Authors :
Sahasra V.; Nithiya Sri V.; Yukaciny S.; Krithika V.; P. Deepalakshmi; Dr. D. P. Sivasakti Balan; R. J. Thayumanaswamy
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/4ta7ujbc
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/ypxj5yed
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun133
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Using a quantitative research design, this study analyzes trade data from the UN Comtrade Database, the International
Monetary Fund (IMF), India's Ministry of Commerce, and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The research tracks overall
trade metrics alongside specific high-volume imports under the Harmonized System (HS) code classification system. The
data reveals that India became highly dependent on ASEAN imports for critical industrial inputs and raw materials,
particularly Electronics (HS 85), Machinery (HS 84), and Palm Oil (HS 15). Conversely, competitive Indian exports were
held back by strict Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) in ASEAN markets and undermined by weak Rules of Origin (RoO)
enforcement, which allowed third-party countries like China to route cheap goods into India duty-free through ASEAN
hubs.
The findings show that this heavy influx of cheap imports hurt India's domestic economy. It created inverted duty
structures that made local manufacturing less competitive, reducing the effectiveness of national industrial initiatives like
Make in India and Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes. Additionally, vulnerable domestic sectors—including small
businesses (MSMEs) and plantation agriculture (rubber, tea, and palm oil)—faced intense financial pressure. While India's
services sector generated a steady surplus through digital exports, ASEAN’s strict limits on the movement of professionals
(Mode 4) prevented it from growing enough to offset the massive merchandise deficit. The study concludes that the current
trade framework is unsustainable for India. It provides an empirical blueprint to guide ongoing re-negotiations for the
updated trade pact, recommending stricter rules of origin to stop third-party dumping, reciprocal actions to dismantle nontariff barriers, and re-aligned tariff structures to protect domestic industries.
Keywords :
Asean-India Free Trade Agreement (AIFTA), Trade Asymmetry, Structural Deficit, Tariff Elasticity, Rules of Origin (Roo), Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs), Value Chain Integration.
References :
- Jain, M. (2020). An evaluation of India's trade performance with ASEAN: A revealed comparative advantage approach. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies, 7(1), 104–115.
- Kalita, S. (2026). The asymmetrical impacts of the ASEAN–India Free Trade Area: A comprehensive econometric assessment using PPML and synthetic control methods (Working Paper No. 4412). EconPapers.
- Kanhaya, K., & Kumar, S. (2023). Deepening regional economic integration: An empirical analysis of trade direction and composition between India and ASEAN. International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management (IJIERM), 10(3), 45–56.
- Khati, P., & Kim, C. (2022). Impact of India’s Free Trade Agreement with ASEAN on its goods exports: A gravity model analysis. Economies, 11(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11010008
- Kumari, M. (2025). Re-estimating the bilateral gains of AIFTA: Evidence from a structural gravity model with intranational trade controls. Journal of East-West Trade, 31(2), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/jewt.2025.19
- Ratna, R. S., &Kallummal, M. (2013). ASEAN-India FTA: An assessment of merchandise trade with special reference to agriculture and fisheries sectors. Journal of Asian Economic Integration, 5(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/097492841300500102
- Singh, L. B. (2021). Trade creation and trade diversion under the ASEAN–India Free Trade Area: An empirical estimation. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 15(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973801021991632
- The Times of India. (2026, February 14). Reviewing AITIGA: India flags widening deficit, pushes for strict rules of origin in ASEAN trade talks. Times News Network.
Using a quantitative research design, this study analyzes trade data from the UN Comtrade Database, the International
Monetary Fund (IMF), India's Ministry of Commerce, and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The research tracks overall
trade metrics alongside specific high-volume imports under the Harmonized System (HS) code classification system. The
data reveals that India became highly dependent on ASEAN imports for critical industrial inputs and raw materials,
particularly Electronics (HS 85), Machinery (HS 84), and Palm Oil (HS 15). Conversely, competitive Indian exports were
held back by strict Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) in ASEAN markets and undermined by weak Rules of Origin (RoO)
enforcement, which allowed third-party countries like China to route cheap goods into India duty-free through ASEAN
hubs.
The findings show that this heavy influx of cheap imports hurt India's domestic economy. It created inverted duty
structures that made local manufacturing less competitive, reducing the effectiveness of national industrial initiatives like
Make in India and Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes. Additionally, vulnerable domestic sectors—including small
businesses (MSMEs) and plantation agriculture (rubber, tea, and palm oil)—faced intense financial pressure. While India's
services sector generated a steady surplus through digital exports, ASEAN’s strict limits on the movement of professionals
(Mode 4) prevented it from growing enough to offset the massive merchandise deficit. The study concludes that the current
trade framework is unsustainable for India. It provides an empirical blueprint to guide ongoing re-negotiations for the
updated trade pact, recommending stricter rules of origin to stop third-party dumping, reciprocal actions to dismantle nontariff barriers, and re-aligned tariff structures to protect domestic industries.
Keywords :
Asean-India Free Trade Agreement (AIFTA), Trade Asymmetry, Structural Deficit, Tariff Elasticity, Rules of Origin (Roo), Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs), Value Chain Integration.