⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Structural Equation Modeling of Sustainability Performance, Partnerships, and Leadership to the Global University Rankings


Authors : Benedict Al Candia; Jovelito A. Canillas; Joseph Bernat; Keith A. Gregorio; Vincent Invierno Caballes; Jannine M. Rafael; Mary Flor Villaruel

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/53tn5duv

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3kcmzk8b

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun1936

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study examines the interplay between sustainability performance, strategic partnerships for the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and leadership competencies, and how these factors collectively affect global university rankings. Guided by Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Shareholder Value Theory (SVT), and Transformational Leadership, it uses a cross-sectional explanatory design with 351 respondents from four state universities and colleges in Region VII, Philippines. Of 35 indicators, 19 were removed after rigorous Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (EFA and CFA), and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) confirmed a good model fit. Results challenge conventional assumptions, showing no direct link between environmental sustainability and overall performance, while economic sustainability aligns strongly with CSR and SVT. Social sustainability’s effect is inconclusive, but institutional partnerships positively impact sustainability performance. Leadership competencies significantly influence global rankings but do not directly mediate sustainability outcomes. Limitations include a limited sample and lack of longitudinal data. Future research should expand institutional coverage, use mixed methods, revisit excluded constructs, and incorporate cross-cultural, longitudinal designs. The study offers empirical insights that both affirm and question existing theories, contributing to policy, governance, and strategic decision-making for sustainability and competitiveness in Philippine higher education institutions (HEIs).

Keywords : Education for Sustainable Development, Academic Leadership, Sustainability Performance, and Sequential Equation Modeling & Global University Ranking.

References :

  1. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/256973
  2. Aleixo, Ana & Azeiteiro, Ulisses & Leal, Susana. (2018). The implementation of sustainability practices in Portuguese higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 19. 10.1108/IJSHE-02-2017-0016.
  3. Alghamdi, Nawal & Aslam, Muhammad & Khan, Khushnoor. (2017). Personality Traits As Predictor Of Emotional Intelligence Among The University Teachers As Advisors. EDUCATION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL. Article ID 9282565. 1-6. 10.1155/2017/9282565.
  4. Anand, S. and Sen, A. (2000) Human Development and Economic Sustainability. World Development, 28, 2029-2049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00071-1
  5. Andrew Gunn & Michael Mintrom [email protected] (2013) Global university alliances and the creation of collaborative advantage, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35:2, 179-192, DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2013.775926
  6. Anwar, Waqas & Shakeel, & Hassan, & Anwar, Aizza & Waqas, Ali & Shakeel, Kiran & Hassan,
  7. S. (2018). Impact of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Employee's Retention: A Case from Call Center. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 8. 652-666. 10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i6/4262.
  8. Armstrong, M., Brown, D. and Reilly, P. (2011) Increasing the Effectiveness of Reward Management: An Evidence-Based Approach. Employee Relations, 33, 106-120.
  9. Atici, K. B., Yasayacak, G., Yildiz, Y., & Ulucan, A. (2021). Green University and academic performance: An empirical study on UI GreenMetric and World University Rankings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125289.
  10. Avery, G.C. and Bergsteiner, H. (2011), "Sustainable leadership practices for enhancing business resilience  and  performance", Strategy &  Leadership, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 5- 15. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571111128766
  11. Awan, S. H., Habib, N., Shoaib Akhtar, C., & Naveed, S. (2020). Effectiveness of Performance Management System for Employee Performance Through Engagement. SAGE Open, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020969383
  12. Alarćon, D., & Sánchez, J.A. (2015). Assessing convergent and discriminant validity in the ADHD-R IV rating Scale: User-written commands for Average variance explained (AVE), Compositereliability (CR), and Heterotrait-Moonotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT).
  13. Awang, Z. (n.d). Validating the measurement model, CFA: The measurement model of a latent construct. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zainudin-Awang/post/How_to_measure_unobserved_variables_using_observed_variables_in_IBM_AMOS/attachment/59d63f1ec49f478072ea9765/AS%3A273775948435460
  14. Bacon, D.R., Sauer, P.L., & Young, M. (1995).  Composite reliability in structural equations modeling, (55)3. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316449505500300 %401442284680224/download/7+Chapter+3+Analyzing+the+Measurement+Model.pdf
  15. Bali Swain, R., & Yang-Wallentin, F. (2020). Achieving sustainable development goals: predicaments and strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27(2), 96-106.
  16. Basiago, A.D. Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. The Environmentalist 19, 145–161 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006697118620
  17. Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. (Eds.). (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  18. Bagozzi, R.P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural equation models. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94
  19. Bastari, A., Eliyana, A., & Wijayanti, T. W. (2020). Effects of transformational leadership styles on job performance with job motivation as mediation: A study in a state-owned enterprise. Management             Science Letters, 10(12),     2883-2888. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.4.019
  20. Beltagui A, Kunz N, Gold S. The role of 3D printing and open design on adoption of socially sustainable   supply   chain   innovation. Int   J   Prod   Econ. 2020;221:107462. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.035.
  21. Benner, M. (2020). “Becoming world class: what it means and what it does” in World Class Universities. Evaluating Education: Normative Systems and Institutional Practices. eds. S. Rider, M. A. Peters, M. Hyvönen, and T. Besley (Singapore: Springer)
  22. Bleeke, J., & Ernst, D. (1991). How to Win in Cross boarder Alliances. Harvard Business Review, 69, 127-135.
  23. Bolton, D., & Nie, R. (2010, December 1). Creating Value in Transnational Higher Education: The Role of Stakeholder Management. Academy of Management Learning and Education; Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.4.zqr701
  24. Brandt, T., Laitinen, E.K. and Laitinen, T. (2016) The Effect of Transformational Leadership on the Profitability of Finnish Firms. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 24, 81-106. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2014-0744
  25. Brown, D. R. (2011). An experimental Approach to organizational Development. 8th Edition, USA Pears on Education.
  26. Burmann, Christoph, Fernando García, Francisco Guijarro, and Javier Oliver. 2021. "Ranking the Performance of Universities: The Role of Sustainability" Sustainability 13, no. 23: 13286. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313286
  27. Burns, J.M. (1978) Leadership. New York. Harper & Row.
  28. Büyüközkan G, Karabulut Y. Sustainability performance evaluation: Literature review and future directions. J Environ Manage. 2018 Jul 1;217:253-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.064. Epub 2018 Apr 5. PMID: 29605780.
  29. Carlo Carraro (1999) International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change
  30. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48.
  31. Carroll, A. B. (2004). Managing ethically with global stakeholders: A present and future challenge. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 114–120.
  32. Carroll, A. B. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Oct., 1979), pp. 497-505 (9 pages) https://doi.org/10.2307/257850
  33. Crane, Andrew and Matten, Dirk and Spence, Laura J., Corporate Social Responsibility: In Global Context (2008). CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: READINGS AND
  34. CASES IN GLOBAL CONTEXT, pp. 3-20, Routledge,  2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1667081
  35. Dueber, D. M. (2017). Bifactor Indices Calculator: A Microsoft Excel-based tool to calculate various indices relevant to bifactor CFA models. https://dx.doi.org/10.13023/edp.tool.01 [Available at http://sites.education.uky.edu/apslab/resources/]  
  36. Davidson, Debra. (2010). The Applicability of the Concept of Resilience to Social Systems: Some Sources of Optimism and Nagging Doubts. Society and Natural Resources. 23. 1135- 1149. 10.1080/08941921003652940.
  37. Davis, K. (1960) Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities? California Management Review, 2, 70-76.
  38. De Lange, D. E. (2012, November 27). How do Universities Make Progress? Stakeholder-Related Mechanisms Affecting Adoption of Sustainability in University Curricula. Journal of Business Ethics; Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551- 012-1577-y
  39. Delmas, M. A., & Pekovic, S. (2018). Organizational Configurations for Sustainability and Employee Productivity: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach. Business & Society, 57(1), 216-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317703648
  40. Delmas, Magali & Pekovic, Sanja. (2013). Environmental Standards and Labor Productivity: Understanding the Mechanisms that Sustain Sustainability. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 34. 10.1002/job.1827.
  41. Deveshwar, A., & Aneja, I., 2014. A study of transnational and transformational leadership styles and factors affecting the leadership style. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 1(8), 176-185.
  42. Deveshwar, A., & Aneja, I., 2014. A study of transnational and transformational leadership styles and factors affecting the leadership style. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 1(8), 176-185.
  43. Disterheft, Antje & Caeiro, Sandra & Azeiteiro, Ulisses & Filho, Walter. (2013). Sustainability Science and Education for Sustainable Development in Universities: A Way for Transition. 10.1007/978-3-319-02375-5_1.
  44. Doh, Jonathan & Quigley, Narda. (2014). Responsible Leadership and Stakeholder Management: Influence Pathways and Organizational Outcomes. Academy of Management Perspectives. 28. 255-274. 10.5465/amp.2014.0013.
  45. Eskandari, M., 2014. Analysis and criticism on transformational leadership. pp. 124-126.
  46. Evan, W.M., Freeman R.E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. Perspectives in Business Ethics Site. Cited by 1476
  47. Faghihimani, M. 2012 Title: A Systemic Approach for Measuring Environmental Sustainability at Higher Education Institutions, a Case Study of the University of Oslo. Reprosentralen, Universitetet i OsloGarriga, E., Melé, D. Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics 53, 51– 71 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34
  48. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50
  49. Farazja, M., & Khademi, M., 2011. The relationship between transformational leadership styles and interactionalist and attitudes towards organizational change. Journal of Educational Science, 6(4), 49-70.
  50. Ferdig, Mary. (2007). Sustainability Leadership: Co-creating a Sustainable Future. Journal of Change Management. 7. 25-35. 10.1080/14697010701233809.
  51. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51-71.
  52. Gagne, P., & Hancock, G.R. (2006). Measurement model quality, sample size, and solution propriety in confirmatory factor models. Multivariate Behav Res, 41(1), 65-83. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_5
  53. Gerard, Laura & McMillan, Janice & Dannunzio-Green, Norma. (2017). Conceptualising sustainable leadership. Industrial and Commercial Training. 49. 116-126. 10.1108/ICT-12-2016-0079.
  54. Gjerde, S., & Ladegård, G. (2019). Leader Role Crafting and the Functions of Leader Role Identities. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818774553
  55. Godemann, J., Haertle, J., Herzig, C., Moon,J. United Nations supported Principles for Responsible Management Education: purpose, progress and prospects. Journal of Cleaner Production. Volume 62, 2014, Pages 16-23, ISSN 0959-6526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.033.
  56. Goodland, Robert & Bank, W.. (2002). Sustainability: Human, Social, Economic and Environmental. Social Science. 6. 220-225.
  57. Gregory Trencher, Masaru Yarime, Kes B. McCormick, Christopher N. H. Doll, Steven B. Kraines, Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability, Science and Public Policy, Volume 41, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages 151–179, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct044
  58. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600102
  59. Gubler, T., Larkin, I., & Pierce, L. (2018). Doing well by making well: The impact of corporate wellness programs on employee productivity. Management Science, 64(11), 4967– 4987. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2883
  60. Gubler, Timothy & Larkin, Ian & Pierce, Lamar. (2018). Doing Well by Making Well: The Impact of Corporate Wellness Programs on Employee Productivity. Management Science. 64. 4967-4987. 10.2139/ssrn.2811785.
  61. Fu, B. (2020, March 1). Promoting Geography for Sustainability. Geography and Sustainability; Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.02.003
  62. Hameed, A. and Waheed, A. (2011) Employee Development and Its Affect on Employee Performance a Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 224-229.
  63. Hassan, Z., Silong, A. D., Ismail, I. A., & Asmiran, S. (2011, January 1). Developing new generation of educational leaders for world class university. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.190
  64. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall
  65. Hartline, M.D., & Wooldridge, B. (2003). Guest perceptions of hotel quality, determiningwhich employee groups count most. Cornell Hostel Restaur. Adm Quant, 44, 43-62.
  66. Hazelkorn, E. (2013). “World-class universities or world-class systems: rankings and higher education policy choices” in Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses. eds. E. Hazelkorn, P. Wells, and M. Marope (Paris: UNESCO) https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34
  67. Hung, N. T., and Yen, K. L. (2022). Towards sustainable internationalization of higher education: innovative marketing strategies for international student recruitment. Sustain. For. 14:8522. doi: 10.3390/su14148522
  68. Imperiale AJ, Vanclay F. Conceptualizing community resilience and the social dimensions of risk to overcome barriers to disaster risk reduction and sustainable development. Sustain Dev. 2021 doi: 10.1002/sd.2182.
  69. Intyaswati, D., Maryani, E., Sugiana, D., & Venus, A. (2021). Social Media as an Information Source of Political Learning in Online Education. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211023181
  70. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. 2010. The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations, SSRN Working Paper Series.
  71. Iqbal, Q., Ahmad, N. H., & Halim, H. A. (2020). How Does Sustainable Leadership Influence Sustainable Performance? Empirical Evidence From Selected ASEAN Countries. SAGE Open, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020969394
  72. Jänicke, M. & Weidner, H. (1997b). Summary: Global Environmental Policy Learning. In: M. Jänicke & H. Weidner (Eds.), National Environmental Policies. A Comparative Study of Capacity-building ( 13 Countries). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, etc., 299– 313
  73. Jensen and Meckling, 1976. Can the corporation survive?. Center for Research in Government Policy  and   Business   Working   Paper   no.   PPS   76-4, University   of Rochester, Rochester, NY (1976)
  74. Jokinen, Tiina. (2005). Global Leadership Competencies: A Review and Discussion. Journal of European Industrial Training. 29. 199-216. 10.1108/03090590510591085.
  75. Karji A, Namian M, Tafazzoli M. Identifying the key barriers to promote sustainable construction in the United States: a principal component analysis. Sustainability. 2020;12:5088. doi: 10.3390/su12125088.
  76. Keeble, Justin & Topiol, Sophie & Berkeley, Simon. (2003). Using Indicators to Measure Sustainability Performance at a Corporate and Project Level. Journal of Business Ethics. 44. 149-158. 10.1023/A:1023343614973.
  77. Khorshid, S., & Pashazadeh, A.  (2014).  The  effect  of  transformational  leadership  on Klettner, Alice & Clarke, Thomas & Boersma, Martijn. (2013). The Governance of Corporate
  78. Sustainability:    Empirical    Insights    into    the    Development,    Leadership and
  79. Implementation of Responsible Business Strategy. Journal of Business Ethics. 122. 10.1007/s10551-013-1750-y.
  80. Korejan, M & Shahbazi, Hasan. (2016). An analysis of the transformational leadership theory.
  81. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences. 8. 452. 10.4314/jfas.v8i3s.192.
  82. Kositpimanvach, E., Mahahing, P., Auiwong, P. B., Kemma, P., Kotchai, A., & Ruangsan, N. (2021). A Model of Transformational Leadership of Private Schools in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Online Submission, 7(4), 278-283.
  83. Kowo, Solomon & Akinbola, Olufemi. (2019). Strategic leadership and sustainability performance of small and medium enterprises. Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum. 13. 38-50. 10.26552/ems.2019.1.38-50.
  84. Khorshid, S., & Pashazadeh, A. (2014). The effect of transformational leadership on organizational learning capabilities with respect to the mediating role of organizational intelligence, Journal of Change Management, 6(11), p.7. leadership in the field of organizational creativity, Journal of Innovation and Value Creation, 2, p. 23.
  85. Liao, P. Y. (2011). A comparison of world university rankings: Bibliometrics orientation. Master's Thesis, Department of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei City.
  86. Lin, W. C., & Chen, C. (2021). Novel World University Rankings Combining Academic, Environmental and Resource Indicators. Sustainability, 13(24), 13873.
  87. Lozano, R. (2011), "The state of sustainability reporting in universities", International Journal of Sustainability    in    Higher    Education,     Vol.     12     No.     1,     pp.     67-     78. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371111098311
  88. Maggiore, Paolo, and Marco Gajetti. Route Profitability for Helicopters . 2nd ed. Bologna: Esculapio, 2013. Print.
  89. Maignan, Isabelle & Ferrell, O.. (2000). Measuring Corporate Citizenship in Two Countries: The Case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics. 23. 283-297. 10.1023/A:1006262325211.
  90. Metcalf, L., Benn, S. Leadership for Sustainability: An Evolution of Leadership Ability. J Bus Ethics 112, 369–384 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1278-6
  91. Mirkamali, M., Shateri, K., & Uzbashi, A. (2013). Explaining the role of transformational
  92. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
  93. Mohamed, L., & Waheed, H. (2011). Secondary Students’ Attitude towards Mathematics in a Selected School of Maldives. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1, 227-281.
  94. Mortazavi, S., & Nikkar, A., 2014. The role of organizational justice mediation in the relationship between transformational leadership style and quality of work life of the studied personnel: Mashhad water and sewage company, Journal of Executive Management. 6(11), 103-122
  95. Ocasio, William & Joseph, John. (2005). An Attention-Based Theory of Strategy Formulation: Linking Micro- and Macroperspectives in Strategy Processes. Advances in Strategic Management. 22. 39-61. 10.1016/S0742-3322(05)22002-8.
  96. organizational learning capabilities with respect to the mediating role of organizational intelligence, Journal of Change Management, 6(11), p.7.
  97. Pappas, E. (2012). A New Systems Approach to Sustainability: University Responsibility for Teaching Sustainability in Contexts. Journal of Sustainable Education, 3, 1-21.
  98. Paracha, M & Qamar, Adnan & Mirza, Anam & Inam-ul-Hassan, & Waqas, Hamid. (2012). "Impact of Leadership Style (Transformational & Transactional Leadership) On Employee Performance & Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction" Study of Private School (Educator) In Pakistan.
  99. Pavel, A. P. (2015). Global university rankings-a comparative analysis. Procedia economics and finance, 26, 54-63.
  100. Pearce, Craig & Wassenaar, Christina & Manz, Charles. (2014). Is Shared Leadership the Key to Responsible Leadership?. Academy of Management Perspectives. 28. 275-288. 10.5465/amp.2014.0017.
  101. Pedro, E.d.M., Leitão, J. and Alves, H. (2022), "Do socially responsible higher education institutions contribute to sustainable regional growth and innovation?", International Journal  of  Sustainability  in  Higher  Education,  Vol.   23   No.   8,   pp.   232- 254. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2021-0400
  102. Pham, H., & Kim, S. Y. (2019). The effects of sustainable practices and managers’ leadership competences on sustainability performance of construction firms. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 20, 1-14.
  103. Pitelis, C. N., & Wagner, J. D. (2019, April 1). Strategic Shared Leadership and Organizational Dynamic Capabilities. Leadership Quarterly; Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.08.002
  104. Pless, Nicola & Maak, Thomas. (2011). Responsible Leadership: Pathways to the Future. Journal of Business Ethics. 98. 3-13. 10.1007/s10551-011-1114-4.
  105. Polyakov, M., Bilozubenko, V., Korneyev, M., & Nebaba, N. (2022). Analysis of key university leadership factors based on their international rankings (QS World University Rankings and Times Higher Education).
  106. Poturak, Mersid & Mekic, Ensar & Hadziahmetovic, Nereida & Budur, Taylan. (2020). Effectiveness of Transformational Leadership among Different Cultures. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies. 7. 119-129. 10.23918/ijsses.v7i3p119.
  107. Powell, T. J. (1987). Self-help organizations and professional practice. National Association of Social Work.
  108. Provan KG. Interorganizational cooperation and decision making autonomy in a consortium multihospital system. Acad Manage Rev. 1984 Jul;9(3):494-504. PMID: 10267617.
  109. R. Bali Swain & F. Yang-Wallentin (2020) Achieving sustainable development goals: predicaments and strategies, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27:2, 96-106, DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2019.1692316
  110. Ramus, Catherine & Steger, Ulrich. (2000). The Role of Supervisory Support Behaviors and Environmental Policy in Employee ‘Ecoinitiatives’ at Leading Edge European Companies. Academy of Management Journal. 43. 605-626. 10.2307/1556357.
  111. Ribeiro, N., Yücel, İ. and Gomes, D. (2018), "How transformational leadership predicts employees’ affective commitment and performance", International Journal of Productivity  and  Performance  Management,  Vol.  67  No.   9,  pp.   1901-   1917. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2017-0229
  112. Risambessy,A. Swasto, B. Thoyib, A. Astuti, S. (2012). The Influence of Transformational Leadership Style, Motivation, Burnout towards Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res [online]. 2(9), 8832-8843. [Viewed 4 May 2020].              Available               from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1086.3961&rep=rep1&ty pe=pdf
  113. Russell, P., & Moffatt, S. (2001). Assessing buildings for adaptability, IEA Annex 31 Energy- Related Environmental Impact of Buildings. International Initiative for a Sustainable Built Environment (iiSBE), ON, available at: http://annex31. wiwi. unikarlsruhe. de/pdf (accessed May 2013).
  114. Sanson, A., Hemphill, S. A., & Smart, D. (2004). Connections between temperament and social development: A review. Social Development, 13(1), 142–170. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9507.2004.00261.x
  115. Schiebel, Walter & Pöchtrager, Siegi. (2003). Corporate Ethics as a Factor for Success – the Measurement Instrument of the University of Agricultural Sciences (BOKU) Vienna. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 8. 116-121. 10.1108/13598540310468715.
  116. Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344– 354. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159304
  117. Scott, P. (2009). Higher Education: Social Mobility, Economic Development and Cultural Transformation. Local   Economy,             24(8),     681-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/02690940903367934
  118. Shafie, Bizhan & Baghersalimi, Saeed & Barghi, Vahid. (2013). The Relationship between Leadership Style and Employee Performance : Case Study of Real Estate Registration Organization of Tehran Province. Singaporean Journal of Business , Economics and Management Studies. 2. 21-29. 10.12816/0003885.
  119. Shattock, Michael. (2013). University Governance, Leadership and Management in a Decade of Diversification and Uncertainty. Higher Education Quarterly. 67. 10.1111/hequ.12017.
  120. Spence, C. (2017c). “Sonic seasoning” in Audio branding: Using sound to build your brand. eds.
  121. L. Minsky and C. Fahey (London, UK: Kogan Page), 52–58.
  122. Spence, L. J. (2016). Small Business Social Responsibility: Expanding Core CSR Theory. Business & Society, 55(1), 23-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650314523256
  123. Srivastava, A.P.Mani, V.Yadav, M. and Joshi, Y. (2020), "Authentic leadership towards sustainability in higher education – an integrated green model", International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 41 No. 7, pp. 901-923. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-08-2019-0404
  124. Ssebunya, Brian & Schader, Christian & Stolze, Matthias & Landert, Jan & Baumgart, Lukas & Schmid, Erwin & Altenbuchner, Christine. (2018). Sustainability Performance of Certified and Non-certified Smallholder Coffee Farms in Uganda. Ecological Economics. 156. 35-47. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.09.004.
  125. Stauffer, B. (2022). What are 21st Century Skills? Retrieved from Applied Education Systems: https://www.aeseducation.com/blog/what-are-21stcentury-skills
  126. Stephens GJ, Johnson-Kerner B, Bialek W, Ryu WS (2008) Dimensionality and Dynamics in the Behavior of C. elegans. PLoS Comput Biol 4(4): e1000028. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000028
  127. Sugiana, I. W., Talib, A., Yusoff, M. N., & Rahman, A. (2021). Transformational Leadership in Private Universities in Dki Jakarta.
  128. Swain, R. Bali & F. Yang-Wallentin (2020) Achieving sustainable development goals: predicaments and strategies, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27:2, 96-106, DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2019.1692316
  129. Sweeney, L. (2009) A Study of Current Practice of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and an Examination of the Relationship between CSR and Financial Performance Using
  130. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Doctoral Thesis, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin.
  131. Thompson, G., & Glasø, L. (2018). Situational leadership theory: a test from a leader-follower congruence approach. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(5), 574- 591.
  132. Torabian, J. (2019). Revisiting global university rankings and their indicators in the age of sustainable development. Sustainability: The Journal of Record, 12(3), 167-172.
  133. Trencher, G., Yarime, M., McCormick, K., Doll, C., & Kraines, S. (2013, August 11). Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Science & Public Policy; Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct044
  134. Tseng, M. L., Chiu, A. S., & Liang, D. (2018). Sustainable Consumption and Production in Business Decision-Making Models. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 118-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.014
  135. Trochim, William M.K. (2006). The Conceptual Framework. Philosophy of Research. Research Methods Knowledge Base.
  136. Ullmann, A.E. (1985) Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationship’s among Social Performance, Social Disclosure and Economic Performance of US Firms. Academy of Management Review, 10, 540-557.
  137. Vallentin, S., & Spence, L. (2017). Strategic CSR: Ambitions and Critiques. In Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategy, Communication, Governance (pp. 63-85). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316335529.006
  138. Viederman, S. 1994. The economics of sustainability: Challenges. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Economics of Sustainability, Fundacao Joaquim Nabuco, Recife, Brazil, Sept. 13–15. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 1999. Industrial Environmental Performance Metrics: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9458.
  139. Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., & Stahl, G. K. (2020). Defining the Socially Responsible Leader: Revisiting Issues in Responsible Leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051819872201
  140. Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate Governance And Environmental Performance: Is There Really A Link? Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885– 913. Http://Www.Jstor.Org/Stable/23260256
  141. Walls, Judith & Berrone, Pascual & Phan, Phillip. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link?. Strategic Management Journal. 33. 10.1002/smj.1952.
  142. Wang, R. J., & Shih, Y. H. (2023, May). What are universities pursuing? A review of the Quacquarelli Symonds world university rankings of Taiwanese universities (2021– 2023). In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1185817). Frontiers.

 

  1. Williamson, O.E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press, New York.
  2. Windsor, D. (2001), "THE FUTURE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY", The
  3. International  Journal  of  Organizational  Analysis,  Vol.  9 No.  3, pp. 225- 256. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028934
  4. Wokutch, Rich & Spencer, Barbara. (1987). Corporate Saints and Sinners: The Effects of Philanthropic and Illegal Activity on Organizational Performance. California Management Review. 29. 62-77. 10.2307/41165239.
  5. Wolhuter, C. C. (2022). The sustainable development goals as criteria for the global ranking of universities. Perspectives in Education, 40(3), 1-13.
  6. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718. https://doi.org/10.2307/258977
  7. Woodcraft, Saffron & Bacon, Nicola & Hackett, Tricia & Caistor-Arendar, Lucia & Hall, Foreword. (2012). Design for Social Sustainability: A framework for creating thriving new communities.
  8. Yangaiya, Salisu. (2023). Examining the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors among Lecturers of Higher Institutions in Katsina State Nigeria. Journal of Islamic Economics and Social Science (JIESS). 3. 25-30.
  9. Zhang, X.M. & Bartol, Kathryn. (2010). Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement. Academy of Management Journal. 53. 107-128. 10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037118.

This study examines the interplay between sustainability performance, strategic partnerships for the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and leadership competencies, and how these factors collectively affect global university rankings. Guided by Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Shareholder Value Theory (SVT), and Transformational Leadership, it uses a cross-sectional explanatory design with 351 respondents from four state universities and colleges in Region VII, Philippines. Of 35 indicators, 19 were removed after rigorous Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (EFA and CFA), and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) confirmed a good model fit. Results challenge conventional assumptions, showing no direct link between environmental sustainability and overall performance, while economic sustainability aligns strongly with CSR and SVT. Social sustainability’s effect is inconclusive, but institutional partnerships positively impact sustainability performance. Leadership competencies significantly influence global rankings but do not directly mediate sustainability outcomes. Limitations include a limited sample and lack of longitudinal data. Future research should expand institutional coverage, use mixed methods, revisit excluded constructs, and incorporate cross-cultural, longitudinal designs. The study offers empirical insights that both affirm and question existing theories, contributing to policy, governance, and strategic decision-making for sustainability and competitiveness in Philippine higher education institutions (HEIs).

Keywords : Education for Sustainable Development, Academic Leadership, Sustainability Performance, and Sequential Equation Modeling & Global University Ranking.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - August - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe