Authors : Marlou M. Liwagon

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/64u7ewn7

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4ajytd7z

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN419

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The purpose of the current study was to determine if symbolic leadership orientation mediated the association between teachers' commitment and supervisory effectiveness. The present investigation's respondents were the 198 public elementary school teachers in Davao Central District, Division of Davao City, chosen by the investigator. The respondents were chosen using a stratified random sampling technique. A descriptive-correlational strategy was used in a non- experimental quantitative research design. The following statistical techniques were applied to the gathered data: mean, Pearson moment product correlation, multiple linear regression analysis, and mediation analysis using a structural equation model. The results showed that the dedication of instructors, the supervisory effectiveness of the school heads, and their symbolic leadership orientation were all characterized as extensive. Furthermore, correlation research showed that the symbolic leadership orientation of school heads, the efficacy of their supervision, and the dedication of instructors are significantly correlated.

Keywords : Educational Management, Supervisory Effectiveness, Commitment, Symbolic Leadership Orientation of School Head, Davao City, Philippines.

References :

1. Angelle, P., & Teague, G. M. (2014). Teacher leadership and collective efficacy: Teacher perceptions in three US school districts. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(6), 738–753. http://www.aisa.or.ke/about-aisa/who-we-are
2. Aunga, D. A. O. & Masare, O. (2017). Effect of leadership styles on teacher’s performance in primary schools of Arusha District Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, 4(4), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.15739/IJEPRR.17.006
3. Balakrishnan, C., Masthan, D., & Chandra, V. (2013). Employee retention through employee engagement - A study at an Indian International Airport. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(8), 9-16. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/edd1/b3dc2cfaf845312f3da3e569cb50db8cc3e0.pdf
4. Beverlin, B. J. (2011). Exploring factors that impact leadership orientations of public school principals in the State of Kansas [Doctor’s Dissertation]. Baker University. https://www.bakeru.edu/images/pdf/SOE/EdD_Theses/Beverlin_Bobbie.pdf
5. Bobbio, A. & Manganelli, A. M. (2009). Leadership self-efficacy scale: A new multidimensional instrument. TPM, 16(1), 3-24. Retrieved from http://www.tpmap.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/16.1.1.pdf
6. Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S. & Wyckoff, J. (2010). Explaining the Short Careers of High Achieving Teachers in Schools with Low-Performing Students. American Economic Review, 95(2), 166-171. DOI: 10.1257/000282805774669628
7. Beukes, I., & Botha, E. (2013). Organisational commitment, work engagement and meaning of work of nursing staff in hospitals. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/38244578.pdf
8. Coetzee, M. & Van Dyk, J. (2017). Workplace bullying and turnover intention:          Exploring work engagement as a potential mediator. Psychol. Rep.            Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033294117725073
9. Field, L. K. & Buitendach, J. H. (2011). Work Engagement, Organisational Commitment, Job Resources and Job Demands of Teachers Working Within Disadvantaged High Schools in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Psychology in Africa 22(1), 87-95. DOI:10.1080/14330237.2012.10874525
10. Hanselman, P. Grigg, J., Bruch, S. K., & Gamoran, A. (2016). “The Consequences of Principal and Teacher Turnover for School Social Resources.” Pp. 49–89 in Family Environments, School Resources, and Educational Outcomes. Vol. 19, Research in the Sociology of Education. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. http://ssc.wisc.edu/~sbruch/pdf/Hanselman.et.al.2011.social.resources.pdf.
11. Hallinger, P. & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95-110. DOI:10.1080/13632431003663214
12. Horng, E. L., Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2009). Principal preferences and the uneven distribution of principals across schools (Research report). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Institute for Research on Education Policy and Practice.
13. Kiral, E. & Kicar, O. (2016). The Relationship between teachers’ school commitment and school culture. International Education Studies, 9(12), 90-108. DOI:10.5539/ies.v9n12p90
14. Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (2012). The leadership challenges: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations. San Francisco, CA: The Leadership Challenge—A Willy Brand.
15. Lin, C., & Wang, W. (2012). The relationship between affective and continuance      organizational commitment. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 2(5), 89-94. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/75aa/a6519f1793e5b2bdc0d08e0d2a9951eed9fd.pdf
16. Maicibi, N. A. (2010). Pertinent issues in management human resource and educational management. Net Media Publisher s Ltd, Kampala
17. Martin, N. K., Sass, D. A., & Schmitt, T. A. (2012). Teacher efficacy in student engagement, instructional management, student stressors, and burnout: A theoretical model using inclass variables to predict teachers' intent-to-leave. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 546–559. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.12.003
18. Moolenar, N. M., Sleegers, P., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2). DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.001
19. Oracion, C. C. (2014). Teacher leadership in public schools in the Philippines [Doctor’s Dissertation]. University of London. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10021652/1/Thesis-final.pdf
20. Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How motivation influences student engagement:      A qualitative case study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 1927-5250. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1081372.pdf
21. Simonson, A., Bender, A., Fetherolf, O., Hancock, S., Krodel, K., Reistad, K.,               Michels, V., & Bertsch, (2017). Exploring the relationship between work        ethic and organizational commitment. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316255463
22. Thien, L.M., Razak, N.A. & Ramayah, T. (2014). Validating teacher commitment    scale using a Malaysian sample. SAGE Open, 1-9. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244014536744
23. Thoe, N., Thah, S., & Fook, F. (2010). Development of a questionnaire to evaluate students’ perceived motivation towards science learning incorporating ICT tool. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654. http://www.mjet-meta.com/resources/5%20-%20V10N1%20-%20NKT%20-%20_SMS_JrnlArtMyJET.pdf