Sustainable Flexible Packaging Optimization: Enhancing Efficiency Through Reducing Wastage & Material Consumption During Manufacturing Process


Authors : Mohammad Mashrafee; Mohammad Morshedul Karim; Azizul Haque; Mohammad Jonaed; S. M. Ashrafur Rahman; Anisul Islam Anis

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/byvuu37s

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mryncshk

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct362

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : As the packaging industry becomes increasingly competitive, optimizing operations is essential to reducing costs and improving efficiency. This proposal focuses on enhancing the material input-output ratio, reducing waste, and minimizing environmental impact, thereby supporting both economic sustainability and ecological responsibility. Reducing cylinder etching is proposed to lower ink consumption without compromising print quality. To maintain the overall GSM, the thickness of the Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE) film will be increased. The implemented strategy led to a reduction of 1,748 kg in material consumption, resulting in cost savings of BDT. 696,160 for every 25,000 kg job. This strategy balances cost efficiency with sustainability, positioning the company as a leader in responsible innovation. By optimizing ink use and LDPE film thickness, operational efficiency is improved while ensuring long-term profitability and a reduced environmental footprint.

Keywords : Sustainable Flexible Packaging, Environmental Impact, GSM (Grams Per Square Meter), Efficiency, Optimization, Return on Investment (ROI), VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds), Cylinder Etching Depth, LDPE (Low-Density-Polyethylene).

References :

  1. Accorsi, R., Cascini, A., Cholette, S., Manzini, R., & Mora, C. (2014). Economic and environmental assessment of reusable plastic containers: A food catering supply chain case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.014
  2. Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
  3. Choudhary, S., & Kumar, R. (2020). Sustainable practices in rotogravure printing: A review of ink reduction techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120294
  4. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2020). The circular economy in packaging: Current trends and future directions. https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/packaging/overview
  5. European Union. (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/852 on packaging and packaging waste. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32018L0852
  6. Flexible Packaging Association (FPA). (2022). The Future of Flexible Packaging: Industry Outlook and Sustainability Trends. https://flexpack.org
  7. Ghosh, P., Das, T., & Karmakar, S. (2020). Solventless lamination in flexible packaging: Environmental benefits and performance analysis. Packaging Technology and Science, 33(4), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2493
  8. Kumar, V., Singh, J., & Kumar, P. (2021). Optimization of LDPE film thickness for sustainable flexible packaging: Balancing GSM and cost efficiency. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 164, 105156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105156
  9. Lewis, H. (2012). Packaging for sustainability. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23677-1
  10. Mahalik, N. P., & Nambiar, A. N. (2010). Trends in food packaging and manufacturing systems and technology. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 21(3), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2009.12.006
  11. McKinsey & Company. (2023). Sustainability in packaging: Global landscape review. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/sustainability-in-packaging
  12. Patel, R., & Rao, P. (2017). Gravure cylinder etching depth optimization for ink savings in flexible packaging. Journal of Print and Media Technology Research, 6(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.14622/JPMTR-1706
  13. Singh, P., Kaur, G., & Kaur, H. (2016). Challenges in recycling multilayer flexible packaging: A material and process perspective. Waste Management, 48, 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.11.030
  14. Smithers. (2021). The Future of Packaging: Long-Term Strategic Forecast to 2030. https://www.smithers.com/services/market-reports/packaging/the-future-of-packaging-long-term-strategic-forecast-to-2030
  15. Sultana, N. (2024). Challenges in academic writing for undergraduate students in a government college of Bangladesh. European Journal of Teaching and Education, 6(1). https://www.dpublication.com/journal/EJTE/article/view/1418
  16. Sustainable Packaging Coalition (SPC). (2021). Definition of sustainable packaging. https://sustainablepackaging.org/our-vision/definition-of-sustainable-packaging/
  17. Tavares, J. R., Stloukal, P., & Koutny, M. (2019). Bio-based materials as a sustainable alternative to conventional plastics in packaging. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 167, 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.06.008
  18. AMI International. (2023). Global LDPE film market trends 2023-2030: Sustainability and cost optimization strategies. AMI International. https://www.ami.international/reports/ldpe-film-trends
  19. Smithers. (2022). The future of flexible packaging to 2027: Market forecasts and technology developments. Smithers Pira. https://www.smithers.com/services/market-reports/packaging/flexible-packaging-future-2027
  20. Zhao, Y., Wang, L., & Fan, X. (2019). Ink transfer mechanisms in rotogravure printing: Implications for sustainability. Progress in Organic Coatings, 127, 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.11.022
  21. Rahman, M. M., & Shahed, F. H. (2024). Bangladeshi students’ challenges of English academic writing in an international university: A qualitative study. TESOL Society of Bangladesh Journal, 11(1). https://journal.tesolbangladesh.com.bd/index.php/tesol/article/view/64

As the packaging industry becomes increasingly competitive, optimizing operations is essential to reducing costs and improving efficiency. This proposal focuses on enhancing the material input-output ratio, reducing waste, and minimizing environmental impact, thereby supporting both economic sustainability and ecological responsibility. Reducing cylinder etching is proposed to lower ink consumption without compromising print quality. To maintain the overall GSM, the thickness of the Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE) film will be increased. The implemented strategy led to a reduction of 1,748 kg in material consumption, resulting in cost savings of BDT. 696,160 for every 25,000 kg job. This strategy balances cost efficiency with sustainability, positioning the company as a leader in responsible innovation. By optimizing ink use and LDPE film thickness, operational efficiency is improved while ensuring long-term profitability and a reduced environmental footprint.

Keywords : Sustainable Flexible Packaging, Environmental Impact, GSM (Grams Per Square Meter), Efficiency, Optimization, Return on Investment (ROI), VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds), Cylinder Etching Depth, LDPE (Low-Density-Polyethylene).

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe