Authors :
Dr. Pradeep P. Tapkire; Vivek B. Pirgonde
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3npzhyj7
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/2w97xf65
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1037
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This paper presents a comprehensive
investigation of the structural analysis of unreinforced
masonry (URM) and reinforced masonry (RM)
structures, tracing the evolution from traditional
construction techniques to modern engineering practices.
Historically, the focus of structural design in ancient
buildings was largely on geometry and material form.
With the advent of steel and concrete, this focus shifted to
the strength and resilience of materials. Utilizing both
experimental data and computational modeling, this
study compares the structural performance of URM and
RM, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each
method. The findings indicate that reinforced masonry
structures exhibit superior strength and stability, making
them more suitable for seismic regions, while
unreinforced masonry can still be viable under specific
conditions. The study concludes with recommendations
for integrating traditional construction techniques with
modern materials to enhance building safety and
resilience.
Keywords :
Ancient Buildings, Structural Behavior, Joints.
References :
- Griffith, M. C., Abrams, D. P., Shapiro, D. A., Schutz, B. G., & Tait, M. J. (2003). "Seismic Performance of Unreinforced and Reinforced Masonry Buildings." *Journal of Structural Engineering*, 129(6), 821-829.
- Drysdale, R. G., & Hamid, A. A. (1989). "Behavior of Reinforced Masonry Shear Walls under Cyclic Loading." *Journal of Structural Engineering*, 115(10), 2609-2625
- Magenes, G. (2006). "Performance-Based Design of Masonry Structures." *Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics*, 35(9), 1155-1176
- Schlegel, R., & Hegger, J. (2012). "Modeling and Analysis of Reinforced Masonry Structures." *Journal of Structural Engineering*, 138(1), 105-113.
- Sarhosis, V., Sheng, Y., Sheng, M. J., & Kotsovos, K. S. (2014). "Experimental Study on Seismic Retrofitting of Unreinforced Masonry Structures." *Journal of Structural Engineering*, 140(2), 04013054.
- Milani, G. (2011). "Finite Element Analysis of Masonry Structures: Review and Advances." *Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering*, 18(3), 351-384.
- Lagomarsino, S., & Giovinazzi, S. (2006). "Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings." *Journal of Earthquake Engineering*, 10(1), 73-92
- Lourenço, P. B., & Rots, J. G. (1997). "Dynamic Behavior of Masonry Structures: Experimental and Numerical Approaches." *Journal of Structural Engineering*, 123(5), 660-667.
- Bruneau, M. (1994). "Evaluation of Masonry Structures under Seismic Loads: An Integrated Approach." *Journal of Structural Engineering*, 120(1), 76-100.
- D'Ayala, D., & Speranza, E. (2003). "Innovative Strengthening Techniques for Masonry Structures." *Journal of Earthquake Engineering*, 7(2), 275-305
This paper presents a comprehensive
investigation of the structural analysis of unreinforced
masonry (URM) and reinforced masonry (RM)
structures, tracing the evolution from traditional
construction techniques to modern engineering practices.
Historically, the focus of structural design in ancient
buildings was largely on geometry and material form.
With the advent of steel and concrete, this focus shifted to
the strength and resilience of materials. Utilizing both
experimental data and computational modeling, this
study compares the structural performance of URM and
RM, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each
method. The findings indicate that reinforced masonry
structures exhibit superior strength and stability, making
them more suitable for seismic regions, while
unreinforced masonry can still be viable under specific
conditions. The study concludes with recommendations
for integrating traditional construction techniques with
modern materials to enhance building safety and
resilience.
Keywords :
Ancient Buildings, Structural Behavior, Joints.