 84–87, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.17148/IJIREEICE.2016.4817.
  2. D. Jiang et al., ‘Research on excitation system of synchronous generator’, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1607, no. 1, p. 012040, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1607/1/012040.
  3. P. Sankhwar, ‘Excitation System, Proportional and Integral Controls of a Synchronous Generator for Reducing Adverse Impacts to Power System from Voltage Fluctuations’, SSRN Electron. J., 2025, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5168281.
  4. H. Zimmer, M. W. Asmah, and J. Hanson, ‘Influences of Excitation Systems on the Dynamic Voltage Behavior of Power Systems’.
  5. ‘IEEE Std 421.1-2007, IEEE Standard Definitions for Excitation Systems for Synchronous Machines’.
  6. A. Al-Zahrani‏ and S. K. Ramdas, ‘Performance Evaluation of Excitation Systems in Stability Enhancement of Power Systems’, Eur. J. Eng. Technol. Res., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 82–93, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.24018/ejeng.2022.7.5.2820.
  7. J. K. Noland, S. Nuzzo, A. Tessarolo, and E. F. Alves, ‘Excitation System Technologies for Wound-Field Synchronous Machines: Survey of Solutions and Evolving Trends’, IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 109699–109718, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2933493.
  8. X. Shen and Y. Wei, ‘Research on Performance Test of Generator Excitation System’, in Proceedings of the 2017 7th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Engineering (ICMSE 2017), Zhuhai, China: Atlantis Press, 2017. doi: 10.2991/icmse-17.2017.71.
  9. P. Kambala, K. P. Yadav, M. Thakur, and S. Deshmukh, ‘Optimized Controllers for Efficient Excitation in Power Generation Systems: Design and Performance Analysis’, J. Mines Met. Fuels, pp. 3551–3561, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.18311/jmmf/2025/49937.
  10. A. Kumar, ‘Nonlinear AVR for power system stabilisers robust phase compensation design’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 14, no. 21, pp. 4927–4935, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2020.0092.
  11. M. Prajapati, J. Patel, D. H. Chandwani, and M. V. Patel, ‘Digital Excitation System for Synchronous Generator’.
  12. S. Tsegaye and K. A. Fante, ‘Analysis of Synchronous Machine Excitation Systems: Comparative Study’, Int. J. Energy Power Eng., vol. 10, no. 12, 2016.
  13. A. Fathollahi and B. Andresen, ‘Enhancing Transient Stability in Multi-Machine Power Systems through a Model-Free Fractional-Order Excitation Stabilizer’, Fractal Fract., vol. 8, no. 7, p. 419, July 2024, doi: 10.3390/fractalfract8070419.
  14. R. Kumari and A. Kumar, ‘Power System Stabilizer Design for Nonlinear AVR Using Local Measurements’.
  15. Ravina B.  Binnar and Walchand College of Engineering, ‘Analysis of Static Excitation System Models for Synchronous Machine’, Int. J. Eng. Res., vol. V9, no. 09, p. IJERTV9IS090027, Sept. 2020, doi: 10.17577/IJERTV9IS090027.
  16. A. Kutsyk, M. Semeniuk, M. Korkosz, and G. Podskarbi, ‘Diagnosis of the Static Excitation Systems of Synchronous Generators with the Use of Hardware-In-the-Loop Technologies’, Energies, vol. 14, no. 21, p. 6937, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14216937.

This paper presents a simulation-based performance analysis of the IEEE ST1A static excitation system for a synchronous generator. This system plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal generator operation by regulating the output voltage and maintaining network stability under disturbances. The main objective is to evaluate the stability, speed, accuracy, and damping characteristics of the voltage regulator. The methodology is based on MATLAB/SIMULINK simulations, enabling a detailed analysis of the ST1A model's dynamic behavior under various fault conditions, including single-phase, two-phase, and three-phase faults within an IEEE 9-bus network. The results show that the ST1A system provides fast and precise voltage regulation, minimizing oscillations and enhancing overall system robustness. However, its ability to damp low-frequency electromechanical oscillations is limited. The integration of a multi-band Power System Stabilizer (PSS4B) proves essential to significantly improve damping, reduce settling times, and enhance transient stability. The coordinated ST1A–PSS4B configuration thus represents an effective solution for reliable voltage control and stability enhancement.

Keywords : Synchronous Generator, Excitation System, IEEE ST1A Model, Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR), Voltage Stability, Transient Response, MATLAB/SIMULINK Simulation, Reactive Power, Power System Stabilizer (PSS), Dynamic Performance.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - January - 2026

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe