Authors : Dr. T. Marazi

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/u2nscx22

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may354

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Sorghum and millet held significant sociological and anthropological importance in various African societies, particularly in regions characterized by arid and semi-arid climates. These drought-tolerant grains were not merely dietary staples; they were deeply interwoven with social structures, belief systems, and cultural practices. This study examines how the cultivation, processing, and consumption of sorghum and millet shaped social organization, ritual life, and economic systems across diverse African communities. The analysis explored how sorghum and millet cultivation influenced settlement patterns, with many communities establishing themselves in areas conducive to their growth. Land tenure systems were often structured around access to these crops, impacting social hierarchies and power dynamics. The study further investigated the division of labor within households and communities, highlighting the roles of women, men, and children in different stages of production, from planting and weeding to harvesting and processing. Furthermore, the consumption of sorghum and millet was frequently embedded in ritualistic practices. These grains were integral to ceremonies marking significant life events, such as births, marriages, and funerals. They were also used in offerings to ancestors and deities, reflecting a profound spiritual connection to the land and its bounty. The study delved into the symbolic meanings attributed to sorghum and millet, demonstrating how they represented fertility, prosperity, and community solidarity. Beyond their nutritional and ritual significance, sorghum and millet played a crucial role in the economic systems of many African societies. They served as mediums of exchange, facilitated trade, and contributed to the development of local markets. Surpluses of these grains were often stored and utilized as famine reserves, enhancing resilience in the face of environmental challenges.

References :

1. Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred ecology (2nd ed.). Routledge.
2. Bhatty, R.S. (1993). Nutritional Composition of Sorghum. Cereal Chemistry, 70(2), pp. 161-167.
3. Brouwer, H. (2013). Collective Action in Agricultural Development: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(2), pp. 425-442.
4. Chambers, R., Pacey, A., and Thrupp, L.A. (2014). Farmer First: A Methodology for Participatory Research. Institute of Development Studies.
5. Cleveland, D. A. (2017). Food from dryland gardens: An ecological, nutritional and social approach to small-scale household food production. Routledge.
6. Dorward, A., et al. (2015). Millet and Sorghum: Food insecurity and its implications. Global Food Security, 4, pp. 35-44.
7. Eithun, C.A., et al. (2020). Soil Fertility and Food Security of Traditional Crops in West Africa. Sustainability, 12(11), Article 4573.
8. Ejeta, G. (2011). The global relevance of sorghum and millet research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1229(1), 31-42.
9. Food and Agriculture Organization (2023). The Role of Sorghum and Millet in Food Security.
10. Harris, D.R. (2009). Agriculture in the African Past. In: The Oxford Handbook of African Archaeology. Oxford University Press.
11. Krings, M. (2017). Food and identity in Niger: An anthropology of indigenous and post-colonial contexts. Indiana University Press.
12. Maret, P. (1985). Sowing the seeds: Historical grains and the socio-cultural dimensions of millet and sorghum cultivation in Africa. Journal of African History, 26(1), 1-16.
13. Mastrorillo, M., et al. (2016). Millet: A resilient crop for food security. Agricultural Systems, 141, pp. 154-161.
14. Netting, R. McC. (1993). Smallholders, householders: Farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford University Press.
15. Okeke, P. N. (2017). Indigenous agricultural knowledge systems in Nigeria: A gendered perspective. Springer.
16. Sustainable Development Goals (2023). The Potential of Sorghum and Millet for Sustainable Development.
17. Tripp, R. (2001). Seed Regulation: A Transaction Cost Perspective. World Development, 29(9), pp. 1555-1570.
18. Xie, S., et al. (2016). Cultural Significance of Sorghum and Millet. Human Ecology, 44(3), pp. 307-316.
19. Barrett, C. B., & Swallow, B. M. (2006). Fractured landscapes: Inequality and the environment in Africa. Earthscan.
20. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
21. Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113.
22. Chambers, R. (1994). Rural appraisal: Rapid, relaxed, and participatory. Institute of Development Studies.
23. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
24. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
25. Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148-170.