Authors : Rosa Mae T. Breguera

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/vaddcvtv

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mtxafran

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov414

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : This study examined the impact of alternative work arrangements on teaching efficacy and work performance of 173 elementary school teachers in District II-A, Schools Division Office of Olongapo City. Using a descriptive-correlation method and survey via Google Forms, data were analyzed with frequency, percentage, mean, Likert scale, ANOVA, and Pearson r. Findings revealed that most teachers reported to school twice weekly and worked from home three times weekly. Teachers demonstrated efficiency in course design, technology use, interpersonal relationships, and learning assessment, with majority achieving outstanding performance under the alternative work setup. No significant difference was found in teaching efficacy across work arrangements, except in technology use, where reporting twice or four times weekly showed variation. Moreover, no correlation existed between alternative work arrangements, work performance, and teaching efficacy. Recommendations include optimizing reporting schedules, improving internet connectivity, and providing training to enhance teaching efficacy and performance.

Keywords : Alternative Work Arrangements (AWA), Teaching Efficacy, Work Performance.

References :

1. Allen, T. (2013). Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66, 345-376. doi: 10.1111/peps.12012. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-17868-002
2. Baloran, E. (2021). Crisis Self-Efficacy and Work Commitment of Education Workers among Public Schools during COVID-19 Pandemic. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202007.0599/v1/download
3. Barni, D. (2019). Teachers’ Self-Efficacy: The Role of Personal Values and Motivations for Teaching. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01645/full
4. Bedir, G. (2015). Perception of Teaching Efficacy by Primary and Secondary School Teachers. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1078840.pdf
5. Bueno, D. & Matriano, E. (2016). Essentials of statistics. Columban College Inc. Olongapo City.
6. Bueno, D. & Matriano, E. (2016). Methods of Research. Columban College Inc. Olongapo City.
7. Bydén, M. (2016).  Flexible work arrangements: Stress-buffering or stress exacerbation? https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/79175471.pdf
8. Cangco, M. (2020). Inquiry Based Instruction and Teachers’ Performance. Far East Adventist School of Theology International Inc. Cavite, Philippines.
9. Cardullo, V. (2021). K-12 teachers’ remote teaching self-efficacy during the pandemic. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JRIT-10-2020-0055/full/html
10. DepEd Website (2020). DepEd Order 11, 2020 (Revised Guidelines on Alternative Work Arrangements in the Department of Education During the Period of State of National Emergency Due to COVID-19 Pandemic). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2020/06/15/do-011-s-2020/
11. DepEd Website (2021). DepEd Memorandum 0498 s 2021. https://www.depedcar.ph/sites/default/files/announcementFiles/dm-phrod-2021-0498_issuance_of_the_e-ipcrf_ande-sat_consolidation_tool_for_school_year_2020-2021.pdf
12. Development Academy of the Philippines (2020). Survey on alternative work arrangement (AWA and its effect on public sector performance and productivity. https://coepsp.dap.edu.ph/research-program/
13. Foulger, T., Graziano, K., Schmidt-Crawford, D. & Slykhuis, D. (2017). Teacher Educator Technology Competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413-448. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/181966/.
14. Higgins, C., Duxbury, L., & Julien, M. (2014). The relationship between work arrangements and work-family conflict. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24763353/
15. Kasalak, G. (2020). The Relationship between Teacher Self-Efficacy and Teacher Job Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis of the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1261816.pdf
16. Realon, J. (2018). A study on the optimum alternative work arrangement and its impact with the motivation, performance and retention of IT sector employees in Metro Manila. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/5519/
17. Simbillo, L. (2019). Ethical Behavior and Teaching Performance. Far East Adventist School of Theology International Inc. Cavite, Philippines.
18. Tacadao, M. (2020). A descriptive study on off-site work arrangement in the Philippines. Department of Labor and Employment. https://ils.dole.gov.ph/a-descriptive-study-on-offsite-work-arrangement-in-the-philippines/
19. Veldman, I. (2017). Interpersonal self-efficacy Questionnaire. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316288086_Measuring_teachers'_interpersonal_self-efficacy_relationship_with_realized_interpersonal_aspirations_classroom_management_efficacy_and_age
20. Yıldırım, M. & Arslan, G. (2020). A Moderated Mediation Effect of Stress-Related Growth and Meaning in Life in the Association Between Coronavirus Suffering and Satisfaction With Life: Development of the Stress-Related Growth Measure. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648236/full