Authors : Isa Munir Husaini; Ekeyi Israel

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4fjy3vwp

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4b6arm5p

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct085

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : The construction of secure landfill liners consumes vast quantities of high-quality natural clay, leading to resource depletion and environmental concerns. Concurrently, the foundry industry generates significant amounts of Waste Foundry Sand (WFS), a by-product that poses disposal challenges. This study investigates the feasibility of utilizing WFS stabilized with bentonite as a sustainable material for landfill liner applications. WFS was mixed with bentonite (0% to 10% by weight) and compacted using British Standard Heavy (BSH) energy. Index properties, compaction characteristics, and Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) at 7, 14, and 28-day curing periods were evaluated. Results indicate that the addition of bentonite transformed the non-plastic WFS into a plastic material at 8% bentonite content and above. The Maximum Dry Density (MDD) decreased from 1.96 Mg/m3 to 1.6 Mg/m3, while the Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) increased from 17% to 21% as bentonite content increased from 0% to 10%. The UCS increased with both bentonite content and curing period, peaking at 383.61 kN/m2 for the 8% bentonite mixture after 28 days of curing. This value significantly surpasses the common regulatory benchmark of 200 kN/m2 for liner stability. The study concludes that an optimum mix of 92% WFS and 8% bentonite, compacted at BSH energy, provides a technically viable, sustainable, and economically beneficial alternative to conventional clay liners, effectively valorizing industrial waste while meeting critical geotechnical requirements for waste containment.

Keywords : Waste Foundry Sand, Bentonite, Landfill Liner, Unconfined Compressive Strength.

References :

1. Osinubi, K. J., & Moses, G. (2012). Attenuation of contaminant migration in compacted lateritic soil treated with bentonite. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 138(6), 734-740.
2. Daniel, D. E. (1993). Geotechnical Practice for Waste Disposal. Chapman & Hall.
3. Inyang, H. I. (2003). Framework for feasibility assessment and implementation of waste and recycled material in construction. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 129(4), 210-218.
4. FHWA (2012). Foundry Sand Facts for Civil Engineers. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
5. Pribulova, A. (2013). Foundry sand as a secondary raw material and its possible processing. Journal of Metallurgy, 2013.
6. Deng, A., & Tikalsky, P. J. (2008). Geotechnical and leaching properties of flowable fill incorporating foundry sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134(7), 994-1003.
7. Siow, L., & Chandima, D. P. (2013). A review on the geotechnical and mechanical properties of bentonite-enhanced soils. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 7(10), 760-764.
8. FHWA (2004). User Guidelines for Waste and Byproduct Materials in Pavement Construction. Publication No. FHWA-RD-97-148.
9. Johnson, C. K. (1981). Phenols in foundry waste sand. Modern Casting, 71(2), 38-39.
10. Recycled Materials Resource Center (RMRC). Typical Mechanical Properties of Spent Foundry Sand.
11. EUBA (2011). Bentonite - Material Safety Data Sheet. European Bentonite Association.
12. O'Kelly, B. C. (2005). A review of the geotechnical characteristics of peat. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 17(5), 595-599.
13. Murthy, V. N. S. (2008). Geotechnical Engineering: Principles and Practices of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. CRC Press.