Temperature-Energy Relationships and Spatial Distribution Analysis for Nano-Enhanced Phase Change Materials Via Thermal Energy Storage


Authors : Florence Awuor Misawo; Fredrick O. Nyamwala; Onyango Thomas T. Mboya

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5fp26j2j

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3ex2ysbp

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul1701

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : This study investigates the thermal performance of nano-enhanced phase change materials (NEPCMs) for thermal energy storage (TES) applications, focusing on their energy behavior during phase transitions. The primary objective was to model and compare the heat storage capabilities of NEPCMs, specifically involving aluminum oxide (Al2O3) nanoparticles, and pure water, using a finite control volume approach to simulate the governing energy equations. Thermophysical properties such as density, specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and volumetric expansion were defined for both base PCMs and nanoparticles to derive effective NEPCM properties. Using MATLAB, discretized equations were implemented to analyze spatial and temperature-dependent energy variations across a two-dimensional domain. Key findings demonstrate that NEPCMs exhibit sharper and more localized energy peaks, attributed to latent heat effects and enhanced thermal conductivity. In contrast, water exhibited broader, smoother energy profiles due to its high specific heat capacity and lack of phase transitions in the studied temperature range. Visualization through 3D surface plots and scatter plots confirmed that NEPCMs enable faster charging/discharging and improved thermal regulation, making them suitable for dynamic TES applications such as solar energy harvesting, electronic cooling, and waste heat recovery. This research underscores the importance of integrating nanoparticles into PCMs to optimize thermal responsiveness and efficiency, and recommends further work in optimizing nanoparticle volume fractions and incorporating transient convection models.

Keywords : Nano-Enhanced Phase Change Materials; Phase Change Process; Energy Storage; Finite Volume Method.

References :

  1. N Ahmed, KE Elfeky, Lin Lu, and QW Wang.  Thermal performance analysis of thermocline combined sensible-latent heat storage system using cascaded-layered pcm designs for medium temperature applications. Renewable Energy, 152:684–697, 2020.
  2. BR Baliga and SV Patankar.  A new finite-element formulation for convection-diffusion problems.   Numerical Heat Transfer, 3(4):393–409, 1980.
  3. Yuri Bazilevs and Thomas JR Hughes.  Weak imposition of dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics.   Computers & fluids, 36(1):12–26, 2007.
  4. J Chiew, CS Chin, WD Toh, Z Gao, and J Jia.  Thermal state-of-expansion or melting of phase change material based heat sink for underwater battery power system.   Journal of Energy Storage, 26:100956, 2019.
  5. Sandra Raquel Leite da Cunha and José Lu13053'fs Barroso de Aguiar.  Phase change materials and energy efficiency of buildings: A review of knowledge.   Journal of Energy Storage, 27:101083, 2020.
  6. Karem Elsayed Elfeky, Abubakar Gambo Mohammed, and Qiuwang Wang.  Cycle cut-off criterion effect on the performance of cascaded, sensible, combined sensible-latent heat storage tank for concentrating solar power plants.   Energy, 230:120771, 2021.
  7. Moritz Gosses, Wolfgang Nowak, and Thomas Wöhling.  Explicit treatment for dirichlet, neumann and cauchy boundary conditions in pod-based reduction of groundwater models.   Advances in water resources, 115:160–171, 2018.
  8. Marcus J Grote and Christoph Kirsch.  Dirichlet-to-neumann boundary conditions for multiple scattering problems.   Journal of Computational Physics, 201(2):630–650, 2004.
  9. Zhidong Han and Alberto Fina.  Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes and their polymer nanocomposites: A review.   Progress in polymer science, 36(7):914–944, 2011.
  10. Feng Hou, Xinjuan Zhao, Hui Wang, and Qinxi Dong.  Microstructure-guided computational model for predicting effective thermal conductivity of cementitious composites filled with phase change particles.   Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 38:102339, 2022.
  11. Amin Ramiani Jafari.  Phase change modelling with flexible source-based kinetics for non-equilibrium transitions.   International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 159:106608, 2021.
  12. Hussam Jouhara, Alina Żabnieńska-Góra, Navid Khordehgah, Darem Ahmad, and Tom Lipinski.  Latent thermal energy storage technologies and applications: A review.   International Journal of Thermofluids, 5:100039, 2020.
  13. Cao JX, Yan XH, and Y Xiao.  Specific heat of single-walled carbon nanotubes: A lattice dynamics study.   Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 72(9):2256–2259, 2003.
  14. JWJ Kaiser, S Adami, IS Akhatov, and NA Adams.  A semi-implicit conservative sharp-interface method for liquid-solid phase transition.   International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 155:119800, 2020.
  15. Karunesh Kant, Amritanshu Shukla, Atul Sharma, and Pascal Henry Biwole.  Heat transfer studies of photovoltaic panel coupled with phase change material.   Solar Energy, 140:151–161, 2016.
  16. Sameer Khare, Mark Dell’Amico, Chris Knight, and Scott McGarry.  Selection of materials for high temperature latent heat energy storage.   Solar energy materials and solar cells, 107:20–27, 2012.
  17. Rahul Khatri, Rahul Goyal, and Ravi Kumar Sharma.  Advances in the developments of solar cooker for sustainable development: A comprehensive review.   Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 145:111166, 2021.
  18. Dai Liu, Long Xin-Feng, Lou Bo, Zhou Si-quan, and Xu Yan.  Progress in thermochemical energy storage for concentrated solar power: A review.   International journal of energy research, 42(15):4546–4561, 2018.
  19. Maoyuan Liu, Patrick Masset, and Angus Gray-Weale.  Solubility of sodium in sodium chloride: a density functional theory molecular dynamics study.   Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 161(8):E3042, 2014.
  20. D Lopes, R Agujetas, Hélder Puga, J Teixeira, R Lima, JP Alejo, and C Ferrera.  Analysis of finite element and finite volume methods for fluid-structure interaction simulation of blood flow in a real stenosed artery.   International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 207:106650, 2021.
  21. Sidi El Becaye Maiga, Samy Joseph Palm, Cong Tam Nguyen, Gilles Roy, and Nicolas Galanis.  Heat transfer enhancement by using nanofluids in forced convection flows.   International journal of heat and fluid flow, 26(4):530–546, 2005.
  22. Dnyaneshwar Malwad and Vinod Tungikar.  Experimental performance analysis of an improved receiver for scheffler solar concentrator.   SN Applied Sciences, 2:1–14, 2020.
  23. Nele Moelans, Bart Blanpain, and Patrick Wollants.  An introduction to phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution.   Calphad, 32(2):268–294, 2008.
  24. Paul E Ohlsen.  Thermal conductivity of sodium chloride within the temperature range 375 k to 637 k.  1956.
  25. Christos Pagkalos, George Dogkas, Maria K Koukou, John Konstantaras, Kostas Lymperis, and Michail Gr Vrachopoulos.  Evaluation of water and paraffin pcm as storage media for use in thermal energy storage applications: A numerical approach.   International Journal of Thermofluids, 1:100006, 2020.
  26. SS Parker, NM Abdul-Jabbar, JM Jackson, and M Monreal.  Feasibility of volumetric expansion of molten chlorides by conventional pushrod dilatometry.   Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 331(12):5259–5263, 2022.
  27. R. Jay Patel, Manish K Rathod, Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan, and Zafar Said.  Influence of longitudinal fin arrangement on the melting and solidification inside the triplex tube latent heat thermal storage system.   Journal of Energy Storage, 46:103778, 2022.
  28. Manish K Rathod and Jyotirmay Banerjee.  Thermal stability of phase change materials used in latent heat energy storage systems: A review.   Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 18:246–258, 2013.
  29. Zafar Said, Hanin Zeyad, Tasnim I Eisa, and Mamdouh EL Haj Assad.  Nano-enhanced pcm for energy storage.  In  2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2019.
  30. Atul Sharma, V Veer Tyagi, Carl R Chen, and Dharam Buddhi.  Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications.   Renewable and Sustainable energy reviews, 13(2):318–345, 2009.
  31. Paul S Sheeran, Juan D Rojas, Connor Puett, Jordan Hjelmquist, Christopher B Arena, and Paul A Dayton.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging and in vivo circulatory kinetics with low-boiling-point nanoscale phase-change perfluorocarbon agents.   Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 41(3):814–831, 2015.
  32. Farooq Sher, Oliver Curnick, and Mohammad Tazli Azizan.  Sustainable conversion of renewable energy sources, 2021.
  33. Asfafaw H Tesfay, Mulu B Kahsay, and Ole J Nydal.  Solar cookers with latent heat storage for intensive cooking application.  In  ISES Proceedings of Solar World Congress, Daegu, Korea, volume 8, pages 71–79, 2015.
  34. Michael Vollmer.  Physics of the electromagnetic spectrum.   Electromagnetic technologies in food science, pages 1–32, 2021.
  35. Mazlan Abdul Wahid, Seyed Ehsan Hosseini, Hasanen M Hussen, Hussein J Akeiber, Safaa N Saud, and Abdulrahman Th Mohammad.  An overview of phase change materials for construction architecture thermal management in hot and dry climate region.   Applied thermal engineering, 112:1240–1259, 2017.
  36. Fuzhang Wang, RS Varun Kumar, G Sowmya, Essam Roshdy El-Zahar, BC Prasannakumara, M Ijaz Khan, Sami Ullah Khan, MY Malik, and Wei-Feng Xia.  Lsm and dtm-pade approximation for the combined impacts of convective and radiative heat transfer on an inclined porous longitudinal fin.   Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 35:101846, 2022.
  37. Xin Wang, Min Luo, Harshinie Karunarathna, and Dominic E Reeve.  An enhanced momentum conservation treatment for fdm simulation of two-phase flows with large density ratio.   Journal of Computational Physics, 478:111949, 2023.
  38. M Grae Worster.  Instabilities of the liquid and mushy regions during solidification of alloys.   Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 237:649–669, 1992.
  39. Shaofei Wu, Ting Yan, Zihan Kuai, and Weiguo Pan.  Thermal conductivity enhancement on phase change materials for thermal energy storage: A review.   Energy Storage Materials, 25:251–295, 2020.
  40. Lu-Yao Yang, Chang-Ping Feng, Lu Bai, Rui-Ying Bao, Zheng-Ying Liu, Ming-Bo Yang, and Wei Yang.  Flexible shape-stabilized phase change materials with passive radiative cooling capability for thermal management.   Chemical Engineering Journal, 425:131466, 2021.
  41. Sheng Yang, Xue-Feng Shao, Jia-Hao Luo, Seyedmohsen Baghaei Oskouei, Özgür Bayer, and Li-Wu Fan.  A novel cascade latent heat thermal energy storage system consisting of erythritol and paraffin wax for deep recovery of medium-temperature industrial waste heat.
  42. Zohir Younsi and Hassane Naji.  A numerical investigation of melting phase change process via the enthalpy-porosity approach: Application to hydrated salts.   International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 86:12–24, 2017.
  43. Malik Sarmad Zahid, Naveed Ahmed, Mumtaz A Qaisrani, Mariam Mahmood, Majid Ali, Adeel Waqas, and Mohsen Assadi.  Charging and discharging characterization of a novel combined sensible-latent heat thermal energy storage system by experimental investigations for medium temperature applications.   Journal of Energy Storage, 55:105612, 2022.
  44. Mostafa M Zaytoun, Mohaned M El-Bashouty, Medhat M Sorour, and Mohamed A Alnakeeb.  Heat transfer characteristics of pcm inside a modified design of shell and tube latent heat thermal energy storage unit.   Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 49:103372, 2023.
  45. Myrto Zeneli, Aris Nikolopoulos, Sotirios Karellas, and Nikolaos Nikolopoulos.  Numerical methods for solid-liquid phase-change problems.  In  Ultra-high temperature thermal energy storage, transfer and conversion, pages 165–199. Elsevier, 2021.
  46. Shuai Zhang, Daili Feng, Lei Shi, Li Wang, Yingai Jin, Limei Tian, Ziyuan Li, Guoyong Wang, Lei Zhao, and Yuying Yan.  A review of phase change heat transfer in shape-stabilized phase change materials (ss-pcms) based on porous supports for thermal energy storage.   Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135:110127, 2021.
  47. Pengbo Zhao, Renkun Dai, Wei Li, Qiuwang Wang, and Min Zeng.  Modeling the mushy zone during the melting process under neumann boundary condition using the improved enthalpy-porosity method.   Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, 78(8):423–442, 2020.
  48. Octav Enea, Prem Paul Singh, Earl M Woolley, Keith G McCurdy, and Loren G Hepler.  Heat capacities of aqueous nitric acid, sodium nitrate, and potassium nitrate at 298.15 k: δcpo of ionization of water.   The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 9(8):731–734, 1977.
  49. TK Engel.  The heat capacities of al2o3, uo2 and puo2 from 300 to 1100 k.   Journal of Nuclear Materials, 31(2):211–214, 1969.
  50. William M Haynes.   CRC handbook of chemistry and physics.  CRC press, 2016.
  51. M Md Ibrahim, V Ramachandran, K Sarangapani, and R Srinivasan.  Thermal expansion of sodium nitrate (i).   Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 47(5):517–520, 1986.
  52. Mengting Ji, Laiquan Lv, Jingwen Liu, Yan Rong, and Hao Zhou.  Nano3-kno3/eg/al2o3 shape-stable phase change materials for thermal energy storage over a wide temperature range: Sintering temperature study.   Solar Energy, 258:325–338, 2023.
  53. M Kawakami, K Suzuki, S Yokoyama, and T Takenaka.  Heat capacity measurement of molten nano3-nano2-kno3 by drop calorimetry.  In  VII International Conference on Molten Slags Fluxes and Salts, The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pages 201–208, 2004.
  54. Mark A Kedzierski.  Viscosity and density of aluminum oxide nanolubricant.   international journal of refrigeration, 36(4):1333–1340, 2013.
  55. Wolfgang Laue, Michael Thiemann, Erich Scheibler, and Karl Wilhelm Wiegand.  Nitrates and nitrites.   Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 2000.
  56. Maoyuan Liu, Patrick Masset, and Angus Gray-Weale.  Solubility of sodium in sodium chloride: a density functional theory molecular dynamics study.   Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 161(8):E3042, 2014.
  57. Ruguang Li, Jiaoqun Zhu, Weibing Zhou, Xiaomin Cheng, and Yuanyuan Li.  Thermal properties of sodium nitrate-expanded vermiculite form-stable composite phase change materials.   Materials & design, 104:190–196, 2016.
  58. Hsin-Yi Peng, Yi-An Wei, Kao-Chi Lin, Shen-Fu Hsu, Jyh-Chern Chen, Chin-Pao Cheng, and Chan-Shan Yang.  Terahertz characterization of functional composite material based on abs mixed with ceramic powder.   Optical Materials Express, 13(9):2622–2632, 2023.
  59. Melina Roshandell.   Thermal Conductivity Enhancement of High Temperature Phase Change Materials for Concentrating Solar Power Plant Applications.  PhD thesis, UC Riverside, 2013.
  60. Ailing Zhang and Yanxiang Li.  Thermal conductivity of aluminum alloys—a review.   Materials, 16(8):2972, 2023.

This study investigates the thermal performance of nano-enhanced phase change materials (NEPCMs) for thermal energy storage (TES) applications, focusing on their energy behavior during phase transitions. The primary objective was to model and compare the heat storage capabilities of NEPCMs, specifically involving aluminum oxide (Al2O3) nanoparticles, and pure water, using a finite control volume approach to simulate the governing energy equations. Thermophysical properties such as density, specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and volumetric expansion were defined for both base PCMs and nanoparticles to derive effective NEPCM properties. Using MATLAB, discretized equations were implemented to analyze spatial and temperature-dependent energy variations across a two-dimensional domain. Key findings demonstrate that NEPCMs exhibit sharper and more localized energy peaks, attributed to latent heat effects and enhanced thermal conductivity. In contrast, water exhibited broader, smoother energy profiles due to its high specific heat capacity and lack of phase transitions in the studied temperature range. Visualization through 3D surface plots and scatter plots confirmed that NEPCMs enable faster charging/discharging and improved thermal regulation, making them suitable for dynamic TES applications such as solar energy harvesting, electronic cooling, and waste heat recovery. This research underscores the importance of integrating nanoparticles into PCMs to optimize thermal responsiveness and efficiency, and recommends further work in optimizing nanoparticle volume fractions and incorporating transient convection models.

Keywords : Nano-Enhanced Phase Change Materials; Phase Change Process; Energy Storage; Finite Volume Method.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe