Teacher Humor Style and Attention Span of Grade 7 Students


Authors : Riena Joy J. Ilarde; Remigilda D. Gallardo

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/bbd7ezfm

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/y24kbfu9

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN549

Abstract : This study delved into the relationship between Teacher Humor Style and the Attention Span of Grade 7 Students. Utilizing a descriptive-correlation research design, the researcher conducted a comprehensive exploration, employing surveys to gather perceptions from students and statistical analyses to unravel the interplay between humor and attention. The findings reveal a moderately extensive use of humor across various indicators, fostering an engaging and enjoyable learning environment. The students demonstrated an extensive duration of focus and active participation, complemented by swift attention recapture abilities. Contextually relevant humor, including puns and subject-related jokes, emerged as a key component of this positive classroom atmosphere. The study also employed a Multiple Linear Regression Model, showcasing the significant influence of various humor indicators on attention span. Recommendations extend to the Department of Education, encouraging the integration of humor-focused professional development for educators. School heads are urged to foster a positive school culture supportive of diverse humor strategies. Teachers are recommended to adopt a reflective approach, continually adjusting their humor strategies based on student responses. For students, an awareness of the positive impact of humor on learning experiences is highlighted. Future researchers are encouraged to delve deeper into cultural nuances and conduct longitudinal studies to observe sustained impacts.

Keywords : Teacher Humor Style, Attention Span, Grade 7 Students, Classroom Dynamics, Educational Humor, Student Engagement.

References :

  1. Adeyemi, B. O., & Mbatha, L. T. (2018). The resonance of humor in African higher educational contexts. African Education Review, 15(4), 22-36.
  2. Alvarez, M. (2016). Relevant Laughter: The Imperative of Contextualizing Humor in Classrooms. Journal of Educational Dynamics, 27(3), 20-31.
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  4. Bennett, C., Tran, R., & Lim, W. (2017). Utilizing Multimedia to Re-Engage the Distracted Mind. Media in Education Journal, 5(1), 15-28.
  5. Brown, J., & Thomas, R. (2020). Cognitive Breaks: The Power of Out-of-Context Humor. Journal of Educational Strategies, 27(5), 10-21.
  6. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  7. Castillo, M. (2016). The Role of Active Participation in Student Comprehension. Journal of Educational Strategies, 28(2), 50-65.
  8. Chen, Y., & Hassan, R. (2018). Neurological Pathways: Understanding Attention Spans in the Classroom. Journal of Educational Neuroscience, 26(4), 38-50.
  9. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  11. Dawson, F., & Vargas, H. (2018). Subject Sensitivity: Tailoring Humor to Curriculum Topics. Journal of Educational Dynamics, 32(3), 15-28.
  12. Del Rosario, M. B., & Lim, P. (2019). Student attention span and its determinants in Philippine higher education classrooms. Philippine Educational Research Journal, 102(2), 21-30.
  13. Desai, M., & Underwood, S. (2016). Laugh to Remember: Exploring the Frequency of Humor in Classroom Engagement. Journal of Pedagogical Dynamics, 25(4), 38-49.
  14. Dumont, L. (2016). In-the-Moment: Capturing Immediate Student Responses to Classroom Humor. Journal of Interactive Pedagogy, 24(2), 45-58.
  15. Espinosa, L., Larson, M., & Green, P. (2019). Global Gags: The Relevance of Humor in Contemporary Classroom Discussions. International Journal of Pedagogical Strategies, 32(1), 10-24.
  16. Fernandez, D., & Murphy, P. (2017). Aligning Jokes with Lessons: The Power of Relevant Humor. Educational Insights Journal, 24(2), 65-78.
  17. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London, UK: Sage.
  18. Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  19. Fink, A. (2017). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
  20. Foster, H., & Davis, L. (2015). The Science of Attention Resets in Lecture Settings. Journal of Teaching Methods, 33(4), 52-66.
  21. Garcia, L., & Thompson, C. (2016). The Humor Spectrum: Cultural Variations in Classroom Humor Styles. Global Education Journal, 24(2), 150-165.
  22. Gomez, R., & Williams, E. (2018). Context Matters: Deciphering the Efficacy of In-Context vs. Out-of-Context Humor. Pedagogical Innovations Journal, 19(1), 55-69.
  23. Gruber, H., & Schmidt, P. (2019). Humor as an integrative tool in multi-language classrooms: An European perspective. Journal of Global Education Insights, 10(1), 25-38.
  24. Guo, P., Larson, J., & Williams, A. (2018). Multimedia Note-Taking: An Exploration of Student Engagement and Information Retention. Journal of Tech-Education, 12(3), 56-70.
  25. Hall, A., & Spencer, J. (2016). Sustaining Student Engagement: The Role of Active Learning Techniques. Journal of Pedagogical Studies, 25(3), 112-128.
  26. James, W., Smith, A., & Kim, J. (2020). Laughter's Legacy: How Humor Shapes Student Perceptions and Attitudes. Educational Psychology Quarterly, 35(3), 25-39.
  27. Kaplan, S., & Reddy, N. (2023). Humor in the Digital Age: Effective Humor Styles in Online Instruction. Journal of E-Learning and Digital Innovations, 29(2), 15-30.
  28. Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2015). Distractions in the Classroom: A Comprehensive Analysis. Journal of Education and Psychology, 42(1), 14-25.
  29. Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  30. Li, M., Yang, P., Fernandez, J., & Gupta, A. (2019). Digital Humor in Modern Education: The Rise of Memes and Animated GIFs in Classroom Engagement. Journal of Tech-Educational Dynamics, 37(4), 38-52.
  31. Lin, T., & Chang, K. (2019). Balance in Laughter: Assessing Optimal Humor Frequency in Classroom Interactions. Educational Reviewer, 32(2), 15-28.
  32. Manuel, L., & de Guzman, A. (2021). Challenges in Davao City's modern classrooms: An exploration of attention span determinants. Davao Studies in Education, 15(2), 25-37.
  33. Martin, L., & Sullivan, P. (2015). Taxonomy of Classroom Humor: Identifying the Types. Journal of Educational Insights, 21(1), 1-14.
  34. McCray, A. T., & Alvarez, A. N. (2020). Measuring Classroom Attention Span: A Study on Student Engagement and Distraction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 1010-1025. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000437
  35. McIntyre, D., & Thompson, S. (2020). The role of humor in diverse Australian classrooms: Bridging gaps and enhancing student attention. Australian Journal of Education Studies, 7(2), 10-24.
  36. Miller, H., & Bell, L. A. (2017). Humor in the classroom: A review of the literature. Education Inquiry, 8(2), 139-156.
  37. Mills, K., & Donovan, P. (2021). Mind Wandering: The Internal Distractions of Students. Journal of Cognitive Studies, 29(2), 34-48.
  38. Moreno, R., & Lewis, E. (2020). E-learning and Attention Duration: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Digital Education, 7(1), 20-34.
  39. Morrison, G. (2015). The Digital Distraction: Student Attention Span in the Modern Classroom. Journal of Pedagogical Trends, 23(1), 5-17.
  40. Nakamura, Y., & Lee, S. (2017). Laughter Across Borders: Humor Styles and Multicultural Education. International Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 19(4), 42-58.
  41. Nelson, R., & Young, S. (2016). Analog vs. Digital: A Comparative Study of Note-Taking Methods. Journal of Learning Techniques, 21(1), 45-59.
  42. Olsen, L., & Carter, M. (2016). Decoding Student Reactions: Humor Appreciation in Classroom Dynamics. Journal of Classroom Research, 23(3), 45-60.
  43. Olsen, T., & Carter, M. (2018). Humor and attention span in the 21st-century classroom. Education Today, 64(3), 12-19.
  44. O'Reilly, M., Patel, V., Nguyen, L., & Gonzalez, R. (2018). The Physiological Impact of Humor in Education: Wearable Tech Sheds Light. Journal of Modern Educational Tech, 29(1), 7-21.
  45. Patel, N., & Kim, J. (2022). Parallel Learning: How Relevant Humor Enhances Concept. Global Journal of Education, 39(1), 5-17.
  46. Peterson, N., Wu, C., & James, L. (2019). Boosting Participation: Effective Strategies in Modern Classrooms. Teaching Innovations Journal, 4(1), 22-38.
  47. Ramirez, A., & Gonzalez, L. (2017). The Place of Satire in Higher Education: A Case Study. Higher Education Journal, 28(3), 50-65.
  48. Reeves, T., & Clark, M. (2020). Cognitive Processes in Notetaking: A Deep Dive. Journal of Cognitive Education Research, 18(2), 24-38.
  49. Reyes, P. M., & Santos, A. R. (2017). Humor in Filipino classrooms: Cultural implications and pedagogical considerations. Philippine Journal of Education, 95(3), 34-45.
  50. Roberts, L., Alvarez, T., & Collins, D. (2017). Adapting to Modern Minds: Strategies to Optimize Student Attention. Educational Dynamics Journal, 29(3), 12-28.
  51. Rodriguez, A., & Patel, D. (2018). Age Matters: Adapting Humor Styles for Different Student Demographics. Journal of Educational Psychology and Pedagogy, 31(1), 72-88.
  52. Sanchez, P., Rodriguez, L., & Thompson, D. (2017). Environmental Factors and Student Distraction. Journal of Classroom Design, 15(4), 60-75.
  53. Sanders, R. (2015). From Slapstick to Memes: The Evolution of Classroom Humor. Educational History Journal, 22(1), 12-23.
  54. Smith, J. P., & Anderson, M. L. (2016). The effects of humor on learning outcomes in higher education contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 78, 50-60.
  55. Smith, K., & Donovan, L. (2019). Tickling the Mind: Physiological Responses to Classroom Humor. Educational Researcher, 48(5), 263-277.
  56. Soto, V., & Graham, R. (2019). Real-time Interactions and Attention in Classrooms: An Empirical Study. Journal of Modern Teaching Techniques, 10(1), 30-44.
  57. Sullivan, J. (2021). Pedagogical Models and the Relevance of Humor: Adapting to Dynamic Classroom Environments. Modern Teaching Methods Journal, 36(4), 45-57.
  58. Thompson, R., Verma, S., & Taylor, D. (2017). Curriculum Comedy: Harnessing Relevant Humor for Improved Academic Outcomes. Education and Psychology Review, 28(2), 40-52.
  59. Torres, R., & Valdez, E. (2020). Humor in Davao classrooms: A look into cultural resonance and pedagogical outcomes. Davao Journal of Education, 12(1), 5-16.
  60. Turner, J., & Lynch, K. (2018). Online Learning Environments and Student Participation Patterns. Journal of E-learning Studies, 9(3), 28-43.
  61. Verma, I., & Singh, A. (2021). Feedback through Laughter: Assessing and Adapting Humor Strategies. Modern Education Review, 38(1), 29-41.
  62. Wang, J., & Paul, R. (2015). Humor Styles in Modern Education: An Analysis of Student Engagement. Journal of Educational Dynamics, 22(3), 315-329.
  63. Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An Explanation of the Relationship Between Instructor Humor and Student Learning: Instructional Humor Processing Theory. Communication Education, 59(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903367238
  64. Watkins, J., Singh, A., & Kumar, V. (2020). Digital Natives and Attention: Challenges and Opportunities in the Modern Classroom. Tech-Educational Review, 34(2), 45-61.
  65. Whitman, B., & Morales, L. (2015). Cultural Context and Classroom Humor: Navigating the Balance. International Journal of Pedagogical Strategies, 26(2), 28-40.

This study delved into the relationship between Teacher Humor Style and the Attention Span of Grade 7 Students. Utilizing a descriptive-correlation research design, the researcher conducted a comprehensive exploration, employing surveys to gather perceptions from students and statistical analyses to unravel the interplay between humor and attention. The findings reveal a moderately extensive use of humor across various indicators, fostering an engaging and enjoyable learning environment. The students demonstrated an extensive duration of focus and active participation, complemented by swift attention recapture abilities. Contextually relevant humor, including puns and subject-related jokes, emerged as a key component of this positive classroom atmosphere. The study also employed a Multiple Linear Regression Model, showcasing the significant influence of various humor indicators on attention span. Recommendations extend to the Department of Education, encouraging the integration of humor-focused professional development for educators. School heads are urged to foster a positive school culture supportive of diverse humor strategies. Teachers are recommended to adopt a reflective approach, continually adjusting their humor strategies based on student responses. For students, an awareness of the positive impact of humor on learning experiences is highlighted. Future researchers are encouraged to delve deeper into cultural nuances and conduct longitudinal studies to observe sustained impacts.

Keywords : Teacher Humor Style, Attention Span, Grade 7 Students, Classroom Dynamics, Educational Humor, Student Engagement.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe