Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Awareness Among Allied Health Sciences Student


Authors : Ramiya R; Dinesh Kumar; Ajayaathitan. M; V. Sivaprakash

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4f2ejfyn

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yebcxfj8

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul1856

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : Introduction Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) is a valuable imaging technique used to assess various diseases by providing insights into the functional and metabolic processes within the body. Unlike traditional imaging methods, SPECT generates computer-based images that reflect the distribution of radiotracers introduced into the patient's system. These images are produced using gamma cameras, which may have one or more heads to detect the gamma radiation emitted by the radiotracers. Gamma rays, a type of electromagnetic radiation, travel at different wavelengths than visible light and allow for the visualization of internal physiological activity. In contrast, Computed Tomography (CT) scans provide three-dimensional anatomical images based on the body's x-ray absorption properties.  Aim To assess the knowledge levels and create awareness about single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) among AHS students in Saveetha College of Allied Health Sciences.  Materials and Method A cross- sectional research was conducted with a self-administered questionnaire containing ten questions distributed amongst 100 Allied Health Science students. The students were randomly selected across various disciplines of Allied Health Sciences. The questionnaire assessed the awareness about single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), safety and application among Allied Health Sciences Students. The responses were recorded and analyzed. There were no incomplete responses and no dropouts from the study. The final data obtained was organized, tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis.  Results Among 100 Allied Health Sciences Students, 77% of the respondents were aware of SPECT (SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY) 17% were not aware and 6% are not sure (Fig- 1). 33% were aware that SPECT AND CT (or conventional CT) are the same, 42% were not aware and 25% were not sure (Fig-2). 45% were aware of can routine iodinated contrast medium can be used in SPECT 27% were not aware and 28% are not sure (Fig-3). 30% were aware of can SPECT be done for a breast-feeding patient 32% were not aware and 38% were Not sure (Fig-4), and 25% were aware of can a pregnant patient be treated with radionuclides 49% were not aware and 26% were not sure in (Fig-5).  Conclusion Awareness of Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) remains limited among Allied Health Science students. To improve understanding and highlight its clinical value, it is important to introduce targeted educational programs and awareness campaigns. Additionally, updating and enhancing the academic curriculum to include more comprehensive information on SPECT can play a crucial role in increasing students' knowledge and familiarity with this imaging modality.

Keywords : Awareness, SPECT, CT, Radioactive Tracer, Allied Health Sciences.

References :

  1. Power SP, Moloney F, Twomey M, James K, O’Connor OJ, Maher MM. Computed tomography and patient risk: facts, perceptions and uncertainties. World journal of radiology. 2016 Dec 28;8(12):902.
  2. Buck AK, Nekolla S, Ziegler S, Beer A, Krause BJ, Herrmann K, Scheidhauer K, Wester HJ, Rummeny EJ, Schwaiger M, Drzezga A. Spect/ct. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2008 Aug 1;49(8):1305-19.
  3. International Atomic Energy Agency. Clinical Applications of SPECT: New Hybrid Nuclear Medicine Imaging System. IAEA; 2008.
  4. Bybel B, Brunken RC, DiFilippo FP, Neumann DR, Wu G, Cerqueira MD. SPECT/CT imaging: clinical utility of an emerging technology. Radiographics. 2008 Jul;28(4):1097-113.
  5. Chen L, Wang X, Bao J, Geng C, Xia Y, Wang J. Direct comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. PloS one. 2014 Feb 10;9(2): e88402.
  6. Naqvi SA, Imran MB, Özdemir Dİ. Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Radiopharmaceuticals. InMedical Isotopes 2020 Aug 21. IntechOpen.
  7. Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ, Frush DP, Hall EJ, Howell RW, McCollough CH, Mettler FA, Pearce MS, Suleiman OH, Thrall JH. Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology. 2011 Mar;258(3):889-905.
  8. Lee SJ, Park HJ. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for radiotherapy planning in patients with lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Scientific reports. 2020 Sep 10;10(1):1-1.
  9. Pimlott SL, Sutherland A. Molecular tracers for the PET and SPECT imaging of disease. Chemical Society Reviews. 2011;40(1):149-62.
  10. Jaszczak RJ, Coleman RE, Lim CB. SPECT: Single photon emission computed tomography. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 1980 Jun;27(3):1137-53.
  11. Khalil MM, Tremoleda JL, Bayomy TB, Gsell W. Molecular SPECT imaging: an overview. International journal of molecular imaging. 2011;2011.
  12. SO’Connor MK, Kemp BJ. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography: basic instrumentation and innovations. InSeminars in nuclear medicine 2006 Oct 1 (Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 258-266). WB Saunders.
  13. Raji CA, Tarzwell R, Pavel D, Schneider H, Uszler M, Thornton J, Van Lierop M, Cohen P, Amen DG, Henderson T. Clinical utility of SPECT neuroimaging in the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. PloS one. 2014 Mar 19;9(3): e91088.
  14. Rosestedt M, Andersson KG, Mitran B, Rinne SS, Tolmachev V, Löfblom J, Orlova A, Ståhl S. Evaluation of a radiocobalt-labelled affibody molecule for imaging of human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 expression. International journal of oncology. 2017 Dec 1;51(6):1765-74.
  15. Madsen MT. Recent advances in SPECT imaging. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2007 Apr 1;48(4):661-73.
  16. Mariani G, Bruselli L, Kuwert T, Kim EE, Flotats A, Israel O, Dondi M, Watanabe N. A review on the clinical uses of SPECT/CT. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2010 Oct;37(10):1959-85.

Introduction Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) is a valuable imaging technique used to assess various diseases by providing insights into the functional and metabolic processes within the body. Unlike traditional imaging methods, SPECT generates computer-based images that reflect the distribution of radiotracers introduced into the patient's system. These images are produced using gamma cameras, which may have one or more heads to detect the gamma radiation emitted by the radiotracers. Gamma rays, a type of electromagnetic radiation, travel at different wavelengths than visible light and allow for the visualization of internal physiological activity. In contrast, Computed Tomography (CT) scans provide three-dimensional anatomical images based on the body's x-ray absorption properties.  Aim To assess the knowledge levels and create awareness about single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) among AHS students in Saveetha College of Allied Health Sciences.  Materials and Method A cross- sectional research was conducted with a self-administered questionnaire containing ten questions distributed amongst 100 Allied Health Science students. The students were randomly selected across various disciplines of Allied Health Sciences. The questionnaire assessed the awareness about single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), safety and application among Allied Health Sciences Students. The responses were recorded and analyzed. There were no incomplete responses and no dropouts from the study. The final data obtained was organized, tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis.  Results Among 100 Allied Health Sciences Students, 77% of the respondents were aware of SPECT (SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY) 17% were not aware and 6% are not sure (Fig- 1). 33% were aware that SPECT AND CT (or conventional CT) are the same, 42% were not aware and 25% were not sure (Fig-2). 45% were aware of can routine iodinated contrast medium can be used in SPECT 27% were not aware and 28% are not sure (Fig-3). 30% were aware of can SPECT be done for a breast-feeding patient 32% were not aware and 38% were Not sure (Fig-4), and 25% were aware of can a pregnant patient be treated with radionuclides 49% were not aware and 26% were not sure in (Fig-5).  Conclusion Awareness of Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) remains limited among Allied Health Science students. To improve understanding and highlight its clinical value, it is important to introduce targeted educational programs and awareness campaigns. Additionally, updating and enhancing the academic curriculum to include more comprehensive information on SPECT can play a crucial role in increasing students' knowledge and familiarity with this imaging modality.

Keywords : Awareness, SPECT, CT, Radioactive Tracer, Allied Health Sciences.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe