Specific Absorption Rate Inside Human Skeletal Muscle at Second Band of Frequency (2.4 - 2.4835GHz)


Authors : Sandeep Kumar

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/25pmy7uw

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/nhbpsre4

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP568

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : In the current scenario the radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitted from wireless equipment viz. mobile phone towers, mobile phones, computers, laptops, microwave ovens, high voltage electric lines etc. has been increased continuously and expose the living beings. The human cells are affected by electromagnetic fields (EMF) and with the development of the fifth generation (5G) of mobile communication technologies and frequency are far increasing; the human skin becomes the first main biological tissue of the human body. In this paper Author’s evaluated SAR for skeletal muscles in human body at 2.4 GHz Radiofrequency (RF) and discuss its harmful effects.Those peoples are living nearby mobile phones towersare exposed directly by EMRand regarding their health issues due to Non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation, The Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) within human body skeletal muscle is calculated through mathematical model and results were compare with standard permitted values of SAR given by many National and International agencies like International Commission non- ionizing radiation Committee (ICNIRC), National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP), World Health Organization (WHO), Federal Communication Commission (FCC) and Department of Telecommunications (DOT) etc.

Keywords : Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR), Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), Electromagnetic Field (EMF), Radiofrequency(RF) etc.

References :

  1. Adey W. R., Electromagnetic fields and the essence of living systems, Plenary Lecture, 23rd General Assembly, International Union of Radio Sciences (URSI), Prague, in J. Bach, Andersen, ed., Modern Radio Science, Oxford University Press, pp. 1-36, 1990.
  2. Moulder J. E. and Foster K. R., Biological effects of power-frequency fields as they relate to carcinogenesis, Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. Med. 209, 309-324, 1995.
  3. Mclntosh, R. L., Anderson, V. and  Mckenzie, R. J., A numerical evaluation of SAR distribution and temperature changes around a metallic plate in the head of a RF exposed worker, Bioelectromagnetics, 23, 377-388, 2005.
  4. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements: Biological effects and exposure criteria for radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, NCRP Report No. 86, 1986.
  5. NCRP, Biological effect of modulated radiofrequency fields (NCRP Commentary No 18), National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, M. D., 2003.
  6. Pathak P. P., Kumar S. and Kumar V., Harmfulness of mobile phones tower, XXIX General Assembly of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI 08), Paper No. 2395, Commission K,  Chicago IL, U.S.A., 9-16 August 2008.
  7. Pathak P. P. Vijay Kumar and Vats R. P. Harmful Electromagnetic Environment near transmission towers, Indian Journal of Radio and Space Physics, 32, 238-241, 2003.
  8. Polk C., Dissymmetric extrapolations across biological systems: Dosimetry of ELF magnetic fields, Bioelectromagnetics, 13-S1, 1992.
  9. Polk C., “Introduction”, In Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, C. Polk and E. Postow (eds.), Boca Raton, CRC Press, USA, 1-23, 1996.
  10. Kumar V., Vats R. P., Goel S., Kumar S., Pathak P. P., Interaction of electromagnetic field with human health, Indian Journal of Radio and Space Physics, 37, 131-134, 2008.
  11. Kumar S., Pathak P. P., Induced electric field inside and surface of human brain due to mobile phone radiation, National Journal of Natural and Physical Science, 20 : pp 35-39, 2006a.
  12. Foster K. R., Moulder J. E., Are mobile phones safe? IEEE Spectrum, pp. 23-28, Aug. 2000.
  13. Rani M.Usha et.al.”Analysis of SAR in Human blood, bones and muscles due to mobile waves at 900 MHz, 1800MHz and 2400 MHz. Int.J.Applied Engineering Research, 13,pp 2025-2029,2018.
  14. Sandeepkumar , P.P. Pathak ‘ Electromagnetic Radiation and human health’. Int. Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9,pp 2008-2013, 2024.

In the current scenario the radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitted from wireless equipment viz. mobile phone towers, mobile phones, computers, laptops, microwave ovens, high voltage electric lines etc. has been increased continuously and expose the living beings. The human cells are affected by electromagnetic fields (EMF) and with the development of the fifth generation (5G) of mobile communication technologies and frequency are far increasing; the human skin becomes the first main biological tissue of the human body. In this paper Author’s evaluated SAR for skeletal muscles in human body at 2.4 GHz Radiofrequency (RF) and discuss its harmful effects.Those peoples are living nearby mobile phones towersare exposed directly by EMRand regarding their health issues due to Non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation, The Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) within human body skeletal muscle is calculated through mathematical model and results were compare with standard permitted values of SAR given by many National and International agencies like International Commission non- ionizing radiation Committee (ICNIRC), National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP), World Health Organization (WHO), Federal Communication Commission (FCC) and Department of Telecommunications (DOT) etc.

Keywords : Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR), Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), Electromagnetic Field (EMF), Radiofrequency(RF) etc.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe