Authors : M. R. T. N. Kumara

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3h34bt4c

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mb87ct28

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov571

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : The extensive use of mobile texting has given rise to a distinct linguistic variety known as Short Message Service (SMS) language, marked by abbreviations, acronyms, and non- standard orthography. This study scrutinizes the influence of SMS language on the use of perception of standard English among young adults. Employing a mixed- method approach that includes questionnaires, writing tasks, and interviews, the research explores the frequency and context of SMS language use and its contemplation in formal writing. The results indicate that while text-based communication fosters linguistic creativity and efficiency, persistent exposure to SMS conventions can influence spelling accuracy, grammatical consistency, and overall linguistic formality. However, it is revealed that, the SMS language, degrading standard English, signifies a dynamic adaptation of linguistic expression in the modern world.

Keywords : Text Messaging, Vowel Deletion, Exponential Order, Morphemes, Syntax, Logograms, Morphosyntactic Structures, SMS Language, Registers, Graphemes, Alphanumeric Homophones, Code – Switching and Code – Mixing, Acronyms, Abbreviations, Emoticons, Textism.

References :

1. Arlini Binti Alias 13 (2015 – 2016), Text (SMS) Language and its effect on standard of English, A study of Malaysian senior generations perceptions, Cass Langkit Journal MSU – Iligen Institute of Technology Philippines Vol. 06 (2015 – 2016).
2. Chamindi Dilrukshi Senarathne (2017), The morphology of Sri Lankan Text Messages, World academy of Science Engineering and Technology, International journal of Social, Behavior, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, Vol. II, No. 01, 2017.
3. Chaka Chaka (2015), The structure and features of the SMS language used in the written work of communication English I students at a University in South Africa, Department of Applied languages, Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa, published 4^th Nov. 2015.
4. Shazia Aziz et al/Elixir Lin. And Trans 55 (2013), 12884 – 12890 ISSN – 2229 – 712 X, the impact of Texting/SMS language on academic writing of students – What do we need to panic about?
5. Odey (2014), Effects of SMS texting on the writing skills of University students in Nigeria – case of the college of Education Akampka Linguistics communication > Vol. 102, No. 03 (September 2014)
6. Powel and Dixen (2011), Does SMS text messaging help or harm adults’ knowledge of standard spelling.
7. Azida and Osman (2010), SMS language and college writing: The languages of the college texters.
8. ELSEBETH LYNGE – (2011), The Danish National Patient Registers, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, University of Copan hagen, Denmark.
9. Durkin Conti Rausden and Walker (2007), Young people with specific language impairment.
10. Deumert and Masingyana (2010), It would be nice if they could give us more language serring South African’s multilingual patients base.