Authors : Maigida S. Abba; Edicha Jibrin A.; Adekiya Oyelayo A.; Oludele J. Ayoola

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/7wkyfe7y

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3tx99x25

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul1037

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Urban recreational facilities are critical components of sustainable city development, providing essential services that enhance human well-being, promote social cohesion, and deliver key ecosystem benefits such as climate regulation, biodiversity conservation, and air purification. Despite their importance, limited attention has been given to the integrated assessment of their spatial distribution, user characteristics, and ecosystem service functions, particularly in rapidly growing cities of developing countries. This study examines recreational facilities in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, Nigeria, with the aim of evaluating their spatial usage patterns, socio-demographic characteristics of users, recreational behaviours, and perceived ecosystem service contributions. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining quantitative surveys of 462 park users with qualitative data from key informant interviews and focus group discussions. Data were collected through questionnaires, field observations, and stakeholder engagements across identified recreational parks in Abuja. Descriptive statistical techniques were used to analyze quantitative data, while qualitative responses were thematically analyzed to provide contextual insights. Findings reveal distinct functional and demographic differentiation among park types. Large Formal Parks serve a diverse population with emphasis on exercise, environmental education, and passive recreation; Neighborhood Parks function as essential community-based spaces for daily use, nature appreciation, and family interaction; while Commercial/Amusement Parks are predominantly youth-oriented, event-driven leisure spaces. Across all park types, users are generally well-educated, with varying income, occupational, and marital profiles shaping patterns of visitation and use. The study further shows that recreational parks in Abuja provide significant perceived ecosystem services, particularly in relation to mental health support, aesthetic improvement, and climate regulation. However, awareness of regulating ecosystem services such as water management and biodiversity conservation remains limited. Visitation patterns also reveal spatial and temporal inequalities, with peak use occurring during weekends and festive periods, and evidence of uneven access and infrastructure quality across park categories. The study concludes that recreational facilities in Abuja play a vital socio-ecological role but are constrained by spatial inequality, infrastructure deficits, and limited public understanding of their full environmental value. It recommends differentiated park management strategies, improved infrastructure investment, enhanced environmental education, and strengthened urban planning integration to promote equitable access and long-term sustainability of recreational ecosystems in the city.

Keywords : Urban Recreational Facilities; Spatial Distribution; Ecosystem Services; Park Users; Environmental Sustainability.

References :

1. Adekunle, M. F., & Adedeji, A. A. (2012). Public perception and management of urban parks in Nigeria. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 5(12), 310–317.
2. Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29(2), 293–301.
3. Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129–138.
4. Ezeamaka, C. K., & Oluwole, A. (2017). Assessment of recreational facilities in Federal Capital City, Abuja, Nigeria. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 49(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.12498
5. Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Barton, D. N. (2013). Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics, 86, 235–245.
6. Ihuma, J. O., Tella, A. O., Madakan, G., & Akpan, E. J. (2016). Socio-ecological survey of parks and gardens in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, 8(2), 54–64. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jrfwe/article/view/134384
7. Jim, C. Y., & Chen, W. Y. (2006). Recreation–amenity use and contingent valuation of urban green spaces in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(1–2), 81–96.
8. Kabisch, N., Korn, H., Stadler, J., & Bonn, A. (2017). Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas. Springer International Publishing.
9. Majebi, E. C., & Agbebaku, H. U. (2024). People’s perceptions of environmental quality at selected recreation/tourist sites in Abuja, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Analysis and Tourism, 12(1), 66–76. https://jeate.k-publisher.com/index.php/Jete/article/view/116
10. Mensah, C. A. (2014). Urban green spaces in Africa: Nature and challenges. International Journal of Ecosystem, 4(1), 1–11.
11. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
12. Mustapha, A., Muhammad, A. U., & Muhammad, N. (2021). Assessment of the impact of participation in recreational activities on mental health of people in FCT Abuja. Education and Training Studies Journal, 9(4), 1–8. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/etsj/article/view/224245
13. Talen, E. (2003). Neighborhoods as service providers: A methodology for evaluating pedestrian access. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(2), 181–200.
14. United Nations. (2019). World Urbanization Prospects 2018: Highlights. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York.